Connect with us

Alaska

Biden’s moves on Alaska drilling, TikTok test young voters

Published

on

Biden’s moves on Alaska drilling, TikTok test young voters


TEMPE, Ariz. — Latest strikes by President Joe Biden to stress TikTok over its Chinese language possession and approve oil drilling in an untapped space of Alaska are testing the loyalty of younger voters, a gaggle that’s largely been in his nook.

Youth turnout surged within the three elections since Donald Trump was elected president in 2016, serving to Biden eke out victories in swing states in 2020, decide up a Democratic Senate seat within the 2022 election and stem potential losses within the Home.

However the 80-year-old president has by no means been the favourite candidate of younger liberals itching for a brand new era of American management. As Biden gears up for an anticipated reelection marketing campaign, a possible TikTok ban and the Alaska drilling might weigh him down.

Advertisement

In the meantime, his plan to wipe out billions of {dollars} in scholar mortgage debt is in jeopardy on the Supreme Courtroom. The hassle, introduced shortly earlier than final yr’s midterms, was an try by Biden to maintain a promise he made after defeating progressive Sen. Bernie Sanders within the Democratic major marketing campaign in 2020.

The chance for Biden is much less that younger left-of-center voters will vote Republican and extra that they’d sit out an uninspiring election altogether.

“I’m a Democrat, however I’m not voting for Biden,” mentioned Mark Buehlmann, a 20-year-old Arizona State College scholar who mentioned he possible would abstain if Biden is the Democratic nominee, as anticipated. “He’s possibly able to doing an excellent job, however he’s not able to gathering the troops, rallying the individuals. Particularly the Democratic voter base. I don’t assume he’s a robust candidate.”

[Biden calls approval of Willow oil field, with environmental concessions, ‘a hell of a trade-off’]

TikTok permits customers, 150 million of whom are in america, to put up quick, inventive movies for buddies and strangers. Its algorithm has an uncanny potential to determine what pursuits its customers and serve up movies they’ll get pleasure from. It’s change into a supremely widespread — some say addictive — place for younger individuals to search out leisure and neighborhood.

Advertisement

Western governments are rising more and more anxious that TikTok’s proprietor, Beijing-based ByteDance, would possibly give shopping historical past or different knowledge about customers to China’s authorities or promote propaganda and disinformation. The U.S. and different nations have banned TikTok from government-owned units, as have a number of states.

The U.S. Committee on International Funding, a part of Biden’s Treasury Division, has threatened to ban TikTok if ByteDance doesn’t promote its stake within the app, in response to a Wall Road Journal report this month.

Trump tried to ban TikTok in 2020, however the transfer was blocked in court docket and later rescinded when Biden took workplace and ordered an in-depth examine of the problem.

[Skeptical US lawmakers question TikTok CEO over safety and content]

ByteDance says it’s working to handle safety issues and has plans to route site visitors via servers owned by Oracle, a Silicon Valley-based tech firm.

Advertisement

Biden administration officers insist that political issues aren’t weighing into the nationwide safety assessment underway, however they’re additionally not blind to it.

Each political events have reoriented round staking out more durable financial and safety positions on China’s rise, and Biden has come beneath growing stress from GOP lawmakers to take motion towards TikTok.

In a latest interview with Bloomberg, Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo provided hyperbolically, “The politician in me thinks you’re going to actually lose each voter beneath 35, without end.”

However it’s clear that the Biden White Home and his possible reelection marketing campaign are keenly conscious of the app’s huge home attain and demographic skew towards Democratic-leaning youthful voters.

Highlighting Biden’s balancing act, Rep. Jamaal Bowman, a progressive New York Democrat widespread on the left, held a information convention this previous week with TikTok creators who’ve constructed widespread and worthwhile channels on the social community “in help of free expression.”

Advertisement

Lawmakers grilled TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew for almost six hours Thursday over knowledge safety and dangerous content material. They responded skeptically throughout a tense Home committee listening to to his assurances that the app prioritizes person security and shouldn’t be banned attributable to its Chinese language connections.

“Let me state this unequivocally: ByteDance will not be an agent of China or every other nation,” Chew mentioned.

In interviews at Arizona State, one of many largest school campuses within the U.S. and a contributor to Biden’s slim 10,000-vote win within the swing state, younger individuals described a TikTok ban as someplace between an annoyance and an inevitability — however not one thing that might change their views of the president.

“Most individuals don’t actually take into consideration these sorts of issues,” Lucas Vittor, a 19-year-old enterprise administration scholar from Houston, mentioned of a TikTok ban. “I feel that they’ll in all probability simply see it as, ‘He’s an oppressive chief, an outdated dude, he doesn’t learn about social media.’”

If TikTok disappears, one other app will emerge to seize the eye of younger individuals, Vittor predicted. Different social media platforms, together with YouTube and Instagram, have integrated related algorithm-driven video options, although some discover them clunky in contrast with TikTok.

Advertisement

“It’s not likely Biden’s subject,” mentioned Ginny Xu, a 20-year-old chemical engineering scholar from Goodyear, Arizona. “It’s extra of a bipartisan factor — ‘security’ from China.”

Shedding entry to TikTok could be disappointing, Xu mentioned, however it wouldn’t dissuade her from voting for Biden if there’s no higher Democratic alternative.

Her buddy, 20-year-old chemical engineering scholar Maddie Bruce, agreed.

“I simply am not a giant Joe Biden fan,” Bruce mentioned. She would favor to see one other Democrat run, however she would nonetheless vote for Biden, she mentioned.

Forcing TikTok’s Chinese language dad or mum to promote its stake within the U.S. firm might present a handy center floor: minimizing the nationwide safety menace whereas avoiding gaining access to the app reduce off for tens of hundreds of thousands of customers.

Advertisement

The younger have by no means voted on the identical charges as their dad and mom and grandparents, however their participation has ticked up markedly for the reason that begin of the Trump presidency.

The 2018 and 2020 midterms introduced the best ranges of youth turnout of the previous three many years, in response to the Middle for Info & Analysis on Civic Studying and Engagement at Tufts College, which research younger voters.

And once they do vote, younger individuals vote overwhelmingly for Democrats.

Biden gained 63% of voters age 18 to 24, in contrast with 34% for Trump, in response to AP VoteCast, an expansive survey of the citizens. Republican Home candidates did higher with younger voters in final yr’s midterms, however Democrats nonetheless had a 14-percentage level benefit, successful voters 24 and youthful 54% to 40%.

“If Democrats are searching for their secret weapon, younger voters are it,” mentioned Jack Lobel, spokesperson for Voters of Tomorrow, which organizes younger voters on-line and in particular person. “For Democrats particularly, who have already got younger voters mainly on their facet, we’re the untapped potential that campaigns are searching for.”

Advertisement

A TikTok ban would possibly irritate a variety of younger voters, however Biden can level to a robust document of standing up for younger individuals’s pursuits, Lobel mentioned.

Biden has tried to supply aid from scholar mortgage debt and has advocated for abortion rights. He signed an enormous local weather spending invoice together with probably the most sweeping gun violence invoice in many years.

Marisol Ortega, a 21-year-old journalism scholar from Glendale, Arizona, mentioned lots of her friends are searching for somebody youthful and extra thrilling, even when they’ll possible maintain their nostril and vote for him.

“Joe Biden has been a reputation in American politics for a really, very very long time,” Ortega mentioned. “I feel individuals are simply form of prepared for one thing new.”

Nonetheless, the Biden administration irked environmentalists and younger individuals by approving the large Willow oil drilling undertaking on Alaska’s North Slope.

Advertisement

Younger activists have been significantly lively in pushing to drastically scale back oil drilling and transfer away from reliance fossil fuels. Earlier than the president’s resolution, a #StopWillow marketing campaign garnered hundreds of thousands of views on TikTok urging Biden to dam the undertaking.

“He has delivered lots for younger individuals, and that’s why our recommendation to the administration was, ‘This isn’t the precise course to go on this subject,’” mentioned Cristina Tzintzún Ramirez, president of NextGen America, a youth organizing group.

AP White Home Correspondent Zeke Miller in Washington contributed to this report.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Northern highlights: Alaska's energy, security policies are the guide feds need amid transition, group says

Published

on

Northern highlights: Alaska's energy, security policies are the guide feds need amid transition, group says


EXCLUSIVE: Private citizens — right up to the governor himself — are primed to be part of a new Alaskan initiative aimed at promoting policies that have been effective in Juneau at a national level as a new administration signals a willingness to listen and adapt to new strategies.

Just as Florida’s education policy under Gov. Jeb Bush served as a blueprint for national education reform, the nonprofit Future 49 aims to position Alaska as today’s model, focusing primarily on national security and energy.

Its top funders are a group of Alaskans of all stripes as well as a few Washington, D.C.-based advocates. It is nonpartisan and simply pro-Alaskan, according to one of its proponents.

It also seeks to dispatch with what one source familiar with its founding called the “out of sight, out of mind” feeling of some in the Lower 48 when it comes to how far-flung Alaska can translate its own successes in the cold north to a federal government that could benefit from its advice.

Advertisement

One of Future 49’s founders is a commercial airline pilot whose family has lived in Alaska for more than 125 years. He said he wanted to show Washington issues Alaska deals with every day.

AK GOV: BIDEN SEARCHING FOR OIL ANYWHERE BUT AT HOME

Anchorage skyline (Getty)

Bob Griffin’s family has lived in Alaska since 1899, he said, remarking he is an example of grassroots support behind showcasing Alaska’s potential to be the driving force in key sectors for the rest of the country.

Griffin said while there has not been any direct contact yet with the new administration, Gov. Mike Dunleavy is an ally of Trump’s and, in turn, primed to have a role in the group.

Advertisement

“We’re focused on not only the Trump administration, but other decision makers, to just highlight and advertise that the successes we’ve had in Alaska in energy, natural resources and other policy priorities are a good fit and benefit to all Americans.”

He noted the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge region spans the size of West Virginia, but the part of it federally budgeted for exploration in a recent fiscal year was only an area half the size of Ted Stevens International Airport in Anchorage, illustrating how Juneau must guide Washington.

FLASHBACK: ALASKAN F-35s PREPARE FOR MAJOR SUB-ZERO ARCTIC WARFARE

A source familiar with the founding of Future 49 told Fox News Digital how the group’s launch comes at a key juncture as one advice-averse administration transitions into one that has signaled its openness to undertake recommendations from states and local groups.

“The resources our nation needs to be energy-dominant are in Alaska, not in unfriendly nations like Russia and Iran who despise what we stand for and commit egregious environmental offenses on a daily basis,” the source said.

Advertisement

ALASKA OUTRAGED AT BIDEN OIL LEASE SALE SETUP BEING ‘FITTING FINALE’ FOR FOSSIL FUEL AVERSE PRESIDENCY

While the group is primed to express a pro-development approach to energy, it will remain nonpartisan and offer Washington successful strategies to develop both green and traditional energy based on work done in Alaska.

Dunleavy has offered a similarly two-fold approach, saying in a recent interview that opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to responsible development may yield just as much economic growth for the nation as emerging green technology, such as a proposal to harness the second-strongest tides in the world churning in Cook Inlet outside Anchorage.

Those parallels show why Future 49’s advent is coming at the right time, a source told Fox News Digital.

Future 49’s plan to use Alaska’s long-term goal to utilize its energy resources as a roadmap was a sentiment also voiced in another confirmation hearing Thursday. Interior nominee Doug Burgum highlighted the need for domestic “energy dominance” for both economic and security reasons.

Advertisement
doug burgum

Doug Burgum, the former governor of North Dakota and nominee for U.S. secretary of the interior, during a Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee confirmation hearing in Washington, D.C., Jan. 16, 2025.  (Al Drago)

With Russia having invaded Ukraine, Dunleavy said most sensitive national defense assets are housed in Alaska, so the state has a deep background in what is needed to deter malign actors.

“We’re very close to the bear,” he said.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Lessons learned from managing a National Guard force so closely tied to top-level national security concerns is another avenue Future 49 will likely seek to aid Washington in.

The group plans to commission a survey of Lower 48 Americans on their view of the Last Frontier and how they perceive Alaska from thousands of miles away, said Alaska pollster Matt Larkin.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

‘Prolonged’ internet outage in North Slope & Northwest: Quintillion blames optic cable break

Published

on

‘Prolonged’ internet outage in North Slope & Northwest: Quintillion blames optic cable break


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – The president of Quintilian blamed an optic cable break for a North Slope & Northwest Alaska internet outage that will take an undefined amount of time to fix.

“It appears there was a subsea fiber optic cable break near Oliktok Point, and the outage will be prolonged,” Quintillion President Michael “Mac” McHale said in a short statement provided by a company spokesperson. “We are working with our partners and customers on alternative solutions.”

The statement mirrored what the company released Saturday morning on social media.

So far, the company has not provided a specific timeline for the repair’s next steps.

Advertisement

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Opinion: Alaska’s court system has had solutions for expensive, unnecessary delays since 2009. What’s lacking is accountability.

Published

on

Opinion: Alaska’s court system has had solutions for expensive, unnecessary delays since 2009. What’s lacking is accountability.


As a former prosecutor, I was shocked and saddened to read reporter Kyle Hopkins’ recent reporting in the Anchorage Daily News and ProPublica on pervasive, unconstitutional, heartbreaking delays of violent felony cases. Judges granting continuances 50 to 70 times over seven to 10 years — with “typically” no opposition from the prosecution, and no mention of the victims. Victims and their families suffering years before the closure that a trial can bring, some even dying during the delays.

Hopkins’ reporting is recent. The problem isn’t. The Office of Victims’ Rights (OVR) has been covering delays for years in annual reports to the Legislature, beginning in 2014. In 2018, after monitoring nearly 200 cases, OVR said judges were mostly to blame.

Other causes have been noted: understaffed public defender and prosecutor offices; the incentive for defendants to delay because witnesses’ memories fade. But in 2019, OVR said, “It is up to the judges to control the docket, to adhere to standing court orders, to follow the law and to protect victims’ rights as well as defendants’ rights.”

Advertisement

In 1994, 86% of Alaskans who voted supported a crime victims’ rights ballot. That overwhelming mandate was enshrined in our state constitution. It includes victims’ “right to timely disposition of the case.” For years, Anchorage Superior Court judges have ignored this right.

After reading the recent coverage, I began searching. Maybe other jurisdictions had found solutions to similar delays. What I discovered shocked me even more.

In 2008, a working group co-chaired by an Alaska Supreme Court justice determined the average time to disposition for felony cases in Anchorage had nearly quadrupled. “This finding amounted to a ‘call to arms’ for improvements …(.)”

In November 2008, the state paid to send three judges, two court personnel, the Anchorage district attorney, the deputy attorney general and three public defenders to a workshop in Arizona about causes of delays, and solutions. David Steelman was a presenter. He worked with the Alaska group in Phoenix and Anchorage. That work resulted in a 59-page report dated March 2009.

I found Steelman’s report online (“Improving Criminal Caseflow Management in the Alaska Superior Court in Anchorage”). His findings are revealing.

Advertisement

Delays resulted from informal attitudes, concerns and practices of the court, prosecutors and public defense lawyers. To change this “culture of continuances,” it was critical the court exercise leadership and the attorneys commit to change. Judges and the public-sector lawyers must recognize they were all responsible for making prudent use of the finite resources provided by taxpayers. Unnecessary delays wasted resources.

Steelman recommended the judges and lawyers agree to individual performance measurements, and the court engage in ongoing evaluation of his Caseflow Improvement Plan. The plan included a “Continuance Policy for Anchorage Felony Cases.”

I found an unsigned Anchorage court order dated May 1, 2009. It included Steelman’s Continuance Policy recommendation that the court log every requested continuance in the court file, name the party requesting it, the reasons given, whether the continuance was granted, and the delay incurred if it was granted.

More telling, it omitted Steelman’s recommendation that, “Every six months, the chief criminal judge shall report to the Presiding Judge on the number of continuances requested and granted during the previous period(.)”

That provision might have ensured accountability.

Advertisement

After years of only bad news, in 2018, OVR reported a glimmer of “good news” — a pre-trial delay working group was formed by Anchorage Presiding Judge Morse and the court system. In September 2018, Judge Morse issued a Felony Pre-Trial Order. Its goals included reducing delays of felony case dispositions and minimizing the number of calendaring hearings. (Sound familiar?)

But, OVR added, “The real test will be whether judges will hold to the new plan and hold parties accountable for delays. The jury is out on whether the will to change is actually present, but the court ultimately will be responsible for improving this problem unless the legislature steps in and passes new laws to resolve this continuing violation of victims’ rights.”

The jury has been out since 2009. The court failed that test. Based on the ADN/ProPublica reporting, the court failed the test of 2018. Things are worse than ever.

And the court’s response? A spokesperson told Kyle Hopkins there was “new” training for judges on managing case flows, as well as an Anchorage presiding judge’s order limiting when postponements may be used. (Sound familiar?)

I also reached out to the court. I requested documentation of this “new” training and a copy of the latest order. I also asked about the unsigned May 2009 court order. I’ve received no response. Similarly, when Hopkins reached out to Anchorage Superior Court judges, none of the criminal docket judges responded directly.

Advertisement

There are two things courts and judges will respond to: their budget and retention elections.

First, the Alaska Senate and House Judiciary and Finance Committees should hold the court system accountable for its proposed budget. Require it to cost out delays from past years. According to a 2011 report by Steelman, just two Anchorage cases (each with over 70 scheduling hearings), “(M)ay have cost the State of Alaska the full-time equivalent of an extra prosecutor or public defender attorney.”

The court system has proven, since 2008, it can’t be trusted to not waste money on unnecessary delays. It must finally be held accountable by the Legislature.

Second, retention elections. Superior Court judges are appointed by the governor, but they must stand election for retention by the voters every six years. The Alaska Judicial Council evaluates each judge before their election and makes that information public. The council incorporates surveys of attorneys, law enforcement, child services professionals, court employees and jurors.

The Judicial Council does not survey victims, or those who assist them, such as OVR or Victims for Justice. It should. Other than the defendant, victims are the only ones with a constitutional right to a speedy trial. That right is being ignored by judges. Alaska voters who issued a mandate should know which judges are ignoring it.

Advertisement

Val Van Brocklin is a former state and federal prosecutor in Alaska who now trains and writes on criminal justice topics nationwide.

The views expressed here are the writer’s and are not necessarily endorsed by the Anchorage Daily News, which welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending