Alaska
Arctic rivers face big changes with warming climate, permafrost thaw and accelerating water cycle • Alaska Beacon
As the Arctic warms, its mighty rivers are changing in ways that could have vast consequences – not only for the Arctic region but for the world.
Rivers represent the land branch of the earth’s hydrological cycle. As rain and snow fall, rivers transport freshwater runoff along with dissolved organic and particulate materials, including carbon, to coastal areas. With the Arctic now warming nearly four times faster than the rest of the world, the region is seeing more precipitation and the permafrost is thawing, leading to stronger river flows.
(NOAA Arctic Report Card image)
We’re climate scientists who study how warming is influencing the water cycle and ecosystems. In a new study using historical data and sophisticated computer models of Earth’s climate and hydrology, we explored how climate change is altering Arctic rivers.
We found that thawing permafrost and intensifying storms will change how water moves into and through Arctic rivers. These changes will affect coastal regions, the Arctic Ocean and, potentially, the North Atlantic, as well as the climate.
Thawing permafrost: Big changes in Arctic soils
Permafrost thaw is one of the most consequential changes that the Arctic is experiencing as temperatures rise.
Permafrost is soil that has been frozen for at least two years and often for millennia. It covers approximately 8.8 million square miles (about 22.8 million square kilometers) in Earth’s Northern Hemisphere, but that area is shrinking as the permafrost thaws.

(Photo by Brandt Meixell/USGS)
Historically, most water going into Arctic rivers flows atop frozen permafrost soils in spring. Scientists call this “overland runoff.”
However, our results suggest that as warming continues, an increasing fraction of annual river flow will come from under the surface, through thawed soils in the degrading permafrost. As the overall flow increases with more precipitation, as much as 30% more of it could be moving underground by the end of this century as subsurface pathways expand.
When water flows through soil, it picks up different chemicals and metals. As a result, water coming into rivers will likely have a different chemical character. For example, it may carry more nutrients and dissolved carbon that can affect coastal zones and the global climate. The fate of that mobilized carbon is an active area of study.
More carbon in river water could end up “outgassed” upon reaching placid coastal waters, increasing the amount of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere, which further drives climate warming. The thaw is also revealing other nasty surprises, such as the emergence of long-frozen viruses.
More rain and snow, more runoff
The Arctic’s water cycle is also ramping up as temperatures rise, meaning more precipitation, evaporation, plant transpiration and river discharge. This is primarily due to a warmer atmosphere’s inherent ability to hold more moisture. It’s the same reason that bigger snowstorms are occurring as the climate warms.
Our study found that the bulk of the additional precipitation will occur across far northern parts of the Arctic basin. As sea ice disappears in a warming climate, computer models agree that a more open Arctic Ocean will feed more water to the atmosphere, where it will be transported to adjacent land areas to fall as precipitation.

(Rawlins and Karmalkar, 2024, image)
More snow in northern Alaska, Siberia and Canada will lead to more water flowing in rivers, potentially up to 25% more under a high-warming scenario based on our research. There is more carbon in the soil in northern parts of the Arctic compared with the south. With permafrost thaw, those regions will also see more water coming into rivers from below the surface, where additional soil carbon can leach into the water and become dissolved organic carbon.
More old carbon is already showing up in samples gathered from Arctic rivers, attributed to permafrost thaw. Carbon dating shows that some of this carbon has been frozen for thousands of years.
Impacts will cascade through Arctic ecosystems
So, what does the future hold?
One of the most notable changes expected involves the transport of fresh water and associated materials, such as dissolved organic carbon and heat energy, to Arctic coastal zones.

Coastal lagoons may become fresher. This change would affect organisms up and down the food chain, though our current understanding of the potential affects of changes in fresh water and dissolved organic carbon is still murky.
River water will also be warmer as the climate heats up and has the potential to melt coastal sea ice earlier in the season. Scientists observed this in spring 2023, when unusually warm water in Canada’s Mackenzie River carried heat to the Beaufort Sea, contributing to early coastal sea ice melting.

Finally, more river water reaching the coast has the potential to freshen the Arctic Ocean, particularly along northern Eurasia, where big Russian rivers export massive amounts of fresh water each year.
There are concerns that rising river flows in that region are influencing the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, the currents that circulate heat from the tropics, up along the U.S. East Coast and toward Europe. Evidence is mounting that these currents have been slowing in recent years as more fresh water enters the North Atlantic. If the circulation shuts down, it would significantly affect temperatures across North America and Europe.
At the coast, changing river flows will also affect the plants, animals and Indigenous populations that call the region home. For them and for the global climate, our study’s findings highlight the need to closely watch how the Arctic is being transformed and take steps to mitigate the effects.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Alaska
I Took My First Alaskan Cruise—Here Are 7 Packing Mistakes You Should Avoid, and What to Bring Instead From $8
Alaska
For 70 years, they were believed to be mammoths… but no, they were whales. Two “megafauna” vertebrae in Alaska have been relabeled, and history is changing in 2026
For more than 70 years, two heavy fossil vertebrae in a museum drawer in interior Alaska were proudly labeled as woolly mammoth. New tests now show they belong to whales instead, forcing scientists to rethink a small but eye-catching piece of the mammoth extinction story.
The bones were collected in the 1950s near Dome Creek, north of Fairbanks, roughly 400 kilometers, or about 250 miles, from the nearest coastline.
Learning that these fossils came from ocean animals has raised a basic question that would puzzle any road trip planner looking at a map of Alaska today; how did whale bones end up so far inland?
From field discovery to museum drawer
In the early 1950s, naturalist Otto Geist found the vertebrae while working in gold mines near Dome Creek and sent them to the University of Alaska Museum of the North. Curators cataloged the round bone disks as mammoth remains, based on their appearance and the well-known presence of Ice Age giants in the region.
For decades, the fossils rested out of sight in collection drawers while visitors focused on full skeletons and tusks under bright gallery lights. It is the kind of small label most museum goers accept without a second thought as they stroll past the glass cases.
Radiocarbon dates that broke the mammoth timeline
That quiet routine changed when the Adopt a Mammoth project invited members of the public to sponsor radiocarbon dating of stored specimens, including these two vertebrae. When a team led by Matthew Wooller at University of Alaska Fairbanks checked the results, the dates came back between roughly 1,900 and 2,700 years old.
Those numbers created a serious mismatch, since woolly mammoths on mainland Alaska are thought to have disappeared around 13,000 years ago. If the dates had truly belonged to mammoths, the bones would have represented the youngest known fossils of the species in this part of the world by many thousands of years.
At first, researchers considered the possibility of a technical error in the dating process. The more they studied the data, though, the more it looked as if “something was amiss” with the old mammoth label rather than with the lab work itself.
Isotopes and DNA reveal two ancient whales
The team then measured stable isotopes of nitrogen and carbon in the bone material to see what kind of food the animals once ate. The chemical pattern matched marine food webs rather than the grasses and shrubs a grazing mammoth would have relied on, a red flag that pointed toward the ocean.
That clue pushed the scientists to extract fragments of ancient DNA from the fossils. Genetic tests showed that one vertebra came from a common minke whale and the other from a North Pacific right whale, both large whales that normally spend their lives in saltwater.
Knowing the bones came from whales also meant the radiocarbon ages needed a correction, since ocean animals can appear older on paper because of the way carbon cycles through seawater. After adjusting for this marine effect, the team estimates that the whales lived roughly 1,100 and 1,800 years ago, long after mammoths had vanished from the mainland.
A whale mystery in the middle of Alaska
One puzzle remains, and it is the part that keeps the story from feeling too tidy. Dome Creek sits about 400 kilometers from the coast on a small stream that today could barely float a fishing raft, which makes the idea of a whale swimming there hard to picture.
The study outlines several possibilities, including whales that traveled far inland along major rivers and died there, or bones that ancient people carried from the shore to use as tools or building material. The authors point out that both ideas have practical limits, especially for a massive right whale that feeds on plankton not found in rivers.
For the most part, the simplest explanation may be a human one rather than a natural one, a basic cataloging mistake when the fossils entered the collection, since Geist gathered bones from both inland and coastal sites and the wrong box may have been marked with the Fairbanks location.
In everyday terms, it is a reminder that even expert labels can age badly and that revisiting old collections with new tools can flip a neat story on its head.
The official study has been published in the Journal of Quaternary Science.
Alaska
Police looking for man considered ‘armed and dangerous’
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – The Anchorage Police Department is looking for help finding 61-year-old Mathew Thomas Becker.
If you see him, “do not attempt contact with him,” APD said.
Instead, call 911 to report his location.
“He is considered armed and dangerous,” APD said.
See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com
Copyright 2026 KTUU. All rights reserved.
-
Oklahoma1 week ago
OSSAA unveils Class 6A-2A basketball state tournament brackets, schedule
-
Oklahoma2 days agoFamily rallies around Oklahoma father after head-on crash
-
Michigan1 week agoOperation BBQ Relief helping with Southwest Michigan tornado recovery
-
Southeast7 days ago‘90 Day Fiancé’ alum’s boyfriend on trial for attempted murder over wild ‘Boca Bash’ accusations
-
Health1 week agoAncient herb known as ‘nature’s Valium’ touted for improving sleep and anxiety
-
Nebraska4 days agoWildfire forces immediate evacuation order for Farnam residents
-
Business1 week agoCommentary: In two new court cases, judges find that AI does not have human intelligence
-
Technology1 week agoTime’s running out to get a free gift card when you preorder a new MacBook