Connect with us

Alaska

A year after its passage, infrastructure bill sends over $2.6 billion to Alaska

Published

on

A year after its passage, infrastructure bill sends over $2.6 billion to Alaska


WASHINGTON — A 12 months after the $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure invoice handed, Alaska has been allotted greater than $2.6 billion, making the state one of many prime recipients per capita within the nation.

The Infrastructure Funding and Jobs Act will finally present $550 billion for infrastructure enhancements throughout the nation, distributing funding over 5 years to enhance roads, web connectivity, and supply clear water, amongst different initiatives. Democrats and a number of other Republicans supported the invoice, together with Alaska Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan and the late Rep. Don Younger.

Murkowski was a part of a gaggle that led negotiations on the invoice. She referred to as the laws “one of the vital important measures I’ve ever labored on,” in a press release final week.

Advertisement

Because the federal authorities continues to dole out infrastructure cash over the following 4 years, Alaska is poised to obtain essentially the most funding per capita. A CNBC evaluation estimated that $6,700 per resident will come into the state. Already, the invoice has allotted cash for greater than 300 tasks in Alaska.

A number of the top-funded tasks embrace:

• $363 million to enhance nationwide highways in Alaska.

• $250 million for the Military Corps of Engineers to function and preserve the Port of Nome.

• $209 million for ferry service for rural communities. The invoice has allotted a further $35.6 million to the Alaska Marine Freeway System for the development of ferries and ferry terminal services.

Advertisement

• $187 million has been designated to construct a brand new border station between Alaska and Canada close to Tok.

In line with the White Home, in Alaska, $1.5 billion of infrastructure invoice cash has been authorised to revamp Alaska bridges and roads, and to date Alaska has acquired about $402 million for ports and waterways.

Web entry is one other focus of the invoice. A number of tribal teams or Alaska Native companies have utilized to take residence a chunk of the $65 billion the invoice allocates for broadband enhancements. Final month, the Tanana Chiefs Convention in Inside Alaska acquired $30 million to develop high-speed web. Additionally, in line with the White Home, greater than 12,000 Alaska households have enrolled within the Inexpensive Connectivity Program, an infrastructure legislation initiative that gives reductions for web payments.

[Starlink begins providing high-speed satellite internet in Alaska]

The Biden administration touts the infrastructure invoice as one in every of its prime accomplishments. On a Nov. 14 name with reporters, White Home infrastructure coordinator Mitch Landrieu poked enjoyable on the Trump administration’s infrastructure week — which was repeatedly derailed — calling the laws the beginning of the “infrastructure decade.”

Advertisement

Nonetheless, some Republicans, together with Sullivan and Murkowski’s Republican Senate challenger Kelly Tshibaka, have been crucial of the invoice’s rollout, saying that allowing reform is critical to expedite the infrastructure tasks. Murkowski mentioned she can be supportive of allowing reform.

“The allowing piece of it’s enormous, as a result of we are able to authorize funding for tasks, but when they get mired in a allowing course of, that simply is interminable,” Murkowski mentioned in an interview final week. “How we are able to reform our allowing course of has been one thing that has been a precedence on either side of the aisle.”

Murkowski has made implementing the invoice one in every of her prime priorities. She has hosted symposiums in Alaska to teach constituents in regards to the grant alternatives that the laws gives.

“Bear in mind this was simply 12 months one in every of a five-year invoice,” Murkowski mentioned. “And so we’ve acquired to be engaged on that implementation on a regular basis with of us again within the state.”

• • •

Advertisement

Reporter Riley Rogerson is a full-time reporter for the ADN based mostly in Washington, D.C. Her place is supported by Report for America, which is working to fill gaps in reporting throughout America and to position a brand new era of journalists in group information organizations across the nation. Report for America, funded by each non-public and public donors, covers as much as 50% of a reporter’s wage. It’s as much as Anchorage Day by day Information to search out the opposite half, by local people donors, benefactors, grants or different fundraising actions.

If you want to make a private, tax-deductible contribution to her place, you can also make a one-time donation or a recurring month-to-month donation through adn.com/RFA. You may also donate by test, payable to “The GroundTruth Undertaking.” Ship it to Report for America/Anchorage Day by day Information, c/o The GroundTruth Undertaking, 10 Visitor Avenue, Boston, MA 02135. Please put Anchorage Day by day Information/Report for America within the test memo line.

• • •





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Alaska’s Mac Swanson taken in 7th round of NHL Draft by Pittsburgh Penguins

Published

on

Alaska’s Mac Swanson taken in 7th round of NHL Draft by Pittsburgh Penguins


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Anchorage-born skater Mac Swanson was drafted by the Pittsburgh Penguins in the 7th round, 207th overall, in the 2024 NHL Draft, Saturday, after a dominant season in junior hockey where he was named USHL’s Player of the Year.

The 18-year old will play at the University of North Dakota this fall after reporting to Penguins’ development camp next week.

Swanson was named by USA Hockey as the best player in Junior Hockey after a season in which he led the Fargo Force to the Clark Cup Championship, where he was named playoff MVP.

During the season, he led all USHL skaters with 51 assists and third in total points with 77 in 55 games played which led to an avalanche of accolades that included USHL Player of the Year, Forward of the Year and a first team All-USHL selection.

Advertisement

His father, Brian Swanson, was selected in the 1994 NHL Draft by the San Jose Sharks and played for the ECHL’s Alaska Aces.



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Wildfire prompts evacuations near Denali National Park entrance along Parks Highway

Published

on

Wildfire prompts evacuations near Denali National Park entrance along Parks Highway


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – A wildfire that has quickly grown to about 300 acres is threatening the entrance to Denali National Park on the Parks Highway and has forced the evacuation of several hundred people.

The blaze — named the Riley Fire — began burning shortly after noon on Sunday and by 5:30 p.m. was reported at around 350 acres in size.

The fire was first spotted near mile 239 of the Parks Highway, across the Nenana River from the town of Denali, a heavily-populated spot in the summer when tourists visit, and about a mile north of the entrance to the park.

No structures are immediately threatened by the blaze, officials said.

Advertisement
A wildfire that has quickly grown to about 300 acres is threatening the entrance to Denali National Park on the Parks Highway.(Courtesy Denali Borough/via Bureau of Land Management)

Denali National Park spokesperson Paul Ollig said that the blaze is within about a quarter of a mile from people and structures.

“The area where the fire is currently burning is up above the Nenana River in close proximity to the Horseshoe Lake Trail area,” Ollig said. “It is generally dense black spruce forest, and is right up against Mount Healy, so it does have some steep terrain that climbs pretty quickly in that area, once you’re across once you’re west of the railroad tracks.”

Ollig estimated that around 200 people are currently being affected by evacuation notices in the area, including 100 to 150 park employees and another 75 to 100 residents.

Other areas of the park near the fire are in “ready” mode to evacuate, Ollig said, meaning they must be ready to evacuate if the order is given. That includes campers in the Riley Creek Campground, which Ollig said is closest to the blaze.

The Bureau of Land Management’s Fire Service team said 12 smokejumpers responded to the fire via plane and another 10 were driving to the area to help suppress it.

Advertisement

Ollig said that tour and transit bus service has been stopped going westbound. Day-use visitors west of the park entrance are being shuttled back eastward, and “public front-country” facilities and nearby trails have been closed, including the Denali Visitor Center.

The Riley Fire burns near the Denali National Park entrance on June 30, 2024.
The Riley Fire burns near the Denali National Park entrance on June 30, 2024.(Courtesy National Park Service)

BLM said in addition to the smokejumpers, four water-scooping planes were on scene to help douse the flames, with two water scoopers and a retardant air tanker on the way.

The fire was reportedly burning an area predominantly thick with black spruce trees near the Alaska Railroad.

The Park Service said that agencies working to contain the fire include the Alaska Division of Forestry & Fire Protection, Tri-Valley Volunteer Fire Department, and the McKinley Village Volunteer Fire Department.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

State of Alaska issues regulations for carbon offsets program

Published

on

State of Alaska issues regulations for carbon offsets program


JUNEAU — The Dunleavy administration has finalized regulations to start selling carbon offset credits on state land.

The Legislature approved Senate Bill 48 in May last year to allow the state to establish a carbon offset program. New state regulations are set to go into effect July 19. In Haines, a yearlong public process has started to amend the state forest management plan to allow for carbon offsets.

Trevor Fulton, the state’s carbon offset program manager, said it would likely take another 18 months to two years for the state to start selling carbon credits.

Advertisement

“We’re still relatively early in that process,” he said at a public meeting in Haines in May.

That process has already been more than a year in the making.

During his annual address to the Legislature last January, Gov. Mike Dunleavy unveiled plans to monetize carbon in Alaska. SB 48 created a framework to establish carbon offsets on state land. The other Dunleavy bill, approved by legislators in May, allows the state to establish a regulatory framework for storage of carbon dioxide deep underground.

Dunleavy said last year that a carbon management system could generate billions of dollars per year in new state revenue. But at first, revenue expectations from carbon credits are much more modest.

The state is looking at three areas to start selling carbon offsets: Haines State Forest, Tanana Valley State Forest and state forested land in the Matanuska-Susitna region. All three pilot projects are expected to be around 75,000 acres to 100,000 acres each. Anew, an outside consultant, estimated in 2022 that the state could bring in $8 million per year from the three areas, in the first decade.

Advertisement

“We hope to see that grow as projects develop across the landscape, and as we tap further into Alaska’s potential for carbon offsetting,” Fulton said.

By law, 80% of revenue generated from carbon credits would go to the state’s general fund, which could be appropriated for any purpose. The other 20% would be directed to the state’s renewable energy grant fund for clean energy projects.

Carbon offsets in Alaska could see the state receive compensation for protecting forests, kelp farms or even selling millions of acres of beetle-killed wood for biochar, a carbon-rich material that has applications in agriculture.

[Environmentalists urge US to plan ‘phasedown’ of trans-Alaska pipeline amid climate concerns]

In an interview, Fulton said the state is looking to participate in carbon offsets in two ways: By developing its own offset program, and then by establishing a leasing program for carbon management projects to third parties. Fulton said state law likely prevents leasing management of Alaska’s timber resources. That means third-party leasing would likely be limited to projects such as biochar and kelp farms, he said.

Advertisement

Alaska is set to participate in the $2 billion global voluntary carbon market, which allows corporations such as airlines to purchase carbon credits to offset their emissions. The much larger $800 billion compliance market that California participates in with its cap-and-trade program mandates that corporations reduce their emissions to certain levels, including with carbon offsets.

Each carbon offset equates to one metric ton of carbon avoided or removed from the atmosphere. Fulton said that would be the equivalent of the amount of carbon produced by an average round-trip drive from Anchorage to Seattle.

Climate vs. logging

The revenue implications of carbon credits are uncertain for Alaska — and so are the environmental benefits. A growing number of studies have questioned how emission reductions from offsets are measured and whether they are effective at all.

In response to concerns about the unregulated voluntary carbon market, the Biden administration in May released a set of principles to define high-integrity carbon offsets that have a measurable impact in reducing emissions.

Legislative debates about monetizing carbon storage in Alaska have focused more on the potential for revenue and industry investment than environmental benefits. But proving those environmental benefits could be key.

Advertisement

[Previously: Alaska’s carbon storage bill, once a revenue measure, is now seen as boon for oil and coal]

Dominick DellaSala, chief scientist with Wild Heritage, a California-based forest conservation group, said the state would need to show how its offset program would reduce emissions and have that verified. Using the example of logging, DellaSala said the state could pledge not to log old-growth trees and instead use them as a carbon sink.

“That difference between what they would have released from logging versus what they are protecting is the carbon offset,” he said.

The Alaska Department of Natural Resources said the state would show the environmental benefits from its offsets program with improved “forest management projects” to increase “carbon stocks year-over-year.” A spokesperson said those projects could include planting trees and thinning tree stands to reduce crowding — among other practices.

Sealaska Corp., a Southeast Alaska Native corporation, agreed several years ago to participate in California’s cap-and-trade program and protect thousands of acres of old-growth forest for 100 years. The deal was worth a reported $100 million between 2015 and 2020.

Advertisement

DellaSala said that “legitimate” carbon offsets in Southeast Alaska would come from protecting old growth forests for decades. He said the state’s regulations and other forest management practices appear “vague,” and run the risk of “greenwashing.”

In May, state officials held a public meeting to start discussions about allowing carbon offsets in Haines State Forest. The 260,000-acre forest managed by the state has some of “highest per-acre carbon levels” studied by Anew.

Jessica Plachta, executive director of Lynn Canal Conservation, welcomed the state’s interest in carbon offsets. She said that much of the timber in the area is of low value due to timber defects. Carbon offsets would be a significant improvement in forest management practices from large, old-growth timber sales, she said.

“These forests support superlative salmon-spawning and rearing habitats, host the world’s largest gathering of bald eagles, and underpin local subsistence and the commercial fishing and tourism industries, which are the bedrock of the local economy,” she said by email.

SB 48 says that state forests used for a carbon offset program “must remain open to the public” for hunting, fishing and other recreation opportunities. The Dunleavy administration has also said that carbon offsets can coexist with resource extraction industries such as logging.

Advertisement

But there could be a balancing act. The trees with the greatest potential to capture carbon emissions are typically the most attractive to the timber industry.

State forester Greg Palmieri said in May that the five-year schedule of timber sales in Haines would be paused as the forest management plan is discussed. Once that process is completed, state officials should have a better idea how to apply carbon offsets in Haines.

“Every acre of the forest that’s available for timber sales is going to be available for carbon offset programs, Palmieri said, adding that “the intention is to create the highest value for the state in the resources that they own on these lands that we manage.”

State officials say they’ve heard some concerns from the timber industry, but they stressed several factors to help allay fears. State forests being considered for carbon offsets are below their allowable cut, which refers to the amount of wood that can be sustainably harvested; there are no specific projects being actively considered; and public engagement would be robust as the offsets programs are developed, they said.

“Enrollment in an improved forest management project doesn’t take timber harvest off the table, it just takes the most aggressive timber harvest scenario off the table,” a spokesperson for the Department of Natural Resources said.

Advertisement

Bryce Dahlstrom, president of the Alaska Forest Association, said the timber industry’s trade group would have no comment about carbon offsetting until state projects are ready to be presented.

For Southeast Conference, a regional economic development organization, there is interest in the potential benefits of carbon offsets. Robert Venables, Southeast Conference’s executive director, said he is looking to develop a mariculture program to see how much carbon can be sequestered in kelp and seaweed.

One challenge for the state, and other actors, is to marry up the science with the potential economic benefits of carbon offsets, he said.

“I think there is a lot of potential, both on the mariculture side as well as in the forests,” he said. “That will take a new approach on both fronts.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending