Connect with us

Washington, D.C

Washington D.C. Democrats and pseudo-left support draconian, punitive crime bill

Published

on

Washington D.C. Democrats and pseudo-left support draconian, punitive crime bill


The Council of the District of Columbia, Washington D.C.’s local legislative body, voted on February 6 to advance the right-wing “law and order” Secure DC Omnibus Amendment Act of 2024. A final vote will take place within the next few weeks, during which more deliberations and amendments are expected to be made. 

District of Columbia Mayor Muriel Bowser, center, speaks with constituents, Friday, June 10, 2022, in Washington. [AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin]

The bill combines proposals from several crime bills proposed last year, in the wake of a supposed crime wave that has hit the District. According to official figures, the city’s homicide rate has increased by 36 percent in the past year, the highest since the 1990s.

As is the case in Democratic Party-run governments at the local and national levels, rather than deal with the root social causes of crime, bourgeois politicians advocate a massive crackdown on the poorest layers of the population and criminalizing poverty.

The bill would give the chief of police the power to create temporary “drug-free zones” for a period of five days at a time. Within these drug-free zones, if the police believe a group of at least two people intend to commit a drug-related crime, they could be asked to leave or face arrest. This portion of the bill would give encouragement to police harassment against groups congregating in such zones for other reasons.

Advertisement

Theft for the purpose of reselling merchandise would be treated as a felony with a maximum sentence of 15 years in prison. A punitive amendment which would have reduced the threshold for first-degree theft—punishable by up to 10 years in prison—from $1,000 to $500 was deferred for the final vote.

The bill would drastically increase the length of pre-trial detention from a maximum of five days to 225 days. Furthermore, the bill would permit pre-trial detention of juveniles for many crimes, including violent crimes and certain unarmed offenses. The D.C. Jail has been cited on numerous occasions for its inhumane and downright horrific conditions.

“Every day, I hear from residents across all eight wards about the urgent need to address crime in our neighborhoods,” the bill’s sponsor, Democratic Councilwoman Brooke Pinto, declared in a press release last month. In a sham effort to provide the “law and order” bill with a popular gloss, Pinto added, “It is resoundingly clear—from residents across the District, businesses, visitors and our federal and regional partners that urgent and effective action is needed now.”

In fact, “urgent and effective action,” that is, addressing underlying issues impacting Washington D.C.’s increasingly impoverished working class, is excluded from this bill and the city’s Democratic Party establishment’s overall agenda.

Nowhere in the bill are the root causes of crime addressed—poverty and the soaring cost of living. Currently, one in seven people in the District of Columbia live below the poverty line. The National Low Income Housing Coalition has reported that D.C. has a shortage of 33,000 rental homes available for “extremely low income” renters, defined for a family of four as having an income of $41,400 or less. Seventy-three percent of people in this category spend over half their monthly income on rent.

So intense is the need for rent relief that the Emergency Rental Assistance Program established at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, described as a “lifeline for residents facing displacement” by Street Sense Media, was forced to stop accepting applications within hours after it came back online in early January. According to the publication, “ERAP historically runs out of money mid-year,” and has taken to opening for brief periods on a quarterly basis in order to extend the program’s funds.

Advertisement

The Democrats, who have long ago cast aside all pretenses of concern for the working class, have no interest in addressing these issues, instead they serve business owners and their upper-middle-class base by further marginalizing the poor.

For example, to advance the needs of big business, a homeless encampment in McPherson Square was cleared out last February, in which 70 homeless people were removed and most of their belongings destroyed, with promises to help the homeless going almost entirely unfulfilled. 

Democratic Mayor Muriel Bowser recently offered $500 million in renovations to Capital One Arena in an attempt to prevent Monumental Sports and Entertainment, owner of several D.C.-area sports franchises, from moving to a potential new arena in Alexandria, Virginia. Monumental’s chairman and CEO, Ted Leonsis, has an estimated net worth of $2.8 billion. 

Bowser has been offering further enticements to businesses to open up shop in D.C., offering $20 million in grants altogether in the hopes that downtown D.C., greatly affected by years of a pandemic that shows no signs of slowing, can be rejuvenated. 

Several activist groups were present at the Secure DC bill’s vote to express their opposition.Tia Bell of the TRIGGER Project expressed concern that the law would ultimately hurt the neighborhoods most affected by gun violence, while others claimed that the bill’s punitive approach would disproportionately harm black residents.

Of the 13 D.C. Council members—11 Democrats and 2 independents—all but one of them voted in favor of advancement, with Ward 8 Councilman Trayon White, a Democrat, voting present. Among the council members who voted in favor are several who were endorsed either by the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) or other pseudo-left groups.

Janeese Lewis George (Ward 4) and Zachary Parker (Ward 5), were endorsed by the DSA, while Matthew Frumin (Ward 3) and Brianne Nadeau (Ward 1) were endorsed by other “progressive” groups and the trade union bureaucracies. All voted to accept the law-and-order bill.

Advertisement

Frumin, in a press statement released on the day of the vote, thanked Pinto for “her leadership and hard work in introducing this bill.” Frumin offered vacuous criticism, noting that, while the bill “focused heavily on accountability and enforcement,” the Council “must be equally committed to creating hope and opportunity.”

For the DSA-endorsed Parker and Lewis George, no hint of criticism was expressed. The latter’s support came after an amendment was introduced that would “[expand] the types of criminal records eligible for sealing or expungement.” This is, of course, after the crime bill would have made possible the targeting of underage youth by the police.

Parker, who has voted to accept previous “law and order” packages in the past, did not even bother to publicly acknowledge his vote. In 2022, the Washington D.C. chapter of the DSA publicly endorsed Parker, declaring that his campaign was a “massive opportunity for the progressive left to elect an uncompromising champion for our values.” 

Not content with prostituting their supposed “values,” the DSA stated their “endorsements are not just a recommendation to DSA members to vote for a particular candidate, but rather a commitment to fight to get that candidate elected.”



Source link

Washington, D.C

DC celebrates boost in college grant program for students – WTOP News

Published

on

DC celebrates boost in college grant program for students – WTOP News


The expanded funding aims to make college more affordable for thousands of D.C. students, continuing a program that has already helped nearly 40,000 graduates pursue degrees nationwide.

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser went back to school on Thursday. She headed to the gym at Coolidge High School in Northwest to make an announcement that could make college more affordable for eligible D.C. high school students.

Standing at the podium in front of a vibrant mural in the gymnasium, Bowser told the students, “A few weeks ago we got some good news from the United States Congress!”

“Even they can get it right sometimes!” she added.

Advertisement

The news from Capitol Hill was that funding for the 25-year-old D.C. Tuition Assistance Grant program, or DCTAG, has been increased, something Bowser said she’s been working toward for 10 years.

Starting in the 2026-27 academic year, the maximum annual award for students who apply and qualify for the grants will go from $10,000 a year to as much as $15,000, and the overall cap increases from $50,000 to $75,000.

“These are real dollars guys, a real $15,000!” Bowser told the students. “This year alone, 4,500 students were approved for DCTAG, and that’s the highest number that we’ve had in the last five years.”

Since DCTAG was established, Bowser said nearly 40,000 D.C. high school students were serviced through the program, attaining degrees at more than 400 colleges across the country.

Among those who benefited from the DCTAG program was Arturo Evans, a local business owner who grew up in Ward 7 and graduated from D.C.’s Cesar Chavez Public Charter School.

Advertisement

Speaking to the Coolidge students, Evans explained that as a high school student, he didn’t know if his dreams would ever come true.

“Do your homework, go to class, be on time, listen to your teachers,” he said. “Do not let your current situation determine who you can be tomorrow.”

Evans said without the grant money available in the DCTAG program his college prospects would have been “very limited.”

“I probably would have stayed local, probably would have had to go to a community college,” he said.

But he told WTOP, since he applied for and received grant money through the program, “TAG was able to pave the way for me to go ahead and achieve my dreams and go to my dream school,” at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

Advertisement

While he was at UNLV, Evans said his mother’s illness meant he had to return to the District to help care for her. But thanks to help from his DCTAG adviser, he was able to complete his degree before becoming the CEO of his own D.C.-based business.

Among the Coolidge students attending the event was senior Victoria Evans (no relation to the speaker Arturo Evans), who also was in the DCTAG program and serves as the Command Sergeant Major of the Coolidge Junior Army ROTC.

Victoria Evans said she hopes to study medicine, and explained, “I found out about DCTAG through my school counselors and my college and career coordinators.”

Asked about the application process, she said, “It’s not hard at all. I would definitely say go and get the money they’re providing.”

D.C. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton pushed to establish the funding when she introduced the D.C. College Access Act, which passed Congress in 1999. It was designed to address the fact that, since D.C. doesn’t have a state university system, D.C. students had limited access to in-state tuition at public colleges and universities.

Advertisement

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

© 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Six months into federal surge, questions persist over MPD’s level of involvement

Published

on

Six months into federal surge, questions persist over MPD’s level of involvement


More than six months into the federal law enforcement surge in the District, questions remain about how the Metropolitan Police Department’s level of involvement in joint operations and what information the department tracks to ensure accountability.

Councilmember Brooke Pinto (D – Ward 2), chairwoman of the Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety, held an oversight hearing of three public safety agencies on Wednesday, including MPD.

The bulk of the 10.5-hour meeting focused on testimony from concerned residents and Interim Chief Jeffery Carroll about the police department.

“Interim Chief Carroll’s testimony provided a clearer sense of how the federal surge of officers is managed overall; however, many questions still remain regarding the ongoing investigations into the three federal agency involved shootings and how and where deployment decisions are being made and which agencies are handling arrests,” Pinto said in a statement to 7News.

Advertisement

At the same time, more residents are raising alarms about federal agencies responding to 911 calls. Carroll said it is not new for agencies such as the U.S. Park Police and the U.S. Secret Service to respond to those calls, but residents are concerned that other agencies are reportedly starting to show up as well.

SEE ALSO | DC Council committee holds oversight hearing on MPD

“When we say law enforcement in DC in 2026, who are we talking about, who’s there, what are they doing, what limits and regulations and oversight are they beholden to, and what recourse do residents have?” Bethany Young, director of policy at DC Justice Lab, told 7News.

“If you call 911, MPD is showing up,” Carroll testified Wednesday. “Can other agencies hear those calls that have those radio channels? Absolutely, they can. But MPD is being dispatched a call and MPD is responding.”

“You see now the uneasiness of some people calling for help,” Councilmember Christina Henderson (I – At-Large), responded to Carroll. “No, I definitely understand,” Carroll replied. “I’m not saying it’s a situation that we want to be in or where we want to be, but I want to make sure that we’re transparent and clear on what the state is right now. That’s what the state is.”

Advertisement

Requests for comment were sent to the D.C. U.S. Attorney’s Office and the mayor’s office about Carroll’s testimony. The mayor did not make herself available for questions at a public event on Thursday.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

DC Courts create new pathway for people without lawyers to get legal help – WTOP News

Published

on

DC Courts create new pathway for people without lawyers to get legal help – WTOP News


Nonlawyers who receive training will now be able to help with civil matters in D.C., as part of a new order issued by D.C. Courts that expands access to legal assistance.

This page contains a video which is being blocked by your ad blocker.
In order to view the video you must disable your ad blocker.

DC Courts create new pathway for people without lawyers to get legal help

Nonlawyers who receive training will now be able to help with civil matters in D.C., as part of a new order issued by D.C. Courts earlier this month that expands access to legal assistance for people without an attorney.

Advertisement

The rule, scheduled to take effect in April, creates a framework for Community Justice Workers, or nonlawyers who are supervised and trained to offer limited legal assistance through a partnership with legal services organizations.

The step comes after a yearslong assessment into the possible role for nonlawyers in offering certain types of legal help to D.C. residents.

As of 2017, 97% of plaintiffs in paternity and child support cases, and in small estate matters, represent themselves in D.C. Superior Court, according to a 2025 report from the District of Columbia Courts Civil Legal Regulatory Reform Task Force.

“We are facing an extraordinary need,” said Nancy Drane, executive director of D.C.’s Access to Justice Commission. “There are thousands of District residents who are not getting the legal help they need.”

The Community Justice Worker model could be compared to seeing a nurse practitioner in a doctor’s office. Ariel Levinson-Waldman, director of nonprofit Tzedek D.C., said someone who goes through a supervised program would be able to provide help, “just like your nurse practitioner does.”

Advertisement

Tzedek D.C. offers pro bono legal help and financial counseling. But, Levinson-Waldman said, there are thousands of people who are eligible for their services and the work of similar providers, and only a select few are available to help.

“Many of the court’s high-volume dockets are cases where the individual D.C. resident is not getting any help,” he said. “This effort, we saw that as a way to change that, to bring more people into opportunities for access to justice, to bring more resources to the problem.”

Whether it be divorce, custody cases, small claims or child support cases, the stakes are high.

Without an attorney or someone who can help in some way, cases often go “less well than it would have. It impacts their family, their future, their finances, sometimes access to the custody of their children,” Levinson-Waldman said.

In some instances, Drane said people experiencing issues such as eviction or family conflict navigate cases without help from a lawyer because legal help is expensive. Free legal service groups have limited capacities and budgets.

Advertisement

Under the Community Justice Worker model, organizations could either train their own staffs to help or partner with community nonprofits.

“What this would mean, practically, is that we will have more helpers in the community who are trained and authorized to provide certain types of legal help,” Drane said. “The real beauty of Community Justice Workers is that they receive what I would call ‘bite-sized training for bite-sized tasks.’”

Karen Dale, market president and CEO of AmeriHealth Caritas District of Columbia, said people “need assistance, they need support. Having someone by your side to help you navigate with a level of specificity, get you to the right resources in a timely way, should be able to help less lives and families and communities get derailed.”

The approach, Levinson-Waldman said, will provide a formal way for “public spirited” volunteers to help their neighbors.

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

Advertisement

© 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending