Connect with us

Arizona

‘I’m not afraid. Let’s do it’: the Arizona abortion clinic taking a stand for patients

Published

on

‘I’m not afraid. Let’s do it’: the Arizona abortion clinic taking a stand for patients


Gabrielle Goodrick’s day has barely begun and she’s already poring over a stack of legal documents. As the nurses and other doctors at her clinic start seeing the first of what will be upwards of 40 patients that day, the 59-year-old family medicine doctor and owner of Camelback Family Planning – one of Arizona’s few abortion clinics – has a decision to make.

Since the supreme court overturned Roe v Wade in June 2022, Arizona has banned all abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy – with a small but vague carveout for medical emergencies. In November, Arizona voters will get to weigh in on a ballot measure that would enshrine the right to abortion until viability, or around 24 weeks.

But that ballot initiative won’t help the 32-year-old woman in Goodrick’s waiting room. The woman had been thrilled five months ago when she’d gotten pregnant, seven years after the birth of her first child, until her water broke prematurely 17 weeks into her pregnancy – far too early for her baby to survive. With no amniotic fluid left in her uterus, it’s only a matter of time until an infection sets in.

In the clinic’s break room, Goodrick sets down the stack of papers – which include a letter four state representatives wrote to Arizona’s attorney general this summer asking what qualified as a “medical emergency” and the attorney general’s response. Dressed in turquoise corduroy trousers and a white button-up, Goodrick pulls her hair into a claw clip before she begins describing the case to a few of the clinic’s nurses. Across the room, her colleague Barbara Zipkin, an obstetrician-gynecologist, listens in as she strokes her 5lb, 16-year-old dog Scooter. The Maltese-Yorkie mix is a fixture at the clinic, regularly accompanying Zipkin into patient rooms to provide emotional support.

Advertisement
The charge nurse, Michele Cunningham, and the receptionist at the Camelback Family Planning clinic check on a patient. Photograph: Kasia Strek/The Guardian

“No one will do it,” Goodrick says. So far, the only known abortions after 15 weeks in the state have been performed when a patient develops a severe infection, but Goodrick doesn’t want to make this patient wait that long.

The woman’s healthcare network has already said it won’t end the pregnancy, and so she and her husband have started talking to a doctor in Las Vegas. But the six-hour drive to Nevada is no small hurdle. And that clinic – like most offering abortion care in the second and third trimester in the United States – only offers a procedure called dilation and evacuation. During a D&E, a patient’s cervix is dilated, often using small rods called laminaria that slowly expand over the course of one to two days, before a doctor empties the patient’s uterus using suction or surgical instruments. It’s difficult for providers to remove the fetus intact during a D&E – but this woman wants to hold her baby to say goodbye.

Camelback is one of only a handful of clinics in the US offering an alternative called induction abortion. Like a medication abortion, in which patients take the abortion pills mifepristone and misoprostol to end a pregnancy in the first trimester, an induction abortion involves taking the same pills in the second or third trimester. Because the fetus is larger than in the first trimester, the misoprostol triggers contractions that are more akin to labor than an earlier medication abortion, and the procedure usually occurs in a hospital instead of at home. (Camelback manages the pain of that labor – which is quicker and less severe than childbirth – with painkillers and conscious sedation). The result is that patients – like this one – can hold and grieve the fetus afterwards, and even take home footprints.

During a consent session, obligatory for all abortion patients at least 24 hours before the procedure, doctors in Arizona are obliged to ask patients several questions, including questions about fetal heartbeat or seeing the ultrasound image. Photograph: Kasia Strek/The Guardian

There’s legal risk to helping this patient – Goodrick’s not sure she would do it if the state didn’t have a Democratic governor and attorney general – but she’ll remark later how frustrating she finds it that more doctors aren’t willing to use their position to more aggressively challenge abortion restrictions. She is in a bind countless doctors have faced in the last two years, as stories of women denied emergency abortions in their home states have piled up.

Zipkin agrees they need to act. From her perch on a black office chair, she responds, defiant: “I’m not afraid. Let’s do it.”

Advertisement

In the aftermath of Roe, patients across the United States are seeking abortion care later in pregnancy, as a growing web of restrictions makes it increasingly difficult for them to access care sooner. And the procedure most physicians offer after the first trimester, a D&E, is not always the procedure patients want – for example, if they’d prefer to hold their fetus after or avoid cervical dilation with laminaria.

In the United States, abortion pills are FDA-approved through 10 weeks of pregnancy – but it’s still legal to use them “off label” later. While they’re not widely prescribed later in the US, they are the standard for second- and third-trimester care in much of northern Europe – and the World Health Organization’s abortion care guidelines describe how to use the pills up to and beyond 24 weeks of pregnancy.

Goodrick and her colleagues are hopeful that educating more physicians on the use of abortion pills later in pregnancy could expand access to care across the US by allowing more physicians with labor and delivery training, rather than only doctors with the surgical skills required to perform a D&E, to offer the procedure. Although conservative groups have called the abortion pill “unsafe” in an attempt to undo the FDA’s approval of the medication, Goodrick believes it could be an equalizer for physicians.

Dr Athena Zimon, right, checks whether an abortion was successful. Photograph: Kasia Strek/The Guardian

In that spirit, this year they published a study sharing their experience providing hundreds of induction abortions to end pregnancies between 18 and 24 weeks before Roe fell. They also regularly host and train medical students.

Advertisement

Offering that care has been harder – but not impossible – since Arizona banned abortions after 15 weeks. Since the ban went into effect, Camelback has directed patients whose pregnancies are past that mark to a clinic in southern California, where they’re able to receive and take mifepristone, which stops the pregnancy from progressing. The next day, after they’ve returned to Arizona, Goodrick and her team administer misoprostol, which induces contractions. They’re able to do so because the pregnancy has already ended, Goodrick says, meaning they’re essentially treating a stillbirth. It’s a loophole that Goodrick’s attorneys have reassured her is legal – and it helps patients avoid the cost of a surgical procedure and out-of-state hotel.

But this patient, who has found her way to Camelback one day in mid-September, is the first the clinic will treat entirely in Arizona since the state’s 15-week ban went into effect in 2022.

“When she found out that we could see her, she started crying,” Goodrick said. “She was so upset still about the hospital not helping her. She was just overwhelmingly relieved.”

Protests outside Camelback aren’t unusual. Photograph: Kasia Strek/The Guardian

“I know it’s scary” for doctors to push back against restrictions, says Goodrick – and she understands that hospitals and their legal teams are even more risk averse. But she’s steadfast: “I think it’s up to the medical field to say [to the state], ‘You don’t know what you’re talking about.’”


Goodrick never intended to provide abortion care – but early in her career she saw the need.

Advertisement

She remembers Henry Morgentaler’s name appearing in the news when she was an undergraduate student at McGill University in Montreal in the 1980s. A Holocaust survivor, Morgentaler had emigrated to Canada, where he began his career, like Goodrick, as a general practitioner. Over time, he became one of the first Canadian doctors to offer vasectomies, IUDs, birth control to unmarried women, and eventually abortions – and his repeated challenges of Canadian law would lead to abortion being legalized nationwide in 1988. The next year, Goodrick enrolled in medical school.

At the University of Vermont, Goodrick felt drawn to women’s health – but not obstetrics and gynecology, a surgical specialty. Instead, she gravitated toward family medicine, where she could receive some obstetrics training but follow patients through their full lives. In 1990 anti-abortion protesters descended on Burlington with the intention of closing two clinics there. That year, she co-founded a pro-choice alliance of medical students at the university.

A staff member reaches for mifepristone pills, used in medication abortions. Photograph: Kasia Strek/The Guardian

“I didn’t really think of abortions like, ‘This is what I’m going to do,’” she said. But when Goodrick began her residency at Phoenix Baptist hospital (now Abrazo Central) in 1993, she did a rotation at the local Planned Parenthood and enjoyed it. She would ultimately open a family practice clinic, where she also offered occasional abortions, though they weren’t the focus of her work.

That changed after 2000, when the Food and Drug Administration approved mifepristone for use in the US. Goodrick says she was the first provider in the south-west to offer the abortion pill – and she remembers patients flying in from across the country to access it.

In those years, even though Roe was still standing, there were few physicians providing second-trimester abortions in the US, and one of the most prominent, George Tiller, was murdered in 2009. As she developed her skills in D&E, Goodrick began to wonder, “How am I going to get help? How am I going to be doing this five days a week for the rest of my life?” The surgical procedure required advanced training, and she worried about finding other physicians to fill in at and eventually take over her practice.

Advertisement

In 2018, Goodrick was attending the International Federation of Abortion and Contraception Professionals’ biannual conference in France when she walked into a session led by Swedish midwives. She discovered that it’s standard in Sweden to provide second trimester abortions not with surgical instruments, but with pills.

Goodrick talks with a 19-year-old patient who came to the clinic for the consent meeting before the abortion procedure. Photograph: Kasia Strek/The Guardian

“We VERY rarely use D&E and almost exclusively use medical abortion”, or pills, in Sweden, said Kristina Gemzell Danielsson, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, via email. In the 1980s, she helped develop what would become the WHO protocol for using abortion pills in the second trimester.

“Due to our geography and [the fact] that many live far from a hospital, surgical abortion in the second trimester is not feasible,” she said. Today, medication abortion in the second trimester, a rarity in the US, is available “in all OB-GYN clinics in the whole country”, she adds. It is often performed by midwives.

When Goodrick returned to Arizona, she told the doctors at her clinic she wanted to bring the practice to the clinic. They were wary at first. D&Es had been in use in the US since the 1970s and were by far the most common way to end a pregnancy in the second trimester; today, they make up about 95% of abortions after 14 weeks in the US. Studies in the late 2000s had found that D&Es resulted in fewer complications than inductions (though research today suggests they’re equally safe) and many providers preferred a 20-minute procedure to hours-long labor.

But Zipkin would get on board and today prefers the inductions. While the risk of perforating the uterus with surgical instruments during a D&E is low, with induction abortions it disappears – and patients don’t have to spend the day before in discomfort as laminaria dilates their cervix.

Advertisement
Goodrick, left,, Dr Atsuko Koyama, middle, and Zimon consider a new way to insert copper IUDs. Photograph: Kasia Strek/The Guardian

Although training in D&E is still vital for any clinic offering care later in pregnancy – in case, for example, a patient’s uterus doesn’t expel all of the pregnancy tissue with pills alone – Goodrick believes the medication might allow more providers to offer abortions in areas where OB-GYNs are few and far between.


There are about half a dozen protesters outside Camelback when Goodrick returns to work the morning after meeting with the patient who needs help as her pregnancy approaches 20 weeks. The sight isn’t unusual, and Goodrick notes that they’ll be gone by the time the Arizona sun is high in the sky, pushing temperatures into the 90s on this relatively cool summer day. Two cheerful clinic escorts greet patients at their cars and use large umbrellas to block them from the protesters’ views.

As she holds the clinic door open for patients, one of the escorts – a 66-year-old sporting a rainbow vest, straw witch’s hat and a bevy of buttons and pins promoting feminism and voting rights – recalls the second-trimester abortion she received in 1999. She’d been trying to get pregnant and, at one of her regular prenatal appointments, her doctor realized her fetus had stopped growing, probably two weeks earlier. Her regular OB-GYN had been able to offer her a D&E. “Now in Arizona I would not be able to do that,” she says, declining to give her name.

The 32-year-old mother in need of care is now resting in a recliner inside. When she arrived at the clinic that morning, Zipkin gave her a small dose of misoprostol to induce labor and painkillers to ease the ensuing cramps. By lunchtime, when Zipkin sits down to sip an orange Sunkist, it’s delivery time: “Doctor!” a nurse beckons down the hall. Within a few minutes, Goodrick joins her in the patient’s room.

Koyama sometimes brings her dog, Sushi, to the clinic to offer patients emotional support. Dr Barbara Zipkin’s dog, Scooter, does the same job. Photograph: Kasia Strek/The Guardian

Less than an hour later, they’re both back in the break room. The woman is coming out from under sedation; her husband is about to join her to say goodbye to their baby. “She did great,” Zipkin says.

Advertisement

Goodrick has by now spoken with the Arizona attorney general, who has reassured her the case falls under her definition of a medical emergency. But she worries the Arizona department of health will still flag the case after Camelback reports it – and that the conservative county attorney could decide to prosecute the clinic despite the state AG’s position.

She’s hopeful she won’t have to deal with these kinds of concerns after Arizonians vote in November on whether to enshrine the right to abortion until 24 weeks. “Obviously what happens federally is very important, but every state needs their own ballot initiative,” Goodrick said.

In moments like these, Goodrick reflects on the legacies of abortion providers who came before, like Dr Tiller. “A lot of us still think of him. ‘What would he do now? How would he act? How would he be calm and sure of himself?’” she says.

It’s why, she says, she told the attorney general, “In the future, if you hear of these cases and they can’t get done in the hospital, tell us. We’ll see them.”



Source link

Advertisement

Arizona

Arizona HS football’s No. 1 2027 prospect has ASU, Miami high on list

Published

on

Arizona HS football’s No. 1 2027 prospect has ASU, Miami high on list


play

  • Hildebrand is ranked as the No. 13 overall offensive tackle in the nation for the 2027 class by 247Sports.
  • Arizona State, Miami, Alabama, Texas A&M and USC are among his current favorites.
  • The 6-foot-6 left tackle has started every varsity game since his freshman year at Chandler Basha.

Chandler Basha left tackle Jake Hildebrand, the state’s No. 1 2027 college football prospect, said Arizona State and Miami are among the top potential schools on his recently revealed 10-best list.

Miami is playing in the Vrbo Fiesta Bowl as part of the College Football Playoff semifinal against Ole Miss at State Farm Stadium in Glendale on Jan. 8.

Advertisement

Hildebrand, 6-foot-6, 293 pounds, has started every varsity game since his freshman year and helped lead the Bears to the Open Division state title this past season. He won’t be able to attend the Fiesta Bowl because he’s in San Antonio, getting ready to play in the Jan. 10 Navy All-American Bowl. The game airs at 11 a.m. MST on NBC.

Hildebrand also has CFP semifinalists Indiana and Oregon, along with Texas A&M, Alabama, USC, Ohio State and Texas among his top 10 colleges.

“A few schools that are my favorite from the top 10 are ASU, Alabama, Texas A&M, Miami and USC,” Hildebrand said in a direct message to The Arizona Republic. “They have definitely been the schools that have been contacting me the most and built the best relationship with.”

There is no timetable for when Hildebrand will commit. He could wait until he makes trips this spring, summer and fall. But he is among the most coveted left tackles in the country, who has 38 offers, according to 247Sports.

Advertisement

The 247Sports Composite has Hildebrand ranked as the No. 13 overall offensive tackle in the country in the 2027 class. He is ranked No. 1 in the class of 2027 by The Republic.

Richard Obert has been covering high school sports since the 1980s for The Arizona Republic. Catch the best high school sports coverage in the state. Sign up for Azcentral Preps Now. And be sure to subscribe to our daily sports newsletters so you don’t miss a thing. To suggest human-interest story ideas and other news, reach Obert at richard.obert@arizonarepublic.com or 602-316-8827. Follow him on X, formerly Twitter:@azc_obert





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arizona

Future of Arizona’s Oak Flat faces pivotal day in Phoenix courtroom

Published

on

Future of Arizona’s Oak Flat faces pivotal day in Phoenix courtroom


play

  • Three lawsuits are before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to prevent the U.S. Forest Service from transferring Oak Flat to a mining company.
  • The site, sacred to Apache and other Native peoples, would be destroyed by a proposed copper mine by Resolution Copper.
  • The land exchange was authorized in 2014 through a last-minute addition to a defense bill, sparking a decade-long battle.

Three lawsuits aiming to keep the U.S. Forest Service from turning over Oak Flat to a mining company for a massive copper mine go in front of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for arguments Jan. 7.

The British-Australian firm Resolution Copper has long sought the exchange to build a mine that bodes to obliterate a site Apaches and other Native peoples hold sacred. It also is one of Arizona’s few functional wetlands.

Advertisement

Two lawsuits filed by the San Carlos Apache Tribe and a coalition of environmentalists and the Inter Tribal Association of Arizona challenged the land exchange, authorized by a last-minute amendment to a “must-pass” defense bill in December 2014. The arguments in the lawsuits are based on the tribe’s religious beliefs and on environmental concerns, including disputes over water usage and possible damage of one of central Arizona’s key aquifers.

In the third suit, the latest to be filed, a group of Apache women who have spiritual and cultural connections to the site argue that the exchange would violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the First Amendment’s religious rights protections and two environmental laws.

Their lawsuit also brought two new factors into play: a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision that affirms parental rights to direct their children’s religious education and references to Justice Neil Gorsuch’s blistering dissent to the Supreme Court’s refusal to hear another case related to the land exchange.

Advertisement

A three-judge panel will hear the cases at the Sandra Day O’Connor U.S. Courthouse in Phoenix.

Religious rights advocates and First Amendment experts have said the ability of Native peoples to exercise their religious rights is at stake.

Oak Flat story: As an Apache girl enters womanhood, lawsuits and tariffs cast shadows

The struggle over Oak Flat nears 30-year mark

For more than two decades, Oak Flat Campground, known to Apaches as Chi’chil Biłdagoteel, “the place where the Emory oak grows,” has been ground zero in a battle over Native religious rights on public lands as well as environmental preservation for a scarce Arizona ecosystem.

Advertisement

The 2,200-acre primitive campground and riparian zone, within the Tonto National Forest about 60 miles east of Phoenix, also lies over one of the nation’s largest remaining bodies of copper ore.

To obtain the copper, Resolution, which is owned by multinational firms Rio Tinto and BHP, plans to use a method known as block cave mining in which tunnels are drilled beneath the ore body, and then collapsed, leaving the ore to be moved to a crushing facility.

Eventually, the ground would subside, leaving behind a crater about 1,000 feet deep and nearly 2 miles across, obliterating Oak Flat.

Resolution Copper, a British-Australian mining firm, sought Congressional approval to exchange other parcels of land it had purchased with the U.S. Forest Service for nearly 10 years when the late Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and other officials engineered a late-night rider to a must-pass defense bill in December 2014. Then-President Barack Obama signed the bill and ever since, tribes, environmentalists and their allies have fought to stop the exchange.

Resolution has said that the mine would bring much-needed jobs and revenues to the economically challenged Copper Triangle to the tune of about $1 billion a year. The company has provided funding to support recovery from the floods that devastated downtown Globe in October and has supported other community organizations.

Advertisement

In November, Resolution announced it had completed rehabilitation of the historic No. 9 shaft at the Magma minehead, including deepening it to nearly 6,900 feet and connecting it to the No. 10 shaft, which plunges about 6,940 feet below the surface.

Vicky Peacey, president and general manager of Resolution, said the shaft project was a huge milestone, employing homegrown talent from surrounding communities to get the job done.

Despite the ongoing litigation, she said, “We are ready to advance this important copper project, enabling thousands of high-paying jobs, billions in economic development for rural Arizona, and access to a domestic supply of copper essential to American security and modern infrastructure.”

Grassroots group Apache Stronghold, led by former San Carlos Apache Tribal Chairman Wendsler Nosie, filed the first lawsuit to stop the exchange. That litigation was declined twice by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2025, but Apache Stronghold continues to fight the land exchange as the group supports the other three lawsuits.

Debra Krol reports on Indigenous communities at the confluence of climate, culture and commerce in Arizona and the Intermountain West. Reach Krol at debra.krol@azcentral.com. Follow her on X, formerly known as Twitter, @debkrol and on Bluesky at @debkrol.bsky.social.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Trump issues rare dual endorsement in Arizona swing district

Published

on

Trump issues rare dual endorsement in Arizona swing district


play

  • The president praised both Jay Feely and Gina Swoboda as “Highly Respected America First Patriots.”
  • The president’s team had not publicly confirmed his endorsement of Swoboda before the Jan. 6 social media post.
  • The district, which includes wealthy pockets of Paradise Valley, Scottsdale, and north Phoenix, has a hot-and-cold relationship with the president.

President Donald Trump endorsed not one but two Republicans in a highly watched Arizona congressional primary, boosting a new candidate after his first pick met resistance from some in the GOP.

In a Jan. 6 social media post, Trump said he was backing Jay Feely, a former Cardinals kicker and sports commentator who recently switched his campaign into Arizona’s Scottsdale-area 1st Congressional District, in addition to Gina Swoboda, the state GOP chair whose candidacy has divided Republicans despite her securing Trump’s support in October.

Advertisement

The president praised both Feely and Swoboda as “Highly Respected America First Patriots.”

“JAY OR GINA WILL NEVER LET YOU DOWN!” he wrote on Truth Social, the social media platform he owns.

The announcement is a blow to Swoboda, a polarizing figure among Arizona Republicans. Her longtime rivalry with Turning Point, the network of conservative advocacy groups founded by the late activist Charlie Kirk, has shadowed her candidacy, prompting attacks and infighting among Arizona Republicans.

The president’s team had not publicly confirmed his endorsement of Swoboda before the Jan. 6 social media post.

In an interview with The Arizona Republic, Feely said he thought the endorsement came back to his “friendship” and shared values with the president.

Advertisement

“I love what he’s doing. I believe in what he’s doing. I’m committed to the same principles that he and his administration have,” Feely said.

“We wish Gilbert resident Jay Feely well in his latest campaign for Congress, but nothing has changed,” Swoboda campaign consultant Chris Baker shot back in a written statement to The Republic. “Gina Swoboda will be the Republican nominee in AZ01.”

The endorsement will also set back two other high-profile GOP candidates in the race, the ultra-conservative state Rep. Joseph Chaplik and businessman John Trobough, who both told The Republic they, too, had been in touch with the White House.

Advertisement

Though Trump’s endorsement will be a boon in the Republican primary, it could become a liability in the general election. The district, which includes wealthy pockets of Paradise Valley, Scottsdale, and north Phoenix, has a hot-and-cold relationship with the president.

National GOP leaders encouraged him to run in Scottsdale, Feely says

Feely initially launched his campaign in Arizona’s 5th Congressional District, which includes much of Chandler, Queen Creek and Gilbert, where he lives with his family. He billed himself as a home-grown candidate with a “heart to serve,” and a MAGA devotee who has a personal relationship with Trump.

His prospects in that district dimmed after the president endorsed one of his opponents, Mark Lamb, the well-known former sheriff of Pinal County. Early polling showed Lamb with a large advantage in the race.

But Trump took a liking to Feely, encouraging the former football player in a November social media post to “run in a different district, or for a different office.”

Advertisement

Feely followed the president’s advice. He switched his campaign into the Scottsdale district on Dec. 19. Trump’s endorsement followed about two weeks later.

In an interview Feely said national Republican leaders in D.C., and “grassroots leadership” in the Valley, encouraged him to pivot to the Scottsdale seat. He said he spoke several times with House Speaker Mike Johnson on the matter.

“I wanted to do what was best for the team,” he told The Arizona Republic.

“If they wanted me to run in CD1, and they felt like I was the best candidate, and the one that could hold that seat, then I was willing to do that.”

Advertisement

It’s rare but not unheard of for the president to endorse multiple candidates in a single race.

Last year Trump endorsed two congressional hopefuls in a West Valley-area Republican primary, including the eventual winner, U.S. Rep. Abe Hamadeh.

And in Missouri’s 2022 U.S. Senate race, Trump left election-watchers scratching their heads when he endorsed “Eric,” a first name shared by the race’s two front-runners. Both campaigns claimed the endorsement as their own.

For years the Scottsdale-area district has been considered one of the most competitive races in the country. Its incumbent, U.S. Rep. David Schweikert, announced last year he would not seek re-election in 2026, winding down his 15-year tenure on Capitol Hill and setting up a bitter contest for the rare open congressional seat.

Across the aisle, about half a dozen high-profile Democrats are fighting for their party’s nomination.

Advertisement

The candidates have already raised millions of dollars between them, with campaign spending only expected to escalate leading up to the Aug. 4, 2026 primaries. The Nov. 3, 2026, general election will bring millions more expensive television advertisements, mailers, and social media ads to the district, much of it financed by national Republican and Democratic groups wrestling for control over the U.S. House.

Feely has raised more than $1 million, about a third of which he has loaned himself, according to a report filed this fall. His personal financial disclosure shows he is worth at least $15 million, giving him a piggy bank that could help finance a campaign.

Swoboda has raised “quite a bit” of money, said campaign consultant Chris Baker, though her fundraising receipts aren’t yet public.

Rivals slam Feely’s out-of-district residence

Feely’s rivals have slammed him for running in a district where he doesn’t live.

Advertisement

“If Jay Feely wants to travel 50 minutes every day to run in Arizona’s 1st Ccongressional District, where he’s never lived, we will pay for his Uber,” Alfredo Rodriguez, a strategist with the Trobough campaign, wrote in a news release. “Tell him to send us the bill.”

“If Gilbert carpetbagger Jay Feely foolishly thinks he can win in AZ01, then more power to him I guess. But the outcome won’t change – Gina Swoboda will win the Republican primary,” Baker wrote in a statement to The Republic.

Feely said in an interview he has connections to the Scottsdale district, even though he doesn’t actually live there. The district is “about economics” and “represents the entrepreneurial spirit,” he said.

“I’ve invested in companies in this district. My friends and family live in this district. And I want to be an asset to all of them,” Feely said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending