Connect with us

Texas

What happens if Joe Biden tries to take over Texas National Guard?

Published

on

What happens if Joe Biden tries to take over Texas National Guard?


The debate on whether President Joe Biden should seize control of the Texas National Guard in order to force it to comply with a recent Supreme Court ruling is continuing to rage between Democrats and Republicans.

Texas Representative Joaquin Castro and former congressman and 2020 presidential hopeful Beto O’Rourke, both Democrats, are among those who are urging Biden to federalize the state’s National Guard to allow Border Patrol agents to remove razor wire put up along the U.S.-Mexico border by Texas law enforcement in order to prevent illegal immigration.

In a 5-4 ruling on January 22, the Supreme Court sided with the Biden administration, which said that the wire erected in Eagle Pass was put up illegally and prevented Border Patrol from trying to detain people who were attempting to cross the border via the Rio Grande.

Despite the ruling, Texas Governor Greg Abbott argued that Biden is failing his duties as president by not controlling the record levels of illegal crossings at the southern border during his time in office. Abbott has also declared that Texas is currently under an “invasion” and invoked the state’s constitutional right to defend and protect itself.

Advertisement

“That authority is the supreme law of the land and supersedes any federal statutes to the contrary. The Texas National Guard, the Texas Department of Public Safety, and other Texas personnel are acting on that authority, as well as state law, to secure the Texas border,” Abbott said.

As a result, Abbott is allowing the Texas National Guard to continue to install the razor wire along the border. He is refusing to allow Border Patrol agents access to Shelby Park—a riverfront park in Eagle Pass that migrants are using to enter the U.S. illegally—in order to remove the wires.

Newsweek reached out to the White House and Abbott via email for comment.

Can Joe Biden Take Over The Texas National Guard?

Biden is within his power to federalize the Texas National Guard in accordance with Title 10 of the U.S. Code, which would mean the state’s troops would be under direct orders of the president.

In 1957, President Dwight D. Eisenhower placed the Arkansas National Guard under federal authority and ordered them to protect nine Black students who enrolled at Central High School in Little Rock. The move arrived after the state’s governor, Orval Faubus, previously called the troops to prevent the Black students’ entry into the all-white school, despite a Supreme Court ruling that declared segregation in public schools unconstitutional.

Advertisement

Currently, Texas National Guard troops are operating under Title 32, which means they fall under the command of the Texas governor as their commander-in-chief.

“Abbott is using the Texas Guard to defy a Supreme Court ruling. When Gov. Faubus did this in 1957, Eisenhower federalized the Arkansas Guard to ensure compliance with the law,” O’Rourke posted on X, formerly Twitter. “Biden must follow this example of bold, decisive leadership to end this crisis before it gets worse.”

However, questions have been raised as to whether Biden can federalize the Texas National Guard in these current circumstances, with some suggesting the president does not have the legal justification to do so.

“Title 10 can only supersede Title 32 in a national emergency. In this case, Biden would have to activate the Texas National Guard to guard the border. Otherwise it is an unlawful order,” retired Air Force General Robert Spalding posted on X.


SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images

What Happens if Joe Biden Takes Over The Texas National Guard?

Presumably, a move to federalize the Texas National Guard would mean the Border Patrol would quickly move in and remove the razor wire, which has been the focus of the arguments in the Lone Star state.

Advertisement

Others have suggested such a move could have broader implications for Biden, as well as setting up possible further legal challenges and issues.

“If the Texas National Guard are federalized under Title 10 for the sole purpose of pulling them off the Texas border and out of the chain of command of the Commander in Chief of the Texas military after Gov. Abbott invoked his constitutional authority to defend the Texas border, the founders would have envisioned this as a crime and misdemeanor and impeachable offense,” Jonathan Hullihan, a constitutional law and national security law expert, told The Center Square.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton also suggested that the Democrats calling for Biden to federalize the National Guard “don’t understand the law” and the president must first declare a national emergency.

“That goes to the whole question, why is he declaring an emergency? Obviously, we have one, right? And now he’s admitting it,” Paxton told Newsmax. “I think that becomes a political issue for him, it becomes a real problem for him politically.”

What Can Abbott Do in Response?

Beyond continuing to defy the Biden Administration and ordering law enforcement to still erect razor wire, Abbott has also indicated that he is willing to appeal any decision from the president to the Supreme Court.

Advertisement

Professor Peter Shane, a law lecturer at New York University and constitutional law expert, dismissed Abbott’s suggestion that he can have supreme authority in Texas after declaring that the state is under “invasion” from people crossing the border illegally.

“This is nonsense. Governors have no power to declare anything under the U.S. Constitution, nor does the Constitution give states any legal power to countermand the exercise of federal authority,” Shane previously told Newsweek.

Uncommon Knowledge

Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.

Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.

Advertisement



Source link

Texas

How to Watch No. 1 Texas Longhorns Hosting No. 15 Texas A&M in Lone Star Showdown

Published

on

How to Watch No. 1 Texas Longhorns Hosting No. 15 Texas A&M in Lone Star Showdown


The Texas Longhorns haven’t slowed down throughout the 2026 season as they now hold a 29-1 record and continue to push the longest winning streak in program history farther along, as the Longhorns’ winning streak now stands at 27 games.

The Longhorns have strung together consistency and dominance over the last weeks of the season, as recently the Longhorns have become the unanimous top team in the country, earning the top spot, ranking as the No. 1 team in the nation.

And now No. 1 Texas will get back to the gauntlet that is SEC play with a conference series against one of its bitter rivals in the dirt edition of the Lone Star Showdown against the No. 15 Texas A&M Aggies. The Longhorns get ready to host, welcoming in the Aggies to Red and Charline McCombs Field with the first game of the series set for Friday, March 27, at 6 p.m. CT.

Advertisement

How to Watch Texas vs. Texas A&M

Texas Longhorns utility Katie Stewart celebrates after hitting a home run in the fourth inning of a Women’s College World Series. | BRYAN TERRY/THE OKLAHOMAN / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images
Advertisement

Who: No. 1 Texas Longhorns and No. 15 Texas A&M Aggies

Advertisement

What: Lone Star Showdown

When: March 27-29

Where: Red and Charline McCombs Field in Austin, TX

TV/Streaming: Friday on SEC Network+, Saturday on ESPN2 and Sunday on ESPN

Advertisement

Radio: Longhorn Radio Network 

Meet the Opponent

Advertisement

Texas A&M Aggies head coach Trisha Ford and Florida Gators head coach Tim Walton shake hands before game. | Matt Pendleton/Gainesville Sun / USA TODAY NETWORK

Advertisement

The Aggies head into the Lone Star Showdown series with a 23-9 overall record and have found success through their two conference series of the season, with a 5-1 record in the SEC. Away from home, the Aggies have split four of their away games with a 2-2 record on the road.

With the flip of the calendar from non-conference to conference play, the Aggies find a rhythm on the field, taking their conference opener against the then No. 17-ranked LSU Tigers on the road 2-1 and followed that up with a sweep at home against the Kentucky Wildcats, outscoring the Wildcats 26-9 over the three-game series.

The Longhorns batting order will battle against an Aggies pitching staff that heads into the weekend series with a 3.10 ERA and 1.09 WHIP. As a whole, the Aggies pitching staff has recorded 193 strikeouts while holding their opponents to a .225 batting average.

The leader of the Aggies pitching staff is sophomore Sydney Lessentine, as her 72 innings pitched is the most by any other Aggies pitcher. In her 19 appearances this season, Lessentine tallies a 2.43 ERA and .82 WHIP along with 60 strikeouts and holds opponents to a .196 batting average.

Advertisement

Sign up to our free newsletter and follow us on FacebookX and Instagram for the latest news.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Texas

Prescribed burns play regenerative role in Texas ecosystems. Here’s why

Published

on

Prescribed burns play regenerative role in Texas ecosystems. Here’s why


COVINGTON, TX – Clouds of grey and brown smoke rolled through the field as yards of fire roared across dead grass. About 30 acres of Austin and Kelli Rollins’ property burned on the March morning, leaving blackened remnants just a couple dozen yards from the house.

But what looked like a natural disaster was the result of careful planning.

Prescribed burns, like the one onthe Rollinses property, can benefit wildlife populations, encourage the growth of native prairie grasses and limit damage from wildfires. Throughout Texas’ history, fires occurred naturally every three to seven years. Most native species are fire-adapted, Texas A&M’s Prescribed Burn Coordinator David Brooke said, but human fire suppression tactics have substantially decreased fire frequency and changed the landscape.

“From the Edwards Plateau, Hill Country up towards Dallas [and the] Panhandle, our habitat was a lot more open. It’s supposed to be rolling plains, prairies … with intermittent tree cover. What we’re seeing now is woody encroachment,” Brooke said.

Advertisement

D-FW Weather Wise

From snow to 100-degree heat, we’ve got you covered.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

At the Rollinses, the prescribed burn began with an introductory meeting to discuss strategy and a test fire on a corner of the lot. The team, largely consisting of members of the North Texas Prescribed Burn Association, edged the field with a water line, creating a moisture barrier to prevent flames from spreading in the wrong direction. Just a few yards behind the lengthening water line, volunteers used drip torches to create a “black line,” a thin burned strip meant to contain the larger plumes of fire that would come later.

The tip of a drip torch is used to set fire to Austin and Kelli Rollins property outside of Covington, Texas, March 18, 2026. They used a controlled burn to regenerate the pasture surrounding their home.

Advertisement

Tom Fox / Staff Photographer

The crew collaborated with the wind, starting the test fire at the most downwind corner and expanding the black lines perpendicularly. Winds whipped, around 20 miles per hour, approaching the regulatory safety limit. By working backwards from the fire’s natural destination, the team limited the chance of flames escaping their control.

“Essentially what we’re doing is building a catcher’s mitt so when we light everything up, [the black line] will be there to stop it,” Brandon Martin said, who serves on the board of the prescribed burn association.

Martin, dressed in a hard hat and flame retardant clothing, assisted with this prescribed burn as a volunteer, but he also knows fire professionally through his role in emergency management at the Tarrant Regional Water District. As well as providing advice, he actively spread flames with a drip torch. Torch canisters are filled with fuel that, when turned down, trickles past a burning wick and ignites as it falls to the ground.

This fire is part of an effort to return the field to native prairie, a landscape Martin said depends on fire to thrive. Regular burning limits the growth of saplings and bushes, keeping the environment clear of exotic species that can outcompete native grasses.

Advertisement
North Texas Prescribed Burn Association member Don Nelson radios wind speed and direction to...

North Texas Prescribed Burn Association member Don Nelson radios wind speed and direction to the rest of the crew during a controlled burn on the property of Austin and Kelli Rollins outside of Covington, Texas, March 18, 2026.

Tom Fox / Staff Photographer

Brooke said fire isn’t only a natural land management process, it’s also cost-effective. Invasive species can be removed mechanically with chainsaws and digging, or with chemical application. But in either instance, the labor and equipment costs are usually significantly higher than burning, especially with bigger plots.

“From an economics standpoint, it’s a heck of a lot cheaper to use fire,” Brooke said.

The resulting ash is high in nitrogen and phosphorus, which fertilizes the soil. With a little rain, Brooke said fields are often covered in green shoots within a matter of weeks, with a reinvigorated landscape emerging in the following months.

However, Brooke noted “one burn isn’t a silver bullet,” since invasive species could also be fed by these fresh nutrients. But if landowners can commit to following the three- to seven-year historic fire frequency, “it gives your native species the edge.”

Advertisement
Austin Rollins grabs a pressure sprayer to extinguish a spot fire during a controlled burn...

Austin Rollins grabs a pressure sprayer to extinguish a spot fire during a controlled burn on his property near Covington, Texas, March 18, 2026.

Tom Fox / Staff Photographer

New growth also attracts a variety of wildlife, as it is highly palatable and an ideal habitat to spot predators. Brooke said he’s seen a number of landowners undertake prescribed burns to improve the hunting prospects.

Prescribed burns are best known for their power to stopthe spread of wildfire. The lack of fuel for a wildfire after an intentional burn can lower the fire’s intensity and help save structures. Brooke pointed to the town of Borger, which has a history of proactive wildfire management.

In the fall of 2023, they burned a 7-mile-long, 250-foot wide strip along the edge of town, creating a “black line” that proved crucial months later. When one of the 2024 Panhandle wildfires approached the town, it stopped just outside of several neighborhoods at the fire break. Firefighters credited the work with saving homes and possibly lives.

For landowners considering undertaking controlled burns themselves, Brooke said Texas is a “right-to-burn” state – guaranteeing landowners the right to burn on their own property – but there are still regulations to follow. County burn bans must be observed, local authorities notified and some state agencies regulate weather conditions to manage the smoke.

Advertisement
The North Texas Prescribed Burn Association used a backing fire to control a burn on the...

The North Texas Prescribed Burn Association used a backing fire to control a burn on the property of Austin and Kelli Rollins outside of Covington, Texas, March 18, 2026. They burned approximately 30 acres.

Tom Fox / Staff Photographer

Wind speeds are required to be between six and 23 miles per hour during a burn. If the breeze is too low, smoke won’t clear properly and it could settle on nearby roads, potentially causing an accident. If gusts are too high, fire behavior becomes more unpredictable.

Some counties also require a copy of the burn plan to be submitted in advance, which accounts for things like weather, the crew, suppression tactics (such as water, specialized rakes and leaf blowers) and smoke modeling.

Ultimately, given the high winds, the team on the Rollinses land decided to burn back to the black line in smaller strips instead of one roaring blaze. But even those sections could generate significant heat as the orange glow jumped from stem to stem. The gusts cleared most smoke quickly, but each time a new strip ignited, the plumes towered into the distance.

When just a few smoldering spots remained, the group gathered to debrief and share H-E-B sandwich trays. Pairs inquired about other teams’ strategies, but mostly, the crew was pleased with the safety and their progress – finishing the project in about three hours.

Advertisement

“Man, it’s beautiful,” Kelli Rollins said as she took a picture of the charred field against the blue sky. “I know that’s a weird thing to say, but it is.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Texas

Texas city named as 1 of 3 finalists for Elon Musk’s ‘Boring Company’ projects

Published

on

Texas city named as 1 of 3 finalists for Elon Musk’s ‘Boring Company’ projects


A modified Tesla Model X drives into the tunnel entrance before an unveiling event for the Boring Company Hawthorne test tunnel in Hawthorne, south of Los Angeles, California on December 18, 2018. – On Tuesday night December 18, 2018, Boring Co. will

After a months-long competition to convince tech mogul Elon Musk’s Boring Company to choose a U.S. city for a transit tunnel project, one Texas city has made the cut for the final three in consideration. 

Advertisement

‘Tunnel Vision Challenge’ finalists

What we know:

The “Thrilling Three” in the running for the Tunnel Vision Challenge, announced in January, are Dallas, New Orleans, LA, and Baltimore, MD.

Advertisement

Dallas is in consideration for a “University Hills Loop.” When the challenge first launched on Jan. 18, the options of “a Loop tunnel, a freight tunnel, a pedestrian tunnel, a utility tunnel, a water tunnel, or any other use case where a tunnel would be useful” were pitched. All three finalists are Loop tunnels, which the company tags as “Teslas in Tunnels!”

Wednesday’s announcement says the projects will be up to one mile long and 12 feet in diameter. 

What’s next:

Advertisement

The Boring Company said in their Wednesday announcement that, if possible, it “would be awesome” to build all three Loops. 

The company plans to, along with the project stakeholders, enter into a rigorous diligence process which includes “meetings with elected officials, regulators, community leaders, and business leaders; geotechnical borings; and utility and subsurface infra investigation.”

Advertisement

They say they plan to build any and all final projects that are found to be feasible. 

Possible second Texas project

The company said there were other projects that caught their attention as interesting projects, which they plan to attempt in the near future. 

Advertisement

These include the “Morgan’s Wonderland Tunnel” in San Antonio, as well as the “Hendersonville Utility Tunnel” in Tennessee. 

The Source: Information in this article comes from The Boring Company. 

TexasDallasTechnologyElon Musk
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending