Connect with us

Texas

New pipeline project worries Central Texas landowner

Published

on

New pipeline project worries Central Texas landowner


FLORENCE, Texas (KXAN) — A brand new oil and fuel pipeline is coming to the Lone Star State and plans present a part of it may run by way of Central Texas.

The greater than 400-mile-long Matterhorn Specific Pipeline will stretch throughout Texas and run by way of Travis, Williamson, Lampasas, Burnet and Lee counties. WhiteWater Midstream is the Austin-based firm behind the venture.

Matterhorn Specific Pipeline Mission Proposed Route

“The venture will play a big function in enhancing power safety, decreasing power prices, and mitigating emissions associated to flaring by offering much-needed takeaway capability for West Texas producers. This may finally develop markets for Texas power and help Texas jobs,” WhiteWater Midstream stated in an announcement.

It added, “We’re dedicated to being good neighbors and incorporating suggestions from all related stakeholders into each the proposed route and the venture’s general design.”

Advertisement

Nonetheless, some landowners are nervous about what this pipeline venture may imply for the way forward for their property.

The way forward for Panahi Ranch

David Panahi was sitting at dwelling together with his spouse final Wednesday night time when he bought a knock on the door.

“About seven o’clock at night time I hear a clanking on our door after which I am going out,” he stated.

That Wednesday knock ended with Panahi being served a petition for a brief restraining order and injunction reduction.

“You get served on Wednesday after which the listening to is the subsequent Thursday… was loopy,” he added.

Advertisement

If the petition is granted, Panahi should enable his Florence land to be surveyed for the Matterhorn Specific Pipeline that the Railroad Fee simply accepted a allow for on the finish of March.

Panahi purchased the roughly 150 acres a few decade in the past within the hopes of giving his dad a peaceable place to spend his retirement.

“My dad escaped Russian-controlled Azerbaijan, the place over there you hear about issues like ‘the federal government seizes your land, pollutes the Caspian Sea,’ all that,” Panahi stated. “Considered one of my dad’s goals was to go stay someplace [in] his retirement… lovely with out air pollution and all that. He was form of fairly unhappy once I discovered about all this pipeline enterprise.”

His objective is to maintain the land as it’s presently saying, “It’s lovely Hill Nation views.”

“It’s over the Trinity Aquifer so, once we bought that space they stated, ‘Hey, that is the most effective space — the Trinity Aquifer right here in Burnet County — there’s a creek there. It has a few ponds.’ It was a extremely fairly space and, regardless that numerous laborious work, I didn’t need anyone to make a multitude on the market so we even bought the mineral rights on the market,” Panahi defined. “Not that we wish to drill for fuel, however I didn’t need anyone to, like, smash the realm”

Now with the pipeline venture in movement, Panahi is worried about what the way forward for the land will likely be — past how the pipeline will have an effect on the pure space and what is going to occur to property values.

Advertisement

“The primary factor, once we bought that space, and my dad retired, we simply wished to maintain it lovely Hill Nation and peaceable.”

WhiteWater Midstream advised KXAN “The Matterhorn venture has been designed with cautious consideration of the setting and the communities alongside the proposed route.”

Panahi, who can also be a dentist, stated he deliberate to make use of the land as a donation-based wedding ceremony location, with proceeds funding his new nonprofit Smile Ministries to assist Central Texans who can not afford dental care.

“Who’s going to have a marriage if there’s like, ‘Warning, pipeline?’” he stated.

What rights do landowners have?

Legal professional Philip Hundl who focuses on Eminent Area Condemnation circumstances stated landowners have choices.

Advertisement

“Primary, take motion. Don’t disregard it,” Hundl stated. “First, getting authorized illustration from somebody that understands eminent area condemnation proceedings, that’s vital, but in addition simply reaching out to the opposite lawyer on the opposite aspect, even you simply the landowner, a non-lawyer and say, ‘, I’ve bought these papers and the date doesn’t work for me. Give me extra time, I’m on the lookout for an legal professional.’ At the least try this, since you’ve made contact, and hopefully the attorneys on the opposite aspect, for Matterhorn will take that into consideration, and be versatile and work with you on some dates, if that’s obligatory, finally.”

Hundl stated whereas he encourages individuals to seek out authorized illustration he understands not everybody can afford to. He stated, in that case, individuals ought to educate themselves as a lot as they will on-line. 

“Realizing extra in regards to the course of, understanding the method, goes to present them much more consolation and scale back their stress stage,” Hundl stated. “Feelings are excessive. So many of those properties which might be being affected have been in households for generations, and now it’s being affected. And landowners, their plans that they’ve had for these properties of constructing a house on this perfect homesite on the property, unexpectedly, they discover out that’s the place the pipeline goes to go, or at the least the proposed pipeline route. I imply, it’s extraordinarily emotional.”

Why can we depend on pipelines?

The Deputy Director of the Vitality Division on the College of Texas Bureau of Financial Geology Mark Shuster stated there’s a cause firms depend on pipelines versus transporting oil and fuel through vans and/or by prepare.

“On the highest stage, they’re merely probably the most cost-effective, and the most secure method to transfer, oil and fuel from the place the oil and fuel are produced to the place it’s going for use or for the method or merchandise,” he defined.

Shuster, who has a long time of expertise within the oil and fuel trade, stated there are over 2.4 million miles of pure fuel pipelines within the U.S. and over 190,000 miles of onshore and offshore oil pipelines.

Advertisement

“The pipelines serve a vital goal to have the ability to transfer these commodities, oil and fuel, to the place they’re going to be utilized,” Shuster stated. “Significantly in Texas, there are 11.5 million barrels of oil which might be produced throughout the U.S., however 5 million barrels are coming from the Permian Basin and that 5 million barrels of oil must go to refiners or petrochemical manufacturing amenities, alongside the Gulf Coast or elsewhere in Texas.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Texas

Texas Rangers closer Kirby Yates has All-Star case, even without lighting up the radar gun

Published

on

Texas Rangers closer Kirby Yates has All-Star case, even without lighting up the radar gun


BALTIMORE — A philosophical question: If a closer doesn’t hit 100 mph, can he still get noticed? You know, kind of like a tree falling in the woods. If nobody sees it, did it actually happen?

We may get an answer to that question in the next week when All-Star rosters are revealed. Rangers closer Kirby Yates has seemingly done everything necessary to make the AL All-Star team, other than light up a radar gun.

Marcus Semien only Texas Ranger moving on in All-Star Game voting

As players wrap up their voting for the All-Star pitching staffs this weekend, choosing three relievers, it’s hard to make a convincing case against Yates reaching the medal stand. Unless, of course, you factor in his fastball. It doesn’t light up Statcast metrics. It’s only good for getting him ahead in counts and setting up his devastating forkball. Among qualified relievers, Yates’ 93.1 mph average fastball ranks only 60th in the AL. The guys getting all the national buzz are Oakland’s Mason Miller and his 100.8 mph fastball and AL saves leader Emmanuel Clase with his 99.8 mph heater.

Rangers

Advertisement

Be the smartest Rangers fan. Get the latest news.

“I know I don’t have a fastball that lights up the radar guns,” Yates said. “But the league is filled with stuff and guys who are throwers. Guys who pitch are the outliers. But if you pitch and execute your pitches, you can be successful. I don’t think that will ever go away.”

He has pitched exceptionally well. There is not a performance-based stat in which he is weak. He began Saturday perfect in his 11 save chances this year, the only AL reliever with at least 10 opportunities and no blown saves. His ERA (0.99) was second. His batting average allowed (.134) was second. He had a WHIP below 1.00 (0.95).

Put this another way. He is the only pitcher in baseball — regardless of league — to begin the statistical second-half of the season perfect on at least 10 save chances, with a WHIP and ERA both below 1.00. There is more. He’s averaging 12.07 strikeouts per nine innings thanks to a filthy splitter and hasn’t allowed a homer.

The closest comp to Yates from a year ago was Minnesota’s Jhoan Duran, who ended June with 11 saves in 13 chances, a 1.91 ERA and a 0.94 ERA. Perhaps, it’s not best to bring this up. Duran still didn’t make the All-Star team. There were six relievers either selected or named as replacements. It included each of the top five in saves and Baltimore’s Yennier Cano, who had a 1.14 ERA and 0.86 WHIP entering July. Moral of the story: Yates’ relatively low number of saves may work against him.

Advertisement

If other players rely on a singular number such as saves or WAR, Yates may get overlooked. He is tied for 11th in the AL in saves and is eighth in WAR among AL relievers at 1.0, though only three-tenths of a win separates him from the No. 2 spot, which belongs to Clase.

On the other hand, if AL manager Bruce Bochy has any input, Yates will get a firm endorsement. That doesn’t carry the weight it once did. Once upon a time, the manager had a big hand in selecting the pitching staff. Now, it’s almost entirely reliant on peer votes. Bochy said this week that he would heartily endorse Yates as a reliever.

So, too, will David Robertson, the AL’s senior reliever at age 39. Robertson was an All-Star in 2010 as a setup man with the New York Yankees.

“His case is great,” said Robertson, who has a pretty solid case of his own. “His WHIP is good. His strikeouts are high. If you aren’t giving up walks and hits and you are striking out guys, what else are you supposed to do? I hope he goes.”

Yates admits it, he’d like to. He’s been an All-Star before and was even named the NL’s closer in 2019. Only problem: NL didn’t have a lead. He didn’t pitch. Since then: He missed most of three seasons with elbow issues and eventually surgery.

Advertisement

“I think making the team would validate a lot of things,” Yates said. “I’d love a chance to pitch, but the fact that I was named the closer that year was a real sign of respect and I appreciated that. In a perfect world, you’d get a chance to do both.”

And if everybody sees it, well, then it definitely happened.

Twitter: @Evan_P_Grant

    Rangers nightmare scenario? An injured Corey Seager may mark end of Texas’ chances in 2024
    Texas Rangers SS Corey Seager’s initial X-rays negative after HBP to left wrist

Find more Rangers coverage from The Dallas Morning News here.

Click or tap here to sign up for our Rangers newsletter.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Texas

Two Texas jail guards are indicted by a county grand jury in the asphyxiation death of an inmate

Published

on

Two Texas jail guards are indicted by a county grand jury in the asphyxiation death of an inmate


Two county jail guards have been indicted on murder charges for the asphyxiation death of an inmate in Texas.

The indictments, dated Tuesday, charge Joel Garcia, 48, and Rafael Moreno Jr., 37, in the April death of 31-year-old former Marine Anthony Johnson Jr. at the Tarrant County jail in Fort Worth.

Attorneys for Garcia or Moreno did not immediately return phone calls and text messages for comment Friday.

Randy Moore, an attorney for Garcia, has previously said that Garcia’s role in the fight was limited and that the use of force was necessary.

Advertisement

“The wheels of justice continue to turn in this case,” Sheriff Bill Waybourn said in a statement. “I said from the beginning that we hold accountable anyone responsible for Mr. Johnson’s death and we are doing that.”

Waybourn, who has said Moreno wrongly placed his knee on Johnson’s back after Johnson was handcuffed and that Garcia was the supervisor, initially fired the two, but both were reinstated and placed on paid leave because the sheriff’s office said the dismissals did not follow official protocol.

The force used in Johnson’s death is intended to stop and subdue people without killing them, yet increasingly it has come under scrutiny following the 2020 death of George Floyd.

Floyd died after a Minneapolis police officer restrained him face down on the ground for nine minutes and pinned a knee to the back of Floyd’s neck, an incident that sparked outrage nationwide.

The family of Johnson, who had been arrested two days before his death for allegedly using a knife to threaten the driver of a vehicle, has called for a federal investigation of the jail. The family has told the Fort Worth Star-Telegram that Johnson was suffering from a mental health crisis.

Advertisement

On Friday, four Missouri prison guards were charged with murder, and a fifth with accessory to involuntary manslaughter, in the December death of a Black man who was pepper-sprayed, had his face covered with a mask and was left in a position that caused him to suffocate.



Source link

Continue Reading

Texas

Texas Supreme Court upholds state ban on gender transition treatment for minors

Published

on

Texas Supreme Court upholds state ban on gender transition treatment for minors


The Texas Supreme Court on Friday upheld the state’s ban on gender transition treatment for children, allowing the Lone Star State to remain one of at least 25 states, and the largest, with restrictions on such treatment.

The law, which has been in effect since Sept. 1, 2023, prohibits children under the age of 18 from accessing hormone therapy, puberty blockers and gender transition surgery. Children who were already on those medications were required to taper off their use of the drugs. The law includes exemptions for children in early puberty or who have “a medically verifiable genetic disorder of sex development.”

The lawsuit that challenged the law argued it harms transgender teenagers who are barred from receiving gender transition treatment recommended by their physicians and parents, according to The Associated Press.

The court, comprised of all Republicans, handed down its ruling in an 8-1 decision.

Advertisement

JUDGE RULES MONTANA LAW DEFINING SEX AS ONLY MALE OR FEMALE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL

The Texas Supreme Court on Friday upheld the state’s ban on gender transition treatment for children. (AP)

“We conclude the Legislature made a permissible, rational policy choice to limit the types of available medical procedures for children, particularly in light of the relative nascency of both gender dysphoria and its various modes of treatment and the Legislature’s express constitutional authority to regulate the practice of medicine,” Justice Rebeca Aizpuru Huddle wrote.

The lone dissenting judge said the court was giving the state’s government the ability to “legislate away fundamental parental rights.”

“The State’s categorical statutory prohibition prevents these parents, and many others, from developing individualized treatment plans for their children in consultation with their physicians, even the children for whom treatment could be lifesaving,” Justice Debra Lehrmann wrote. “The law is not only cruel — it is unconstitutional.”

Advertisement

A lower court had ruled the law unconstitutional, but it was permitted to take effect during the state Supreme Court’s consideration of the case.

Texas Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton tweeted after the ruling that his office “will use every tool at our disposal to ensure that doctors and medical institutions follow the law.”

'Protect Trans Youth' protesters

The law prohibits children under the age of 18 from accessing hormone therapy, puberty blockers and gender transition surgery. (Fox News )

The groups who filed the lawsuit criticized the ruling as harmful to transgender children and their families.

“It is impossible to overstate the devastating impact of this ruling on Texas transgender youth and the families that love and support them,” Karen Loewy, senior counsel and director of Constitutional Law Practice at Lambda Legal, which was one of the groups that sued the state on behalf of doctors and families, told The Associated Press.

ACLU of Texas’ policy and advocacy strategist for LGBTQIA+ rights, Ash Hall, said the government should not “deprive trans youth of the health care that they need to survive and thrive,” adding that “Texas politicians’ obsession with attacking trans kids and their families is needlessly cruel.”

Advertisement

Gender transition treatment for transgender children is supported by major medical organizations, including the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Psychiatric Association and the Endocrine Society.

BRAGG’S OFFICE FACES BAR COMPLAINT ALLEGING DISCRIMINATION IN ‘DIVERSITY’ HIRING PRACTICES

Transgender pride flag

The lawsuit that challenged the law argued it harms transgender teenagers who are barred from receiving gender transition treatment recommended by their physicians and parents. (ALLISON DINNER/AFP via Getty Images)

One justice dismissed the medical groups’ position as irrelevant to whether the Texas law is constitutional.

“The fact that expert witnesses or influential interest groups like the American Psychiatric Association disagree with the Legislature’s judgment is entirely irrelevant to the constitutional question,” Justice James Blacklock wrote in a concurring opinion. “The Texas Constitution authorizes the Legislature to regulate ‘practitioners of medicine.’”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

In a lower court hearing, several doctors who treat transgender children testified that patients could face deteriorating mental health that could potentially lead to suicide if they are denied gender transition treatment.

Texas officials said the law was needed to protect children and pointed to several other restrictions for minors intended to keep them safe, including when it comes to tattoos, alcohol, tobacco and certain over-the-counter drugs.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending