Connect with us

Arizona

NBA early entry list includes 280 players — including Arizona’s Mathurin, Koloko and Terry

Published

on

NBA early entry list includes 280 players — including Arizona’s Mathurin, Koloko and Terry


The NBA introduced Tuesday evening that 283 gamers have utilized for early entrance to the June NBA Draft, which has 58 spots.

Arizona’s three early entrants — Bennedict Mathurin, Christian Koloko and Dalen Terry — had been joined by 244 different school entrants and 36 worldwide candidates. A complete of 20 gamers from the Pac-12 are on the listing.

The NCAA’s additional 12 months of eligibility given to gamers who participated throughout 2020-21 means these gamers are thought-about “early” entrants except they’ve performed a complete of 5 seasons.

Individuals are additionally studying…

Advertisement

Beneath NCAA guidelines, early entrants can return to high school in the event that they withdraw by June 1, 10 days after the NBA Mix in Chicago, and comply with a set of tips. Amongst different issues, they will solely signal with an NCAA-certified agent and might’t settle for advantages from anybody apart from that agent.

ESPN tasks all three of Arizona’s early entrants will get drafted: Mathurin at No. 11, Koloko at 36 and Terry at 44. However whereas Mathurin and Koloko are definitively leaving Arizona, Terry is testing the draft.

Advertisement

Terry’s determination figures to be among the many most impactful to the Pac-12 race subsequent season, together with these of Colorado’s Jabari Walker, Stanford’s Harrison Ingram, UCLA’s Jules Bernard, WSU’s Mouhamed Gueye and Oregon’s Will Richardson.

Cal’s Andre Kelly, Stanford’s Jaiden Delaire and WSU’s Efe Abogidi are additionally testing the draft however have concurrently entered the switch portal, so will probably wind up exterior the convention subsequent season a method or one other (although UA has been recruiting Abogidi).

Here is a breakdown of Pac-12 gamers coming into the draft early. Gamers who’re testing the draft or are unsure to be testing are famous as such in parentheses.  The NBA’s full listing is hooked up to this story as a PDF. 

ARIZONA

CAL

Andre Kelly (testing/portal)

Advertisement

COLORADO

STANFORD

Jaiden Delaire (testing/portal)

Harrison Ingram (testing)

 OREGON

Will Richardson (testing)

 OREGON STATE

Maurice Calloo (unsure)

Advertisement

 UCLA

USC

UTAH

 WASHINGTON STATE

Efe Abogidi (testing/portal) 

Contact sports activities reporter Bruce Pascoe at 573-4146 or bpascoe@tucson.com. On Twitter @brucepascoe

Advertisement



Source link

Arizona

In-State DL Kaleb Jones commits to Arizona Football

Published

on

In-State DL Kaleb Jones commits to Arizona Football


Starting to make an impact on the state of Arizona, Arizona Football has received a commitment from 2025 Defensive Lineman Kaleb Jones.

Things are heating up in Arizona, and it is not just the sweltering heat! Less than 24 hours after Arizona Football secured multiple commitments on Sunday, the Wildcats added another on Monday morning.

Making news via Social Media, in-state defensive lineman Kaleb Jones announced his commitment to the Wildcats, selecting Arizona over reported offers from Arizona State, Oregon, and Oregon State. 

A big and burly lineman who hails from Mountain Pointe High School in Phoenix, AZ, Kaleb will come to Tucson to help bolster an Arizona defensive line in need of depth.

It has been a busy recruiting weekend in Tucson, and continuing on their huge recruiting day from Sunday, Arizona added Jones from the talented Mountain Pointe High School.

Another local product, Kaleb is a big and talented kid with a big frame and an opportunity to add more size.

Coming in, Jones mostly projects as an interior defensive lineman, and with added size and strength, you figure he should be a nice depth add for the Cats here! Following his junior season, Jones totaled 45 tackles (30 solo), 18.5 tackles for loss, 7.5 sacks, and a fumble recovery according to MaxPreps. You can watch his highlights here!

Next. More on Arizona Football Recruiting. More on Arizona Football Recruiting. dark

Don’t forget to follow us at @ZonaZealots on Twitter and like our fan page on Facebook for continued coverage of Arizona news, opinions, and recruiting updates!

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Arizona Cardinals’ Kyler Murray slammed by Colin Cowherd’s tired take on gaming

Published

on

Arizona Cardinals’ Kyler Murray slammed by Colin Cowherd’s tired take on gaming


play

The Arizona Cardinals’ Kyler Murray has been earning rave reviews for his work ethic and leadership entering the 2024 NFL season.

But evidently not everyone is impressed.

Advertisement

FOX Sports’ Colin Cowherd recently slammed the quarterback on his podcast, suggesting that he isn’t more popular because of the “huge stigma” behind his gaming.

This feels like a ratings grab during the slow season, especially since the “too much gaming” issue is a tired topic for a team and its fan base that eagerly awaits Murray’s chance to lead the Cardinals’ success during the 2024 season.

And a majority of commenters (see below) would tend to agree.

Cowherd explained: “He’s accurate, he’s a playmaker, he got a poorly owned franchise to the playoffs in a tough division. I think the gaming thing is a huge stigma. I think older GMs look at it and think, ‘Jesus, grow the eff up. Like, this guy’s addicted to gaming.’”

Cowherd suggested that Murray needed to “grow up” and leave the gaming behind, while sharing a “theory” about people that enjoy playing video games.

Advertisement

More: Cardinals’ Kyler Murray-Marvin Harrison combo has chance to be NFL’s best new duo

What Colin Cowherd said about Kyler Murray

“I have this theory,” Cowherd said. “So, I have this therapist friend — a lady — and she has said that it’s not an epidemic, but it is an issue with men who are gamers are bad for marriages. And this person has said she has seen it repeatedly. People think that guys get into porn, and it ruins marriage. She’s like, ‘No, gamers; it’s addictive.’ And I will be honest, when I hear a guy’s a gamer and he’s older, you know, he’s out of his teen years, or he’s past like 20-21, I tend to be like, ‘It’s time to grow up, come on.’ 

“Most guys get married and have kids, and even if they love that stuff, they get out of it; they move on. But a lot don’t, and it’s like an issue. Therapists are seeing this and they’ve been seeing it for years. It’s blowing up marriages, guys that just can’t stop. It’s not like getting a book and going to read it for 30 minutes.”

Advertisement

Cowherd wasn’t done.

He added: “Quarterback people say he’s the best Texas high school football player ever. He wins the Heisman. He gets Arizona to the playoffs. The fans don’t like him. The media doesn’t like him. Execs don’t like him. His owner doesn’t like him. I’ve never seen a player this talented … Nobody’s saying be patient people bailed on him.”

“My take on Kyler is, he is the most talented quarterback in my life that has no support group. I mean, Jordan Love didn’t play for three years, was terrible in September in his fourth year, and everybody was yelling, ‘Give him time.’”

More: Arizona Cardinals’ Kyler Murray on ‘hot seat’, ‘QB purgatory’ lists for 2024-25 NFL season

Colin Cowherd slammed for slamming Kyler Murray for gaming

Many people came to Murray’s defense in the comments to Cowherd’s podcast on YouTube, slamming the radio host in the process.

Advertisement

“Your take is WAAAAY off! Kyler is dialed in….,” one commenter said.

Another responded: “Kyler is playing video games to relax. He’s not out there hitting women, getting DUIs, no guns, no drama. The NFL gives monsters second chances but this is a topic? Get the f out of here. People cheat on their spouses, lie, & make bad headlines everyday. He’s not a bad person. How is this an issue?”

From another: “An absolutely insane take and a terrific way to alienate your own listener fan base”

Another wrote: “I’m a gamer, have 2 kids and my relationship is just fine, I also train both my kids for baseball and coach my sons little league team and take him to every travel ball practice or tournament he has. Gaming isn’t the problem it’s gaming all damn day that’s the problem. 12 hours gaming is kinda crazy for any age lol”

One follower commented: “lol most of the guys in the nba & nfl play a lot of video games you guys are out of the loop on this”

Advertisement

Another wrote: “This is a bit of an old take guys. He’s shown a lot of growth since Kliff and Keim left, the two people holding him and the team back the most”

And another: “This take is so abysmal, it is an opinion that could only really come from a guy that grew up in the 60s/70s. Gaming is no different than movies, watching tv, or reading fiction it is a form of entertainment nothing more. If a person is an addict that is a completely separate thing.”

What do you think about Colin Cowherd’s take on Kyler Murray’s gaming?

More: Former Arizona Cardinals wide receiver slammed for ‘inside’ Kyler Murray information

Reach Jeremy Cluff at jeremy.cluff@arizonarepublic.com. Follow him on X, formerly Twitter @Jeremy_Cluff.

Advertisement

Support local journalism: Subscribe to azcentral.com today.





Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Does Arizona have enough water? Phoenix-area cities are spending big to make sure it does

Published

on

Does Arizona have enough water? Phoenix-area cities are spending big to make sure it does


Brett Fleck does not have an easy job. He manages water for a city in the desert. He has to keep taps flowing while facing a complicated equation: The city is growing — attracting big business and thousands of new residents every year — but its main source of water is shrinking.

Standing on the edge of a sun-baked canal with palm trees lining its banks, Fleck watched water flow into the pipes that supply the Phoenix suburb of Peoria, Arizona.

“We’re really having a complete changeover in how people view the Colorado River from a reliability standpoint,” he said.

Get top headlines and KUNC reporting directly to your mailbox each week when you subscribe to In The NoCo.

Advertisement

The river, which accounts for about 60% of the city’s supply, is stretched thin. Its water is used by 40 million people from Wyoming to Mexico. Climate change is shrinking its supply, and the federal government is scrambling to boost depleted reservoirs. The Biden Administration has poured money on the problem, allocating $4 billion from the Inflation Reduction Act for Colorado River projects.

Across the seven U.S. states that use its water, that money has been used to save water in a number of ways — from patching up leaky canals to paying farmers to pause crop planting. A relatively small chunk of that money has gone to cities, but it’s being welcomed with open arms in the Phoenix metro area.

Peoria’s water department is one of seven in Arizona getting paid by the federal government to leave some of its supplies in Lake Mead, the nation’s largest reservoir. In May 2023, the Biden Administration announced it would set aside $157 million for a handful of Arizona cities and one mining company to cut back on their take from the Colorado River.

Following that money and seeing how cities are spending the federal cash reveals a major trend in Arizona’s water management.

Advertisement
The sun sets behind Phoenix on June 14, 2024. The city and its suburbs are attracting new residents and businesses despite shrinking water supplies. Local leaders say they have plans for expensive engineering projects that will help keep taps flowing for decades to come.

The Biden administration framed the spending effort as “water conservation,” but Arizona’s municipal water leaders aren’t using it to make changes traditionally thought of as conservation. Instead of paying for small tweaks to water use – like encouraging residents to install low-flow showerheads or rip out their thirsty lawns – many are thinking bigger, putting their multimillion dollar checks towards billion dollar infrastructure projects that are aimed at keeping taps flowing for decades to come.

Basically, cities like Peoria are planning to engineer their way out of the problem.

“When you don’t have that reliability,” Fleck said, “You have to make additional investments for alternatives, backup supplies, etc. That’s what it really takes to make sense of the world that we live in now.”

A changing mindset

Much ink has been spilled about the future of life in Phoenix. The sprawling metro area – referred to by locals as “The Valley” – is home to about 5 million people. A booming economy and strikingly wide suburban sprawl are pushing its borders further into once-unoccupied dusty expanses in nearly every direction. Meanwhile, climate change has inspired growing skepticism about the long-term sustainability of that growth.

Advertisement

Scorching temperatures, which consistently peak above 110 degrees in the summer, and much-publicized threats to its major sources of water, have accelerated calls in the national media for central Arizona to pump the brakes on expansion.

But on the ground, the people that run water departments in cities and suburbs project optimism.

“We have to plan ahead and say, ‘It’s not enough to have enough water to live this year, this month, two years, or five years,” said Cynthia Campbell, a water management advisor for the City of Phoenix. “We plan for 100, and that’s the way we’ve approached it in Arizona. That, I think, is the secret sauce that keeps us sustainable.”

A view of skyscrapers with blue sky above.

Downtown Phoenix viewed from City Hall on March 4, 2024. The city’s water leaders say they’re nearing the ceiling on how much water can be saved through traditional conservation, and are instead turning their eyes and budgets toward new technology that will help decrease demand for water from the Colorado River and underground aquifers.

Campbell described shifting attitudes in Phoenix-area water management. Dwindling water supplies have, for years, forced those cities to do more with less. She explained how Phoenix uses less water now than it did two decades ago, despite significant population growth. The city mostly chalks that up to more efficient water use by homes and businesses, specifically highlighting water that was conserved through more efficient outdoor watering for lawns and plants.

Advertisement

But now, those practices are getting closer to the ceiling in terms of how much water they can save, and new residents keep arriving.

“At some point in time, there does have to be a recognition of the scope of the problem,” Campbell said. “You just can’t conserve your way out of it.”

That mindset has put one word on the lips of many water managers in central Arizona: augmentation.

Engineering a way to more water

The word “augmentation” has different definitions depending on who you ask, but it generally means water departments are focused on adding new water supplies, rather than just using less of the water they already have.

Peoria and Phoenix water leaders highlighted two expensive infrastructure projects that fall into the augmentation category. The first is a massive renovation of a nearby dam that would make its reservoir bigger, allowing cities in the area to store more water during wet winters.

Advertisement

The Bartlett Dam holds back a reservoir about an hour’s drive northeast of Phoenix. Over time, the reservoir has gotten shallower, as sediment in the water settles to the bottom and piles up, reducing the amount of water storage. Bartlett Reservoir and nearby Horseshoe Reservoir have lost a combined 45,000 acre-feet of their total holding capacity. By comparison, Peoria, a city of nearly 200,000 people, gets a total of 35,000 acre-feet of water delivered each year.

Because the reservoirs reach capacity more quickly, water managers have been forced to release excess water instead of storing it for dryer times. A proposed expansion of the dam would make it easier to store that water by making Bartlett Dam about 100 feet taller. Peoria and Phoenix are among 22 cities, tribes and farm districts that are interested in chipping in for the project, which is projected to cost about $1 billion.

Murky water flows toward a dam with a body of water beyond.

Michael McNamara

/

Advertisement

Salt River Project

Water is released from behind Bartlett Dam in March 2023 after a wet winter. Cities that use water stored behind the dam want to fund a $1 billion expansion of the dam to make sure that extra water can be stored instead of released downstream.

The dam holds back water from the Salt River, whose supplies are managed separately from the Colorado River. But increasing the amount of stored Salt River water could help cities ease up on their Colorado River reliance.

A second idea that falls into the augmentation category represents an entirely different way of “adding” water to the system, and it’s part of a regional trend: cleaning up sewage and making it drinkable again.

Water managers refer to the practice as “advanced water purification,” or “wastewater recycling,” and it’s stirring up a lot of excitement – and big investment – in a number of places that share similar anxieties about shrinking supplies from the Colorado River.

Small cities are eyeing the expensive new technology for the future, and big ones are already putting shovels in dirt.

Advertisement

In Phoenix, the city council greenlit a $300 million construction project to revive a shuttered water treatment plant in the city’s far northern reaches, which officials said would lay the groundwork for installing equipment to turn wastewater into clean drinking water.

Elsewhere in the Colorado River basin, big cities are forging ahead with the practice. In the Los Angeles Metro area, the main water distributor proposed a $3.4 billion wastewater recycling facility, and has rallied hundreds of millions of dollars in support from out-of-state water agencies that could buy California’s unused Colorado River water if the new facility is a success. In Colorado, the state government passed first-of-its-kind legislation that would make it easier for cities to bring the new water treatment tech online, and some cities say they’re 3-5 years away from building it.

Beneath the surface

Phoenix-area water managers have to keep a lot of balls in the air at once. The water flowing through their pipes comes from a few sources, each with very different challenges.

The Colorado River, which mostly begins as snowmelt in the faraway Rocky Mountains, comes to the metro via the Central Arizona Project, a 336-mile canal that cuts through the desert. The Salt and Verde Rivers bring snow and runoff from a watershed that covers the colder, higher-altitude parts of Arizona. And one source starts much closer to home: groundwater.

That last water source, at least recently, has proven the trickiest to manage. Groundwater use and management have become hot-button political issues in Arizona as experts raise alarm about underground stores of water that are shrinking fast, including some that, once drained, would take generations to refill.

Advertisement

Water experts say all of the most pressing water issues facing Arizona cities – the shrinking Colorado River, the overtaxed underground aquifers, and work to augment existing supplies – are all smaller pieces of a bigger puzzle.

Kathryn Sorensen, a former director of Phoenix’s water department, said Colorado River shortages will probably turn up the pressure on groundwater.

“Our aquifers, while large and plentiful, are also fossil aquifers, so if we pump them out too quickly, then it’s just gone,” said Sorensen, who now researches water policy at Arizona State University. “So these types of things like advanced water purification, augmentation, additional conservation efforts, those all play into avoiding the use of those fossil groundwater supplies.”

Sorensen described the groundwater supplies – and whether or not they’re managed sustainably – as pivotally important to Arizona’s long-term future.

“If we’re going to continue to have the sort of economic opportunities we have here and the quality of life that we have here a few generations from now,” she said, “It’s really of utmost importance that we protect groundwater today.”

Advertisement

‘There’s not a lot of gambling going on here’

Groundwater has become the latest issue to help fuel a wave of national attention on the long-term viability of Phoenix as a place for people to live.

Articles with headlines like “How long can the world’s ‘least sustainable’ city survive?” have helped to crystalize nationwide skepticism about central Arizona’s future. In 2023, state officials put a pause on some new subdivisions because they couldn’t draw enough water from underground. The announcement launched a flurry of news coverage. The New York Times framed it as “the beginning of the end” for development around Phoenix.

In that article, Katie Hobbs, Arizona’s governor, is quoted as saying, “We are not out of water and we will not be running out of water.”

Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs speaks into a microphone at a podium with an American flag beside her.

Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs speaks in Tucson, Ariz. on Mar. 13, 2024. State leaders have been forced to advocate for policies that respond to the Phoenix area’s water supply crunch while simultaneously trying to tamp down any fears that the city and suburbs might not be a good place to live and work.

Hobbs and other leaders in the state have been forced into a bit of a juggling act. Some are trying to advocate for policies that respond to the Phoenix area’s water supply crunch while simultaneously trying to tamp down any fears that the city and suburbs might not be a good place to live and work.

Advertisement

Campbell, who advises Phoenix’s political leaders on water decisions, said she’s confident that people who buy a house or open a business in Phoenix will have water in the future, because those policymakers are feeling a lot of pressure to make sure growth is sustainable.

“They know that the moment there’s a crack in the armor,” she said, “The moment that we have to turn off a tap, every national media outlet will cover it, and it will have a devastating effect on our economy. So there’s not a lot of gambling going on here.”

What ‘sustainable’ growth looks like

Sustainable growth certainly weighs on the mind of water manager Brett Fleck in Peoria.

The city itself touted its status as one of the nation’s top “boomtowns,” growing by 19% in the five-year stretch between 2016 and 2021. It recently paved the way for a massive, $2 billion microchip operation. Amkor Technology’s 56-acre facility in Peoria is set to be the nation’s largest semiconductor packaging and test facility, and will likely use a massive amount of water.

“Do I think Arizona can continue to grow sustainably? As long as we continue to make the investments and plan, absolutely,” he said. “The day that we stop making those investments in our sustainability is the day that we probably shouldn’t be growing anymore.”

Advertisement

Fleck said his city is working with Amkor to create a system that brings recycled water to the facility, so the semiconductor operation doesn’t draw from the drinking supply.

A man stands looking down at a large beige pipe and pointing while another man stands nearby watching.

Brett Fleck shows where Colorado River water enters the city’s water treatment facility in Peoria, Ariz. on March 18, 2024. The city has plans to build new water purification technology that will turn sewage into usable water, decreasing the strain on the Colorado River and groundwater.

At a relatively small water treatment plant on Peoria’s western edge, the city’s water system is getting upgraded in real time and the facility is quickly expanding its footprint.

“This water reclamation facility is really the start of Peoria’s water future,” Fleck said as workers in hard hats crisscrossed the dirt expanse behind him.

Treated water from the plant could see a few fates, Fleck said. It may be pumped into underground storage, sent to the giant new microchip facility, or maybe even purified to drinking standards and sent back into pipes. The latter is probably a decade from reality.

Advertisement

“It’s all based on funding,” Fleck said.

Now that cities around Arizona are seeing the promise of new technology and methods to get more out of their endangered water supplies, the massive cost of those projects stands as the biggest hurdle to their implementation. Fleck said the billions of federal dollars being sent to remedy the Southwest’s water woes pale in comparison to the tens or hundreds of billions needed to build needed infrastructure.

“Unfortunately, it’s a drop in the bucket,” he said. “However, at least we’re headed in the right direction. So at least we’re making those investments, and we’re recognizing that we need to make those investments to pivot away from our very large reliance on Colorado River supplies.”

Armed with a combination of federal, state, and local money, cities all around the Phoenix area are moving in that direction. Tempe, for example, has similar plans to Peoria and plans to open a water recycling facility by 2025. Nearby Scottsdale hosts one of only three water treatment facilities in the nation that is part of a pilot program for advanced water purification, and is poised to bring it into regular use.

An uncertain future

Arizona’s city leaders say they’re doing all they can to fend off anxiety about an uncertain future for water supply. Two big factors, largely out of those cities’ hands, mean that anxiety is justified.

Advertisement

The first is funding. Large-scale, high-tech water projects that come with nine- or ten-figure price tags benefit greatly from federal help. The Biden Administration has spent an amount of money that one water expert called, “the largest investment in drinking water infrastructure and water supply infrastructure that we’ve seen in a generation.”

Future administrations might not be so spendy.

“Federal funding is always a dicey proposition,” said Sorensen, the ASU water researcher. “Relying on annual appropriations, it can be hinky, especially when you have to compete with other very worthy federal priorities.”

The second big cause for uncertainty is the messy, ongoing negotiation process that will result in new rules for sharing the Colorado River. The current rules for divvying up its water expire in 2026, and the people in charge of writing new ones are stuck in a heated standoff.

Those people are negotiators from the seven states that use its water. Despite their differences, they generally agree that climate change has shrunk the amount of water in the river, and states need to cut back on demand accordingly.

Advertisement

Three men sit on a panel while one in the middle speaks.

Tom Buschatzke (right), Arizona’s top water negotiator, sits on a panel about Colorado River management in Boulder, Colo. on June 6, 2024. Every proposed water cutback plan, even the one co-signed by Arizona itself, puts more of Arizona’s water on the chopping block than any other state.

Their disagreements, though – sometimes rooted in century-old rivalries between states – mean that it’s not clear exactly how much water, if any, each state should lose.

But every proposed cutback plan, even the one co-signed by Arizona itself, puts more of Arizona’s water on the chopping block than any other state.

That is due to a system called prior appropriation, which serves as the bedrock of Colorado River management. In short, it means that the first person to use water will be the last to lose it in times of shortage. And when it comes to Colorado River use, Arizona sits in a more vulnerable legal position.

The canal that carries water to central Arizona from the Colorado river was authorized in 1968, and the users who depend on its water are first in line to have their water taken away when reservoirs are low.

Advertisement

Sorensen said that fact is a major motivator for Arizona’s water leaders to make sure they manage supplies in a sustainable way.

“We’ve known since 1968 that our water was first to be cut when there wasn’t enough to go around, and that has made us prepare very methodically for those cuts,” Sorensen said. “The pressure has certainly been turned up, but it’s pressure that’s always existed.”

This story is part of ongoing coverage of the Colorado River, produced by KUNC and supported by the Walton Family Foundation. It was produced in partnership with The Water Desk, an independent initiative of the University of Colorado Boulder’s Center for Environmental Journalism.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending