Connect with us

Arizona

AZ attorney general has advice for schools on immigration enforcement. Here’s the guidance

Published

on

AZ attorney general has advice for schools on immigration enforcement. Here’s the guidance


play

  • Attorney General Kris Mayes informed Arizona schools that they generally do not have to allow immigration officials entry to nonpublic areas of campus without a valid warrant.
  • Mayes emphasized that all students, regardless of immigration status, have a right to a free public education in Arizona.
  • The guidance comes after the Trump administration rescinded a policy that largely prohibited immigration enforcement at “sensitive” locations, including schools.

Arizona’s Democratic attorney general has issued guidance to K-12 schools and colleges following the Trump administration’s rescission of a policy that had largely barred immigration enforcement at schools.

In a letter sent last week, Attorney General Kris Mayes addressed what she described as “one of the most important and frequent questions right now”: whether schools must allow immigration officials to enter nonpublic areas of campus.  

Advertisement

“The answer to that question will frequently be ‘no,’” Mayes wrote.  

Mayes wrote that except in emergencies, schools should “confirm that the law enforcement officer is acting pursuant to a valid judicial warrant” if federal immigration authorities “seek access to a student while on school grounds.” That warrant must be “signed by a neutral judge or magistrate based on a finding of probable cause.”

Schools are not required to permit entry to immigration officials based on ICE administrative arrest warrants, which are frequently used by federal immigration officers to perform their duties, she said. Mayes added that schools generally may not release students’ personally identifiable information unless in response to a judicial order or lawfully issued subpoena.  

Mayes noted in her guidance that all students in the U.S. are entitled to a free public education, regardless of immigration status. That right was established by the 1982 Supreme Court decision Plyler v. Doe. The Arizona Constitution also guarantees access to a free public education for all children between ages 6 and 21 who reside in the state, Mayes wrote.  

Advertisement

Mayes advised schools to “proactively plan for how to respond to the possibility of federal immigration enforcement” and “clearly communicate” the plans to students and parents.  

“Confusion itself can cause great harm — leading to fear and changes in behavior, such as not attending school,” Mayes wrote.  

Mayes’ advice echoes guidance that has been given to schools by other Democratic attorneys general and advocates nationwide in response to President Donald Trump’s threats of heightened immigration enforcement.  

Trump’s Department of Homeland Security in January rescinded a long-standing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement policy that had largely prohibited immigration enforcement at or near “sensitive” locations like schools and churches. Lawsuits have since been filed to challenge the policy change, including by Denver Public Schools. A federal judge has temporarily blocked ICE enforcement at or near places of worship in response to a lawsuit from Quaker groups.

Advertisement

Some Arizona school districts and governing boards quickly reacted to the rescission of the sensitive locations policy. Among them was the Phoenix Union High School District, which in January told families that the district’s campuses were “safe zones” for all students “regardless of citizenship status.”  

Phoenix Union’s Governing Board also adopted a resolution outlining plans for responding to requests by ICE for school access or student information. It stated the district does not collect information on students’ immigration status. Governing boards of Phoenix-area school districts, including Fowler Elementary, Balsz Elementary, Cartwright Elementary and Tempe Union have adopted similar resolutions.  

Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne, a Republican, said he does not think ICE agents will enter Arizona schools to detain children. Horne said he thinks the policy change was intended to allow immigration officials to enter a school “if someone they want to arrest is hiding there.” He cited Acting Department of Homeland Security Secretary Benjamine Huffman’s statement that the policy change would mean “criminals will no longer be able to hide in America’s schools and churches to avoid arrest.” 

Horne said in January that the Arizona Department of Education, which he runs, was not planning to issue any formal guidance to schools related to immigration policy changes.

Advertisement

Will Arizona higher ed institutions cooperate with immigration officials?

A student group at Arizona State University named College Republicans United in January hosted a tabling event on the Tempe campus, calling on other students to report their peers to ICE. Several lawmakers and hundreds of students and community members called for the event to be barred from campus, but it was ultimately permitted by university officials who said they disagreed with the sentiment, but would not stop the group from meeting or discipline its members. 

“Encouraging ASU students to make indiscriminate complaints to law enforcement about fellow students is not in keeping with the principles which underlie our academic community,” a statement from an ASU spokesperson read. 

The handful of people with the club talked to very few students and ultimately left after being surrounded by hundreds of people marching in a peaceful protest.  

A university spokesperson confirmed that no ICE agents had been on ASU’s campus. They said, typically, immigration officials would have a warrant and would coordinate with university police beforehand. 

“It is the same way we would work with any law enforcement personnel that came onto our campuses,” they said. 

Advertisement

The University of Arizona directed school employees to cooperate with non-university law enforcement in a broad communication about changing federal guidelines in higher education. An excerpt of the expansive document specifically told employees not to ”physically block or interfere with their entry or actions” and contact university police. 

Another section specified that the university will release personal information “when legally required or in response to a valid court order, subpoena or warrant.” UA officials also highlighted existing resources for international faculty, staff and students. 

The Maricopa Community College District sent immigration-related guidance to all employees in early February, according to a statement from the district. Each of the district’s colleges has designated people who have received training and can provide direction and support on responding to immigration inquiries, the statement said.

Attorney general’s guidance notes bullying prevention in schools 

José Patiño of Aliento, an advocacy group that provides support for the immigrant community, said his organization has focused on reaffirming students’ right to a public K-12 education regardless of their citizenship status — something he said many families and educators do not know.  

Advertisement

Most of the group’s work focuses on schools in Maricopa County, prioritizing ways to make students from immigrant families feel more included and prevent bullying based on a student’s immigration status.  

Mayes’ guidance specifically highlighted bullying and harassment, noting laws that bar harassment on the basis of race and national origin. School district governing boards are required to supply ways for students and parents to report bullying anonymously, according to Arizona law. 

While Patiño believes it’s unlikely for ICE agents to enter schools, he said he’s alarmed by growing division or the possibility that anyone would try to prevent a child from going to school. 

“It just feels like I don’t recognize this country anymore,” Patiño said. 

Advertisement

Madeleine Parrish covers K-12 education for The Arizona Republic. Reach her at mparrish@arizonarepublic.com.

Helen Rummel covers higher education for The Arizona Republic. Reach her at hrummel@azcentral.com. Follow her on X, formerly Twitter: @helenrummel.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Arizona

Arizona prisons director defends practice of lowering inmate custody level

Published

on

Arizona prisons director defends practice of lowering inmate custody level


PHOENIX (AZFamily) — Ricky Wassenaar was already serving 16 life sentences for his role in an escape attempt and hostage standoff at the Lewis Complex prison in Buckeye in 2004. For the past 20 years, he remained mostly out of the limelight, serving his time.

But in April of this year, Wassenaar attacked three inmates in the Cimarron Unit of the state prison in Tucson, killing them, and sparking a controversy over how he was able to carry out the murders and how he had access to other inmates in the first place.

“I would have killed at least seven. My goal was at least seven,” Wassenaar told True Crime Arizona’s Briana Whitney, in a phone interview. She said he seemed excited to talk about it, bragging that he had provided a service, because the inmates he killed were sex offenders.

According to Wassenaar’s inmate profile, at the end of 2024, he was moved out of maximum security, where he had been for decades, and into close custody, which is a slightly lower level of security.

Advertisement

“He was max custody and then he was put out in close custody, which means he gets to walk among them (other inmates),” said Rodney Carr, who is a former warden in the Arizona prison system.

He left the Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry after Gov. Katie Hobbs hired Ryan Thornell as the new director. Thornell came to Arizona from Maine, where he was deputy commissioner of a prison system a fraction the size of Arizona’s.

“I worked for a lot of directors and not always that I agreed with. But that’s my job. Well, with him it got to the point where I couldn’t,” said Carr.

Carr and another former warden, as well as several correctional officers, reached out to Arizona’s Family Investigates with similar complaints: that the department under Thornell’s leadership was moving maximum security inmates into close custody, where it costs less and requires fewer correctional officers to oversee the inmates.

“Under the way they’re managing maximum security inmates in a closed custody environment, staff are going to get hurt,” said Carr.

Advertisement

In an interview with Arizona’s Family Investigates, Thornell said he is moving inmates out of maximum security. “That is absolutely something we are doing. Just like every other department of corrections across the country must do. It’s a practice and we are doing that here,” said Thornell.

He said 90 to 95% of inmates who are in custody will eventually be released into the community, including those in maximum security. And Thornell said keeping them in maximum security the entire time they are in prison is not good for the community once they are released. He said the effect the isolation of maximum custody has on inmates is real and often negative.

“How can I say that somebody in max custody is OK to release into local Arizona, but they’re not OK to release into a close custody yard that still has fences or razor wire?” he said.

When asked if it was a mistake to take Wassenaar out of maximum custody, Thornell said no, but he couched his answer.

“Hindsight is always 20/20, right? So, knowing what I know today, should we have moved him out of max custody? Yes, we should have. Would I do it knowing the facts that I have at my disposal today? Knowing what he did then? No, I wouldn’t. But the practice was sound. It’s still a sound practice,” he said.

Advertisement

Thornell acknowledged that the number of violent incidents in close custody has increased, but he denied that it was the result of max-custody inmates creating more problems.

“It’s easy for a warden, a former warden, to come forward and say, ‘20 years ago, that’s not how we did it.’ Well, 20 years ago, nobody cared who we were releasing back into the community,” said Thornell.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Arizona lawmakers demand answers over Phoenix immigration court arrests

Published

on

Arizona lawmakers demand answers over Phoenix immigration court arrests


PHOENIX (AZFamily) — Some Arizona lawmakers are demanding answers on what has been happening outside a Phoenix immigration court recently.

On Wednesday, four Arizona Democrats sent a letter to the Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons. It came from Sens. Mark Kelly and Ruben Gallego, as well as Reps. Yassamin Ansari and Greg Stanton.

The letter comes after tense protests last week. For two days straight, ICE agents were at Phoenix immigration court, arresting people there for routine hearings and putting them into vans. That second day turned chaotic with protestors and officers getting physical.

“That pattern of dismissal and detainment kind of slowed down towards the end of the week, but unfortunately, today we did see more people detained at the immigration court,” said state Sen. Analise Ortiz, a Democrat from the West Valley.

Advertisement

She has been showing up to immigration court to support migrants at their hearings, and says ICE was there again on Wednesday, but it was different this time. “People were actually being told they could leave the courthouse, so they were driving off of the property and then being stopped and detained down the street. Someone relayed to me that a toddler was detained. This is just horrible, and this is inhumane,” said Ortiz.

The letter poses three main questions, with the first being how many people has ICE arrested and detained at an immigration court during the week of May 19 and how many have been placed in expedited removal?

The second asks for copies of all guidance and written directives associated with this recent ICE action, and the third asks how ICE is complying with requirements for screening individuals for fear of persecution.

The letter also says the Democratic lawmakers believe tactics like this make the immigration process less fair and efficient and undermine the Trump administration’s goal of targeting criminals who are public safety threats.

“A lot of these individuals who are in deportation proceedings (or) immigration proceedings, they don’t have a criminal history,” said immigration attorney Sheree Wright with IBF Law Group.

Advertisement

She has been volunteering to advise migrants at their hearings. “When it comes to safety, these are not criminals,” said Wright.

Arizona’s Family also spoke to a former Phoenix-based ICE agent who was in the field for 22 years. He wanted to remain anonymous.

The former agent said arrests like the ones at the immigration court are not new. He also said they are safer for the public, the officers, and the detainees because there is a screening process at places like court buildings. According to the former officer, when they detain someone, they often go through what is called “custody redetermination” to see if the migrant should continue with their immigration proceedings or be placed in expedited removal.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Takeaways From Arizona State Baseball Tournament Draw

Published

on

Takeaways From Arizona State Baseball Tournament Draw


The Arizona State baseball program is officially tournament bound.

The Sun Devils – coached by fourth-year head coach and program alum Willie Bloomquist – were officially selected to be the three seed in the Los Angeles regional on Monday morning.

With that, the selection ended several days of nervous waiting after the program sputtered to end the season.

Ultimately, the rough finish is in the rearview mirror now and the Sun Devils are looking to make the most of this chance – here are three takeaways for the weekend ahead:

Advertisement

This one is obvious – the Sun Devils are in a region with the host in 15th seeded UCLA, the second region seed in UC Irvine, and Mountain West champs Fresno State.

UCLA and UC Irvine are battle-tested over the entirety of the season, while Fresno State has picked up play as of late despite only putting together a 31-29 campaign to this point.

The region will be a challenge for the Sun Devils, but it isn’t insurmountable…

The Sun Devils have the talent to win the region – and UC Irvine’s recent run of opponents leaves reason to be concerned that the Anteaters aren’t currently conditioned to compete with power four competition despite having proven they can defeat high level programs this season.

UCLA also is one of the lower national seeds that received the opportunity to host a regional – it doesn’t seem insurmountable for the Sun Devils – who boasted the best offense across the entire Big 12 – to capture some magic once again and make a serious run.

Advertisement

It feels as if a win in the opening matchup with UC Irvine is a must however, which brings the last takeaway into the fray.

This Arizona State baseball team truly has the ceiling of a College World Series squad – but also the floor of a squad that goes winless in the tournament.

While it would be unlikely for the Sun Devils to drop an elimination game to (presumably) Fresno State, a fifth loss in as many games could potentially prove to be too much for a team that entered the season with so much promise.

The opening game of the Sun Devils’ tournament experience is set for Friday night at 6 P.M. Arizona time – the game is set to be broadcast on ESPNU.

Read more about the best-case scenario for ASU in the upcoming tournament here, and listen to the recent podcast covering the ultimate selection the Sun Devils received here.

Advertisement

Please let us know your thoughts on the upcoming tournament run for Willie Bloomquist and the Sun Devils when you like our Facebook page when you click right here.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending