Connect with us

Arizona

How Apache Stronghold's fight to protect Oak Flat in central Arizona has played out over the years

Published

on

How Apache Stronghold's fight to protect Oak Flat in central Arizona has played out over the years


Oak Flat, a piece of national forest land in central Arizona, is at the heart of a yearslong struggle between Native American groups and mining interests that both consider it important for their future.

Resolution Copper, a subsidiary of international mining giants Rio Tinto and BHP, wants to develop the large deposit of copper ore deep under Oak Flat into a massive mine. The nonprofit Apache Stronghold considers the land sacred and says it should be preserved for religious ceremonies.

In a significant blow to Apache Stronghold, a divided federal court panel voted 6-5 on Friday to uphold a lower court’s denial of a preliminary injunction to halt transfer of land for the project.

Apache Stronghold says it will appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Advertisement

Here is how the fight has played out over the years:

November 2013: Resolution Copper introduces its initial general plan of operations for a proposed mine at Oak Flat.

Dec. 12, 2014: The U.S. Senate approves a must-pass military spending bill that included the Oak Flat land swap, giving the national forest property to mining companies for development of America’s largest copper mine. A rider tucked into the legislation called for Resolution Copper to get 3.75 square miles (9.71 square kilometers) of forest land in return for eight parcels it owns in Arizona.

March 4, 2016: The Forest Service adds Oak Flat to the National Register of Historic Places. Arizona Republican Congressman Paul Gosar and Democratic Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick oppose the historic place designation, with Gosar saying it is “sabotaging an important mining effort.”

May 24, 2020: A Rio Tinto iron mining project destroys two rock shelters that were inhabited by Indigenous people for 46,000 years in Juukan Gorge in Western Australia state, prompting the resignation of the company CEO.

Advertisement

Jan. 12, 2021: Apache Stronghold sues the federal government, saying the Forest Service cannot legally transfer the land to Rio Tinto for several parcels the company owns and maintains the land around Oak Flat was reserved for Western Apaches in an 1852 treaty with the U.S.

Feb. 12, 2021: A federal judge rejects the request to keep the Forest Service from transferring the land to Resolution Copper. saying that because Apache Stronghold is not a federally recognized tribe it lacks standing to argue the land belongs to Apaches.

March 1, 2021: The U.S. Department of Agriculture pulls back an environmental review that had cleared the way for the land swap, saying it needed more time to consult with Native American tribes and others.

Oct. 21, 2021: Apache Stronghold asks a three-member panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to keep Rio Tinto from getting the Oak Flat property. Months later, the panel issues a 2-1 decision that the federal government can give the Oak Flat land to Rio Tinto, but then agrees to let a larger appeals panel hear the case.

March 21, 2023: Apache Stronghold tells a full panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that the Resolution project would prevent Native American groups from exercising their religion by destroying land they consider sacred. The 11-member panel says it will issue a decision in the coming months.

Advertisement

March 1, 2024: An 11-member “en banc” panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals votes 6-5 to uphold a lower court’s denial of a preliminary injunction to halt the transfer of land for the project.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Arizona

Cardinals Expect All-Pro Kicker to Return

Published

on

Cardinals Expect All-Pro Kicker to Return


ARIZONA — The Arizona Cardinals are set to see kicker Matt Prater return to the practice field on Wednesday as the team prepares for their Week 16 matchup against the Carolina Panthers.

“He’ll be out there kicking today. You’ll see him out there booting it today,” head coach Jonathan Gannon told reporters ahead of practice.

Prater played in just four games this season after suffering a knee injury which saw him land on injured reserve back on Oct. 15.

While the full injury was not disclosed, ESPN’s Josh Weinfuss reported Prater has been recovering from surgery to repair his meniscus in the left knee.

Advertisement

Replacement Chad Ryland has mostly been clutch for the Cardinals in Prater’s absence, helping Arizona to a 7-7 record while going 22-26 on all field goal attempts, converting all 15 kicks under 40 yards.

With just three weeks left in the regular season, Prater could make a return at any point when the Cardinals officially open his 21 day window for return. Prater is allowed to practice with the team and can be elevated to the active roster at any point.

Arizona has matchups against the Carolina Panthers, Los Angeles Rams and San Francisco 49ers to close out the year.

It will be interesting to see how the Cardinals handle their kicking conundrum, as Ryland has mostly played well while Prater is one of the league’s best despite being at the age of 40.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arizona

Samford Bulldogs play the Arizona Wildcats, aim for 6th straight win

Published

on

Samford Bulldogs play the Arizona Wildcats, aim for 6th straight win


Associated Press

Samford Bulldogs (9-2) at Arizona Wildcats (4-5, 0-1 Big 12)

Tucson, Arizona; Wednesday, 9 p.m. EST

Advertisement

BETMGM SPORTSBOOK LINE: Wildcats -19.5; over/under is 168.5

BOTTOM LINE: Samford is looking to keep its five-game win streak intact when the Bulldogs take on Arizona.

The Wildcats are 3-1 in home games. Arizona averages 83.4 points and has outscored opponents by 12.4 points per game.

The Bulldogs are 2-2 on the road. Samford averages 19.1 assists per game to lead the SoCon, paced by Rylan Jones with 6.1.

Arizona’s average of 6.3 made 3-pointers per game is 1.2 fewer made shots on average than the 7.5 per game Samford allows. Samford averages 19.5 more points per game (90.5) than Arizona gives up to opponents (71.0).

Advertisement

TOP PERFORMERS: Caleb Love is shooting 36.6% and averaging 13.3 points for the Wildcats.

Jones is averaging 10.5 points, 6.1 assists and 1.6 steals for the Bulldogs.

___

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Arizona regulators reaffirm monthly fee for APS solar customers

Published

on

Arizona regulators reaffirm monthly fee for APS solar customers


PHOENIX (AZFamily) — Arizona Public Service (APS) electric customers with solar panels will still need to pay a relatively new monthly fee after the Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) voted in favor of the grid access charge.

Commissioners reaffirmed the fee in a 3-1 decision on Tuesday. The APS grid access charge (GAC) was approved in February and came under fire after opponents said it discriminated against residential solar customers by increasing rates.

“In general, all costs related to such services should be equitably distributed to each class of service. As demonstrated… residential solar customers are paying less than 70% of the costs to serve them,” Judge Belinda Martin said.

Proponents of the upgraded charges say there is a cost shift in place now and that the restructured charges will balance costs between the two types of customers.

Advertisement

“$61 million were imposed on APS’ residential customers that do not have solar. That means about one million customers have been paying the bill for those that have solar on their homes,” said Jim O’Connor, an ACC chairman.

APS says the fee is a fixed charge that helps recover the costs of maintaining services and equipment. Regulators say that solar customers rely on APS’ power grid to provide electricity when their systems aren’t working, which is why the increase is justified.

Still, groups like the Arizona Solar Energy Industries Association (AriSEIA) disagreed, saying that utility provider miscalculated the cost of service to solar customers.

“APS testified that if the ACC eliminated the solar fees, the difference would be $.25 to residential customers. Despite the evidence, the ACC will penalize solar customers several dollars per month and approved an amendment to increase it in APS’ next rate case, which is anticipated to be filed in 2025,” the association said in a news release after the ruling.

“The evidentiary record makes it clear that solar customers are subsidizing non-solar customers and yet APS and the ACC continue to penalize solar customers with unfounded and discriminatory fees,” said Autumn Johnson, the executive director of AriSEIA.

Advertisement

In a news release, the ACC said critics of the opinion have “mischaracterized the GAC as a ‘solar tax’ on about 184,000 Arizonans with rooftop solar.”

“I understand no one wants to pay more on their bills, but this is about parity and fairness for all ratepayers,” said Commissioner Kevin Thompson. “I hope there’s a day when homeowners can live completely free from the grid, but we are not there now. I believe all costs related to providing service should be equally and fairly distributed among all classes of customers, and we have a duty to address cost shifts and subsidies when they exist.”

AriSEIA said an appeal is likely early next year.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending