Connect with us

Technology

Hollywood cozied up to AI in 2025 and had nothing good to show for it

Published

on

Hollywood cozied up to AI in 2025 and had nothing good to show for it

AI isn’t new to Hollywood — but this was the year when it really made its presence felt. For years now, the entertainment industry has used different kinds of generative AI products for a variety of post-production processes ranging from de-aging actors to removing green screen backgrounds. In many instances, the technology has been a useful tool for human artists tasked with tedious and painstaking labor that might have otherwise taken them inordinate amounts of time to complete. But in 2025, Hollywood really began warming to the idea of deploying the kind of gen AI that’s really only good for conjuring up text-to-video slop that doesn’t have all that many practical uses in traditional production workflows. Despite all of the money and effort being put into it, there’s yet to be a gen-AI project that has shown why it’s worth all of the hype.

This confluence of Hollywood and AI didn’t start out so rosy. Studios were in a prime position to take the companies behind this technology to court because their video generation models had clearly been trained on copyrighted intellectual property. A number of major production companies including Disney, Universal, and Warner Bros. Discovery did file lawsuits against AI firms and their boosters for that very reason. But rather than pummeling AI purveyors into the ground, some of Hollywood’s biggest power players chose instead to get into bed with them. We have only just begun to see what can come from this new era of gen-AI partnerships, but all signs point to things getting much sloppier in the very near future.

Though many of this year’s gen-AI headlines were dominated by larger outfits like Google and OpenAI, we also saw a number of smaller players vying for a seat at the entertainment table. There was Asteria, Natasha Lyonne’s startup focused on developing film projects with “ethically” engineered video generation models, and startups like Showrunner, an Amazon-backed platform designed to let subscribers create animated “shows” (a very generous term) from just a few descriptive sentences plugged into Discord. These relatively new companies were all desperate to legitimize the idea that their flavor of gen AI could be used to supercharge film / TV development while bringing down overall production costs.

Asteria didn’t have anything more than hype to share with the public after announcing its first film, and it was hard to believe that normal people would be interested in paying for Showrunner’s shoddily cobbled-together knockoffs of shows made by actual animators. In the latter case, it felt very much like Showrunner’s real goal was to secure juicy partnerships with established studios like Disney that would lead to their tech being baked into platforms where users could prompt up bespoke content featuring recognizable characters from massive franchises.

That idea seemed fairly ridiculous when Showrunner first hit the scene because its models churn out the modern equivalent of clunky JibJab cartoons. But in due time, Disney made it clear that — crappy as text-to-video generators tend to be for anything beyond quick memes — it was interested in experimenting with that kind of content. In December, Disney entered into a three-year, billion-dollar licensing deal with OpenAI that would let Sora users make AI videos with 200 different characters from Star Wars, Marvel, and more.

Advertisement

Netflix became one of the first big studios to proudly announce that it was going all-in on gen AI. After using the technology to produce special effects for one of its original series, the streamer published a list of general guidelines it wanted its partners to follow if they planned to jump on the slop bandwagon as well. Though Netflix wasn’t mandating that filmmakers use gen AI, it made clear that saving money on VFX work was one of the main reasons it was coming out in support of the trend. And it wasn’t long before Amazon followed suit by releasing multiple Japanese anime series that were terribly localized into other languages because the dubbing process didn’t involve any human translators or voice actors.

Amazon’s gen-AI dubs became a shining example of how poorly this technology can perform. They also highlighted how some studios aren’t putting all that much effort into making sure that their gen AI-derived projects are polished enough to be released to the public. That was also true of Amazon’s machine-generated TV recaps, which frequently got details about different shows very wrong. Both of these fiascos made it seem as if Amazon somehow thought that people wouldn’t notice or care about AI’s inability to consistently generate high-quality outputs. The studio quickly pulled its AI-dubbed series and the recap feature down, but it didn’t say that it wouldn’t try this kind of nonsense again.

Disney-provided examples of its characters in Sora AI content.
Image: Disney

All of this and other dumb stunts like AI “actress” Tilly Norwood made it feel like certain segments of the entertainment industry were becoming more comfortable trying to foist gen-AI “entertainment” on people even though it left many people deeply unimpressed and put off. None of these projects demonstrated to the public why anyone except for money-pinching execs (and people who worship them for some reason) would be excited by a future shaped by this technology.

Aside from a few unimpressive images, we still haven’t seen what all might come from some of these collaborations, like Disney cozying up to OpenAI. But next year AI’s presence in Hollywood will be even more pronounced. Disney plans to dedicate an entire section of its streaming service to user-generated content sourced from Sora, and it will encourage Disney employees to use OpenAI’s ChatGPT products. But the deal’s real significance in this current moment is the message it sends to other studios about how they should move as Hollywood enters its slop era.

Advertisement

Regardless of whether Disney thinks this will work out well, the studio has signaled that it doesn’t want to be left behind if AI adoption keeps accelerating. That tells other production houses that they should follow suit, and if that becomes the case, there’s no telling how much more of this stuff we are all going to be forced to endure.

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

Technology

MacBook Neo versus an old MacBook Air: good luck

Published

on

MacBook Neo versus an old MacBook Air: good luck

My first thought when Apple announced the MacBook Neo today was “okay, but why not just get an older Air?” If you’re thinking that too, you might be right. If you can find one.

The Neo starts at $599 with an A18 Pro processor, 8GB of memory, and 256GB storage, and ends at $699 with the same specs plus TouchID and 512GB of storage. It has two USB-C (not Thunderbolt) ports, a pretty basic-looking screen, a mechanical trackpad instead of haptic, and various other cost-saving measures. It’s the cheapest new MacBook you can get now.

The new M5 MacBook Air starts at $1,099 with 16GB of memory and 512GB of much faster storage, a bigger and brighter screen, a better webcam, better Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, more speakers, Thunderbolt 4, a faster charger, and so forth. It’s $100 more than last year’s model, probably because of the Neo. Or you can get an M4 MacBook Air for $1000, with a slightly slower processor than the M5 (but still faster than the Air), and otherwise pretty much the same specs.

If you could still get a new M1 Air from Walmart for $700, it’d be a pretty tough call between that and the Neo. That machine came out in 2020, but is still better in most respects. Unfortunately, they’ve been out of stock since last month — probably because of the Neo — so that’s the end of that. You can probably find a refurb one. Same with the M3 and M4: if you can find one for around the same price as the Neo, especially with 16GB of RAM, you should get one of those. But they’re pretty thin on the ground, and I’d expect them to become thinner. (Keep an eye on Apple’s refurb site, though — a refurb M4 Air for $750 is pretty dang good.)

The modern Air is unquestionably a better computer. The thing about $1,000 is it’s a lot more money than $600. $600 is already more than most non-Mac people want to spend on a laptop, but it’s a lot less than an Air, and the gap between the two is big enough that it’s harder to justify the jump unless you know you’re gonna need more than 8GB of RAM, if you’re ever gonna use Thunderbolt, and so forth. I wouldn’t buy the Neo for myself.

Advertisement

The Neo isn’t meant to compete with the Air, though. It’s aiming for the first-time MacBook buyer. It’s Apple trying to pick up the cheap Windows laptop crowd who are annoyed by Windows. With its $499 price for education, it’s also an attempt to break the Chromebook’s stranglehold on the K-12 market, to turn iPad kids into MacBook Neo teens into Air adults. Heck, when it’s time for my kids to turn in their school-issued Chromebooks, and I have to choose between a Chromebook, a Windows laptop, and a MacBook Neo for them? That’ll be interesting.

And that’s how they get you!

I honestly don’t think the Neo vs Air debate is going to be that hard for most people, just because most people aren’t spending a thousand bucks on a laptop in the first place. The processor’s probably going to feel about the same as an M1 Air’s, which is to say fast enough for most things. The toughest parts are going to be figuring out if you’re satisfied with 8GB of RAM (rough!), if you ever really need Thunderbolt (maybe not?), and if you care about that fancy webcam (eh). If you already know the answer, you already know the answer. And you should probably grab that refurb Air while you can.

A cynical part of me thinks this is Apple trying to get MacBooks onto the same upgrade cycle as its phones. If you bought the cheapest MacBook Air six years ago, it’s probably still fine. If you buy the cheapest MacBook Neo today, is it going to feel fine in six years? Maybe! Or maybe you’ll decide you need to spring for an Air next time. And up the funnel you go.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Technology

Stop the insanity 2.0: ’90s icon Susan Powter’s tech comeback

Published

on

Stop the insanity 2.0: ’90s icon Susan Powter’s tech comeback

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

There was a time when you could not turn on the TV without seeing Susan Powter. Platinum buzz cut. Barefoot. Fierce. Unfiltered. And that battle cry that still lives in pop culture: “Stop the Insanity!”

Advertisement

In the 1990s, Powter built a massive wellness brand by pushing back on diet culture and talking about real life. Then the spotlight went dark. The part most people missed was brutal: financial collapse, isolation and crushing hopelessness.

Powter says the years after fame were not a quick fall. They were a long grind. She describes driving for Uber Eats for nine years, working “eight to 10 hours every day, seven days a week, trying to make my $80 to $100 a day so I could pay my damn bills.” Then comes the twist that makes this story feel very 2026. Tech did not break her. Tech helped her rebuild.

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

Susan Powter attends the “Stop the Insanity: Finding Susan Powter” NYC screening at Village East Cinema on November 21, 2025, in New York City. (Santiago Felipe/Getty Images)

How Susan Powter built her original wellness empire

When Susan Powter sat down with me in my Los Angeles studio for my Beyond Connected podcast, she began by rewinding the story to where it all started. Powter’s story begins far from Hollywood. She took me back to 1982 in Garland, Texas. She had two babies a year apart. After her divorce, she gained more than 130 pounds. She says she didn’t recognize herself physically. She felt financially doomed and emotionally overwhelmed.

Advertisement

Then she figured something out. “I would go to the grocery store, Piggly Wiggly. This is the truth,” she says. Other moms would stop her and tell her she looked great. Powter would answer, “No, no, you don’t understand. I figured out with modification you could be fit,” and she says, “a crowd would gather in the grocery store.”

That moment was not a marketing plan. It was a single mother talking to other women who were struggling too. That voice and that honesty turned into classes, then a studio, then a media machine. Powter never liked the labels people gave her. “They always used to call me a fitness guru. I’ve never used that term,” she says. Her version is simpler and more relatable: “I said, I’m just a housewife who figured it out and started talking to other housewives.”

But the business side got ugly. “It became a monster,” she says. “It started generating so much money, and then they started producing me out of me.”

Why Susan Powter lost her fortune and disappeared

This is where her story hits a nerve for anyone who has ever felt trapped in a system that profits from them. Powter describes management chaos, lawyers and huge legal bills. She says, “My last legal bill was $6.5 million.”

But the real breaking point came the day she decided to walk away. She was living in Beverly Hills when she says she discovered what was happening behind the scenes with unscrupulous management and bad-faith actors. She says that the very empire she built no longer felt like it belonged to her. As a result, her response was swift and absolute. “I sent one paragraph to everyone; Simon & Schuster, Time Warner, all management, literary agents. And I said, so-and-so no longer represents Susan Powter. Stop the Insanity. One paragraph.” That was it. She fired everyone. Then she left. “I moved to Seattle, and I started teaching classes in basements,” she says. “I left it all.”

Advertisement

She also pushes back on the tidy narrative people prefer about her downfall. “I did not go from Hollywood to Harbor Island, which is the welfare hotel that I lived in for far too long in Las Vegas. I didn’t go there in three years. That’s not what happened.” 

Instead, she describes years of work, shifting family dynamics and what she calls “quiet poverty.” And she names the part people tend to skip because it makes them uncomfortable: what poverty does to your identity. “It’s soul-sucking, dehumanizing,” she says.

At one point, she recalls walking eight miles in brutal Las Vegas heat. “My dollar store flip-flops literally melted under my feet. It was 120 degrees.” She adds, “That’s when you feel dehumanized.” 

During that period, she drew strength from the late Joan Rivers, who had faced her own trials. “She said to me, ‘You hang on, kid. This is a tough game,’” Powter recalls of meeting her earlier in her career. Years later, when her own world unraveled, Susan says she often asked herself, “What would Joan Rivers do?”

‘STOP THE INSANITY’ SUSAN POWTER EXPOSES TRUTH BEHIND FITNESS EMPIRE’S COLLAPSE AND LIFE DRIVING FOR UBER EATS

Advertisement

When 1990s fitness icon Susan Powter sat down in Kurt’s Los Angeles studio for getbeyondconnected.com, she opened up about the collapse few people saw coming. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson )

The moment tech went from a distraction to Susan Powter’s lifeline

Powter does not talk about technology like a cute productivity hack. She talks about it like survival. She used a phone, an app, digital platforms and a decision to use the same tools many of us blame for distraction as a way to climb back. Powter says the internet helped her see a path forward. “I’m internet obsessed, and I’m proud to say it,” she says. She also shows self-awareness about the darker side. “I know the darkness of it. I get it, I get it, but it is such a power.”

Then she says the line that sums up her whole strategy, “I’m going to digitalize everything. I’m going to sell it myself. I’m going to own everything.” That is her new business plan. And it is the part a lot of creators, freelancers and founders will recognize right away: when you stop waiting for permission, you start building assets you control.

How Susan Powter is taking back control with the help of tech

Powter talks about ownership like someone who has learned the cost of not having it. This time, she wants to see everything. “I’ll be checking the bank balance every 12 seconds,” she says. “I’ll be checking the analytics every second.” There is no confusion in her voice. She is not handing control to anyone else again.

For nine years, she drove for Uber Eats, eight to 10 hours a day, chasing $80 to $100 just to cover bills. There was no cushion and no mystery revenue. Everything depended on what she could see and control. After that, data feels like protection.

Advertisement

She calls gig work and the internet “literally life-saving,” and says, “access to what is happening now matters, especially for 68-year-olds.” For anyone who thinks technology belongs to the young, her story argues the opposite. A phone and apps can drain your time. They can also rebuild your life.

Now, Powter is rebuilding on her own terms, using technology to reclaim her voice, her brand and her future. (Obscured Pictures)

How Susan Powter uses Instagram and TikTok today

Powter is not tiptoeing back into the public eye. She is going full speed. She says she is “obsessed with TikTok, Insta,” and she is experimenting with TikTok Shop. Powter also draws a bright line around how she wants to show up.

“I’ll recommend show and tell, not sell what I want to be,” she says. Her style is classic Susan. Big energy. Big honesty. Zero patience for fake polish. At one point, she laughs and describes her approach like this: “It’s kind of like affiliate marketing on acid.”

And she is thinking bigger than social media posts. She talks about doing “vertical actual reality TV,” showing people the brand rebuild in real time, filming gatherings and owning the content. “I’ll film it, I’ll own the content, I’ll put it up live. We’re done,” she says.

Advertisement

The book, the movie and the part that matters most

Powter’s memoir is titled “And Then EM Died: Stop the Insanity, A Memoir,” available on Amazon. She calls it “a letter to my dead dog,” and says, “This is the first product I have owned out of all the products, all the years, all the work, and I get to see every sale.”

The documentary, “Stop the Insanity: Finding Susan Powter,” executive-produced by Jamie Lee Curtis and directed by Zeb Newman, is available on Amazon and Apple TV. But if you take one thing from this conversation, make it this: Powter refuses the tidy inspirational story arc. “The only reason I survived anything… No, I died a million deaths,” she says. Then she says what actually fueled her: “A lot of it was rage. I wasn’t going down like that.”

And yet she does not end there. “It doesn’t matter what happened. To hell with that. My being survived.” That honesty lands because it sounds like real life, not a poster. And maybe that is the real message now. Survival is not always pretty. Sometimes it is loud, messy and powered by the simple refusal to disappear.

Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?

Think your devices and data are truly protected? Take this quick quiz to see where your digital habits stand. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing right and what needs improvement. Take my Quiz here: Cyberguy.com.

Kurt’s key takeaways

Susan Powter’s story resonates because it feels familiar, even now. First, a public identity collapses. Then private life grows heavier than anyone sees. Yet that is not where her story ends. Instead, she finds leverage where few people think to look: in a phone, in an app, in a platform and in the power to publish without gatekeepers. Of course, she is not pretending technology fixes everything. She sees the darkness. At the same time, she sees the power. Now, she is using that power the way she always has: loudly, honestly and on her own terms.

Advertisement

So here’s the question to sit with: If your life fell apart tomorrow, would your tech habits help you rebuild, or would they pull you deeper?  Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter. 

Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved. 

Advertisement

Related Article

'90s fitness icon Susan Powter admits 'frightening' reality after losing multimillion-dollar empire
Continue Reading

Technology

Anker’s last-gen sleep buds are nearly 40 percent off ahead of daylight saving time

Published

on

Anker’s last-gen sleep buds are nearly 40 percent off ahead of daylight saving time

Bad news: most Americans are about to lose an hour of sleep next week. Good news: if you have trouble falling (or staying asleep), Newegg is currently selling Anker’s Soundcore Sleep A20 earbuds for $113.99 ($66 off) when you use coupon code MMSF88 at checkout, which drops them to just $6 shy of their lowest price to date.

A couple of us here at The Verge are fans of Anker’s last-gen sleep buds, which do a good job of muffling disruptive noises (including snoring). They’re lightweight and comfortable enough to wear overnight, even while sleeping on your side, with multiple ear tips and wings for a personalized fit. In fact, in his review, my colleague Thomas Ricker said that they improved his average sleep time by nearly 30 minutes within a two-week period.

What’s even more convenient is that they offer a variety of sleep-focused features to help you rest better. For example, you can use them to play a range of relaxing sounds, from meditation exercises and nature clips to white noise. You can use them as a regular pair of Bluetooth earbuds, too, just in case you prefer to listen to audiobooks or your own curated sleep playlist. They even come with adjustable EQ as well, though we wouldn’t recommend using them as your primary earbuds for music, given that they can’t match the audio quality you’d get from a pair of midrange earbuds from Apple, Sony, or Bose.

In addition, the Sleep A20 offer up to 14 hours of battery life and sleep tracking, providing insights into how long and how well you’ve slept via a companion app that also details your sleep positions and movements. The newer Soundcore Sleep A30 feature active noise cancellation, which is more effective at masking sounds than the A20’s passive isolation, but Anker’s last-gen earbuds remain a decent, budget-friendly option that can help you comfortably tune out most nighttime distractions for nearly half the price.

Continue Reading

Trending