Connect with us

Alaska

Measure limiting Alaska campaign cash fails to get enough signatures for 2024 vote

Published

on

Measure limiting Alaska campaign cash fails to get enough signatures for 2024 vote


By James Brooks, Alaska Beacon

Updated: 35 seconds ago Published: 5 minutes ago

JUNEAU — Backers of a new ballot measure proposing limits on donations to political candidates failed to make the cutoff for this year’s elections.

With the Alaska Legislature not expected to pass a bill dealing with the topic this year, there will be no limit on the amount of money that someone can give a candidate for office in this year’s state elections. Federal limits still apply to this year’s U.S. House elections.

Advertisement

If the Alaska Legislature fails to pass a substantially similar bill in 2025, the 2026 elections will also take place without limits.

“We clearly did not make the deadline,” said Bruce Botelho, a former Alaska attorney general who lives in Juneau and was a co-sponsor of the ballot measure.

Two other ballot measures — one proposing an increase to the minimum wage, and another proposing the repeal of Alaska’s open primary and ranked-choice general elections — did gather enough signatures, and those are now being verified by the Alaska Division of Elections.

[Alaska House committee advances legislation to repeal ranked choice voting]

If the signatures are confirmed, those measures will be on either the primary or general election ballot, depending on when the Legislature adjourns this year.

Advertisement

In order to make this year’s ballot, supporters needed to gather the signatures of 26,705 registered voters, with a minimum amount from at least 35 of the state’s 40 House districts, before Jan. 16.

That didn’t happen with the measure limiting campaign donations, largely because the measure got a late start: Supporters received their signature booklets Sept. 18 and had just four months to make the deadline.

“I think we just have not had enough volunteers collecting enough signatures, primarily in the Railbelt area,” Botelho said.

He said he knew the job would be difficult but thought it wasn’t impossible. In 2011, Botelho was part of a group that called for a vote on a coastal zone management plan. The group received their signature books four days before Christmas 2010 but still managed to make a mid-January deadline.

That measure, which didn’t pass a statewide vote, was supported by local governments, which made signature-gathering easier, Botelho said. The new effort was volunteer-driven.

Advertisement

Rep. Calvin Schrage, I-Anchorage, is another co-sponsor of the effort and said that signature-gathering was “a little bit behind where we’d like to be,” but that sponsors have until September to gather enough names to make the 2026 ballot.

“We’re not going to meet the 2024 ballot deadline, but we are continuing forward,” he said.

Originally published by the Alaska Beacon, an independent, nonpartisan news organization that covers Alaska state government.





Source link

Advertisement

Alaska

VB emergency management crews continue offering help in Alaska

Published

on

VB emergency management crews continue offering help in Alaska


VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. (WAVY) — Help from Hampton Roads continues in Alaska after Typhoon Halung brought catostrophic flooding to the western part of the state near the Bering Sea.

It’s all hands on deck across Alaska as the state navigates the massive damage left behind, and emergency crews say it’ll continue to be a group effort in the coming days.

“We’ve got three people here from Virginia that are assisting in Alaska,” said Andrew Booden, Virginia Beach Emergency Management and Hampton Roads Incident Management team member Andrew Booden. “I’m in Anchorage at the state EOC at the National Guard’s headquarters. It all started on Oct. 8. A massive storm rolled through with massive flooding — six, seven feet of tidal flooding hurricane force winds, a lot of flooding and infrastructure damage.”

Booden has been working alongside other officials as a liaison between the state EOC and different agencies to help with a massive clean up from Typhoon Halung.

Advertisement

“I’m evacuating people and dogs,” Booden said, “and I don’t expect to be off. I’m working 11-and-a-half, 12-hour days, and I don’t expect to take a day off.”

It’s work that will surely continue.

Booden will be heading back to Hampton Roads Oct. 30.

To read more on all their efforts, click here.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska’s $44 Billion LNG Project Nears Key Milestone as Pipeline Study Wraps Up | OilPrice.com

Published

on

Alaska’s  Billion LNG Project Nears Key Milestone as Pipeline Study Wraps Up | OilPrice.com


The proponents of the $44-billion Alaska LNG are expected to complete by the end of the year the crucial engineering and cost study for an 800-mile-long pipeline set to service the export project, U.S. Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum has said.

“There’s a lot of optimism about the Alaska LNG project, and the FEED study should be coming out in December of this year, and I think that we’re going to see a lot of interest in that project,” Burgum said at an event hosted by the American Petroleum Institute (API), as carried by Reuters.

The Alaska LNG project is designed to deliver North Slope natural gas to Alaskans and export LNG to U.S. allies across the Pacific. An 800-mile pipeline is planned to transport the gas from the production centers in the North Slope to south-central Alaska for exports. In addition, multiple gas interconnection points will ensure meeting in-state gas demand.

The Alaska LNG project is a joint venture between U.S. energy developer Glenfarne Group and Alaska Gasline Development Corporation, a company owned by the state of Alaska.

Advertisement

Energy companies are ready to commit to buying $115 billion worth of LNG from Alaska once President Donald Trump’s pet energy project gets done, Glenfarne said in June, noting that as many as 50 companies have expressed formal interest.

U.S. officials toured Asia earlier this year in search of potential Asian investors in the LNG project. The LNG export facility is strongly supported by the Trump Administration, which has also been pressing Japan and South Korea to buy more LNG as a way to reduce America’s trade deficit with its Asian allies.

Japanese and other Asian companies have been considering investments in the $44-billion Alaska LNG project, but so far they have appeared to be concerned that the costs may be too high, considering the cold weather in Alaska and the scale of the pipelines needed to bring the project on stream.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska communities devastated by severe storm could take years to recover

Published

on

Alaska communities devastated by severe storm could take years to recover


Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska warned over the weekend that it could take years for some of her state’s communities to recover after they were devastated by a powerful storm recently.

Speaking at the Alaska Federation of Natives’ annual convention on Saturday, the Republican shared her experience visiting Kipnuk, a village where officials estimate 90% of structures were destroyed amid flooding and other extreme conditions, describing the widespread devastation and “long road” ahead for rebuilding.

“It’s going to take years to recover from the disaster of what we have seen with this storm,” she said. Murkowski added, “We have to come together in times of tragedy and disasters – we know that.

“After the flood waters recede, and after the damage to the homes and the fish camp is calculated, there’s so much work that remains, and so much healing that is needed.”

Advertisement

Murkowski’s remarks came after the remnants of Typhoon Halong on the weekend of 11 October battered remote communities in south-west Alaska with strong winds, rain, record-breaking storm surges and flooding.

More than 1,500 people were displaced, and homes were inundated and swept away. At least one person was killed, and two others remained missing heading into Monday. The US Coast Guard has rescued dozens from their homes.

On 16 October, Mike Dunleavy, Alaska’s governor, said it could take “upwards of 18 months” before many residents would be able to return to their homes and communities.

In a letter to Donald Trump, Dunleavy requested that the president declare a major disaster in the state, which would unlock federal resources.

“Due to the time, space, distance, geography and weather in the affected areas, it is likely that many survivors will be unable to return to their communities this winter,” he wrote.

Advertisement

“Agencies are prioritizing rapid repairs,” he added. “But it is likely that some damaged communities will not be viable to support winter occupancy, in America’s harshest climate in the US Arctic.”

Murkowski and two more members of Alaska’s congressional delegation – US senator Dan Sullivan and House representative Nick Begich – sent a letter urging Trump to approve Dunleavy’s request.

“The scale of this disaster surpasses the state’s ability and capacity to respond without federal support,” they wrote. “With winter fast approaching, and transportation and broadband connectivity limited, there is an urgent need for federal aid to repair housing, restore utilities, and secure heating fuel before severe winter conditions set in.”

The Alaska national guard was activated, and as of Sunday, it had airlifted “633 survivors from Bethel to Anchorage”.

Alaska’s state emergency operations center said on Sunday that “large-scale evacuations are complete; additional small-scale evacuations will occur as needed”.

Advertisement

The center said on Sunday that it remained at the state’s highest level of activation.

“Sheltering operations are continuing in Bethel, Anchorage, and other communities,” the center said, adding that it “continues to deploy personnel and supplies to impacted communities for emergency home and infrastructure repair”.

In May, the Trump administration canceled a $20m US Environmental Protection Agency grant to Kipnuk intended to prevent coastal erosion and protect against flooding.

A statement by the Trump administration to the Anchorage Daily News defended the grant cancelation, claiming without elaborating that the money would have been wasted.

Murkowski has also sought to defend the Trump administration over the grant cancelation, arguing that the money would not have arrived in time to prevent the damage from the recent storm, as the Daily News noted.

Advertisement

The senator did add that the recent devastation underscores the importance of funding meant to prevent damage from future storms.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending