Connect with us

Alaska

Alaska legislators propose bills to reject their own pay raises

Published

on

Alaska legislators propose bills to reject their own pay raises


The Alaska Home and Senate are divided on whether or not lawmakers ought to obtain a 67% pay elevate, alongside a roughly 20% elevate for the governor and his cupboard.

A number of lawmakers launched or signaled their assist on Wednesday for payments that will reject the pay will increase proposed by an unbiased compensation fee whose course of some lawmakers known as “flawed” and “clumsy,” whilst Senate majority members continued to defend the fee’s suggestions.

Members of the Home minority, the Home majority and the Senate minority all mentioned they’d introduce laws to nullify the wage advice, which might elevate lawmaker salaries from $50,400 to $84,000 whereas additionally elevating division commissioner salaries from $140,000 to $168,000 and the governor’s pay from $145,000 to $176,000.

Advertisement

Some lawmakers known as for the wage will increase to be rejected after the unbiased fee answerable for recommending wage modifications for legislators and state executives final week abruptly amended its unique suggestions to incorporate the steep pay elevate for lawmakers.

The amended suggestions have been adopted in a 15-minute assembly in spite of everything 5 members of the fee have been appointed by Gov. Mike Dunleavy, days after the earlier commissioners both resigned or have been eliminated by Dunleavy.

Dunleavy appointed an all-new fee after lawmakers had voted unanimously earlier this month to reject suggestions by the earlier commissioners that included pay raises for the governor and his cupboard, however not for legislators.

The fee final week amended these suggestions to lift legislator salaries with out first notifying the general public that they deliberate to take action or accepting public testimony on the plan as required underneath state statute. Dunleavy then vetoed the invoice rejecting the fee’s suggestions on Monday.

However even lawmakers who in precept agree with the necessity to improve their very own pay mentioned that the truncated public course of, mixed with new income projections launched Tuesday that indicated the state would have tons of of hundreds of thousands of {dollars} lower than beforehand predicted, pushed many Home members and two Senate members to name for the fee’s suggestions to once more be rejected.

Advertisement

A request by Home Speaker Cathy Tilton, R-Wasilla, to name a joint session to override the governor’s veto of the disapproval invoice was declined by Senate President Gary Stevens, R-Kodiak, who later mentioned he thinks the wage improve is “an excellent factor to do.”

“Some folks might not, they usually can discover methods to not settle for it in the event that they select to not. However for many of us, I believe it’s fairly costly to be right here and $50,000 a yr was kind of unfair to me,” mentioned Stevens.

An effort to drive a joint session failed within the Senate on a 16-2 vote, with solely Sen. Shelley Hughes, R-Wasilla, and Sen. Robb Myers, R-North Pole — two of the three Senate members who should not a part of the 17-member bipartisan majority — voting in favor of the joint session. An effort within the Home to drive a joint session additionally failed.

Below state regulation, the fee’s suggestions change into regulation after 60 days except the Legislature votes to reject them. Authorized advisers to the Legislature have interpreted that regulation to imply that the Home and Senate can reject the amended suggestions by passing a brand new invoice.

‘Probably the most urgent concern’

Home minority members mentioned Wednesday they’re drafting a invoice that will just do that, along with directing the Division of Administration to expedite research into the salaries and advantages of different state staff, in response to the state’s reported challenges in recruiting and retaining staff.

Advertisement

Rep. Donna Mears, D-Anchorage, who’s co-sponsoring the laws, mentioned that as an alternative of contemplating the pay for legislators and high-level executives, the main focus must be on lecturers, coverage and different state staff.

“Probably the most urgent concern dealing with our state shouldn’t be rising legislative pay,” mentioned Rep. Maxine Dibert, D-Fairbanks, one other sponsor of the laws.

Tilton mentioned the bulk would have its personal laws to reject the fee’s suggestions.

Even when the Home is ready to go laws to reject the wage suggestions, Senate leaders have indicated that they assist the pay will increase and are unlikely to go a measure disapproving of them.

Hughes and Myers — the 2 minority senators — launched laws to reject the suggestions nonetheless. Their invoice would additionally make it potential for lawmakers to obtain their complete annual wage through the first 5 months of the yr, in an effort to accommodate lawmakers who lose their common earnings through the months when the Legislature is in session, starting in January and stretching by way of spring.

Advertisement

“Not solely is the compensation fee course of flawed and fraught with conflict-of-interest points resulting from legislators having the facility to present themselves a elevate by passively accepting the report, however such a big elevate when we’ve an incredible shortfall is unwarranted on this fiscal local weather,” Hughes mentioned in a ready assertion.

Myers works as a truck driver when the Legislature shouldn’t be in session and has advocated for lawmaker compensation to be made accessible to legislators in a bulk sum whereas the Legislature is in session, to make up for misplaced pay throughout these months.

Their invoice was referred to the Senate Finance Committee, the place it might get a listening to however was unlikely to have a good response by committee chairs who’ve already signaled their assist for the fee’s suggestions.

‘With a hacksaw’

After the Senate rejected the decision for a vote to override the governor’s veto, Home leaders proposed a nonbinding decision, known as a “sense of the Home,” to symbolically sign the chamber’s disapproval of the salaries.

“The Home finds that the method undertaken by the state officers’ compensation fee was flawed in adopting an modification to their unique report and with the spring income forecast predicting a deficit of over $900 million for this and the following fiscal yr, pay raises should not justified or warranted,” the sense of the Home learn.

Advertisement

However then Rep. Dan Ortiz, I-Ketchikan, proposed an modification to the measure that will have deleted most of its language, together with the road stating that “pay raises should not justified or warranted.” That modification was finally adopted in a 25-14 vote. All 14 lawmakers who opposed it have been Republicans.

“Clearly, what’s taken place over the past week has been a considerably clumsy course of and there’s issues on the very least with it,” mentioned Minority Chief Rep. Calvin Schrage, I-Anchorage, defending the modification. With out the modification, Schrage mentioned, the measure would have carried out “what must be carried out with a scalpel — with a hacksaw.”

“I do know that personally, there are elements of the compensation fee report which I agree with,” mentioned Schrage, referring particularly to the necessity for larger salaries for division executives to draw certified candidates.

“What we’re actually united in disagreeing with is the method by which the compensation report was amended and delivered to this physique,” mentioned Schrage.

However the Home by no means bought to vote on the measure. Home Guidelines Chair Craig Johnson, R-Anchorage, withdrew it earlier than a last vote, saying later that it was “gutted” by Ortiz’s modification.

Advertisement

Rep. Zack Fields, D-Anchorage, known as the back-and-forth between the Home and Senate on the potential joint session “political theater.”

“It could have simply led to this contentious course of that finally would have modified nothing,” mentioned Fields.

Fields, who’s one in every of a handful of lawmakers with younger kids, mentioned that finally, larger salaries for legislators are wanted to draw working-class folks to the Legislature.

“I believe there are 4 of us with younger children within the Home, and each single one in every of us is on the higher finish of earnings distribution. We aren’t consultant of Alaskans, and that’s as a result of a working-class individual can’t assist their household doing this job and that’s not truthful to Alaskans,” mentioned Fields. “On the substance, I assist the suggestions. The method was a catastrophe.”

Iris Samuels reported from Anchorage and Sean Maguire reported from Juneau.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Northern highlights: Alaska's energy, security policies are the guide feds need amid transition, group says

Published

on

Northern highlights: Alaska's energy, security policies are the guide feds need amid transition, group says


EXCLUSIVE: Private citizens — right up to the governor himself — are primed to be part of a new Alaskan initiative aimed at promoting policies that have been effective in Juneau at a national level as a new administration signals a willingness to listen and adapt to new strategies.

Just as Florida’s education policy under Gov. Jeb Bush served as a blueprint for national education reform, the nonprofit Future 49 aims to position Alaska as today’s model, focusing primarily on national security and energy.

Its top funders are a group of Alaskans of all stripes as well as a few Washington, D.C.-based advocates. It is nonpartisan and simply pro-Alaskan, according to one of its proponents.

It also seeks to dispatch with what one source familiar with its founding called the “out of sight, out of mind” feeling of some in the Lower 48 when it comes to how far-flung Alaska can translate its own successes in the cold north to a federal government that could benefit from its advice.

Advertisement

One of Future 49’s founders is a commercial airline pilot whose family has lived in Alaska for more than 125 years. He said he wanted to show Washington issues Alaska deals with every day.

AK GOV: BIDEN SEARCHING FOR OIL ANYWHERE BUT AT HOME

Anchorage skyline (Getty)

Bob Griffin’s family has lived in Alaska since 1899, he said, remarking he is an example of grassroots support behind showcasing Alaska’s potential to be the driving force in key sectors for the rest of the country.

Griffin said while there has not been any direct contact yet with the new administration, Gov. Mike Dunleavy is an ally of Trump’s and, in turn, primed to have a role in the group.

Advertisement

“We’re focused on not only the Trump administration, but other decision makers, to just highlight and advertise that the successes we’ve had in Alaska in energy, natural resources and other policy priorities are a good fit and benefit to all Americans.”

He noted the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge region spans the size of West Virginia, but the part of it federally budgeted for exploration in a recent fiscal year was only an area half the size of Ted Stevens International Airport in Anchorage, illustrating how Juneau must guide Washington.

FLASHBACK: ALASKAN F-35s PREPARE FOR MAJOR SUB-ZERO ARCTIC WARFARE

A source familiar with the founding of Future 49 told Fox News Digital how the group’s launch comes at a key juncture as one advice-averse administration transitions into one that has signaled its openness to undertake recommendations from states and local groups.

“The resources our nation needs to be energy-dominant are in Alaska, not in unfriendly nations like Russia and Iran who despise what we stand for and commit egregious environmental offenses on a daily basis,” the source said.

Advertisement

ALASKA OUTRAGED AT BIDEN OIL LEASE SALE SETUP BEING ‘FITTING FINALE’ FOR FOSSIL FUEL AVERSE PRESIDENCY

While the group is primed to express a pro-development approach to energy, it will remain nonpartisan and offer Washington successful strategies to develop both green and traditional energy based on work done in Alaska.

Dunleavy has offered a similarly two-fold approach, saying in a recent interview that opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to responsible development may yield just as much economic growth for the nation as emerging green technology, such as a proposal to harness the second-strongest tides in the world churning in Cook Inlet outside Anchorage.

Those parallels show why Future 49’s advent is coming at the right time, a source told Fox News Digital.

Future 49’s plan to use Alaska’s long-term goal to utilize its energy resources as a roadmap was a sentiment also voiced in another confirmation hearing Thursday. Interior nominee Doug Burgum highlighted the need for domestic “energy dominance” for both economic and security reasons.

Advertisement
doug burgum

Doug Burgum, the former governor of North Dakota and nominee for U.S. secretary of the interior, during a Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee confirmation hearing in Washington, D.C., Jan. 16, 2025.  (Al Drago)

With Russia having invaded Ukraine, Dunleavy said most sensitive national defense assets are housed in Alaska, so the state has a deep background in what is needed to deter malign actors.

“We’re very close to the bear,” he said.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Lessons learned from managing a National Guard force so closely tied to top-level national security concerns is another avenue Future 49 will likely seek to aid Washington in.

The group plans to commission a survey of Lower 48 Americans on their view of the Last Frontier and how they perceive Alaska from thousands of miles away, said Alaska pollster Matt Larkin.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

‘Prolonged’ internet outage in North Slope & Northwest: Quintillion blames optic cable break

Published

on

‘Prolonged’ internet outage in North Slope & Northwest: Quintillion blames optic cable break


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – The president of Quintilian blamed an optic cable break for a North Slope & Northwest Alaska internet outage that will take an undefined amount of time to fix.

“It appears there was a subsea fiber optic cable break near Oliktok Point, and the outage will be prolonged,” Quintillion President Michael “Mac” McHale said in a short statement provided by a company spokesperson. “We are working with our partners and customers on alternative solutions.”

The statement mirrored what the company released Saturday morning on social media.

So far, the company has not provided a specific timeline for the repair’s next steps.

Advertisement

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Opinion: Alaska’s court system has had solutions for expensive, unnecessary delays since 2009. What’s lacking is accountability.

Published

on

Opinion: Alaska’s court system has had solutions for expensive, unnecessary delays since 2009. What’s lacking is accountability.


As a former prosecutor, I was shocked and saddened to read reporter Kyle Hopkins’ recent reporting in the Anchorage Daily News and ProPublica on pervasive, unconstitutional, heartbreaking delays of violent felony cases. Judges granting continuances 50 to 70 times over seven to 10 years — with “typically” no opposition from the prosecution, and no mention of the victims. Victims and their families suffering years before the closure that a trial can bring, some even dying during the delays.

Hopkins’ reporting is recent. The problem isn’t. The Office of Victims’ Rights (OVR) has been covering delays for years in annual reports to the Legislature, beginning in 2014. In 2018, after monitoring nearly 200 cases, OVR said judges were mostly to blame.

Other causes have been noted: understaffed public defender and prosecutor offices; the incentive for defendants to delay because witnesses’ memories fade. But in 2019, OVR said, “It is up to the judges to control the docket, to adhere to standing court orders, to follow the law and to protect victims’ rights as well as defendants’ rights.”

Advertisement

In 1994, 86% of Alaskans who voted supported a crime victims’ rights ballot. That overwhelming mandate was enshrined in our state constitution. It includes victims’ “right to timely disposition of the case.” For years, Anchorage Superior Court judges have ignored this right.

After reading the recent coverage, I began searching. Maybe other jurisdictions had found solutions to similar delays. What I discovered shocked me even more.

In 2008, a working group co-chaired by an Alaska Supreme Court justice determined the average time to disposition for felony cases in Anchorage had nearly quadrupled. “This finding amounted to a ‘call to arms’ for improvements …(.)”

In November 2008, the state paid to send three judges, two court personnel, the Anchorage district attorney, the deputy attorney general and three public defenders to a workshop in Arizona about causes of delays, and solutions. David Steelman was a presenter. He worked with the Alaska group in Phoenix and Anchorage. That work resulted in a 59-page report dated March 2009.

I found Steelman’s report online (“Improving Criminal Caseflow Management in the Alaska Superior Court in Anchorage”). His findings are revealing.

Advertisement

Delays resulted from informal attitudes, concerns and practices of the court, prosecutors and public defense lawyers. To change this “culture of continuances,” it was critical the court exercise leadership and the attorneys commit to change. Judges and the public-sector lawyers must recognize they were all responsible for making prudent use of the finite resources provided by taxpayers. Unnecessary delays wasted resources.

Steelman recommended the judges and lawyers agree to individual performance measurements, and the court engage in ongoing evaluation of his Caseflow Improvement Plan. The plan included a “Continuance Policy for Anchorage Felony Cases.”

I found an unsigned Anchorage court order dated May 1, 2009. It included Steelman’s Continuance Policy recommendation that the court log every requested continuance in the court file, name the party requesting it, the reasons given, whether the continuance was granted, and the delay incurred if it was granted.

More telling, it omitted Steelman’s recommendation that, “Every six months, the chief criminal judge shall report to the Presiding Judge on the number of continuances requested and granted during the previous period(.)”

That provision might have ensured accountability.

Advertisement

After years of only bad news, in 2018, OVR reported a glimmer of “good news” — a pre-trial delay working group was formed by Anchorage Presiding Judge Morse and the court system. In September 2018, Judge Morse issued a Felony Pre-Trial Order. Its goals included reducing delays of felony case dispositions and minimizing the number of calendaring hearings. (Sound familiar?)

But, OVR added, “The real test will be whether judges will hold to the new plan and hold parties accountable for delays. The jury is out on whether the will to change is actually present, but the court ultimately will be responsible for improving this problem unless the legislature steps in and passes new laws to resolve this continuing violation of victims’ rights.”

The jury has been out since 2009. The court failed that test. Based on the ADN/ProPublica reporting, the court failed the test of 2018. Things are worse than ever.

And the court’s response? A spokesperson told Kyle Hopkins there was “new” training for judges on managing case flows, as well as an Anchorage presiding judge’s order limiting when postponements may be used. (Sound familiar?)

I also reached out to the court. I requested documentation of this “new” training and a copy of the latest order. I also asked about the unsigned May 2009 court order. I’ve received no response. Similarly, when Hopkins reached out to Anchorage Superior Court judges, none of the criminal docket judges responded directly.

Advertisement

There are two things courts and judges will respond to: their budget and retention elections.

First, the Alaska Senate and House Judiciary and Finance Committees should hold the court system accountable for its proposed budget. Require it to cost out delays from past years. According to a 2011 report by Steelman, just two Anchorage cases (each with over 70 scheduling hearings), “(M)ay have cost the State of Alaska the full-time equivalent of an extra prosecutor or public defender attorney.”

The court system has proven, since 2008, it can’t be trusted to not waste money on unnecessary delays. It must finally be held accountable by the Legislature.

Second, retention elections. Superior Court judges are appointed by the governor, but they must stand election for retention by the voters every six years. The Alaska Judicial Council evaluates each judge before their election and makes that information public. The council incorporates surveys of attorneys, law enforcement, child services professionals, court employees and jurors.

The Judicial Council does not survey victims, or those who assist them, such as OVR or Victims for Justice. It should. Other than the defendant, victims are the only ones with a constitutional right to a speedy trial. That right is being ignored by judges. Alaska voters who issued a mandate should know which judges are ignoring it.

Advertisement

Val Van Brocklin is a former state and federal prosecutor in Alaska who now trains and writes on criminal justice topics nationwide.

The views expressed here are the writer’s and are not necessarily endorsed by the Anchorage Daily News, which welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending