Connect with us

Alaska

First avian influenza death of Alaska polar bear reflects growing spread of virus

Published

on

First avian influenza death of Alaska polar bear reflects growing spread of virus


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – The first known avian influenza death of an Alaska polar bear is causing grave concerns from scientists, who are pushing for answers while they continue to monitor the largest land carnivore in the world today.

The bear was found in October by a North Slope wildlife team in Utqiagvik, the northernmost city in the US. It was first reported by the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation after they received tissue samples of the bear from the North Slope Borough Department of Wildlife Management.

Due to the polar bear being listed under the Endangered Species Act, more tests were run on the sample from the animal. Polar bears were initially listed in 2008 as threatened due to the decline of sea ice in their habitat, an environmental change that will likely continue contributing to the species’ decline.

“Anytime you find a new species that’s affected, [there] is more information and more data that we need to try to understand what this virus is capable of doing,” said Dr. Bob Gerlach with the DEC’s Division of Environmental Health.

Advertisement

Gerlach, the state veterinarian, maintains the state has been doing surveillance, while also investigating mortality events, in this case, looking for avian influenza.

In Alaska, there have been five confirmed avian influenza cases among foxes (3), brown bears (1) and black bears (1). Gerlach thinks the polar bear could have either eaten a bird or been around a dead bird, which caused exposure to the virus.

From studies conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, using samples from previous outbreaks, scientists know the virus can stay active for long periods.

“They’ve actually collected samples from water and sediment in the fall and found the avian influenza, and in the spring when they thawed out, they were able to recover the virus again,” Gerlach said. “So it can — because it’s frozen in those environments — stay infective for a long time period. That’s why we see it more in the rainier, wet and cold seasons than you do in the dry, warm seasons like during the summer.”

Alaska is a central location for migratory waterfowl, with birds passing through the state from elsewhere in North America or across the Pacific Ocean. It’s a cause for concern as the USGS has discovered three different introductions that are impacting birds and causing the virus to spread in the state.

Advertisement

“We’re seeing it from 2022 and 2023 being very impactful and having a big impact on both domestic poultry and wild birds and now terrestrial mammals,” Gerlach said.

Gerlach believes there’s an adaptation with avian influenza that makes it unique and different from others, allowing it to linger in a species and come back over time. Especially since in South America, there have been some large mortality events of seals and sea lions even though there have been no detections of the virus in marine mammals in Alaska.

With the adaptation being a possible threat to other species, it begs the question of if it will also threaten people. So far, scientists know the risk to people is extremely low, but it’s why researchers with domestic animals are working with public health to better understand how the virus is changing and if there will be continued threats to other animals.

There have also been concerns for those in rural and Native villages in Alaska which rely on a subsistence lifestyle. Gerlach says if you are following standard procedures and cleaning poultry with sanitation and cooking all produce, there will not be a risk from consumption. If you see a bird that does not look healthy, he says, do not harvest it.

According to Gerlach, the types of animals most at risk of avian influenza will be those that are young, old or immunocompromised.

Advertisement

With Alaska being a vast state, the DEC relies on the public to inform local wildlife biologists and health authorities to investigate any problems.

“It’s only through the collaboration that we have with our other fellow agencies and our office is only providing one small part to this,” Gerlach said. “The wildlife biologists that are out there in the public that are reporting these morbidity mortalities are really important with respect to how we understand what’s going on and how this is going to impact us up here in Alaska.”

Gerlach encourages the public to ask questions and if they see something unusual, report it. He asks the public to not handle sick or dead animals but instead, call attention to them by calling the proper authorities.

If you come across a dead or sick animal, you may report it by reaching out through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife’s dead bird hotline or contacting a local fish and game office.

Advertisement



Source link

Alaska

Alaska delegation mixed on Venezuela capture legality, day before presidential war powers vote

Published

on

Alaska delegation mixed on Venezuela capture legality, day before presidential war powers vote


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Alaska’s congressional delegation had mixed reactions Wednesday on the legality of the Trump administration’s actions in Venezuela over the weekend, just a day before they’re set to vote on a bill ending “hostilities” in Venezuela.

It comes days after former Venezuelan Nicolás Maduro was captured by American forces and brought to the United States in handcuffs to face federal drug trafficking charges.

All U.S. Senators were to be briefed by the administration members at 10 a.m. ET Wednesday, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, according to CBS News.

Spokespersons for Alaska Sens. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, and Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, say they were at that meeting, but from their responses, the two shared different takeaways.

Advertisement

Sullivan, who previously commended the Trump administration for the operation in Venezuela, told KDLL after his briefing that the next steps in Venezuela would be done in three phases.

“One is just stabilization. They don’t want chaos,” he said.

“The second is to have an economic recovery phase … and then finally, the third phase is a transition to conduct free and fair elections and perhaps install the real winner of the 2024 election there, which was not Maduro.”

Murkowski spokesperson Joe Plesha said she had similar takeaways to Sullivan on the ousting of Maduro, but still held concerns on the legality.

“Nicolás Maduro is a dictator who led a brutally oppressive regime, and Venezuela and the world are better places without him in power,” Plesha said in a statement Wednesday. “While [Murkowski] continues to question the legal and policy framework that led to the military operation, the bigger question now is what happens next.”

Advertisement

Thursday, the Senate will decide what happens next when they vote on a war powers resolution which would require congressional approval to “be engaged in hostilities within or against Venezuela,” and directs the president to terminate the use of armed forces against Venezuela, “unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for use of military force.”

Several House leaders have also received a briefing from the administration according to CBS News. A spokesperson for Rep. Nick Begich, R-Alaska, said he received a House briefing and left believing the actions taken by the administration were legal.

“The information provided in today’s classified House briefing further confirmed that the actions taken by the Administration to obtain Maduro were necessary, time-dependent, and justified; and I applaud our military and the intelligence community for their exceptional work in executing this operation,” Begich said in a statement.

Looming vote

Sen. Tim Kaine, D-VA, authored the war powers resolution scheduled for debate Thursday at 11 a.m. ET — 7 a.m. AKST.

It’s a resolution which was one of the biggest topics of discussion on the chamber floors Wednesday.

Advertisement

Sen. Rand Paul, R-KY, said on the Senate floor Wednesdya that the actions taken by the administration were an “act of war,” and the president’s capture of Maduro violated the checks and balances established in the constitution, ending his remarks by encouraging his colleagues to vote in favor of the resolution.

“The constitution is clear,” Paul said. “Only Congress can declare a war.”

If all Democrats and independents vote for the Kaine resolution, and Paul keeps to his support, the bill will need three more votes to pass. If there is a tie, the vice president is the deciding vote.

“It’s as if a magical dust of soma has descended through the ventilation systems of congressional office buildings,” Paul continued Wednesday, referring to a particular type of muscle relaxant.

“Vague faces in permanent smiles and obedient applause indicate the degree that the majority party has lost its grip and have become eunuchs in the thrall of presidential domination.”

Advertisement

Legality of actions under scrutiny

U.S. forces arrested Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, from their Caracas home in an overnight operation early Saturday morning, Alaska time. Strikes accompanying the capture killed about 75 people, including military personnel and civilians, according to U.S. government officials granted anonymity by The Washington Post.

Maduro pleaded not guilty Monday in a New York courtroom to drug trafficking charges that include leading the “Cartel of the Suns,” a narco-trafficking organization comprised of high-ranking Venezuelan officials. The U.S. offered a $50 million reward for information leading to his capture.

Whether the U.S. was legally able to capture Maduro under both domestic and international law has been scrutinized in the halls of Congress. Members of the administration, like Secretary of State Marco Rubio, have been open in defending what they say was a law enforcement operation carrying out an arrest warrant, The Hill reports. Lawmakers, like Paul or Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-NY, say the actions were an act of war and a violation of the constitution.

While the president controls the military as commander in chief, Congress constitutionally has the power to declare wars. Congressional Democrats have accused Trump of skirting the Constitution by not seeking congressional authorization before the operation.

Murkowski has not outright condemned or supported the actions taken by the administration, saying in a statement she was hopeful the world was safer without Maduro in power, but the way the operation was handled is “important.”

Advertisement

Sullivan, on the other hand, commended Trump and those involved in the operation for forcing Maduro to “face American justice,” in an online statement.

Begich spokesperson Silver Prout told Alaska’s News Source Monday the Congressman believed the operation was “a lawful execution of a valid U.S. arrest warrant on longstanding criminal charges against Nicolás Maduro.”

The legality of U.S. military actions against Venezuela has taken significant focus in Washington over the past several months, highlighted by a “double-tap” strike — a second attack on the same target after an initial strike — which the Washington Post reported killed people clinging to the wreckage of a vessel after the military already struck it. The White House has confirmed the follow-up attack.

Advertisement

Sullivan, who saw classified video of the strike, previously told Alaska’s News Source in December he believed actions taken by the U.S. did not violate international law.

“I support them doing it, but they have to get it right,” he said. “I think so far they’re getting it right.”

Murkowski, who has not seen the video, previously said at an Anchorage press event the takeaways on that strike’s legality seem to be divided along party lines.

“I spoke to a colleague who is on the Intelligence Committee, a Republican, and I spoke to a colleague, a Democrat, who is on the Senate Armed Services Committee … their recollection or their retelling of what they saw [was] vastly different.”

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

National Native helpline for domestic violence and sexual assault to open Alaska-specific service

Published

on

National Native helpline for domestic violence and sexual assault to open Alaska-specific service


A national support line for Native survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault has begun work to launch an Alaska-specific service. Strong Hearts Native Helpline is a Native-led nonprofit that offers 24-hour, seven-day-a-week support for anonymous and confidential calls from people who have experienced domestic violence or sexual assault. The line is staffed by Native […]



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Dozens of vehicle accidents reported, Anchorage after-school activities canceled, as snowfall buries Southcentral Alaska

Published

on

Dozens of vehicle accidents reported, Anchorage after-school activities canceled, as snowfall buries Southcentral Alaska


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Up to a foot of snow has fallen in areas across Southcentral as of Tuesday, with more expected into Wednesday morning.

All sports and after-school activities — except high school basketball and hockey activities — were canceled Tuesday for the Anchorage School District. The decision was made to allow crews to clear school parking lots and manage traffic for snow removal, district officials said.

“These efforts are critical to ensuring schools can safely remain open [Wednesday],” ASD said in a statement.

The Anchorage Police Department’s accident count for the past two days shows there have been 55 car accidents since Monday, as of 9:45 a.m. Tuesday. In addition, there have been 86 vehicles in distress reported by the department.

Advertisement
Snow measuring up to 17 inches deep in Anchorage, Alaska, on Jan. 6, 2026.(Alaska’s News Source)

The snowfall — which has brought up to 13 inches along areas of Turnagain Arm and 12 inches in Wasilla — is expected to continue Tuesday, according to latest forecast models. Numerous winter weather alerts are in effect, and inland areas of Southcentral could see winds up to 25 mph, with coastal areas potentially seeing winds over 45 mph.

Up to a foot or more of snow has fallen across Southcentral Alaska, with more snow expected...
Up to a foot or more of snow has fallen across Southcentral Alaska, with more snow expected through the day.(Alaska’s News Source)

Some areas of Southcentral could see more than 20 inches of snowfall by Wednesday, with the Anchorage and Eagle River Hillsides, as well as the foothills of the Talkeetna Mountain, among the areas seeing the most snowfall.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending