Connect with us

Alaska

Alaska-bound bees find new homes after shipping disaster

Published

on

Alaska-bound bees find new homes after shipping disaster


Invoice Crumpler holds up a honeycomb to look at the bees’ state from a hive rescued from the tarmac of Atlanta-Hartsfield Airport a month earlier than, when a cargo of hundreds of thousands of bees meant for Alaska was diverted from California. ( Picture by Matthew Pearson/WABE)


Invoice Crumpler stood in entrance of a handful of honeybee hives tucked away on conservation land within the industrial outskirts of Atlanta.

These weren’t his regular bees.

They have been rescued from amongst hundreds of thousands of honeybees that died in a Delta cargo bay within the April solar. The greater than 600 kilos of bees have been presupposed to go from Sacramento to Anchorage, however resulting from flight cancellations the bees ended up at Atlanta’s Hartsfield-Jackson airport.

Advertisement

“They’re thriving in comparison with what they got here from,” Crumpler stated, gesturing towards the hives with a smoke pot in his hand. “They’re nonetheless alive. They’re constructing frames out. The queen is laying eggs.”

Whereas the Alaska-bound bees by no means made it to their last locations, the fast work of a nicely established colony of bee keepers united communities throughout the continent, and the honeybees discovered new houses throughout Georgia. And 4,400 miles away, in Alaska, one native beekeeper went to nice lengths to make her beekeepers complete once more.

Whereas the rescue try occurred in Atlanta, Sarah McElrea was ready on the Anchorage airport when she heard many of the bees had died.

“Very devastating,” she stated from her yard in June. “Nonetheless simply nauseating to consider what occurred.”

In April, beekeepers flocked to Atlanta’s Hartsfield-Jackson airport to examine on the bees and take the survivors dwelling. (Matthew Pearson/WABE)

McElrea sells bees and teaches lessons from her dwelling in Soldotna. She was gutted by the tragedy. And it additionally took an enormous monetary toll.

Advertisement

McElrea had to purchase a wholly new cargo of 5 million bees from her provider in Sacramento. However this time, she and her husband stayed with the bees. They booked flights to Seattle and drove right down to Sacramento, the place they picked up the bees in individual.

“It was excessive 80s at 9:00 at night time once we left Sacramento with the bees,” McElrea stated. “And it’s actually harmful, clearly. I imply, that’s what killed them in Atlanta.”

They needed to get inventive to maintain them cool. McElrea’s husband made a makeshift pipe to get chilly air to the bees behind two rental vans. They drove to Seattle and made certain the bees have been rigorously loaded on the flight again to Alaska.

It was plenty of stress and never plenty of sleep. However she stated it was price it.

“Boy, what a sigh of aid,” McElrea stated. “It was an unimaginable feeling to be again on the bottom in Alaska. The sense of aid is fairly indescribable.”

Advertisement

From there, they drove north so far as Fairbanks and south to Homer to get the bees to their new houses.

A type of houses was Jim Allemann’s, in Nikiski. At a beekeepers potluck in McElrea’s yard this June, he sat in a camp chair amongst a small circle of native beekeepers, exchanging tales and recommendation.

“You simply look ahead to type of catching up with Sarah and what’s happening within the bee world, ‘trigger she is aware of what’s happening,” Allemann stated. “[She’s] so devoted. I imply, if you see what she went by means of this 12 months to get bees up right here for us — that’s manner past the decision of responsibility.”

First-time beekeeper Brandy Nelson of Soldotna took McElrea’s class this winter and stated she was excited to see how her hive does this summer season.

“I feel we’re actually fortunate to have somebody who loves bees a lot,” she stated on the potluck.

Advertisement

There’s not a long-term answer to the bee transportation drawback but. And McElrea gained’t be getting one other cargo till subsequent 12 months. However for now, the climate appears to be rewarding her efforts.

It’s been a very hot spring and summer season for Southcentral Alaska. And McElrea stated her bees are loving it.

“I all the time say this time of 12 months, you realize, that is our 12 months — that is going to be a tremendous 12 months. That is the 12 months to be a beekeeper,” she stated. “We’re about due for a extremely buttkicking 12 months, I feel.”

This story was produced in collaboration with WABE in Atlanta, Ga.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Alaska senators react to government spending bill passing, avoiding shutdown

Published

on

Alaska senators react to government spending bill passing, avoiding shutdown


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Alaska senators Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan shared their reactions on avoiding a government shutdown, with the government funding bill passing through Congress late Friday evening.

In a press release, Senator Lisa Murkowski said, “There is never, ever a time when a government shutdown is a good thing for Americans or Alaskans. I’m relieved that cooler heads prevailed and a needless shutdown was avoided.”

Murkowski supported extending the federal government funding deadline to March 14, 2025. This would provide disaster recovery funds for communities across the country.

After garnering support from both chambers of Congress, $300 million will go towards the U.S. Department of Commerce’s fishery disaster assistance, which according to the press release, Senator Murkowski played a crucial role in securing.

Advertisement

Senator Dan Sullivan also released a statement on “X” saying:

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Who works unpaid or gets furloughed in government shutdown

Published

on

Who works unpaid or gets furloughed in government shutdown


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – With a federal spending bill now approved by the House and headed to the Senate for votes, the possibility of a government shutdown that was slated to begin at 12:01 a.m. ET (8:01 p.m. Friday AKST) on Saturday now seems to have been averted, but the stopgap measure will only last for three months.

If and when the federal government shuts down, each federal agency determines its own plan for how to handle a shutdown, although government operations deemed nonessential will stop happening.

The last time Alaska faced a government shutdown, the governor’s office issued a news release on Sept 26, 2023, stating, “Approximately 4,700 state executive branch positions are at least partially federally funded. Employees in these positions would see no disruption in their pay and will continue to report to work. A small number of federal employees work within state departments. Their status would be determined by the guidance from the federal agency that employs them.”

Alaska’s News Source has emailed the governor’s office requesting an update.

Advertisement

The longest previous federal shutdown was 35 days.

According to labor stats from the state, as of November of this year, there were 15,100 people were listed as “federal government” employees in Alaska with 81,600 in “government” jobs.

Compared to this time last year, there were 15,000 “federal government” employees and 80,400 “government jobs.”

Nationally, if legislators can’t reach a deal, 1.5 million federal employees will be furloughed or told to work without pay.

Most national parks will close.

Advertisement

Air traffic controllers and food safety inspectors would continue to work, but without pay.

“The State of Alaska administers many programs on behalf of the federal government,” the 2023 news release from the governor’s office stated. ”Federal programs that are mandatory by law, authorized outside of the annual appropriations process and have existing carry-forward funds, or classified by the federal administration as ‘excepted’ due to life, health and safety implications would continue to operate during a shutdown. These categories include programs such as Medicaid and federal air traffic control.”

A list of frequently asked federal government furlough questions is also available on the State of Alaska website.

This story was updated with new information.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Environmentalist group sues to gain information about Alaska trawler toll on marine mammals

Published

on

Environmentalist group sues to gain information about Alaska trawler toll on marine mammals


The federal government has failed to give adequate information on deaths of killer whales and other marine mammals that become entangled in commercial trawling gear in Alaska waters, claims a lawsuit filed on Thursday in U.S. District Court in Anchorage.

The lawsuit, filed by the environmental group Oceana, targets the National Marine Fisheries Service, an agency of the National Oceanic and atmospheric Administration.

The whales and other marine mammals killed in fishing gear are subjects of what is known as bycatch, the unintended, incidental catch of species that are not the harvest target.

Advertisement

The lawsuit focuses on three Freedom of Information Act requests filed by Oceana from 2021 to 2023. Oceana asked for records, photographs and videos of animals that have been killed as bycatch in Alaska fisheries. The agency denied some requests and provided information in response to others, but that information was heavily redacted, with photographs blurred and made unrecognizable through a pixelation technique and text blacked out, the lawsuit said.

Distorted photos sent to Oceana included images of whales, Steller sea lions, a walrus, and bearded, fur and ribbon seals, according to the complaint, which seeks to compel the agency to provide more complete information.

NMFS justified the redactions and image distortions as necessary to protect confidentiality, according to the lawsuit. But Oceana, in its lawsuit, said those redactions “are not based on any valid legal requirement to protect confidential information and are not consistent” with applicable laws: the Freedom of Information Act, the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and the Marine Mammal Protection Act.

“Public access to information is essential to hold the government accountable and ensure U.S. fisheries are managed sustainably,” Tara Brock, Oceana’s Pacific legal director and senior counsel, said in a statement issued by the organization. “The unlawful withholding of information by the Fisheries Service related to the deaths of whales, fish, and other ocean life is unacceptable. People have the right to know how commercial fisheries impact marine wildlife.”

Oceana filed a related lawsuit on Thursday in the U.S. District Court of Central California over bycatch of various species of mammals and fish by the halibut trawl fishery that operates off that state’s coast.

Advertisement

An altered photo of a killer whale that died as bycatch in Alaska trawl gear is part of the evidence presented by Oceana in a lawsuit against the National Marine Fisheries Service. The lawsuit, filed onThursday, cites this an other photos provided by NMFS as evidence that the agency is withholding important information about marine mammal deaths in the Alaska trawl fisheries. (Photo provided by Oceana)

That halibut harvest “catches enormous quantities of marine species as bycatch,” which “results in the injury and death of thousands of fish and other animals,” including Dungeness crab, giant sea bass, elephant seals, harbor porpoises and cormorants, among other species. That halibut fishery “has the highest bycatch rate in the nation,” and it discards about 77% of the fish it catches, the lawsuit said.

The National Marine Fisheries Service declined to comment on the lawsuits filed Thursday.

The legal actions follow a period with an unusually high number of killer whales ensnared in trawl gear used to harvest Bering Sea fish. Nearly a dozen killer whales were found dead in 2023, compared to 37 cases of killer whale deaths in fishing gear that were recorded in Alaska from 1991 to 2022.

A different environmental organization, the Center for Biological Diversity, last year filed a notice of intent to sue NMFS over the trawl bycatch of whales and other marine mammals.

Advertisement

So far, no such lawsuit has been filed, said Cooper Freeman, the center’s Alaska director. Instead, his organization has been meeting with NMFS to try to find ways to reduce the dangers to marine mammals from trawling, he said.

“At this point we have not decided to bring a lawsuit although we continue to have very, very serious concerns about the fisheries and are tracking the harms,” Freeman said.

The agency has pledged some corrective action, Freeman said. It has committed to reassess harms to endangered species and it has promised to analyze Alaska’s killer whales as separate populations, one in the Bering Sea and the other in the Gulf of Alaska, he said. Lumping the two populations as one can understate the impacts of bycatch deaths, he said.

Originally published by the Alaska Beacon, an independent, nonpartisan news organization that covers Alaska state government.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending