Arizona
Arizona Republicans aren’t giving you the full story on their ‘border security’ bill
Opinion: Arizona lawmakers pushing a ballot measure to crack down on illegal immigration aren’t telling the truth on what it does.
How a border health clinic keeps migrants from inundating Yuma
There’s a reason that Amanda Aguirre, who heads the Regional Center for Border Health in Somerton, and her staff are exhausted.
Arizona Republic
The Arizona lawmakers pushing for a Texas-style law authorizing local officers to go after illegal border crossers insist nobody will be racially profiled because of it.
That’s a myth and they know it.
There’s no such thing as an immigration crackdown without racial profiling — not in Arizona or any place else in America.
Reality is that most asylum seekers and border crossers fleeing poverty and other calamities come from countries where darker skins predominate.
What the ballot measure would do
Until a few years ago, most people crossing the southern border came from Mexico.
Now they’re mainly from elsewhere, including Central America, Haiti, Venezuela, Cuba, Syria, Iran, Turkey and other war-zone countries like Ukraine.
Thus, putting a target on these immigrants is a target on anyone with dark skin, unless enforcement is geographically limited to the borderline, which the Arizona proposal doesn’t do.
The Republican-sponsored House Concurrent Resolution 2060 is largely similar to the legislation that Gov. Katie Hobbs recently vetoed. They now want to skip the governor and send it directly to the November ballot to rally voters against Democrats whom they blame for the uptick of border crossers.
The Arizona proposal, which mimics Texas’ immigration law being litigated in federal court, would make it a state crime to enter the country illegally, punishable with jail time and longer prison sentences for repeat offenders.
It’s also stacked with a range of penalties designed to crack down on illegal immigration anywhere in the state — not just at the border, as proponents maintain.
Those include:
- Making it a state crime to submit false documents in applying for federal, state or local benefits,
- Requiring agencies to use the federal E-Verify program to determine public benefits eligibility, and
- Imposing a minimum 10-year prison sentence on adults caught selling fentanyl that results in a death.
Supporters insist it’s about border security
“This is truly a border security bill,” Republican Sen. President Warren Petersen told Fox News, insisting that it is different than the infamous Senate Bill 1070 that led to racial profiling of Latinos and which cost Arizona hundreds of millions of tourism dollars and legal fees.
What Petersen says and what the proposal spells out don’t entirely match.
“It allows law enforcement to, if they see somebody crossing the border illegally, they’re able to arrest them, detain them and put them through the judicial process,” Petersen said.
GOP looks for job security: In fake border bill
That’s right. But a crucial detail he and others leave out of their media soundbites is the fact that the proposal doesn’t specifically limit law enforcement along Arizona’s 370-mile shared border with Mexico.
Technically, any law enforcement officer anywhere in the state could turn “any traffic stop into an immigration interrogation,” as Democratic Rep. Analise Ortiz puts it.
Republican Yavapai County Sheriff David Rhodes admitted as much during this week’s legislative hearing, saying there’s a lot of questions to be answered.
Speaking on behalf of the Arizona Sheriff’s Association, Rhodes said border counties would bear the brunt of arresting undocumented immigrants but still wouldn’t say enforcement is strictly limited to the border.
This is important because border enforcement — at the border — is Republicans’ selling point to voters, leaving out the sweeping ramifications this kind of law would inflict on Arizona’s labor market, immigrant families of mixed-immigration status and Latinos in general.
These provisions would target brown people
Nobody can deny that SB 1070 put a target on brown people. Police data and court documents prove it.
Anecdotally, countless U.S. citizens were targeted under the “show me your papers” provision of SB 1070. Some of them told lawmakers as much, yet Republicans dismissed the narrative as nothing more than politicking.
Yet, proponents can’t admit the fact that the legislation as written gives local enforcement anywhere in the state the authority to enforce immigration law and that it would be up to them to carry it out — and how.
No word yet on how much of taxpayers’ money it would take to enforce any of the provisions.
Or on how local law enforcement would differentiate illegal border crossers from legal residents and U.S. citizens making a wrong turn in traffic.
What would give local cops the “probable cause” to question the immigration status of somebody they encounter other the initial suspicions because of their skin color?
Presumably, none of the supporters have ever been racially profiled and truly believe the practice doesn’t exist. But these people are smart enough to know exactly what has happened under SB 1070.
They know exactly what they’re doing. They’re counting on Arizonans to merely take their word for what they say the ballot measure would do — whether that’s true or not.
Elvia Díaz is editorial page editor for The Arizona Republic and azcentral. Reach her at 602-444-8606 or elvia.diaz@arizonarepublic.com. Follow her on Twitter, @elviadiaz1.
Arizona
Freed sex offender allegedly poses as doctor, sexually assaults student at Arizona elementary school: police
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Friday – A convicted sex offender freed from prison two weeks ago allegedly posed as a doctor and sexually assaulted a student inside an Arizona elementary school, sparking outrage and calls for answers from parents, according to reports.
Abel Kai Gblah, 25, is accused of sexual assault and kidnapping after he accessed school grounds and posed as a doctor to lure a student into a classroom and assaulted her at Orangewood Elementary School on Nov. 19, according to the Phoenix Police Department (PPD).
PPD officials said in a statement to Fox News Digital that officers were called to the school after administrators reported that an incident had occurred on campus.
“When officers arrived, they learned an unauthorized man had made it onto school grounds and lured a grade-school-aged girl into a classroom where he sexually assaulted her,” police said. “At some point, the student was able to push the man away. He then ran from the scene before officers arrived.”
NEWLY RELEASED VIDEO SHOWS COPS CUFFING TEEN LINKED TO VIOLENT SEX ASSAULT SCANDAL THAT HAS FAMILIES FUMING
Abel Kai Gblah was accused of sexually assaulting and kidnapping a student at a Phoenix elementary school on Nov. 19. (National Sex Offender Registry)
FOX 10 Phoenix reported that court documents show Gblah allegedly drew the attention of a student by impersonating a doctor and expressing that he had to examine her.
After fleeing the school, police located Gblah, who was booked into jail on multiple charges.
Gblah was released from prison two weeks ago on similar charges, according to the outlet, and was also allegedly involved in human smuggling across the U.S. border.
According to FOX 10, a prosecutor at Gblah’s court appearance said he was convicted twice in 2021 for sexual conduct with a minor and a registered sex offender.
FURY ERUPTS AFTER ACCUSED TEEN SEX PREDATOR DODGES PRISON; FAMILIES SWARM COURTHOUSE DEMANDING JUDGE’S HEAD
Abel Kai Gblah was arrested this week after allegedly sexually assaulting a student at a Phoenix elementary school. (iStock)
The news station reported that the Washington Elementary School District said in a statement that school administration immediately called 911 and placed the school on lockdown for over an hour.
“He was on campus for approximately 10 minutes and during that time, he made inappropriate contact with a student,” the district wrote.
The district shared a separate statement with Fox News Digital that it released to parents on Friday, which revealed the results of its internal investigation, including that Gblah was a former student of the school who attended from 2012 to 2015.
Abel Kai Gblah allegedly assaulted a student at Orangewood Elementary School in Phoenix on Nov. 19. (Google Maps)
While initial reports indicated that the Gblah gained access to the campus behind a student who had buzzed in, further investigation revealed that he entered through an unlocked lobby door, and walked in with a tardy student, the district stated.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Following the investigation, a staff member has been placed on administrative leave, the district added.
“We understand how alarming this situation has been and want you to know that we are reviewing every aspect of our safety procedures and communication to ensure that an event like this does not happen again, wrote Orangewood Elementary Principal Emily Paterson.
According to FOX 10, Gblah is being held on a cash-only bond of $500,000, with a preliminary hearing scheduled for Dec. 1.
Arizona
Predicting the final score of Baylor vs. Arizona
Things just keep getting worse and worse for Baylor. After preseason hype and a potential Big 12 Championship-contending team, the Bears are sitting at 5-5 on the season and Baylor needs one win in the last two weeks to secure bowl eligibility.
Baylor’s remaining games will come against two winning teams and this week, the Bears will travel to take on Arizona. Noah Fifita and the ‘Cats are at 7-3 on the season, and could very easily have a few more wins on the season.
With Mack Rhoades OUT as athletic director, what are Baylor’s options for replacement?
Arizona has an electric offense with Fifita at the helm, and the Wildcats’ defense is great against the pass. Arizona ranks No. 1 in the conference in stopping the pass and Sawyer Robertson will have his hands full in this game. WR Ashtyn Hawkins is out for the first half after getting into a scuffle late in the game against Utah.
Here is how our staff sees Baylor’s game going down against Arizona.
On paper, these two teams are similar offensively. Both squads can toss the football around and have a good enough run game to get them by. But what separates Baylor and Arizona is the defense. The Bears’ defense is downright bad, and the Wildcats have one of the better defenses in the Big 12.
Sawyer Robertson will be going up against the top-ranked passing defense in the conference; however, it wasn’t that long ago that Robertson crushed a UCF defense that was really good on paper. While Arizona is better than UCF, I think Robertson can have his way.
While the Baylor offense could score points against Arizona, I don’t see the Bears stopping Noah Fifita and the ‘Cats.
Final score: Arizona 38, Baylor 31
The Bears need one win to become bowl eligible. Baylor doesn’t buckle under that pressure. Sawyer Robertson throws for a ton of yards for the second straight week, cuts down on the mistakes, and the Baylor defense bends but doesn’t break in a victory over Arizona.
Final score: Baylor 31, Arizona 27
I believe Baylor will bounce back in Tucson on Saturday. Although Arizona’s defense has been playing its best football of the season, I believe Baylor’s receiving corps is still one of the best in the nation. I don’t believe Sawyer Robertson plays two bad games in a row, and he will find the receivers throughout the game.
Look at Kole Wilson and Josh Cameron to continue to be weapons, with potential for Jadon Porter to play a big role. Although the Baylor defense took a massive step backwards against Utah, I believe there is potential to create trouble for Noah Fifita. I think it is a positive matchup for the Baylor secondary against the Arizona passing attack, and all the pressure lies on the linebackers and defensive line to stuff the run and actually make Fifita uncomfortable.
Final score: Baylor 33, Arizona 24
Arizona
Trump says message from Arizona senator, others ‘seditious behavior’ punishable by death
PHOENIX (AP/AZFamily) ― President Donald Trump on Thursday accused several Democratic lawmakers, including an Arizona Senator, of sedition “punishable by DEATH” after the lawmakers called on U.S. military members to uphold the Constitution and defy “illegal orders.”
The 90-second video was first posted early Tuesday from Sen. Elissa Slotkin’s X account. In it, the six lawmakers — Slotkin, Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly, and Reps. Jason Crow, Chris Deluzio, Maggie Goodlander and Chrissy Houlahan — speak directly to U.S. service members, whom Slotkin acknowledges are “under enormous stress and pressure right now.”
“The American people need you to stand up for our laws and our Constitution,” Slotkin wrote in the X post.
All of the lawmakers in the video are veterans of the armed services and intelligence community. Sen. Kelly was a U.S. Navy captain.
Trump on Thursday reposted messages from others about the video, amplifying it with his own words. It marked another flashpoint in the political rhetoric that at times has been thematic in his administrations, as well as among some in his MAGA base. Some Democrats accused him of acting like a king and trying to distract from other news, including the soon-to-be-released files about disgraced financier and sexual abuser Jeffrey Epstein.
What Democrats said in the video
With pieces of dialogue spliced together from different members, the lawmakers introduce themselves and their background. They go on to say the Trump administration “is pitting our uniformed military against American citizens. They call for service members to “refuse illegal orders” and “stand up for our laws.”
The lawmakers conclude the video by encouraging service members, “Don’t give up the ship,” a War of 1812-era phrase attributed to a U.S. Navy captain’s dying command to his crew.
Although the lawmakers didn’t mention specific circumstances in the video, its release comes as the Trump administration continues attempts at deployment of National Guard troops into U.S. cities for various roles, although some have been pulled back, and others held up in court.
Are U.S. troops allowed to disobey orders?
Troops, especially uniformed commanders, have a specific obligation to reject an order that’s unlawful, if they make that determination.
However, while commanders have military lawyers on their staffs to consult with in helping make such a determination, rank-and-file troops who are tasked with carrying out those orders are rarely in a similar position.
Broad legal precedence holds that just following orders, colloquially known as the “Nuremberg defense” as it was used unsuccessfully by senior Nazi officials to justify their actions under Adolf Hitler, doesn’t absolve troops.
However, the U.S. military legal code, known as the Uniform Code of Military Justice or UCMJ, will punish troops for failing to follow an order should it turn out to be lawful. Troops can be criminally charged with Article 90 of the UCMJ, willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer, and Article 92, failure to obey an order.
How Trump, others responded
On Thursday, Trump reposted to social media an article about the video, adding his own commentary that it was “really bad, and Dangerous to our Country.”
“SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR FROM TRAITORS!!!” Trump went on. “LOCK THEM UP???” He also called for the lawmakers’ arrest and trial, adding in a separate post that it was “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH.”
The Steady State, which describes itself as “a network of 300+ national and homeland security experts standing for strong and principled policy, rule of law, and democracy,” wrote in a Substack post on Thursday that the lawmakers’ call was “only a restatement of what every officer and enlisted servicemember already knows: illegal orders can and should be refused. This is not a political opinion. It is doctrine.”
Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell challenged the theory that illegal orders were being issued.
“Our military follows orders, and our civilians give legal orders,” Parnell told The Associated Press on Thursday. “We love the Constitution. These politicians are out of their minds.”
Democrats fire back
The lawmakers involved in the video issued a joint statement on Thursday in response to the president’s comments.
The statement, in part, says the lawmakers will not be intimidated or threatened to deter them from their sworn oath to the U.S.
“What’s most telling is that the President considers it punishable by death for us to restate the law,” the joint statement read. “Our servicemembers should know that we have their backs as they fulfill their oath to the Constitution and obligation to follow only lawful orders. It is not only the right thing to do, but also our duty.
“But this isn’t about any one of us. This isn’t about politics. This is about who we are as Americans. Every American must unite and condemn the President’s calls for our murder and political violence. This is a time for moral clarity.
“In these moments, fear is contagious, but so is courage. We will continue to lead and will not be intimidated.”
Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
-
Business1 week agoDeveloper plans to add a hotel and hundreds of residences to L.A. Live
-
Southwest1 week agoFury erupts after accused teen sex predator dodges prison; families swarm courthouse demanding judge’s head
-
Business5 days ago
Fire survivors can use this new portal to rebuild faster and save money
-
World1 week agoVideo: Russia’s First A.I. Humanoid Robot Crashes Into the Tech Scene
-
Politics1 week agoMajor Pentagon contractor executive caught in child sex sting operation
-
World4 days agoFrance and Germany support simplification push for digital rules
-
Technology1 week agoAI-powered scams target kids while parents stay silent
-
News5 days agoCourt documents shed light on Indiana shooting that sparked stand-your-ground debate