Connect with us

Sports

Discussing Kevin De Bruyne and the most influential midfielders of the Premier League era

Published

on

Discussing Kevin De Bruyne and the most influential midfielders of the Premier League era

“Always I have to be careful for the respect for the players that have played incredible roles, but there’s no doubt he’s one of the greatest for sure,” said Pep Guardiola of Kevin De Bruyne’s impending exit from Manchester City.

De Bruyne’s impact at City since joining from Wolfsburg in 2015 has been huge, with the Belgian scoring 106 goals in 413 appearances, contributing to 187 Premier League goals (scoring or assisting), equalling the assist record for a single season and winning 19 trophies.

While Guardiola was careful about discussing where he stands in the greatest player debate, the City coach praised his “influence in our success in the last decade”.

Which had us asking, who are the most influential midfielders of the Premier League era?

Here is a selection of our writers’ answers and explanations of why they chose them. There probably isn’t a right answer but please let us know who we’ve overlooked (sorry, Paul Scholes) and register your vote in our poll (or submit your own entry).

Advertisement

We’ll publish the results on Sunday.


Yaya Toure

Premier League career: Manchester City 2010-18

Quite simply, Yaya Toure played in a style different to any midfielder the Premier League had seen before. He had the physicality of a centre-back, screening of a No 6, driving ability of a No 8, and shot power of a striker, patch-worked together in one sky blue-clad body.

There was Claude Makelele, who achieved Toure’s defensive coverage but was far more limited in attack, while even Arsenal’s Patrick Vieira lacked the Ivorian’s ability to take games by the scruff of their necks. Mousa Dembele, at his best, probably comes closest.

Here was the player that straddled City’s first post-takeover steps — his goal against Stoke City won the 2011 FA Cup, the club’s first trophy in 35 years — and Pep Guardiola’s dominant sides. David Silva, as wonderful as he was, relied on the industry and guile of his deeper-lying partner.

Advertisement

Toure playing for Manchester City in 2018 (Mike Hewitt via Getty Images)

He is probably the figure who has most influenced the mimetic ideal of a Premier League midfielder, his frame dominating in the most physical league in the world, but his technical ability still allowing him to evade pressure and crash the box. Ask any top-flight manager to draw up the frame and skill set of their ideal midfielder, all rules of creation in their hands, and Toure would be the closest facsimile.

Jacob Whitehead


Frank Lampard

West Ham United 1995-01, Chelsea 2001-14, Manchester City 2014-15

Goals. Lampard scored 177 of them, elevating him to seventh place on the Premier League’s all-time list. To put that into context, he’s surrounded by strikers. The next-highest midfielder — Steven Gerrard — is in 23rd place. Lampard’s assists? 102. Astonishing numbers that highlight Lampard’s incredible attacking output across 22 Premier League seasons, most spent with Chelsea, where he won three Premier League titles after signing from West Ham in 2001.

Lampard’s biggest talent, by his own admission, was his work ethic and dedication. Encouraged by his father, Frank Lampard Snr, he practised relentlessly, striving to be the best that he could be every day at training, and, ultimately, he got his reward.

Advertisement

An elegant passer of the ball, aided by his awareness and football intelligence, Lampard mastered the art of the late run into the penalty area, where he scored goals of every description to establish himself as one of the Premier League greats.

Stuart James


Roy Keane

Nottingham Forest 1990*-93, Manchester United 1993-2005

A force of nature, a supreme competitor. Sir Alex Ferguson once said, “If I was putting Roy Keane out there to represent Manchester United on a one-on-one, we would win the Derby, the Grand National, the Boat Race and anything else.”

Keane was not just part of a dominant team at United in the 1990s and early 2000s, he was the heart and soul.

Advertisement

Keane was United’s on-pitch leader (Michael Steele/EMPICS via Getty Images)

He didn’t play defence-splitting passes like Gerrard, De Bruyne or Paul Scholes. He didn’t have the silky skills of Cesc Fabregas, Luka Modric or Silva. He didn’t score goals like Lampard and he didn’t have the towering presence of Vieira. But he was, in an understated way, an extraordinary footballer — not just a fearsome tackler but a swashbuckling box-to-box midfielder and who evolved into an intelligent and inspirational (if at times impetuous) captain who elevated and at times dragged his team-mates to another level.

Oliver Kay

* 1992-93 was the first Premier League season


Xabi Alonso

Liverpool 2004-09

As if it wasn’t enough to be so good that Jose Mourinho compared you to a “metronomic” Guardiola. No, Alonso could also do the audacious to sit alongside the elegantly procedural midfield demands.

Advertisement

He scored in a Champions League final, won the FA Cup and shared the limelight with Gerrard in his prime. But the Basque midfielder will also be remembered for one of the Premier League’s most ridiculous goals, against Newcastle United at Anfield in September 2006.

Having won the ball himself just outside the centre circle, he saw opposition ‘keeper Steve Harper off his line and duly put the ball into the net from a staggering 60 yards. It was the second-longest goal in top-flight history but remarkably, he had already gone better.

That year, he had scored from more than 70 yards near the end of an FA Cup win at Luton Town after the goalkeeper had gone up for a set piece. The complete range of passing, a penchant to put his foot in when required and capable of jaw-dropping goals — Alonso had it all.

Greg O’Keeffe


Steven Gerrard

Liverpool 1998-2015

Advertisement

Football has become about specialisms, players whose job description is tightly defined around one super-strength. Very few have possessed the ability to claim they are one of the best across all categories.

Vieira, Toure and Rodri all have a case, but those players were usually part of either the best or second-best team in England. Gerrard did not have that luxury in many seasons, yet he is still the best all-rounder there has been. It is why his spectacularly outsized influence on Liverpool was so captivating.

He had power, guile, range, aggression. He was Roy of the Rovers incarnate, a sheer force of nature who could transform games on his own. It is why Jose Mourinho tried to sign him for three different clubs and why Ferguson thought he was the only player who replicated Keane’s ubiquity on the pitch.

Steven Gerrard

Gerrard stayed loyal to Liverpool (AMA/Corbis via Getty Images)

That ferocious energy and desire to be everything was what Rafa Benitez refined. He added a subtlety to his game while playing just off Fernando Torres, producing sublime killer passes on tap. Late in his career, he was reinvented as a ‘quarterback’, pinging diagonals from deep with machine-like precision.

He could have been placed into any team or style and had he not stayed at his boyhood club and racked up titles elsewhere, the conversation would be a lot shorter.

Advertisement

Jordan Campbell


Cesc Fabregas

Arsenal 2003-11, Chelsea 2014-19

He was so good, he changed the way Arsenal played football.

Arsene Wenger’s early success in north London had been built on the pace and power of Vieira, Emmanuel Petit and Gilberto Silva, but when a scruffy 16-year-old with a dodgy mullet and a baggy shirt arrived from Barcelona, a new era began.

After Viera’s departure, Fabregas was given the keys to the Arsenal midfield and grabbed them with both hands. His passing was slick, his vision sublime, and he quickly became the poster boy for what would come to be known as ‘Wengerball’.

Advertisement

He was unlucky to never win the trophies his quality deserved with Arsenal, but he returned from a spell back at Barcelona to win two Premier League titles in three seasons with Chelsea.

Under Wenger, Mourinho and Antonio Conte, the styles were wildly different, but it’s a testament to how good a player he was that Fabregas’ quality always shone through.

Kaya Kaynak


Patrick Vieira

Arsenal 1996-2005, Man City 2010-11

In the Premier League, there was a time before Wenger and a time after he arrived.

Advertisement

And just as Thierry Henry used Wenger’s Arsenal team as a vehicle to redefine the role of a Premier League forward, so Vieira used it to transform the idea of a midfielder.

There had been outstanding box-to-box operators before him, most notably Bryan Robson at the league’s inception in the early 1990s, then Keane. But Vieira was the complete package.


Vieira was key to Wenger’s Arsenal (John Peters/Manchester United via Getty Images)

He could match any midfielder of his era for technique, skill and intelligence while having the edge on everyone else in athleticism, physical presence, stamina and mobility. He could bend games to his will through sheer force of personality and he did it all while gliding across the pitch with a grace that no supreme, 6ft 4in (193cm) athlete should be able to produce.

Steve Madeley


Kevin De Bruyne

Manchester City 2015-2025

Advertisement

It’s not just the relentlessness of De Bruyne’s output that City will miss, but the imagination and variety — the spark — that he consistently found, so often the man with the creative solution that other talented team-mates just couldn’t see.

There were moments of sheer genius — a deft reverse pass to find Leroy Sane in a 7-2 win against Stoke City; a free kick rolled under the wall against Cardiff City, a defence-splitting ball to drag Manchester City back into the game at Newcastle.

There were moments of repeated brilliance — those unstoppable crosses from the right, always struck with whip, venom, and deep into the areas that no opponent wanted to defend. And when all else failed, there was sheer power — searing strikes against Swansea City and Chelsea, a thumping half-volley off the bar at St James’ Park, and a surging, title-winning run into the box against Aston Villa all springing to mind.

On both feet, and with absolutely everything he had, De Bruyne brought a unique mix of brutal efficiency and eye-catching style, a hard-working midfielder with game-breaking talent to boot.

Advertisement

How City will adapt to life without him remains unclear; it’s the same question fans asked when Toure and Silva chose to move on, before a certain Belgian midfielder answered the call.

Leaving with six Premier League titles, five League Cups, two FA Cups and, most importantly, a Champions League to his name, the club have De Bruyne to thank for helping to deliver its finest hours.

Thom Harris


Claude Makelele

Chelsea 2003-08

There are not many football players whose role became so clearly defined that it is named after them.

Advertisement

Makelele arrived at Chelsea in the twilight of his career. Aged 30, Makelele had been converted from an attacking midfielder to a deep-lying, anchoring midfielder that would protect his back line and hoover up any defensive actions that came anywhere near his orbit.

However, it was not just his ability to cover ground and regain possession, but also how much his role transformed the way that Chelsea played on the ball — signalling to the Premier League that a 4-4-2 was becoming increasingly outdated.


Makelele even had a role named after him (Odd Andersen/AFP via Getty Images)

“If I have a triangle in midfield — Claude Makelele behind and two others just in front — I will always have an advantage against a pure 4-4-2 where the central midfielders are side by side,” said Mourinho as Chelsea manager. “That’s because I will always have an extra man. It starts with Makelele, who is between the lines.”

When ‘The Makelele Role’ becomes an established phrase within the game, you know you have made an impact in the Premier League.

Mark Carey

Advertisement

Paul Ince

Manchester United 1989*-1995, Liverpool 1997-99, Middlesbrough 1999-2002, Wolverhampton Wanderers 2003-04 (Ince played in the top flight for West Ham from 1986-89)

Ince was the start of it all. In the inaugural Premier League season (1992-93), Manchester United won their first title in 26 years. Ince played 41 of the 42 games. He made United win matches.

Next season, same again. United won the second ever Premier League season, with Ince playing 39 of 42 matches and scoring eight goals, most of them alongside new arrival Keane.

In the third Premier League season, United were beaten into second place by Blackburn Rovers and Ince’s relationship with Ferguson had soured, so he was sold to Inter Milan for £7.5million ($9.7m at current rates).

A lot was said about Ince, not least by Ferguson, who called Ince a “big-time Charlie” when the midfielder was playing for Liverpool, a comment Ferguson later regretted.

Advertisement

It’s true, Ince did rate himself, but justifiably so. If you supported the opposition, Ince felt unbeatable. He controlled the midfield and controlled the game, the way great Italian midfielders were able to.

He spent two seasons in Serie A before signing for Liverpool. He was past his best then, but before that, Ince was the Premier League’s stepping stone to get to Keane, Vieira and De Bruyne.

Andrew Hankinson


N’Golo Kante

Leicester City 2015-16, Chelsea 2016-23

Kante took the Makelele role and asked for large fries to go with it. He super-sized what it meant to be a ball-winning midfielder (despite his shorter height and slighter frame) and spearheaded consecutive Premier League titles with different clubs.

Advertisement

He arguably achieved a unique feat in being central to two successive title-winning teams. Eric Cantona did something similar with Leeds United and Manchester United in 1992 and 1993, but only joined the former from February onwards when they were already top of the table.


Kante was central to Leicester’s remarkable title (Getty Images)

It is impossible to envisage Leicester winning the title in 2016 without Kante, who did the jobs of two, even three players with his relentless interceptions and tackles. Then at Chelsea a season later, he repeated the feat, scooping up all the player-of-the-year awards along the way.

A World Cup and a Champions League would follow as Kante reimagined himself slightly further up the field. Sadly, injuries stunted his golden era, but at his best, no one in the world was better at what Kante did.

He is also the greatest bargain buy on this list, costing Leicester just £5.6m from French club Caen in 2015

Tim Spiers

Advertisement

David Silva

Manchester City 2010-20

There is an interesting debate to be had between Silva and De Bruyne, purely in terms of their different styles of play. Plenty of City fans will pick Silva as the best player to ever play for the club, and most Spaniards would probably side with Silva due to their different appreciation of what makes a footballer special.

De Bruyne’s game lends itself more to British sensibilities: he is all about powerful running and crash, bang, wallop goals.

Silva was the yin to De Bruyne’s yang. If De Bruyne was the icing on the cake, Silva was the cake.

He made City tick during his entire period at the club, whether it was Roberto Mancini, Manuel Pellegrini or Guardiola in charge. The latter’s game plans are all about controlling the game and Silva’s tempo-setting approach, always knowing how many touches were needed in a given moment, found an obvious home. To sound all hipster for a moment, Silva would be the thinking man’s choice.

Advertisement

Sam Lee


Have your say

(Top image: Getty Images)

Sports

Jon Jones requests UFC release after Dana White says legend was ‘never’ considered him for White House card

Published

on

Jon Jones requests UFC release after Dana White says legend was ‘never’ considered him for White House card

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Mixed martial arts legend Jon Jones ended his retirement from UFC simply because he wanted a spot on the “Freedom 250” fight card at the White House in June. 

But, when UFC CEO Dana White announced the card during UFC 326 this past weekend, Jones wasn’t among the fighters. As a result, he has requested a release from his UFC contract. 

White was candid when asked about Jones following the UFC 326 card. 

Advertisement

Jon Jones of the United States of America reacts after his TKO victory against Stipe Miocic of the United States of America in the UFC heavyweight championship fight during the UFC 309 event at Madison Square Garden on Nov. 16, 2024 in New York City.  ((Photo by Sarah Stier/Getty Images))

“Never, ever, ever, which I told you guys a hundred thousands times, was Jon Jones ever even remotely in my mind to fight at the White House,” White explained, per CBS Sports. “Some guy with Meta Glasses filmed him talking about his hips – that his hips are so bad. And I don’t know if you guys saw that flag football game where he can barely run. Jon Jones retired because of his hips. He’s got arthritis in his hips. Apparently, doctors say he should have a hip replacement.”

White added that “the Jon Jones thing is bulls—,” saying that he texted the fighter’s lawyer saying he would never be on the White House card despite Jones saying he was in negotiations for it. 

UFC ANNOUNCES CARD FOR WHITE HOUSE EVENT

The Meta Glasses incident White is referring to came from a viral video, where Jones, unaware he was being filmed, discussed issues with his hips to a fan. 

Advertisement

On Monday, Jones composed a thorough response to White’s comments about him and the White House Card. He previously posted and deleted social media explanations, but Monday’s appeared to be his final statement on the matter. 

UFC President Dana White speaks after UFC Fight Night at Toyota Center on Feb. 21, 2026.  (Troy Taormina/Imagn Images)

“Yes, I have arthritis in my hip and it’s painful, but that doesn’t mean I can’t fight,” Jones, who retired a heavyweight champion in 2025, said. “So let me get this straight, if I had accepted the lowball offer, suddenly my hip would be fine and I’d be on the White House card? That doesn’t make sense. I even received stem cell treatment last week to get ready for the White House card, and training camp was scheduled to start today. I was preparing to be ready. 

“I understand business deals fall through sometimes, but going out publicly and saying things that aren’t true isn’t right. After everything I’ve given to the UFC, the years, the title defenses, the fights, hearing that I’m ‘done’ is disappointing. Especially when as recently as Friday UFC was calling me trying to get me on that White House card for a much lower number.”

Jones finished his statement by saying he “respectfully” asks to be released from his UFC contract.

Advertisement

Jon Jones enters the ring before facing Stipe Miocic in the UFC heavyweight championship fight during the UFC 309 event at Madison Square Garden on November 16, 2024 in New York City, New York. (Chris Unger/Zuffa LLC)

“No more spins, no more games. Thank you to the real fans who know what’s up,” he wrote. 

The UFC did not immediately respond to a request for comment by Fox News Digital.

Jones is considered one of the best UFC fighters of all time, owning a 28-1-1 record, which includes his last bout with Stipe Miocic, knocking him out to take the heavyweight title belt. He is also a two-time light heavyweight champion. 

Advertisement

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

With U.S. at war with Iran, political upheaval could engulf World Cup

Published

on

With U.S. at war with Iran, political upheaval could engulf World Cup

Twelve days ago the U.S., a World Cup host country, launched a full-scale bombing campaign against Iran, a country that has qualified to play in the tournament. That’s never happened before.

Five days later, that same World Cup host began military operations inside the borders of Ecuador, another World Cup qualifier, half a world away. That’s never happened before either.

With the tournament scheduled to kick off in three months, those events have soccer scholar Jonathan Wilson questioning whether it’s wise for the World Cup to go on at all.

“It seems to me, for each passing day, it’s less and less likely that the World Cup can happen,” he said.

That take seems unduly alarmist said David Goldblatt, a British sportswriter and sociologist who is a visiting professor at Pitzer College in Claremont. Anything short of a full-scale war inside the U.S. would not be enough to pull the plug on the tournament now, he said. Especially with FIFA expecting revenues of as much as $11 billion.

Advertisement

“I mean, it’s not a good look,” Goldblatt conceded. “And certainly when set against FIFA’s official pronouncements on its role in encouraging world peace and cosmopolitan celebrations of a universal humanity, none of that sits terribly easily.

“But in terms of actually running the World Cup, I don’t think it’s going to make very much difference at all.”

However, with the Trump administration open to engaging in more international conflicts, there’s little doubt this World Cup, the largest and most complex in history, will also be the most political in history as well.

Complicating things further is the fact the current conflict in the Middle East hasn’t been limited to just the U.S. and Iran. Iranian missiles have hit both Qatar and Saudi Arabia, among other countries, and Jordan has fired on U.S. assets.

Those three countries are World Cup qualifiers as well.

Advertisement

The fate of a soccer tournament pales in importance to the death and destruction the conflagration in the Middle East has produced, of course. But the need for unity is the very reason there’s a World Cup in the first place.

When French soccer administrator Jules Rimet founded the tournament 96 years ago, he believed soccer could be a tool for international peace. And in the early years of the tournament, Rimet, FIFA’s longest-serving president and a talented diplomat, was able to limit the impact of geopolitics on the World Cup, watering down Mussolini’s influence on the 1934 World Cup, for example, and steering the 1938 tournament away from Hitler’s Germany.

FIFA President Gianni Infantino has taken a far different approach, courting President Donald Trump’s support despite his growing number of global conflicts.

A week before bombs began falling on Iran, Infantino appeared at the inaugural meeting of Trump’s Board of Peace wearing a red cap with ‘USA’ on the front and the numbers ‘45-47’ — a reference to Trump’s non-consecutive presidencies. That act was so blatantly partisan, IOC president Kirsty Coventry said her organization would investigate whether Infantino, an IOC member, breached the terms of the group’s charter, which requires members to act independent of political interests.

FIFA president Gianni Infantino holds up a USA hat as he attends the inaugural meeting for the Board of Peace at the Institute of Peace in Washington on Feb. 19.

Advertisement

(Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images)

“Infantino has absolutely breached every FIFA protocol on neutrality,” said Wilson, author of “The Power and Glory: The History of the World Cup.”

“Absolute neutrality is always impossible and not desirable, but it has clearly gone way, way, way beyond. The peace prize looked grotesque at the time. It looks even worse now. And I can’t see how the future will look kindly on Infantino. I think Infantino has to some extent legitimized Trump.”

This is hardly new behavior from Infantino, who had close relationships with Vladimir Putin ahead of the 2018 tournament played in Russia and Qatar’s leaders ahead of the 2022 tournament despite their well-known human rights violations.

Advertisement

The list of countries Infantino is asking to overlook poor relations with the country hosting the majority of World Cup games this summer is growing.

Consider that Denmark, which administers Greenland, an autonomous territory Trump has also threatened to invade, can qualify for the tournament in a European playoff that will take place later this month. Then there’s World Cup qualifiers Haiti, Ivory Coast and Senegal, who aren’t at war with the U.S. but whose citizens have been banned from entering the country to cheer for their teams. That completely contradicts a promise from Infantino, who said “everybody will be welcome” at the 2026 World Cup.

“If I had a crystal ball I could tell you now what is going to happen,” Heimo Schirgi, the World Cup chief operating officer for FIFA, said Monday. “But obviously the situation is developing. It’s changing day by day and we are monitoring closely. [But] the World Cup will go on right? The World Cup is too big and we hope that everyone can participate that has qualified.”

Goldblatt, the Pitzer professor, said Infantino’s action are understandable since he has few cards to play against Trump.

President Trump speaks as he receives the FIFA Peace Prize while FIFA president Gianni Infantino applauds Friday.

President Trump speaks as he receives the FIFA Peace Prize as FIFA president Gianni Infantino applauds on Dec. 5 the Kennedy Center in Washington.

(Patrick Smith / Getty Images)

Advertisement

“What’s Infantino going to do? What levers can you pull?” he asked. “You can threaten to take it away. That’s not happening. Moral admonishment? Who’s going to take that from FIFA? It is a farcical idea that anybody thinks that the president of FIFA has any kind of collective moral authority or any role as a spokesperson for the progressive part of the world.

“They may fantasize that this is the case. But it is morally and politically absurd that any of us should expect that of these people. So if you are Infantino and that is the case, you know what works with Trump? What works is flattery. So of course he’s gone down that path.”

The games, Goldblatt said, will go on even if bombs are still falling. And that may not be an entirely bad thing.

“Football’s a great distraction. That’s partly why it’s so popular,” he said. “It will be virtually impossible, if the war continues, for that not to be a central element of like, the meaning and the purpose of what we’re all doing here.

Advertisement

“How we’ll feel and what it will look like, I don’t know. It will be very strange. Football is unpredictable and extraordinary. Something will happen that will warm our souls.”

You have read the latest installment of On Soccer with Kevin Baxter. The weekly column takes you behind the scenes and shines a spotlight on unique stories. Listen to Baxter on this week’s episode of the “Corner of the Galaxy” podcast.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Australia grants asylum to 5 Iranian women’s soccer players amid Iran conflict

Published

on

Australia grants asylum to 5 Iranian women’s soccer players amid Iran conflict

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Australia granted asylum to five players from the Iranian women’s soccer team who were visiting for a tournament when the U.S.-Israeli attacks against Iran began.

Australian federal police officers on Tuesday transported the five women from their hotel in Gold Coast, Australia, to a “safe location” after they made asylum requests to meet with Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke and to finalize the processing of their humanitarian visas.

“Last night I was able to tell five women from the Iranian Women’s Soccer team that they are welcome to stay in Australia, to be safe and have a home here,” Burke said on X.

The move comes after the team refused to sing the Iranian anthem before their first Women’s Asian Cup match early last week against South Korea, although they later sang and saluted the anthem in two subsequent matches, including ahead of their final match, when they were eliminated by the Philippines.

Advertisement

IRANIAN WOMEN’S SOCCER FANS SHOW SUPPORT FOR TRUMP AS TEAM APPEARS TO PIVOT ON NATIONAL ANTHEM STANCE

Australian Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke poses with five Iranian women soccer players who have been granted asylum in Australia, Tuesday, March 10, 2026. (Australia Ministry of Home Affairs)

“I don’t want to begin to imagine how difficult that decision is for each of the individual women, but certainly last night it was joy, it was relief,” Burke told reporters after signing the documents. “People were very excited about embarking on a life in Australia.”

The five women said they were happy for their names and pictures to be published, according to Burke, who emphasized that the players wanted to make clear that they were not political activists.

The Iranian team arrived in Australia for the tournament before the war against Iran began on Feb. 28.

Advertisement

After the team was eliminated from the tournament over the weekend, they faced potentially returning to a country still under bombardment. The team’s head coach, Marziyeh Jafari, said on Sunday the players “want to come back to Iran as soon as we can.”

An official squad list named 26 players, as well as Jafari and other coaches.

While only five players were granted asylum, Burke said the offer was given to everyone on the team.

IRAN FLAG REMOVED FROM PARALYMPICS OPENING CEREMONY AFTER SOLE ATHLETE WITHDRAWS OVER TRAVEL SAFETY CONCERNS

Iran players during their national anthem ahead of the Women’s Asian Cup soccer match between Iran and the Philippines in Robina, Australia, Sunday, March 8, 2026. (Dave Hunt/AAPImage via AP)

Advertisement

“These women are tremendously popular in Australia, but we realize they are in a terribly difficult situation with the decisions that they’re making,” Burke said. “The opportunity will continue to be there for them to talk to Australian officials if they wish to.”

It remains unclear when the remaining players will leave Australia.

“Australians have been moved by the plight of these brave women,” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told reporters. “They’re safe here and they should feel at home here.”

“They then had to consider that and do it in a way that did not present any danger to them or to their families and friends back home in Iran,” he continued.

The asylum offer came after U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday called on Australia to grant asylum to any team member who wanted it.

Advertisement

Trump had blasted Australia on social media, saying Australia was “making a terrible humanitarian mistake” by allowing the team to be “forced back to Iran, where they will most likely be killed.”

Supporters react towards a bus transporting Iranian woman players following their Women’s Asian Cup soccer match against the Philippines on the Gold Coast, Australia, Sunday, March 8, 2026. (Dave Hunt/AAP Image via AP)

“The U.S. will take them if you won’t,” Trump said, despite his administration’s efforts to limit the number of immigrants in the U.S. who can receive asylum for political purposes.

Just hours later, Trump praised Albanese in another post.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

“He’s on it! Five have already been taken care of, and the rest are on their way,” Trump wrote.

Albanese said Trump had called him for “a very positive conversation,” about the issue. The prime minister said he explained “the action that we’d undertaken over the previous 48 hours” to support the women.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Trending