Connect with us

Texas

The PFF grades are not kind for Michigan this week

Published

on

The PFF grades are not kind for Michigan this week


The Michigan Wolverines dropped their first game of the season on Saturday, losing to Texas, 31-12. It was a tough game to watch if you’re a Michigan fan, and the advanced stats from Pro Football Focus (PFF) agree with the eye test.

Let’s get into this week’s player grades and snap counts.

Offense

OL Evan Link – 57 snaps / 27.2 overall player grade

OL Dominick Giudice – 57 / 59.3

Advertisement

OL Myles Hinton – 57 / 55.6

OL Giovanni El-Hadi – 57 / 66.0

OL Josh Priebe – 57 / 65.6

QB Davis Warren – 54 / 76.5

TE Colston Loveland – 44 / 55.7

Advertisement

WR Tyler Morris – 40 / 58.1

WR Kendrick Bell – 39 / 53.1

RB Donovan Edwards – 32 / 71.9

WR Semaj Morgan – 31 / 68.1

WR CJ Charleston – 19 / 62.3

Advertisement

TE Marlin Klein – 17 / 57.8

WR Peyton O’Leary – 15 / 72.9

RB Ben Hall – 14 / 62.8

TE/FB Max Bredeson – 13 / 73.0

RB Kalel Mulings – 13 / 64.5

Advertisement

WR Fred Moore – 7 / 52.3

QB Alex Orji – 3 / 56.6

WR Amorion Walker – 1 / 59.0

Takeaways: After rotating in Greg Crippen with Dominick Giudice last week against Fresno State, Crippen didn’t see the field at all against Texas. It appears that position battle is over, as Giudice played every snap along the offensive line on Saturday.

Additionally, it’s interesting to see Kendrick Bell’s snap counts increase from Week 1 (30) to Week 2 (39). He was a guy that kind of flew under the radar this offseason, with guys like Fred Moore, Amorion Walker and CJ Charleston garnering more attention at the position. The coaching staff seems to trust him the most as the team’s WR3 at this point.

Advertisement

Surprises: It’s a shock that Kalel Mullings and Max Bredeson only got 13 snaps each on Saturday. For a ground and pound team like Michigan is, it’s stunning that these two hardly played at all. But I guess that’s what happens when you give up 24 points in the first half and only put a field goal on the board to counter that. Being down by three touchdowns to start the second half likely had a role with that, but to have two of your better offensive players on the bench more often than not is … not great.

Defense

CB Jyaire Hill – 65 / 57.2

LB Ernest Hausmann – 65 / 43.9

LB Jaishawn Barham – 64 / 43.7

S Makari Paige – 61 / 56.2

Advertisement

DT Kenneth Grant – 60 / 61.7

CB Will Johnson – 58 / 70.3

DT Mason Graham – 58 / 67.9

S Quinten Johnson – 57 / 58.3

CB Zeke Berry – 50 / 63.0

Advertisement

Edge Derrick Moore – 46 / 64.3

Edge Josaiah Stewart – 45 / 75.9

DT Rayshaun Benny – 28 / 74.4

Edge TJ Guy – 26 / 64.6

Edge Cameron Brandt – 25 / 52.3

Advertisement

S Wesley Walker – 21 / 55.8

CB Aamir Hall – 17 / 59.9

LB Jimmy Rolder – 13 / 55.3

DT Trey Pierce – 7 / 60.8

DT Ike Iwunnah – 6 / 82.3

Advertisement

DT Enow Etta – 4 / 62.4

CB Kody Jones – 3 / 60.0

CB Myles Pollard – 2 / 60.0

Takeaways: Kenneth Grant playing 60 snaps and Mason Graham playing 58 snaps could be detrimental for them as the season goes on. They are two of the best defensive tackles in the country, but if you’re playing that many snaps per game, even the best of the best are going to get gassed.

A season ago, Graham played 442 total snaps while Grant played 403 snaps. Through two games, Graham is already up to 104 snaps while Grant is at 101. For them to already be a quarter of the way to what they played all of last year is insane.

Advertisement

Additionally, the linebackers were graded pretty harshly by PFF, with Ernest Hausmann and Jaishawn Barham both grading out below 50. They gave Barham a very good tackling grade of 80.4, but nothing else was graded higher than 52.6. PFF also dinged Hausmann for three missed tackles, and for giving up five catches on five targets in coverage. It was a really rough day for the linebackers.

Surprises: Where in the world was Ja’Den McBurrows? The player to relieve Zeke Berry in the slot was redshirt sophomore Kody Jones, who only had 59 snaps in his entire career until yesterday. Perhaps McBurrows had a last second injury pop up, but that was an interesting thing to see on the player report.



Source link

Texas

Betting Texas A&M-Texas: Why the balanced Aggies pose problems for Longhorns

Published

on

Betting Texas A&M-Texas: Why the balanced Aggies pose problems for Longhorns


No. 3 Texas A&M walks into Austin with everything still on the table, while No. 17 Texas is clinging to the final thread of a postseason dream that’s been unraveling since the team was ranked preseason No. 1 for the first time in their history.

One side is chasing a conference title, and the other is trying to keep its season from folding in its own backyard. The matchup has urgency, consequence and an energy that guarantees excitement, twists and everything in between, but the reasons why sit beneath the surface.

Saddle up … Aggies versus Longhorns is about who can handle the ride.

All odds by ESPN BET


No. 3 Texas A&M Aggies at No. 17 Texas Longhorns
Friday, 7:30 p.m. ET, ABC

Line: Texas A&M -2.5
Money line: Texas A&M (-120), Texas (Even)
Over/Under: 51.5 (O -110, U -110)

Advertisement

Texas: a team that lives in between potential and production

This Texas team can be so much more and maybe in 2026 they can be. They have the quarterback talent, the receiver room and the pass-rush ceiling, and the solid markers to build a base that can go toe to toe with any team in the country.

Unfortunately, we’ve been seeing the same story unfold since the start of the season, even a continuation of last year. Texas moves through games with volatility instead of a steady foundation. When Arch Manning has time, the Longhorns can hit explosives in a way that genuinely scares opponents. He’s thrown 23 touchdowns and is throwing 8.1 yards per pass, which shows that the ability is there, the firepower is there.

The catch is how often the Longhorns offense is forced into that mode. The run game is nearly non-existent, hovering near 3.7 yards per carry, outside of the top 100 in the country, which means they aren’t consistently living in second-and-4 or even third and manageable. This can make such a difference. Instead, we see Texas always one negative play away from giving possessions back. It means Manning is having to manufacture answers to predicaments that shouldn’t exist. The offense isn’t giving him the framework, so he’s sticking it together on the fly.

On the fly doesn’t work in competitive football unless you’re Johnny Manziel.

Defensively, the effort is there and the pressure numbers are real, generating over 200 pressures, but the coverage isn’t airtight enough to hide the moments where the pass rush doesn’t immediately hit.

Advertisement

When Texas wins, the question is always, “is Texas good?” And when they lose, it’s always “oh, right, that’s more like it.” The Longhorns are talented, explosive, and competitive, but Texas is also dependent on conditions, timing, rhythm, and quarterback brilliance. That’s the space they operate in and why their path to winning requires chaos, which means a lot of things have to go right, far more than it should.

Texas A&M: a team with a fully formed identity and multiple ways to win

The Aggies are built with an offense that doesn’t lean on one player or one phase, it’s the product of balance. Texas A&M has a run game that actually shifts the way defenses behave, averaging 5 yards per carry, top 30 in the FBS, giving them a kind of control most teams never find. The Aggies playcalling can stay patient. It means comebacks can happen, it means Marcel Reed can operate a system designed for efficiency, not heroism.

Reed’s 9.0 yards per pass is happening because the offense is forcing defenses into conflict on every snap. The scoring outputs back it up: 54 total touchdowns on the season is a clear sign that the Aggies can finish drives and don’t waste possessions. The red zone efficiency tells the same story. A&M plays football with the understanding that momentum is built, stacked and maintained.

Defensively, tackling has been a weak point but it hasn’t derailed their ability to dictate games or control pace. The Aggies play inside their identity every week, an advantage that shows up when the games get tight.

Advertisement

Betting consideration: Texas A&M -2.5

The Aggies are the more complete team so this is a wager that backs up the side that holds up under pressure. In KC Concepcion and Mario Craver, they have a WR duo that is a matchup nightmare for a Texas secondary that sits out of the top 50 in coverage grade, and has been vulnerable anytime the pass rush doesn’t close.

Concepcion’s ability to separate underneath and Craver’s vertical range stretch the defense horizontally and vertically at the same time, forcing Texas into coverage trade-offs they haven’t solved all year.

Then there’s the Aggies defense, which plays aggressively with over 200 pressures on the season, but aren’t reckless. They’ll heat up Manning without exposing themselves behind it. That kind of balance matters against a Texas offense that’s built on volatility. Texas needs pop-offs to survive, which becomes harder when the opposing front dictates and the back end holds up well enough to avoid collapse.

If the Aggies play balanced and are able to attack the exact weak points Texas can’t hide, then laying a short number on the road is justified, and possibly even a few points short.

Betting trends

Courtesy of ESPN Research

  • Texas is 0-4 ATS against AP Top-5 teams since the start of last season, worst in FBS.

  • The Aggies are 7-15 ATS as a favorite since the start of last season, T-worst among Power 4 schools with UGA (min. 20 games).

  • Texas is 5-1-1 ATS as a home underdog over the last 10 years, T-best in FBS with Notre Dame/App State (min. 5 games).

  • Texas A&M is 3-7-2 ATS when the spread is between a FG (+3 to -3) since 2022, worst among power conference teams (min. 10 games as Power 4 team in span).



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Texas

Texas Tech’s Jacob Rodriguez, A&M’s Cashius Howell named finalists for Bednarik Award

Published

on

Texas Tech’s Jacob Rodriguez, A&M’s Cashius Howell named finalists for Bednarik Award


Texas Tech linebacker Jacob Rodriguez and Texas A&M defensive end Cashius Howell were named finalists for the Bednarik Award, which is presented annually to college football’s defensive player of the year.

Ohio State safety Caleb Downs was the third finalist.

Rodriguez and Howell have spearheaded their respective teams’ push for a conference title and a College Football Playoff bid. Both players are in a position to compete in the Big 12 and SEC Championships, respectively, with a win on Saturday.

Howell has manned the defensive line for one of the three remaining undefeated FBS teams, contributing an SEC-leading 11.5 sacks. He is a four-time SEC defensive lineman of the week and leads all defensive ends with six pass breakups.

Advertisement

Sports Roundup

Get the latest D-FW sports news, analysis and opinion delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, Kevin Sherrington’s A La Carte.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Related

Texas A&M’s defense ranks first nationally in 3rd down defense and second in FBS with 39.0 sacks.

Advertisement

Rodriguez has aided Texas Tech in its best start since 2008 and its highest-ranked scoring defense in over a decade.

Although he has contributed only a sack to the nation’s leader in team sacks, the senior inside linebacker leads the country with seven forced fumbles. He also has four interceptions.

Rodriguez has taken over social media over the past four weeks, earning the Heisman fan vote in four consecutive weeks.

Rodriguez and Howell are also finalists for the Bronko Nagurski Trophy and Lombardi Award.

The Bednarik Award winner will be announced as part of the ESPN’s college football awards show, which will be broadcast live on ESPN on Friday, Dec. 12.

Advertisement
    Texas A&M QB Marcel Reed named finalist for Davey O’Brien Award
    Texas Tech’s Joey McGuire named Region 4 AFCA Coach of the Year

Find more Texas A&M coverage from The Dallas Morning News here.

Find more Texas Tech coverage from The Dallas Morning News here.



Source link

Continue Reading

Texas

17-year-old charged in shooting of a North Texas DoorDash delivery driver, police say

Published

on

17-year-old charged in shooting of a North Texas DoorDash delivery driver, police say



A 17-year-old has been charged in the shooting of a North Texas DoorDash delivery driver late last month, Mesquite police said.

Investigators discovered that just before 12:30 a.m. on Oct. 27, the driver was making a delivery to a home in the 2000 block of Birch Bend when a man wearing dark clothing approached and started shooting at him. 

The suspect, later identified as 17-year-old Ledavion Sockwell, fled the area.

Advertisement

Responding officers found the delivery driver had been shot multiple times and rendered aid until fire department personnel arrived and took the driver to the hospital. The delivery driver survived the shooting.

Late Monday afternoon, the Mesquite Police Department Major Crimes Unit and Mesquite Tactical Unit executed a search and arrest warrant for Sockwell in the 1400 block of Regent St. He was taken into custody without incident.   



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending