Connect with us

Alaska

Challengers outraise incumbent lawmakers with a month to go before Alaska’s primary election

Published

on

Challengers outraise incumbent lawmakers with a month to go before Alaska’s primary election


A Fairbanks Republican looking to unseat a Democratic incumbent had the biggest fundraising haul heading into the final month before Alaska’s August primary election, according to reports submitted earlier this week.

Leslie Hajdukovich, who previously served on the Fairbanks North Star Borough School Board, far surpassed all other candidates, raising over $125,000 since the beginning of February, with more than $106,000 in the bank heading into the final month before the primary.

Alaska’s primary election will take place Aug. 20. Under the voting system adopted by Alaskans in 2020, the top four vote-getters in every primary race advance to the general election, regardless of party affiliation. The races for all but two of the 50 legislative seats up for election have four or fewer candidates.

Advertisement

Democratic Fairbanks incumbent Sen. Scott Kawasaki, who has served in the Legislature since 2007 and in the Senate since 2019, will face a tough challenge from Hajdukovich. After redistricting occurred in 2021, Kawasaki now represents a district that voted overwhelmingly for former President Donald Trump in 2020.

Kawasaki raised over $43,000 in the reporting period, and had more than $66,000 in his campaign account as of last week. Kawasaki said Hajdukovich’s lead was to be expected because sitting lawmakers cannot fundraise during the legislative session, which ended in mid-May, giving Hajdukovich a lead of several months to fill her campaign coffers.

“It really wasn’t very shocking,” Kawasaki said.

Hajdukovich did not respond to an interview request from the Daily News.

Aside from Hajdukovich, Democrats and left-leaning candidates appeared to have the upper hand in fundraising, particularly in races where they were challenging sitting lawmakers who — like Kawasaki — had only recently turned to fundraising. More than 110 legislative candidates are set to appear on the August ballot, and they collectively raised more than $1.6 million in the reporting period that began in February and ended last week.

Advertisement

Walter Featherly, an independent candidate challenging Republican incumbent Rep. Julie Coulombe to represent an Anchorage district, raised more than $90,000, and had more than $50,000 in the bank at the end of last week. Coulombe raised less than $18,000 and had just over $31,000 remaining in her account.

Denny Wells, a Democrat running to represent a South Anchorage House district currently represented by Republican Rep. Tom McKay, had a fundraising windfall of over $76,000, including a single contribution of $20,000 from Anchorage attorney Robin Brena. With McKay running for state Senate, Wells’ main competition will come from Mia Costello, a Republican former lawmaker who raised just over $10,000.

Many candidates reported receiving four- and five-figure contributions from some campaign donors. That is possible thanks to a court decision from 2021 that invalidated Alaska’s campaign contribution limits, which prior to the decision limited amounts to $500 per candidate per year.

Brena had been a key opponent of those campaign finance limits, arguing previously that without the limits, more of the political spending would go directly to politicians, rather than to independent groups that can impact the results of elections without being affiliated with specific candidates. Brena also gave $10,000 in recent months to independent candidate Nick Moe, who is vying to fill a vacant West Anchorage seat against Democrat Carolyn Hall.

In 2022, lawmakers had worked on a last-minute deal to restore some campaign contribution limits in Alaska. That deal fell through, and when lawmakers reconvened in 2023 and 2024, work on legislation related to election reform, including campaign finance reform, repeatedly stalled. Ultimately, no such legislation passed, allowing unlimited contributions to continue flowing to legislative candidates.

Advertisement

Kawasaki is a proponent of reinstating campaign contribution limits. Kawasaki said the current election cycle has brought “a lot of big-dollar, big-donor checks, and then fewer checks overall.” That means candidates are less likely to turn to donors who may be able to give only $50, he added. Kawasaki, who began his political career in his 20s as a city council member in Fairbanks, said he has always relied on smaller contributions to run his campaigns. Hajdukovich, who is a member of a well-connected family in Fairbanks, could benefit from the higher limits, he said.

“We knew that our opponent was going to have deep pockets,” said Kawasaki.

Recent reports show that even as candidates solicit larger campaign contributions, many still rely heavily on self-financing. At least seven candidates gave their own campaigns $10,000 or more in the recent reporting period. Kawasaki is one of them. He said the funding can function as “a safety” for candidates who face well-funded opponents.

McKay, who raised just under $17,000 in the reporting period — including $5,000 from himself — is running against Democratic incumbent Sen. Matt Claman, who raised nearly $50,000 and had nearly $115,000 in his campaign account heading into the final month before the primary — more than any other candidate. Another Republican candidate for the seat, Liz Vazquez, raised more than $5,500, almost exclusively from herself.

In another Anchorage district, Republican Rep. Craig Johnson is facing a challenge from more moderate Republican former lawmaker Chuck Kopp. Kopp raised more than $21,000 compared with Johnson’s haul of less than $14,000, including $10,000 from Johnson himself.

Advertisement

Anchorage Republican Rep. Stanley Wright is facing a challenge from Democrat Ted Eischeid, who came close to beating Wright in 2022. Eischeid raised close to $50,000, nearly 10 times the amount raised by Wright, who brought in just over $5,000.

In Homer, Republican Rep. Sarah Vance, who raised over $16,000, will face a well-funded challenge from Kenai Peninsula Borough Assembly President Brent Johnson, who brought in over $20,000. But Vance still has nearly double the funding remaining in her campaign account heading into the primary, with just over $24,000 compared to Johnson’s $12,500.

Kotzebue Rep. Thomas Baker, who switched his party affiliation from Republican to independent earlier this year after Gov. Mike Dunleavy appointed him to fill a vacancy in the Legislature, is facing a tough reelection race. He reported raising just over $1,000. Most of that came from three Republicans serving with Baker in the House — Kevin McCabe of Big Lake, Mike Cronk of Tok and Dan Saddler of Eagle River. Meanwhile, Robyn Burke, an Utqiagvik Democrat challenging Baker for the seat, reported raising just over $25,000.

In several open races, fundraising reports begin to shed light on the candidates with momentum heading into the primary election.

Fairbanks Republican Sen. Click Bishop’s decision not to run for reelection created an open race in a district covering a vast area in the Interior, including parts of Fairbanks. Republican Rep. Cronk of Tok announced earlier this year he planned to run for that seat, and raised nearly $15,000. That is half the amount that current Fairbanks North Star Borough Assembly Member Savannah Fletcher raised. An independent left-of-center candidate, Fletcher raised close to $30,000. Another Republican in the race, James Squyres, self-funded his campaign with $10,000. Fletcher has a significant funding advantage heading into the primary, with nearly $26,000 compared to Squyres’ $9,000 and Cronk’s sum of less than $6,000.

Advertisement

In an open Southeast House seat created by the planned departure of Ketchikan independent Rep. Dan Ortiz, the leading fundraiser is Republican Jeremy Bynum, who raked in nearly $49,000. He was trailed by two independent left-of-center candidates: Grant Echohawk, who raised nearly $9,000, and Agnes Moran, who raised $16,000, including $5,000 from Moran herself.

In an open South Anchorage House seat created by the retirement of Republican Rep. Laddie Shaw, independent candidate Ky Holland just outraised Republican Lee Ellis. Holland brought in $26,000 to Ellis’ $25,000. Another Republican candidate in the race, Lucy Bauer, self-funded her campaign with $25,000. Republican Brandy Pennington raised $14,000, with $12,500 coming from Pennington.

In the six-way race to fill the open House seat created by Cronk’s decision to run for Senate, the top fundraiser is Pamela Goode, a Republican from Delta Junction who gave her own campaign more than $12,000. Democrat Brandon Kowalski of Fairbanks is second, having raised around $9,600. Republican Rebecca Schwanke of Glennallen raised $9,500. Republican Cole Snodgrass of Fairbanks raised close to $6,300. Another Republican, Dana Mock of Fort Greely, raised just $940. Current State Board of Education Chair James Fields, who is running as a Libertarian, reported no campaign contributions.

Some candidates have already said they will drop out if they underperform in the primary election. Others say that campaigning will ramp up in earnest only after the primary race is over.

• • •

Advertisement





Source link

Alaska

Wayne and Wanda: I’m ready to break up with Alaska but facing resistance from everyone

Published

on

Wayne and Wanda: I’m ready to break up with Alaska but facing resistance from everyone


Dear Wanda and Wayne,

I never thought I’d be the person writing this letter, but after this winter, I think I might be done with Alaska. I was born here, grew up here, raised my family here, and never imagined living anywhere else. I defended Alaska to the haters. I rolled my eyes at people who retired to Arizona. I told myself long winters are worth it because summers are the best.

But this winter broke something in me. It was so long, dark, icy and relentless. By the time spring finally arrived, I felt angry that winter took so much out of me and that I spent months feeling trapped by weather, darkness and road conditions. Angry that I’m getting older and still structuring my life around surviving winters instead of enjoying my life. And at the time I’m writing this, this spring has sucked! My heat is still coming on every day. I’m still wearing my puffer jackets!

Part of me wonders if it’s not really about the winter at all. I’m divorced and my two kids are grown and doing their own thing, both staying in Alaska for now. For the first time in my life, nothing is really anchoring me to a place. And if I’m being honest with myself, in addition to feeling trapped by the weather, I’m bored with it here. The dating scene feels impossibly small. Every time I open a dating app, it’s the same people. Half the time I already know them, or know someone who dated them (and broken up with them for a good reason!).

Advertisement

So I’m sketching out plans to move somewhere warmer, bigger and completely unfamiliar. I think I want to know what life feels like somewhere else while I’m still young enough to enjoy it. I really feel this is a moment for a big change.

The problem is that nobody seems supportive. When I bring it up, people act like I’m having a midlife crisis. Friends tell me I’ll regret it. Family members remind me that the kids are here. Other Alaskans give me the usual speech about how the Lower 48 is generic. It’s gotten to the point where I almost don’t talk about it anymore because I’m tired of defending myself.

But all the resistance has me questioning myself and whether moving is a legitimate and logical step, or whether I’m just exhausted from a hard winter and romanticizing a different life. How do you know the difference between running toward something and simply running away?

Wanda says:

You’re asking whether you’re running toward or away from something — essentially if you’re taking a positive step or being reactive. Those aren’t mutually exclusive. Sometimes we leave both because we’re exhausted by what we’ve been carrying, and also because we are moving toward something new at the same time.

Advertisement

Every reason you listed for staying in Alaska has changed. You raised your children here? They’re grown. You had a marriage here? That chapter is closed. You tolerated winters for the sunny payoff? Nailed it: This spring has sucked.

Now you’re primed for a reset, and questioning how you want the near term and future of your life to unfold is not a crisis, it’s taking action. And it’s way more productive than floating along season to season in a fog of monotony, settling for an unfulfilling existence. Your friends and family may genuinely believe they’re protecting you from a mistake, but they’re also protecting their own worldview. Your decision to leave can feel like an implicit criticism of their choices.

But this isn’t a committee decision, and you’re a grown woman capable of major decisions, who absolutely should explore life’s possibilities without defending it to everyone you know. So go explore. Visit places. Rent before you buy. Spend a winter somewhere else. Gather information instead of arguments. And know that no matter where you land, you can always come home again — even if it’s just for a long visit in the middle of summer.

Wayne says:

This isn’t a midlife crisis that can be glossed over with a motorcycle, lip filler, a 20-something boyfriend (who probably went to high school with your kids — yikes), or kicking off your Cowgirl Era with a hat, boots and a two-week Nashville dive bar tour.

Advertisement

This is an existential crisis with your health and happiness at risk. And you’ve faced it thoughtfully, sat with it thoroughly, and are now making the best decisions selfishly. Good for you! You can’t fault your family and friends for also being selfish and wanting you to stay in AK. Of course they don’t want their mom and friend moving far away. But you’ve got to mute that noise and focus on what’s best for you.

Yes, Alaska life is special, but it sure isn’t easy. And we don’t get medals for stubbornly battling through decades of winters. What we do get is some sweet and fleeting summer moments followed by more winters. You know that, and it’s not enough for you anymore.

Most people would totally understand an 18-to-20-year-old Alaska kid taking off to see what else is out there in the world. What, we’re supposed to stop being interested in new experiences once we hit a certain age? And we’re expected to stick around someplace forever just because we’ve always been there?

It’s time for you to go. See what life feels like when you’re not scraping ice off your windshield in May. See how much fun you can have with new people in new places. It’s exciting, it’s living, and you deserve it.

[Wayne and Wanda: Is it the winter blues I can’t shake off, or something more?]

Advertisement

[Wayne and Wanda: Rebuilding my social life after a divorce]

[Wayne and Wanda: My relationship is poised for big steps, and I’m anxious]





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Here’s Why Alaska Air Shares Popped Higher This Week | The Motley Fool

Published

on

Here’s Why Alaska Air Shares Popped Higher This Week | The Motley Fool


Shares in Alaska Air Group (ALK 1.16%) rose by 12.7% in an excellent week for airline stocks. The move comes as the sector climbs a wall of worry driven by soaring jet fuel prices stemming from the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. While the market’s prior concerns are understandable, there’s growing anecdotal evidence suggesting that airlines, including Alaska Air, might emerge from the period in better shape than many expect.

This week’s airline updates

Southwest Airlines (LUV 0.83%) CEO Robert Jordan gave a presentation at the Bernstein 42nd Annual Strategic Decisions Conference, and his remarks surprised the market. It’s no secret that jet fuel prices have soared, and that’s challenging airlines’ profitability. Still, it doesn’t appear to have affected end demand, with Delta Air Lines previously telling investors that strong demand in the first quarter was continuing into the second quarter, even as it raised prices.

Today’s Change

(-1.16%) $-0.54

Advertisement

Current Price

$46.05

That positive trend, with Southwest’s Jordan telling investors that Southwest had participated in seven consecutive fare increases with “no drop off in demand at all.” Jordan went on to note that “I’m becoming increasingly bullish that we will be able to cover these fuel increases with revenue increases,” and also believes that “the industry will retain a much higher percent of the fare increases that would be typical historically.”

Advertisement

What it means to Alaska Air

Given that Alaska competes with Southwest on some routes and is suffering from rising jet fuel prices, the news from Southwest is particularly relevant. For example, in its recent first-quarter earnings report, Alaska’s management said higher fuel costs would impact earnings per share (EPS) by $0.70 in the first quarter and by more than $3 in the second quarter.

Air passengers.

Image source: Getty Images.

These are significant numbers from an airline that analysts expect to report a $0.77-per-share loss in 2026 and then $6.32 in EPS in 2027. However, if Alaska can offset fuel costs with higher prices, then those estimates might need a positive revision.

Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Alaska Air Group, Delta Air Lines, and Southwest Airlines. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

State of Alaska Secures Win in Fight for Transparency Around Oil Development

Published

on

State of Alaska Secures Win in Fight for Transparency Around Oil Development


 

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Image-SOM

(Bethel, AK) –Wednesday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a favorable opinion for the State of Alaska in ConocoPhillips Alaska v. Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC), agreeing that State laws requiring disclosure of oil well data are not preempted by federal law.

“Alaska relies heavily on our resources and resource development,” said Acting Alaska Attorney General Cori Mills. “We are also stewards of those resources for the citizens of Alaska. Alaska’s law both allows resource development now, and encourages further development and exploration in the future. We’re pleased that the Ninth Circuit recognized that federal law has not overridden Alaska’s balanced approach.”

The Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission regulates oil and gas operations throughout Alaska, including within the National Petroleum Reserve–Alaska (NPR–A). Under Alaska law, companies need permits from the AOGCC to drill and must submit well data. The AOGCC is required to keep well data confidential for 24 months.

Advertisement

ConocoPhillips drilled several wells on lease holdings within the NPR–A and submitted data to the AOGCC. When the 24-month period expired, the AOGCC notified ConocoPhillips of the upcoming well data disclosure. ConocoPhillips sued in federal court to stop the disclosure process claiming that the Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act, the federal law allowing private exploration in the NPR–A, preempted Alaska’s 24-month disclosure law. The federal district court found Alaska law preempted, and the AOGCC sought appellate review by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

On appeal, the Ninth Circuit agreed with the AOGCC. The federal Production Act does not preempt state law. The Ninth Circuit therefore reversed the district court’s holding to the contrary.

“The Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission is pleased with the court’s decision upholding Alaska law,” said AOGCC Commissioner Jessie Chmielowski in a declaration filed in the litigation court. “Alaska’s balanced approach to well data confidentiality leads to increased exploration activity, not less. Alaska law allows for a two-year confidentiality period on exploration well data to leverage a company’s investment in drilling. Thereafter, making the data public has incentivized exploration on the North Slope. Placing well data in the public record allows competing companies to evaluate different exploration concepts or interpretations based on seismic data that, without well data, are just educated guesses.”

# # #



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending