Connect with us

Alaska

Alaska Supreme Court to hear arguments in fight to unlock Hilcorp data kept secret during $5.6B purchase of BP assets

Published

on

Alaska Supreme Court to hear arguments in fight to unlock Hilcorp data kept secret during .6B purchase of BP assets


The state Supreme Court on Tuesday will hear oral arguments in a case that could force oil company Hilcorp to release financial information that it was allowed to keep secret when it acquired BP’s Alaska assets for $5.6 billion in 2020.

The city of Valdez brought the case, represented by Robin Brena, a longtime oil and gas attorney in Alaska. Valdez is challenging a decision by the Regulatory Commission of Alaska permitting the company to keep its financial statements out of the public eye.

The state agency made the decision in 2020, as it approved the transfer of regulatory approvals related to BP’s interest in the trans-Alaska pipeline system to a Hilcorp affiliate, Harvest Alaska, as part of the blockbuster deal. The transfer drew wide public interest, generating more than 300 comments.

Advertisement

Valdez, home to Valdez Marine Terminal, where North Slope oil is loaded onto ocean-going tankers, and near the location of the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill, does not want undo the transaction, according to its 80-page brief.

It wants the information released in part to determine Hilcorp’s financial fitness to safely operate the oil field infrastructure, it argues. Concerns include Hilcorp’s responsibility for the eventual dismantling, removal and cleanup of its operations.

Among other goals, Valdez also seeks “to clarify and add conditions to the transaction to provide ongoing financial transparency and greater protection of the public interest.”

The Regulatory Commission of Alaska, in its 60-page brief, argues that the city did not properly challenge its decision approving confidentiality for Hilcorp, an argument the city denies. The commission says Valdez has no standing to pursue the case, and the Supreme Court should affirm the decision by the Superior Court dismissing the case in 2021.

[Report says safety culture at Valdez Marine Terminal presents ‘unacceptable’ risk]

Advertisement

“Valdez expressed concern about the transaction, but it never filed a protest or sought to intervene,” the commission’s brief asserts.

Privately owned Hilcorp, based in Houston, Texas, operates the Prudhoe Bay oil field, where more than half the oil in Alaska is produced. It holds the largest stake in the trans-Alaska pipeline, at 49%.

Hilcorp and its affiliated companies, and BP, are defendants in the case alongside the state regulatory agency.

Steven Jones, a spokesperson with the Regulatory Commission of Alaska, said the agency would not publicly comment while the case is underway.

Valdez asserts in its brief that the five-member commission produced an “extreme interpretation” of Alaska law to support Hilcorp’s confidentiality request, one with far-reaching implications that would broadly limit public disclosure.

Advertisement

The commission’s “unconstitutional” interpretation of the statute “eliminates the rights of all Alaskans to review virtually every public document relating to the state regulation of pipelines in Alaska as well as the rights of our courts to meaningfully judicially review the final orders of the RCA relating to those pipelines,” the city argues.

“No Alaskan who has lived through the consequences of the Exxon Valdez oil spill may doubt whether Valdez, and all Alaskans, should have access to the core financial information necessary to meaningfully comment on whether (the pipeline) is being operated by owners who are fit, willing, and able to safely operate (it),” the city argues.

In an emailed statement, Brena said the “issue before the Supreme Court is whether Alaskans have the constitutional right to meaningfully participate in administrative proceedings and judicial appeals that shape the future of Alaska.”

The commission argues in its brief that Valdez did not exhaust all potential administrative challenges at the regulatory commission before turning to the court. It says Valdez could have a chance to privately access the financial information, but did not attempt to do so.

It asserts that the case is moot, in part because the Regulatory Commission of Alaska approved the pipeline transfer and the transaction has closed, after Valdez did not take timely and proper steps to stop the process.

Advertisement

It says Valdez had no direct interest in the transaction and suffered no harm from the confidentiality decisions.

A spokesman for Hilcorp did not immediately provide comment.

Confidentiality provisions exist to protect businesses across many industries from having to publicly disclose information that can harm their competitive advantage, said Kara Moriarity, head of the Alaska Oil and Gas Association, a trade group for the oil industry.

“It’s important for any industry in Alaska doing business to maintain a level of confidentiality,” she said.

Hilcorp provided the financial information to the agency, which was able to view it before approving the transfer of assets, Moriarty said.

Advertisement

The court will decide if the agency made the right decision, or not, she said.

[ConocoPhillips will develop new field, adding 20,000 barrels of oil daily in Alaska]

The hearing will be held at the Boney Courthouse in downtown Anchorage Tuesday at 1:30 p.m. Both sides will have one hour to present their arguments. The hearing will be available online at KTOO.

The consumer advocacy organization, Alaska Public Interest Research Group, as well as Fairbanks Climate Action Coalition, plan to rally outside the courtroom. The groups, which are not part of the case, are pointing to Hilcorp’s track record of spills and safety violations to argue that the public needs to have access to the financial data.

They’re also asking citizens to “respectfully” listen to the arguments to show the Supreme Court that Alaskans are concerned about the issue, said Phil Wight, a policy analyst with AKPIRG.

Advertisement

“The fact we can’t see their basic finances matters because we have no assurances they have the capital or wherewithal to clean up a major oil spill,” Wight said.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Alaska governor, ally of Trump, will keep flags at full-staff for Inauguration Day • Alaska Beacon

Published

on

Alaska governor, ally of Trump, will keep flags at full-staff for Inauguration Day • Alaska Beacon


Alaska will join several other Republican-led states by keeping flags at full-staff on Inauguration Day despite the national period of mourning following President Jimmy Carter’s death last month.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy announced his decision, which breaks prior precedent, in a statement on Thursday. It applies only to flags on state property. Flags on federal property are expected to remain at half-staff.

Flags on state property will be returned to half-staff after Inauguration Day for the remainder of the mourning period.

The governors of Indiana, Idaho, Iowa, Texas, Florida, Tennessee, Oklahoma, North Dakota, Nebraska, Montana and Alabama, among others, have announced similar moves. 

Advertisement

U.S. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, a Republican from Louisiana, said on Tuesday that flags at the U.S. Capitol would remain at full-staff on Inauguration Day. 

Their actions follow a statement from President-elect Donald Trump, who said in a Jan. 3 social media post that Democrats would be “giddy” to have flags lowered during his inauguration, adding, “Nobody wants to see this, and no American can be happy about it. Let’s see how it plays out.”

Dunleavy is seen as a friend of the incoming president and has met with him multiple times over the past year. Dunleavy and 21 other Republican governors visited Trump last week in Florida at an event that Trump described as “a love fest.”

Since 1954, flags have been lowered to half-staff during a federally prescribed 30-day mourning period following presidential deaths. In 1973, the second inauguration of President Richard Nixon took place during the mourning period that followed the death of President Harry Truman. 

Then-Gov. Bill Egan made no exceptions for Alaska, contemporary news accounts show, and no exception was made for Nixon’s inauguration in Washington, D.C., either. 

Advertisement

A spokesperson for Dunleavy’s office said the new precedent is designed to be a balance between honoring the ongoing mourning period for former President Jimmy Carter and recognizing the importance of the peaceful transition of power during the presidential inauguration. 

“Temporarily raising the flags to full-staff for the inauguration underscores the significance of this democratic tradition, while returning them to half-staff afterward ensures continued respect for President Carter’s legacy,” the spokesperson said.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Federal disaster declaration approved for Northwest Alaska flooding

Published

on

Federal disaster declaration approved for Northwest Alaska flooding


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – President Joe Biden announced the approval of federal disaster assistance on Thursday for recovery efforts in areas that sustained damage from flooding and storms in October 2024.

Those areas include the Bering Strait Regional Educational Attendance Area (REAA) and the Northwest Arctic Borough area where many structures were damaged by a severe storm from Oct. 20-23, 2024.

Jerry Jones and his two children were rescued Wednesday after being stranded overnight on the roof of their flooded cabin about 15 miles north of Kotzebue during a large storm impacting Western Alaska.(Courtesy of Jerry Jones)
Kotzebue Flooding
Kotzebue Flooding(Michelle Kubalack)

In a press release, FEMA announced that federal funding is available on a cost-sharing basis for emergency work to the state of Alaska, tribal and eligible local governments, and certain private nonprofit organizations.

The announcement comes just a few days after Biden released the major disaster declaration approval for the August Kwigillingok flooding.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Arctic hotspots study reveals areas of climate stress in Northern Alaska and Siberia

Published

on

Arctic hotspots study reveals areas of climate stress in Northern Alaska and Siberia


Map of areas that experienced ecosystem climate stress in the Arctic-boreal region between 1997-2020 as detected by multiple variables including satellite data and long-term temperature records. Watts et al., 2025, Geophysical Research Letters. Credit: Christina Shintani / Woodwell Climate Research Center

Ecological warning lights have blinked on across the Arctic over the last 40 years, according to new research, and many of the fastest-changing areas are clustered in Siberia, the Canadian Northwest Territories, and Alaska.

An analysis of the rapidly warming Arctic-boreal region, published in Geophysical Research Letters, provides a zoomed-in picture of ecosystems experiencing some of the fastest and most extreme climate changes on Earth.

Many of the most climate-stressed areas feature permafrost, or ground that stays frozen year-round, and has experienced both severe warming and drying in recent decades.

Advertisement

To identify these “hotspots,” a team of researchers from Woodwell Climate Research Center, the University of Oslo, the University of Montana, the Environmental Systems Research Institute (Esri), and the University of Lleida used more than 30 years of geospatial data and long-term temperature records to assess indicators of ecosystem vulnerability in three categories: temperature, moisture, and vegetation.

Building on assessments like the NOAA Arctic Report Card, the research team went beyond evaluating isolated metrics of change and looked at multiple variables at once to create a more complete, integrated picture of climate and ecosystem changes in the region.

“Climate warming has put a great deal of stress on ecosystems in the high latitudes, but the stress looks very different from place to place and we wanted to quantify those differences,” said Dr. Jennifer Watts, Arctic program director at Woodwell Climate and lead author of the study.

“Detecting hotspots at the local and regional level helps us not only to build a more precise picture of how Arctic warming is affecting ecosystems, but to identify places where we really need to focus future monitoring efforts and management resources.”

The team used spatial statistics to detect “neighborhoods,” or regions of particularly high levels of change during the past decade.

Advertisement

“This study is exactly why we have developed these kinds of spatial statistic tools in our technology. We are so proud to be working closely with Woodwell Climate on identifying and publishing these kinds of vulnerability hotspots that require effective and immediate climate adaptation action and long-term policy,” said Dr. Dawn Wright, chief scientist at Esri. “This is essentially what we mean by the ‘Science of Where.’”

The findings paint a complex and concerning picture.

The most substantial land warming between 1997–2020 occurred in the far eastern Siberian tundra and throughout central Siberia. Approximately 99% of the Eurasian tundra region experienced significant warming, compared to 72% of Eurasian boreal forests.

While some hotspots in Siberia and the Northwest Territories of Canada grew drier, the researchers detected increased surface water and flooding in parts of North America, including Alaska’s Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta and central Canada. These increases in water on the landscape over time are likely a sign of thawing permafrost.

  • Arctic hotspots study reveals areas of climate stress in Northern Alaska, Siberia
    Warming severity “hotspots” in Arctic-boreal region between 1997-2020 were detected by analyzing multiple variables including satellite imagery and long-term temperature records. Watts et al., 2025, Geophysical Research Letters. Credit: Christina Shintani / Woodwell Climate Research Center
  • Arctic hotspots study reveals areas of climate stress in Northern Alaska, Siberia
    Map of areas of severe to extremely severe drying in the Arctic-boreal region. Drying severity was determined by analyzing multiple variables from the satellite record. Watts et al., 2025, Geophysical Research Letters. Credit: Christina Shintani / Woodwell Climate Research Center
  • Arctic hotspots study reveals areas of climate stress in Northern Alaska, Siberia
    Map of areas that experienced vegetation climate stress in the Arctic-boreal region between 1997-2020 as detected by multiple variables from the satellite record. Watts et al., 2025, Geophysical Research Letters. Credit: Christina Shintani / Woodwell Climate Research Center

Among the 20 most vulnerable places the researchers identified, all contained permafrost.

“The Arctic and boreal regions are made up of diverse ecosystems, and this study reveals some of the complex ways they are responding to climate warming,” said Dr. Sue Natali, lead of the Permafrost Pathways project at Woodwell Climate and co-author of the study.

Advertisement

“However, permafrost was a common denominator—the most climate-stressed regions all contained permafrost, which is vulnerable to thaw as temperatures rise. That’s a really concerning signal.”

For land managers and other decisionmakers, local and regional hotspot mapping like this can serve as a more useful monitoring tool than region-wide averages. Take, for instance, the example of COVID-19 tracking data: maps of county-by-county wastewater data tend to be more helpful tools to guide decision making than national averages, since rates of disease prevalence and transmission can vary widely among communities at a given moment in time.

So, too, with climate trends: local data and trend detection can support management and adaptation approaches that account for unique and shifting conditions on the ground.

The significant changes the team detected in the Siberian boreal forest region should serve as a wakeup call, said Watts.

Advertisement

“These forested regions, which have been helping take up and store carbon dioxide, are now showing major climate stresses and increasing risk of fire. We need to work as a global community to protect these important and vulnerable boreal ecosystems, while also reining in fossil fuel emissions.”

More information:
Regional Hotspots of Change in Northern High Latitudes Informed by Observations From Space, Geophysical Research Letters (2025). DOI: 10.1029/2023GL108081

Provided by
Woodwell Climate Research Center

Advertisement

Citation:
Arctic hotspots study reveals areas of climate stress in Northern Alaska and Siberia (2025, January 16)
retrieved 16 January 2025
from https://phys.org/news/2025-01-arctic-hotspots-reveals-areas-climate.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending