Connect with us

Washington, D.C

Expanding estimates, unanswered questions: Checking the math on DC stadium deal

Published

on

Expanding estimates, unanswered questions: Checking the math on DC stadium deal


At a splashy announcement in late April, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser assured taxpayers their $1.1 billion investment in a new football stadium and entertainment complex would be money well spent — pledging that over 30 years the deal would bring in $4 billion in tax revenue.

A month later, her administration released a report from private consultants that upped that figure to $5.1 billion in tax revenue over a 30-year period.

But the News4 I-Team’s review of that new fiscal impact shows at least a third of those tax dollars will remain at the proposed Washington Commanders stadium site — a significant portion of the return promised to taxpayers.

Of the $5.1 billion private consultant CSL predicts the stadium and surrounding district will generate in tax dollars over 30-plus years, the I-Team found $1.7 billion will be spent running the stadium, maintaining the stadium and paying off the money D.C. borrows to build the stadium.

Advertisement

“Some of the tax revenue that’s generating that will stay on the campus is really meant to be able to maintain the quality of what’s there so it doesn’t degrade over time,” said D.C. City Administrator Kevin Donahue, adding those dollars would offset annual operating costs from public safety and civil enforcement associated with game days. 

Donahue explained all sales taxes, food and beverage taxes, and ticket taxes generated at the stadium would stay in a fund used solely for the stadium expenses and upkeep.

It’s just one aspect of the $3.7 billion stadium complex deal now under consideration by the D.C. Council, which has discussed delaying a vote on the package Bowser proposed as part of the Council’s annual budget process.

Under the deal, the Commanders pledge to invest $2.7 billion of private money with more than $1 billion in D.C. taxpayer funds to revamp the RFK Stadium site in Ward 7.

The deal has come under fire, however, from taxpayer watchdogs who say District dollars would be better invested in District residents’ more urgent needs.

Advertisement

“This is really an investment in billionaire sports team owners. And what it is going to do is grow their profits while D.C. bears the cost,” Shira Markoff of the DC Fiscal Policy Institute told News4.

Markoff said that, at a time when necessities such as D.C. Medicaid and other safety nets face dramatic cuts, District residents deserve to know the full cost of the deal.

“This is D.C.’s money,” Markoff said. “We want to see it invested on behalf of D.C. residents to really grow our economy, you know, in ways that benefit D.C. workers and our most vulnerable population.”

But proponents of the deal, including Bowser, have argued there are few realistic alternatives for the RFK site, with estimates showing the Commanders complex would generate about 30,000 construction jobs and $4.2 billion in pay for those workers over three decades.

She has defended the multibillion-dollar tax revenue estimates as conservative, saying in early June: “When we look at the number of jobs created, tax revenue generated, the adjacent economic activity that is created, we think it could be even bigger.”

Advertisement

The I-Team asked for clarity on how the anticipated tax revenue changed from $4 billion over three decades to more than $5 billion in the private consultants’ report. The I-Team was told the private consultants aren’t available for media questions, but Donahue said the increase was a result of speeding up the projected opening of restaurants, shops and apartments surrounding the stadium.

“The bigger difference really was in the economic activity that’s happening outside the stadium,” Donahue told News4.

The I-Team wanted to see those dates and details and filed open records requests for the documents showing the initial projections and discussions around them.

The District provided the report breaking down the $5 billion figure but said neither the mayor, deputy mayor for economic development nor about a half dozen of their senior staffers had a copy of the first draft — which included the $4 billion figure — before reporting its promises in the stadium announcement.

The I-Team also was told the District could not locate a single email, text or voice message about it in its records.

Advertisement

The deal also projects as many as 6,477 multi-family residences around the stadium. That is almost five times as many residences in the District’s Wharf neighborhood, according to The Wharf’s website.

Under the deal, the Commanders have the right to develop the residences, but it’s unclear how many District dollars could go to that effort. The District already requires a portion of housing units to be designated as affordable and, according to Donahue, hasn’t ruled out providing additional funds for that purpose.

Donahue said District leaders arrived at the 6,477 number based off a master plan it has for the RFK site. But when the I-Team asked for a copy of that plan, which they said was prepared by outside consultants, they declined to release it. 

Meanwhile, the D.C. Council hired an outside consultant to review the terms of the deal, which Bowser said must be approved by July 15 under its agreement with the Commanders. If that date passes, the Commanders could start negotiating again with Maryland or Virginia.

The team has said it hopes to open the new stadium by 2030.

Advertisement

Investigative producer Katie Leslie and photojournalist Derrick Cheston contributed to this report.



Source link

Washington, D.C

Who will lead DC police? Search for new chief begins – WTOP News

Published

on

Who will lead DC police? Search for new chief begins – WTOP News


The D.C. police department is once again searching for a new chief who will lead the department following Pamela Smith’s departure.

About two years after Pamela Smith was approved to lead officers on a permanent basis, the D.C. police department is once again searching for a new chief.

Smith said Monday that she will step away from her position at the end of the year, calling it a personal decision she talked over with family.

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser spoke about Smith’s resignation during a news conference Monday.

Advertisement

“I’ve been around long enough to know and to have lived through transitions,” Bowser said. “There are ways to approach this period of time and do it in a way that’s going to be most beneficial to D.C. residents. I’m going to marinate on it a little bit, and I’ll appoint the right, perfect person.”

Bowser will nominate the department’s next chief. The next permanent police chief will also need to earn the approval of the D.C. Council.

Smith’s resignation isn’t the only shake-up in D.C.’s leadership.

The mayor recently announced that she won’t seek reelection for a fourth term. With about a year left on the job, a reporter asked Bowser about the “challenges” associated with searching for a new chief as she prepares to exit office.

“I don’t call it a challenge,” Bowser said. “Because of the very deep bench we have and because of the great reputation of our department.”

Advertisement

Bowser said she will look internally for a new chief but would be open to nominating an external candidate.

“I’m obviously going to start first with the best police department in the nation,” Bowser said.

At the time Smith took over as chief in 2023, D.C. was at the peak of a crime wave.

Under her leadership, rates of crime have fallen. According to data provided by D.C. police, overall crime dropped 18% in 2025. Homicides are down 30% this year.

What should Bowser be looking for? Groups weigh in

The D.C. Police Union called on Bowser to collaborate with its members in the search for a new permanent chief.

Advertisement

“The ideal candidate must demonstrate proven leadership qualities that prioritize respect for the rank-and-file officers, foster trust within our communities, and commit to reforming broken policies lingering from the misguided ‘defund the police’ era, which resulted in laws and regulations that have undermined effective policing and officer morale,” the union wrote in a news release Monday morning.

Congressman Oye Owolewa, who represents the District in the U.S. House, said there’s an opportunity presented by the change in leadership. He also will not be seeking reelection as D.C.’s shadow representative in 2026.

“As we look ahead, it is my hope that this transition presents an opportunity to continue strengthening trust between law enforcement and the communities they serve, while advancing policies rooted in accountability, transparency, and true public safety for all,” Owolewa wrote in a statement.

Looking ahead, Bethany Young, policy director with D.C. Justice Lab, believes the next chief has a chance to make D.C. a national model.

“It feels like it’s in the air, like there’s something really that we’re on the precipice of,” said Young, whose organization pushes for police reform in the District.

Advertisement

Young said she hopes they will listen to residents and be open to reforms, such as limiting traffic stops for minor violations and supporting alternatives to policing for behavioral health crises.

“They want to see more accountability,” Young told WTOP. “They want to see more oversight. They want to have more information about how policing is operating in D.C.”

She also believes the next chief should rely on data, not politics, and be bold enough to speak out when policing practices don’t align with community needs.

“There are certain things that a police chief … cannot control,” Young said. “However, you always have a voice.”

She said the organization didn’t see eye to eye with the chief when it came to what she called an increase in unnecessary police interactions, collaboration with federal agencies and a lack of transparency and accountability.

Advertisement
‘What I’d like to do is give them encouragement’

Smith’s departure comes at a time when D.C. police officers have worked alongside federal partners, such as patrols with National Guard members.

City leaders have insisted police do not work directly alongside U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers; but some D.C. residents have reported instances where immigrants are arrested for minor infractions and arrested by ICE agents moments later.

Smith was asked about advice for the next chief and what guidance she has given to police officers in navigating law enforcement responsibilities alongside federal partners.

“They know probably better than I do what’s happening in community from day to day with our federal partners, because a lot of them are very intimately involved, especially our commanders,” Smith said. “At this point, I don’t need to give them any advice. I think what I’d like to do is give them encouragement.”

Smith, who has served in law enforcement for 28 years, said she will be available to support the department’s next leader.

Advertisement

“I will be available to the incoming or interim to provide him or her support with respect to the direction that the police department will continue,” Smith said.

For the next chief, Smith said three things are critical: communication, collaboration with partners and being involved with the community.

“My phone rings all time of day, all time of night, and you have to answer the call, you have to answer the phone, you have to show up,” Smith said.

A passion for D.C. residents is essential, she said.

“You may have to sit in somebody’s basement to have a conversation about something,” Smith said. “You have to dress down sometimes. Sometimes I’m in the community, and people don’t know I’m there. It’s just to protect the anonymity of the folks who really trust the Metropolitan Police Department, but sometimes are afraid to share the information that’s necessary.”

Advertisement

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

© 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

List: What to do in the DC area this week and weekend, through Dec. 14

Published

on

List: What to do in the DC area this week and weekend, through Dec. 14


We share the best things to do every weekend in The Weekend Scene newsletter – it’s completely free to subscribe!

Wreaths Across America returns this weekend, inviting people across the country to decorate service members’ graves with festive greenery.

Volunteers and organizers will work to place more than a quarter-million wreaths just at Arlington National Cemetery, and many more at over 5,400 locations nationwide. Anyone can donate or sign up to volunteer for this holiday tradition.

Here’s what else to do this week in the Washington, D.C. area.

Advertisement

What to do in Washington, D.C.

Home Alone in concert with the National Symphony Orchestra: Tues., The Anthem, $102

Light Yards Express: Weds., The Yards Park, free

Tingey Plaza Holiday Market: Fri. to Sun., The Yards, free

Gay Men’s Chorus of Washington – The Holiday Show: Sat., Sun. and Dec. 20, Lincoln Theatre, $68.40

National Kiss Under the National Mistletoe: Sat., 3-6 p.m., Anthem Row, free

Advertisement

WWE Saturday Night’s Main Event – John Cena’s Final Match: Sat., 7:30 p.m., Capital One Arena, $303+ (there’s also a free fan event)

National Menorah Lighting: Sun., The Ellipse, free


What to do in Maryland

Holiday Trains and Planes: Fri., 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., College Park Aviation Museum, $5 adults; $4 seniors; $2 students and free for children under 2

Takoma Park Gift Market: Fri., Ethan Allen and Carroll Aves., free

Skate With Santa: Sat., 2-4 p.m., Tucker Road Ice Rink in Fort Washington, $6-$9 and $4 for skate rental

Advertisement

BlackRock Center for the Arts Celebrates The Season market and music: Sat., noon to 4 p.m., Germantown, free

Concert – Earth, Wind & Fire: Fri. and Sat., The Theater at MGM National Harbor, $140+

Indoor Holiday Market at rio: Sat. and Sun., Gaithersburg, free


What to do in Virginia

Capital Art & Craft Festival: Fri. to Sun., Dulles Expo Center, $10 in advance or $12 at the door (free for kids 12 and under)

Wreaths Across America at Arlington National Cemetery: Sat., 8 a.m., Arlington, free

Advertisement

Old Town Alexandria Christmas Market and Holiday Craft Show: Sat., 11 a.m. to 4 p.m., John Carlyle Square, free

Kwanzaa Celebration: Sat., noon to 2 p.m., Alexandria Black History Museum, $15

Holidays in Purcellville – parade, market and more: Sat., various locations, free

Hillsboro Holiday Homes Tour: Sat., Hillsboro, $18-$28

Ice & Lights – The Winter Village at Cameron Run: Through Feb., Alexandria, $14.82

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Family of man killed by off-duty FBI agent in Metro Center files $15M lawsuit

Published

on

Family of man killed by off-duty FBI agent in Metro Center files M lawsuit


Three years after his death during an altercation with an off-duty FBI agent inside Metro Center station, Troy Bullock’s family continues to seek justice — now in a $15 million lawsuit.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia previously said there was insufficient evidence to pursue federal civil rights charges or D.C. criminal charges against the FBI agent.

The lawsuit’s court documents obtained by News4 describe the incident as a “violation of civil rights, use of excessive force, an assault and battery, and an unreasonable search and seizure of Troy Bullock that resulted in his death at the hands of a federal law enforcement agent.”

It also goes into details about the incident, stating that it was the unidentified agent who initially approached Bullock regarding his conduct while he was waiting for an oncoming train.

Advertisement

After the incident, prosecutors said that the agent, whose identity was not released, said he saw Bullock start a fight with someone else.

The United State Attorney’s Office later said when the agent stepped in and told Bullock he should leave the person alone, Bullock became aggressive and pushed the agent, which allegedly caused the two to fall.

However, the lawsuit says, “Without provocation or legal justification, FBI Agent John Doe initiated a physical altercation by pushing or shoving Mr. Bullock.”

Surveillance video obtained by News4 at the time shows the struggle between the two men as they fell over a barrier about 8 feet to the ground below. Seconds later, shots were fired, and people started running.

As the struggle continued, the off-duty agent drew his service weapon and shot Bullock, who died at the station, authorities said.

Advertisement

Police later said Bullock had a gun on him during the incident.

The lawsuit calls his death the “[…] direct and proximate result of the actions of FBI Agent John Doe,” and that his actions were quote “objectively unreasonable, unwarranted, and undertaken with a reckless disregard for Mr. Bullock’s life and constitutional rights.”

The paperwork also claims that the agent failed to de-escalate the situation or utilize less-lethal alternatives, contrary to established law enforcement protocols.

This lawsuit seeks 15 million dollars for losses suffered by Bullock and his family and punitive damages against the agent, in an amount to be determined at trial.

News4 reached out to the FBI, and it said its standard practice is to decline comment on any pending litigation.

Advertisement

News4 also reached out to both Bullock’s family members, who have publicly spoken before, and the attorney that filed the lawsuit, but have not received a response.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending