Pittsburg, PA
Pittsburgh aims to capitalize on AI boom. Here’s how Steel City is remaking itself.
At Carnegie Mellon University’s Robotics Institute, robots are being trained to use artificial intelligence to do everyday tasks. One curvy, tubelike robot with a claw for a hand is learning how to hang clothes. Another is being trained to help people get dressed – it can grab onto a sleeve and pull it up a person’s arm.
The robots are examples of something called physical AI: essentially, robots that use artificial intelligence to perceive their environment and make decisions with some degree of autonomy. The university sees physical AI as a technological frontier where it can plant a flag – and it’s doing this work in a building that carries echoes of Pittsburgh’s industrial past.
In a passageway between lab rooms at the institute – housed in what a top faculty member says used to be the Bureau of Mines – a pair of tracks mark the path where steel mining carts used to bring equipment to be inspected. It’s a visible reminder of Pittsburgh’s steel boom, which brought in a massive wave of manufacturing and job growth until the industry collapsed in the early 1980s.
Why We Wrote This
Pittsburgh, once known as a center of the steel industry, now wants to be a hub for the kind of artificial intelligence that makes a difference in peoples’ daily lives. What happens here could produce innovations that affect the economy on a broader scale.
Now, Pittsburgh is banking on being a leader in a potential new industrial revolution. With a pool of talent from Carnegie Mellon and the University of Pittsburgh, the city ranks No. 7 on the Brookings Institution’s benchmarking of nearly 200 U.S. artificial intelligence hubs. City leaders promote Pittsburgh’s potential to be a global AI hub. They say the AI revolution is a natural extension of the region’s industrial history, and will bring in blue-collar jobs by way of data center construction. They also say Pittsburgh’s culture means its AI innovation is focused on technologies that can solve significant problems for people.
“We’re not a land of dating apps,” says Meredith Meyer Grelli, the managing director of Carnegie Mellon’s Swartz Center for Entrepreneurship. “We’re like, figure [stuff] out that makes the world a better place to be in.”
As with all bets, Pittsburgh’s wager on AI comes with risks. After a decades-long economic slump, the AI boom has brought venture capital to the city, with investment reaching a record high of $999 million last year. But AI is still a new industry, and it’s not yet clear whether people will flock to robots that could empty their dishwashers or perform surgeries. A number of high-profile figures like OpenAI CEO Sam Altman suggest investors have become overexcited about the technology – and if they pull back, the boom could fizzle.
Even if AI growth continues, city leaders’ predictions could still fall short. Unlike during the steel mining boom, for example, many of the jobs created by AI – like construction jobs for data centers – so far are temporary.
And although Pittsburgh has seen innovations in many areas of AI, city leaders seem especially quick to tout its capabilities in physical AI – an area that not everyone sees as the future.
“Robotics is a slow field that makes slow progress,” says Zico Kolter, a co-founder of Gray Swan AI and a professor at Carnegie Mellon’s School of Computer Science, referring in part to physical AI.
But those pushing for Pittsburgh to lean into AI see reasons to be optimistic. Artificial intelligence in general is in a moment of significant growth, with AI’s global market value – generally determined based on factors including capital investment and future growth potential – projected to exceed $4.8 trillion by 2033, according to a United Nations report.
Many people already interact with AI by using chatbots like ChatGPT, or when they see an AI overview as the result of a Google search. Physical AI is more rare in everyday life, but is becoming more visible – for example, with driverless taxis in cities like San Francisco. That technology was pioneered at Carnegie Mellon.
“These are technologies that spread through the whole economy,” says Mark Muro, a senior fellow at Brookings Metro. “If this technology is so important for productivity gains, it really matters who has it and who doesn’t.”
An attempt to own the moment
A one-mile corridor starting in Bakery Square, a bustling office district with housing, shopping and restaurants, offers a glimpse into the city’s rising technology profile. Dubbed “AI Avenue” by developers last year, the stretch of blocks houses 26 tech companies developing AI, including physical AI – from big names like Google and Duolingo to fast-growing startups.
Joanna Doven, a founding CEO of a government consulting firm, says AI Avenue produced a “light bulb moment” a couple years ago. She recalls noticing a flurry of tech-related leasing in the area, and wondered, “Is anybody paying attention?”
Her thinking was, “This is a moment we should own.” Now she leads Pittsburgh’s newly formed AI Strike Team, a 13-member group that strives to unite key players in business, academia, and the government to make the city a leading technology hub. The team’s pitch includes the intangible factor of Pittsburgh’s industrial culture.
“We have founders that are here for a reason,” says Ms. Doven. “The gritty, hard-work ethic of Pittsburgh is still here, and that’s something that they need to succeed.”
She says Pittsburgh’s technological development focuses on health care, physical AI, and defense. This year, the city saw three new AI companies become “unicorns” – companies worth more than $1 billion. All three fit at least one of those categories.
Pittsburgh is still no Silicon Valley, says Mr. Muro, a co-author of the Brookings AI report. The California region known as a center of tech boasts at least 60 of these “unicorn” companies. But he says Pittsburgh’s manufacturing legacy allows it to offer unique contributions.
“The U.S. AI boom is impressive but it’s imbalanced – oriented too little toward real-world, often manufacturing, use cases,” writes Mr. Muro in an email to the Monitor. “But this is what Pittsburgh is working on and good at. … We need a bridge that connects AI and manufacturing.”
The jobs question
A short drive from AI Avenue is Carnegie Mellon University, home to the country’s top-ranked AI program according to the U.S. News and World Report, and widely considered to have one of the strongest robotics programs – a combination that’s a fit for physical AI.
On a recent afternoon, a drone hovers over the sidewalk bridging the campus with the neighboring University of Pittsburgh. Inside the Swartz Center for Entrepreneurship on CMU’s campus, students work at a cluster of tables piled with cables and other equipment, next to a small human-shaped robot that hangs from a cable. They’re collecting data on how to make an AI algorithm inhabit a physical form.
Carnegie Mellon is at the center of “so many developments, so many companies and so many economies,” says Mike Embrescia, the chief development officer of the physical AI company Carnegie Robotics, which is not directly connected to the school.
College graduates have gone on to found businesses like Aurora Innovation, a Pittsburgh-based company that recently became the first to launch an AI-based commercial driverless trucking service on public roads.
But these college graduates are also bearing the brunt of a softening labor market, according to new data. And many people speculate that AI development may lead to unemployment, as robots could be created to do tasks more efficiently than humans, without having to be paid.
When people find out he works in AI, Mr. Embrescia says, “You typically get the remark, oh, they’re gonna take my jobs someday.”
Pennsylvania has made an effort to link AI with job creation. In June, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro and leaders from Amazon announced a $20 billion investment in AI infrastructure resulting in the construction of two new data centers in the state. Gov. Shapiro says the data centers will result in 10,000 temporary construction jobs as well as 2,400 permanent jobs.
Ms. Doven thinks that rather than just taking jobs, AI can help fill positions that are already vacant. “In the Pittsburgh region, there’s two available jobs for every one person that wants a job,” she says as she grabs a late lunch in Bakery Square. Pointing to the restaurant’s kitchen, she says the staff here have been hiring dishwashers at well above market rate because of the difficulty in finding workers.
She admits the effects of AI on job security are uneven across industries.
“Software jobs are in peril,” she says. “Highly specialized AI jobs are in demand.”
For some people, job loss from AI is already a reality. Language learning company Duolingo drew criticism for laying off about 10% of its contractor workforce early last year as it expanded reliance on AI.
A recent Brookings report found that the U.S. labor market had not yet been notably impacted by AI, although the report’s writers emphasized that could change as the technology develops.
“The new steel”
The Lawrenceville neighborhood in Pittsburgh was once labeled a blighted community. When the steel industry collapsed, the steel mills and foundries shuttered, leaving the buildings as hollow reminders of past prosperity.
Now, Lawrenceville has a new identity. Underpinning the community is the National Robotics Engineering Center (NREC), a technology organization formed by Carnegie Mellon University that’s housed in what used to be a steel foundry. The surrounding area has been dubbed “Robotics Row” for the cluster of robotics and artificial intelligence companies that have sprung up largely within the last decade.
This is where the self-driving unit of Uber got its start about 10 years ago. And this is where Carnegie Robotics, operating out of an old steel mill across the street from NREC, recently designed a piece of AI software, which clips onto soldiers’ backpacks, that can translate languages onto soldiers’ eyeglasses or map out battlefields in 3D.
It’s the kind of innovation Pittsburgh strives to be known for.
“We were the center of the world around steel,” says Mark Henderson, vice chancellor of the University of Pittsburgh and a member of Pittsburgh’s AI Strike Team. “AI is the new steel.”
Pittsburg, PA
Blanche says DOJ
Pittsburg, PA
Luke Bryan concert expected to bring thousands of fans to Pittsburgh-area farm
On Sept. 17, multi-platinum country music star Luke Bryan will bring his Farm Tour to 1846 Farms near Latrobe.
Westmoreland County is no stranger to large outdoor concerts. Some may remember the Rolling Rock Town Fair in the early 2000s, while others may recall Luke Bryan’s stop at a farm in South Huntingdon Township just two years ago. Now the country music superstar is returning to the area.
The Unity Township farm’s general manager, Aleisha Stas, gave KDKA a tour of the family farm, which dates back to before the Civil War. She says Bryan’s team first reached out after finding the farm on social media, but she says at first, she and her family thought it was too good to be true.
“This was around April Fools, so we thought it was an April Fools prank,” Stas said. “My whole family, we were like, there’s no way this is about to happen. But this has been incredible.”
Stas says Bryan’s team is handling everything logistically from parking and bathrooms to deciding exactly where the concert will be staged.
“If we have it on this side of the property, we can hold 12,000 people,” Stas said. “And if we have it on (the other side) of the property, it can be up to 20,000. But we have not determined that yet.”
Many of those decisions will be made as September gets closer. In the meantime, however, the farm is holding off on planting in certain fields until the final concert location is selected.
And while hosting thousands of people may sound a little intimidating, Stas says her family is excited to welcome fans to the farm for what they hope will be a memorable night.
“Obviously, we’ve never had this many people here before, so it will be a new thing for all of us, but we are not worried,” said Stas. “Luke Bryan’s team are experts with this, and I think it will go great.”
Tickets for this concert are currently on sale, and they will run you about $77 per person, plus tax for general admission.
Pittsburg, PA
2025 Steelers Offseason Recall: Garrett shutdown as Pittsburgh bullied Browns in Week 6 | Steel City Underground
Steel City Underground presents post-game takeaways in our Steelers Offseason Recall series, revisiting key moments from the 2025 season and how they shaped the year that followed.
AFC North football rarely looks pretty, and the Pittsburgh Steelers’ Week 6 matchup against the Cleveland Browns at Acrisure Stadium followed that familiar formula. What started as a defensive slugfest on a torn-up field eventually turned into another frustrating afternoon for Cleveland as Pittsburgh pulled away for a 23-9 victory.
The win improved the Steelers to 4-1 and extended their remarkable regular season home winning streak against the Browns to 22 games. More importantly, it reinforced an early-season identity centered around disruptive defense, efficient quarterback play, and winning the battle in the trenches.
Looking back, these were the biggest surprises from Pittsburgh’s victory.
Embed from Getty Images
Jalen Ramsey stole the show from Watt and Garrett
Nobody expected Jalen Ramsey to leave Week 6 with more sacks than T.J. Watt and Myles Garrett combined, but that’s exactly what happened.
Ramsey entered the game after missing practice time earlier in the week and proceeded to deliver one of the more unexpected stat lines of the season. The veteran defensive back recorded two sacks and six combined tackles while frequently helping confuse Cleveland’s protection schemes.
Meanwhile, Watt recorded half a sack while Garrett failed to register one entirely.
Ramsey even admitted afterward that the performance surprised him. His production highlighted an emerging trend within Pittsburgh’s defense: pressure was coming from everywhere.
Embed from Getty Images
The Steelers defense overwhelmed Cleveland’s offense
While Ramsey grabbed headlines, the collective defensive effort suffocated Cleveland for most of the afternoon.
The Steelers finished with six sacks as Nick Herbig led the team with two sacks while Ramsey added two of his own. Derrick Harmon, Watt, and Alex Highsmith also got involved as Pittsburgh repeatedly collapsed the pocket around rookie quarterback Dillon Gabriel.
Gabriel never looked comfortable. The rookie completed 29 of 59 passes for 221 yards and struggled once Cleveland became one-dimensional after falling behind. He finished with a passer rating of 66.3 while absorbing constant punishment.
Pittsburgh didn’t rely solely on edge pressure either. Defensive backs blitzed, interior rushers collapsed protection, and disguised looks forced Cleveland into mistakes.
Perhaps equally impressive was how the Steelers handled Browns rookie running back Quinshon Judkins. Entering the matchup, Judkins had averaged 4.6 yards per carry and looked like one of Cleveland’s few consistent offensive weapons. Pittsburgh erased that advantage, holding him to a season-low 36 rushing yards on 12 carries while limiting him to 3.0 yards per attempt.
Through five games played after their bye week, the Steelers had already amassed 20 sacks and were rapidly becoming one of football’s most disruptive defenses.
Embed from Getty Images
Myles Garrett disappeared
The Browns needed a game-changing performance from Myles Garrett. Instead, Pittsburgh’s offensive line turned in one of its best performances of the season.
Garrett moved around the formation throughout the game, but he spent much of the afternoon lined up across from Broderick Jones. With occasional help early and more one-on-one opportunities later, Jones and company neutralized Cleveland’s biggest defensive weapon.
Garrett finished with only two combined tackles. He failed to record a solo tackle, sack, forced fumble, quarterback hit, or pass defended.
Keeping Garrett quiet fundamentally changed how Cleveland could attack Rodgers and allowed Pittsburgh’s offense to remain balanced throughout the afternoon.
Embed from Getty Images
Rodgers stayed efficient and upright
Aaron Rodgers didn’t deliver a vintage statistical masterpiece: he simply controlled the game.
The veteran quarterback completed 21 of 30 passes for 235 yards while distributing the football efficiently and trusting Arthur Smith‘s offensive approach. Rodgers leaned heavily on his tight ends early before taking advantage of favorable matchups later in the game.
His biggest moments arrived in the second half. Rodgers connected with Connor Heyward for a touchdown strike before finding D.K. Metcalf for another score that helped create separation on the scoreboard.
Equally important, Rodgers stayed upright. For only the second time that season, Pittsburgh allowed zero sacks. Cleveland hit Rodgers only three times despite him attempting 30 passes.
Compare that with Dillon Gabriel, who absorbed six sacks and 16 total quarterback hits.
The offensive line, aided by extra blocking looks featuring Spencer Anderson, kept Cleveland’s front from controlling the game and allowed Rodgers to operate comfortably. Metcalf benefited from the protection, turning four receptions into 95 yards while the Steelers spread touches across Jonnu Smith, Pat Freiermuth, Roman Wilson, Darnell Washington, and Heyward.
Meanwhile, Jaylen Warren, Kenneth Gainwell, and Kaleb Johnson combined for 89 rushing yards to maintain offensive balance. Pittsburgh averaged 5.8 yards per play and controlled possession despite both teams having the same number of drives.
Embed from Getty Images
The officiating nearly stole the spotlight
Not everything about the victory came without frustration. Ron Torbert’s officiating crew inserted itself into the game repeatedly as Pittsburgh absorbed ten accepted penalties during an afternoon filled with questionable decisions.
Several pass interference rulings frustrated players and fans alike.
Jerry Jeudy appeared to drag Brandin Echols down by both shoulder pads on one play, yet the result went against Pittsburgh. Later, Browns cornerback Denzel Ward appeared to pin D.K. Metcalf’s arm without drawing a flag.
Even Watt found himself repeatedly flagged for alignment penalties despite checking positioning with officials beforehand, leading to visible frustration from Mike Tomlin on the sideline.
The most controversial moment arrived on special teams. Ke’Shawn Williams appeared to spark the crowd with a 47-yard punt return before an illegal blindside block penalty on Jabrill Peppers erased the play. The penalty not only wiped away field position but also backed Pittsburgh up an additional ten yards.
Despite the officiating frustrations, the Steelers remained composed, and by the end of the afternoon, that discipline, paired with suffocating defense and efficient offense, delivered another divisional win and continued building momentum heading into a critical AFC North stretch.
-
Tennessee3 minutes agoFranklin police ticket 13-year-old after e-bike crash, and a new Tennessee law brings more changes July 1
-
Texas8 minutes agoNational Democrats aim to flip 12 Texas House seats under newly expanded target list
-
Utah15 minutes agoUtah’s wonderful women took Kevin O’Leary to school over his…
-
Vermont18 minutes agoHundreds of housing units in the works at closely-watched project in Burlington’s South End – VTDigger
-
Virginia23 minutes agoCrews put out house fire in Bristol, Virginia
-
Washington30 minutes agoDeputies use drone to catch man wanted for damaging car in Washington County
-
Wisconsin33 minutes agoRacing Sausages, Wienermobile, ancient canoes all call this place home
-
West Virginia38 minutes agoTop Bike Adventures in West Virginia’s Mountain Playground