Connect with us

Tennessee

Tennessee families, schools grapple with what to teach about America and when

Published

on

Tennessee families, schools grapple with what to teach about America and when


Chara Dixon and Keishana Barnes need Tennessee colleges to show their kids about slavery, the Jim Crow period and the civil rights motion. They each imagine that educators ought to roll out classes about U.S. historical past in an age-appropriate method.

However the two ladies have very completely different concepts about the best age for these classes, stemming largely from their private experiences, together with how they’re elevating their kids.

Dixon, who was born in Thailand and now lives within the predominantly white city of Franklin, believes her son was too younger final yr to delve into a brand new studying curriculum that acknowledged America’s sophisticated racial historical past. She says her then-8-year-old, whom she describes as a “form and delicate” little one of combined race, grew to become more and more despondent over second-grade studying classes that included historic tales about indignant white mobs taunting and generally attacking Black heroes of the civil rights motion.

(READ MORE: Politics are nonetheless shaping Chattanooga-area public colleges)

Advertisement

Barnes, a 20-year educator who’s Black and lives in Memphis — the place almost 65% of the inhabitants is African American — welcomes faculty classes starting in kindergarten to show concerning the nation’s previous and current racial struggles. Even earlier than her three kids started faculty, she and her husband advised them that colour and sophistication have created unjust methods that linger immediately. Whereas they do not share extra concerning the horrors of slavery than they suppose their kids can perceive, they attempt to reply their questions on what it meant when an enslaved individual was not allowed to be accountable for their very own physique.

The 2 households’ divergent approaches present the methods dad and mom who need what’s finest for his or her kids are wrestling with when and the way college students ought to research laborious historical past and its legacies, particularly on the subject of racism.

Entrance and middle are considerations concerning the age-appropriateness of curriculum and instruction designed to introduce painful truths about America’s origins and present-day injustices — truths which some dad and mom really feel are at odds with a redeeming nationwide narrative and which others say have to be shared early if America hopes to ever obtain racial reconciliation.

(READ MORE: The combat over ‘Maus’ is a part of a much bigger cultural battle in Tennessee)

LIFELONG LEARNING

Advertisement

What kids study after they’re younger has broad penalties for the remainder of their training.

Developmental psychologists say kids have a pure curiosity about gender and race. Analysis exhibits infants as younger as 6 months previous can acknowledge pores and skin colour and that preschoolers type judgments about individuals primarily based on race and gender.

If educators do not reply their questions actually — or shrink back from introducing truths about America’s origins to kids at a younger age ­— children might embrace inaccurate narratives that have to be “unlearned” after they’re older and fewer malleable.

Polls present dad and mom need educators to show historical past precisely, however that age-appropriateness is a sticking level.

One nationwide ballot, carried out final fall by a community of training advocacy teams, discovered that the majority dad and mom throughout the political spectrum agree “colleges ought to educate college students to like their nation, however must also educate the total historical past of America, together with the horrible issues which have occurred associated to race and racism.”

Advertisement

The ballot discovered bipartisan settlement that classes about slavery, the Civil Struggle and civil rights needs to be taught in highschool however much less help for instructing these subjects in center faculty and even much less for elementary faculty. And a transparent partisan divide emerged about whether or not colleges ought to educate that inequality nonetheless exists immediately, with Republicans extra seemingly than Democrats to view racial historical past as disconnected from current situations.

“If we are able to agree that all of us need our children to study the reality, then it is a matter of how we do this,” stated Cardell Orrin, who’s on the lookout for widespread floor because the chief in Memphis of Stand for Youngsters, an training advocacy group.

“If we agree all of us need our youngsters to be higher than we’re and to stay in a extra equitable world, then we are able to have these conversations too,” he continued. “But when there’s an insistence about instructing American exceptionalism, that is tougher, as a result of American exceptionalism relies on falsehoods.”

For example, is America keen to confront its ugly historical past about forging a brand new nation on land first occupied by Indigenous peoples? Concerning the compelled relocation of Native Individuals alongside the Path of Tears? Or the federal government’s corralling of hundreds of Japanese Individuals in detention camps throughout World Struggle II?

However when is the best time to broach such uncomfortable topics?

Advertisement

Age suggestions from publishers and booksellers goal a broad age vary on function. What’s applicable for one 7-year-old will not be applicable for a classmate primarily based on their ranges of studying, comprehension and maturity, in addition to private pursuits and sensitivities.

(READ MORE: ‘It is about management’: Writer of ‘Maus’ pushes again after McMinn County bans guide on Holocaust)

Picture by Dan Lyon/Chalkbeat / {A photograph} of Ruby Bridges as just a little lady is mirrored in a mirror, taken from an autobiography.

“It is half science, half artwork by way of figuring out what is true for the best child on the proper age,” stated Michael Robb, senior analysis director with Frequent Sense Media, which publishes evaluations to assist households and educators make good media decisions. “To some extent, age-appropriateness is subjective as a result of each child is just a little completely different and so is each mother or father.”

FAMILY EXPERIENCES

In Memphis, Keishana Barnes and her husband have tried to put a basis at house to border what their kids — ages 11, 8 and 5 — study in school.

Advertisement

“We’ve got launched the total reality to them from the start, and we do this in methods which might be applicable for his or her ages,” Barnes stated.

The kids know concerning the transatlantic slave commerce, as an illustration. They have been taught that the white supremacy that drove the nation’s slave economic system continues to have implications immediately in dehumanizing methods. They know that, as Black individuals, they’re extra more likely to be accused of stealing or concealing a weapon if they’ve their palms of their pockets whereas in a retailer.

“There are a lot of conditions that exist — not due to what they’re or appear to be — however due to how a system would possibly deal with them. Then, pores and skin colour completely issues,” says Barnes, a former classroom instructor who has a grasp’s diploma from Harvard Graduate College of Training and instructs instructor candidates on the College of Memphis.

“I’d be doing my kids an awesome disservice if I have been to fake that this world is colorblind,” she continued. “I’d not be making ready them for actuality.”

Barnes remembers her personal early faculty classes as “principally patriotic” and rooted within the thought of American exceptionalism. For her kids, she desires publicity to completely different views at an earlier age.

Advertisement

“I feel curriculum can all the time be improved to current the reality as a substitute of only one model of the reality,” she stated.

Some 200 miles away in Franklin, Chara Dixon watched on-line classes final yr and observed her son changing into more and more quiet and disinterested at school over what she calls “darkish and miserable” tales about one heavy matter after one other — from the near-extinction of buffalo from the Western frontier to racial discrimination within the South within the Fifties and ’60s.

“The Story of Ruby Bridges,” which is advised from Ruby’s perspective, included drawings of indignant white individuals holding up indicators and calling the little lady names as she walked to highschool. A special textual content, “When Peace Met Energy,” depicted nonviolent demonstrations in Birmingham, with white firefighters utilizing fireplace hoses to violently spray younger Black protesters.

Each readings supplied traditionally correct representations of occasions in U.S. historical past and aligned with Tennessee tutorial requirements for second graders.

For English language arts, the texts supported studying accuracy, fluency and comprehension targets. To satisfy social research requirements, the readings developed geographic and historic consciousness, together with the idea of democracy, the contributions of well-known Individuals and “how collaboration and respect for others is critical to realize and preserve a functioning society.”

Advertisement

However Dixon discovered the teachings unbalanced. In her eyes, they targeted extra on the evils of white oppressors than on the heroism of Black civil rights leaders and their white allies resembling Ruby’s first grade instructor, Barbara Henry.

“They taught hate first,” she stated concerning the classes, which she believes robbed her youthful son of his “childhood innocence” and interjected a racial lens that she and her white husband have sought to maneuver past when elevating their kids.

Dave Allen, assistant superintendent over instructing, studying, and evaluation for Williamson County Faculties, stated the district “patently disagrees” with any declare that it teaches hate.

“We obtained zero studies of scholar writing samples with any indication of hate after this second-grade module,” he stated. “The writing samples categorical constructive takeaways from the content material discovered.”

(READ MORE: Hamilton County faculty board accepts report from guide evaluation committee)

Advertisement

LEARNED SHAME

For all of the pitched debates, the problems stay pretty easy to Dixon.

A tipping second, she stated, got here when her then-second grader started telling her he was not American, however Thai like his mom’s facet of his household.

“It broke my coronary heart,” she stated. “He hates to be American. He is ashamed to be half white.”

Dixon shared her considerations first along with her son’s instructor, then the college principal, then the district superintendent and faculty board members. The superintendent provided to maneuver him to a personalized curriculum. However Dixon declined, nervous that might isolate her son. He completed the college yr, then started third grade final fall at a close-by personal faculty that promotes a “classical curriculum that embodies conventional American values.”

Advertisement

“He’s doing nicely. He’s comfortable,” stated Dixon, whose fifth-grade son stays in public colleges.

Dixon, who helps the state’s regulation concentrating on crucial race idea, testified about her household’s expertise earlier than the district’s curriculum reconsideration committee. She additionally advised her story to a group presentation on crucial race idea hosted final spring by the native chapter of Mothers for Liberty. Final summer season, she joined a small contingent of mothers, together with the chapter’s chief, in a non-public assembly with Tennessee Training Commissioner Penny Schwinn to air their considerations.

“I am only a mother attempting to guard my kids,” Dixon stated.

In Memphis, the Barneses moved their kids final yr to a non-public faculty for presented kids within the principally white suburb of Collierville — not over curriculum considerations of their native public colleges however to hunt a greater tutorial match.

As a mother, Barnes watches intently to verify her kids are studying correct historical past in school — as an illustration, rejecting Thanksgiving narratives that promote dangerous stereotypes about Indigenous peoples.

Advertisement

However like many African American dad and mom, she would not fully rely upon faculty to introduce her kids to Black historical past, which has been taught inconsistently since a wave of colleges started incorporating these topics into curricula within the mid-Seventies.

Now, the way forward for how Black historical past will likely be taught in colleges is unsure, with at the very least 36 states proscribing or attempting to limit classroom discussions about race, together with Tennessee.

“At house, I taught our youngsters early that people have performed actually horrible, hurtful issues to different individuals and sadly that continues,” Barnes recounts. “And so I inform them that I would like you as kids to continue learning about this stuff and I would like you to develop up and deal with others in a loving method.

“I am attempting,” she stated, “to show them how issues have been, how they’re, and the way issues may be higher.”

This story was initially revealed by Chalkbeat. Join their newsletters at ckbe.at/newsletters.

Advertisement



Source link

Tennessee

ESPN moves Tennessee back into College Football Playoff, gives Vols return trip to Georgia

Published

on

ESPN moves Tennessee back into College Football Playoff, gives Vols return trip to Georgia


Losses on Saturday by Indiana, Alabama and Ole Miss moved Tennessee up to No. 8 in ESPN’s new projected College Football Playoff rankings. The projection had the Vols as the No. 9 seed in the 12-team bracket, making a return trip to No. 8 Georgia in the first round of the playoffs.

The other first-round matchups were No. 12 Arizona State at No. 5 Ohio State, No. 11 Indiana at No. 6 Penn State and No. 10 SMU at No. 7 Notre Dame. Oregon was ranked No. 1 and seeded first by ESPN’s Heather Dinich

“As long as Tennessee doesn’t lose at Vanderbilt on Saturday — and that’s hardly a guarantee — the Vols should be in the committee’s top 12 on Selection Day,” Dinich wrote, “now that Ole Miss played itself out.”

ESPN keeps Alabama at No. 12 in playoff rankings despite third loss

The College Football Playoff selection committee will release its new rankings and bracket projection Tuesday night. The official bracket will be announced on December 8.

Advertisement

ESPN on Saturday night had Ohio State ranked No. 2 and seeded fifth. Texas was ranked No. 3 and seeded second as the presumed SEC champion. Miami was ranked No. 6 and seeded third as the projected ACC champ and Boise State was ranked No. 10 and seeded fourth as the projected Mountain West champs.

Alabama stayed in the top 12 at No. 12 in the ESPN rankings, but was bumped out of the bracket by Arizona State, which was ranked No. 17 but would be in the field as the projected Big 12 champion. 

“Alabama needs help even if it is still in the top 12 on Tuesday night,” Dinich wrote, “because the Tide would be bumped out for the Big 12 champion in this scenario. Alabama needs to beat rival Auburn and hope there is more fallout above them.”

ESPN dropped Indiana to No. 11 in its rankings. Just outside the top 12 was No. 13 Ole Miss, No. 14 South Carolina, No. 15 Texas A&M and No. 16 Clemson. BYU dropped to No. 18 after its loss at Arizona State and Colorado dropped to No. 20 after its loss at Kansas. 

Tennessee at Vanderbilt, Saturday, Noon ET, ABC

Tennessee (8-2, 5-2 SEC) beat UTEP 56-0 on Senior Day at Neyland Stadium Saturday afternoon and now goes to Vanderbilt (6-5, 3-4) this week in the regular-season finale. 

Advertisement

Indiana lost 38-15 at Ohio State, Ole Miss lost 24-17 at Florida and Alabama lost 24-3 at Oklahoma. Texas A&M also lost at Auburn for its second SEC loss.

The Tennessee-Georgia winner in the ESPN projection would advance to face No. 1 Oregon in the Rose Bowl.

Georgia can play its way out of the first round by winning the SEC Championship game. Georgia has clinched a spot in Atlanta and will face the winner of Saturday’s game between Texas and Texas A&M.

“The Vols got some help on Saturday,” Dinich wrote. “With Ole Miss and Indiana both losing, Tennessee should move up by default — not because it hammered UTEP 56-0. 

“The head-to-head loss to Georgia will keep them behind the Bulldogs, which makes putting them ahead of Alabama difficult for the committee in spite of the win against the Tide.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Tennessee

Analyst Slams Titans, Aaron Rodgers Rumors

Published

on

Analyst Slams Titans, Aaron Rodgers Rumors


The Tennessee Titans have to figure out what they’re going to do at the quarterback position moving forward.

Will Levis showed flashes of big-time potential during his rookie season last year. Unfortunately, in year two, he has taken a huge step back and shown a lot of regression.

That has led to questions about his future with the team.

Recently, it has been suggested that Aaron Rodgers could end up being a potential target for the Titans if they’re looking for another quarterback.

Advertisement

It’s widely expected that Rodgers will part ways with the New York Jets in the offseason. Some speculation has even suggested that he could cut ties with the Jets during the 2024 season.

With that being said, Mike Moraitis of The Sporting News has slammed the rumors of Rodgers being a potential target for Tennessee.

“However, for the Titans to even consider bringing Rodgers in, they would have to be confident they are just a quarterback away and that Rodgers can put them over the top,” Moraitis wrote. “And, Rodgers would have to believe that the Titans are right there in terms of being a contender. Nothing we’ve seen from Rodgers or the Titans in 2024 has indicated any of those things are the case.”

He continued forward, revealing his thoughts on what the Titans should actually choose to do.

“What the Titans need to do is find their long-term solution under center and not a shaky bridge quarterback,” he wrote. “If Levis doesn’t rebound, Tennessee needs to get their guy in the 2025 NFL Draft, where they will have a high pick.”

Advertisement

Obviously, in an ideal world, Levis would bounce back strong down the stretch of the season. He could still very well do that and there is no denying the talent he possesses.

Bringing in Rodgers would be entertaining, but it wouldn’t change much about the outlook for the franchise. Depending on the price, they could consider signing Rodgers to a one or two-year deal and drafting a rookie. Starting Rodgers and letting a rookie learn from the sideline could make sense.

Even with that being a possibility, the idea of Rodgers to Tennessee just doesn’t make a ton of sense. Fans should not expect to see the Titans try to pursue Rodgers this offseason.

Make sure you bookmark Tennessee Titans on SI for the latest news, exclusive interviews, film breakdowns and so much more!



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tennessee

Titans Predicted for Another Loss vs. Texans

Published

on

Titans Predicted for Another Loss vs. Texans


The Tennessee Titans are just one day away from their next matchup against the Houston Texans at NRG Stadium.

The Titans are looking for their first win since Week 9, when they beat the New England Patriots at home. In the last two weeks, Tennessee has lost by double digits to strong playoff-contending teams, and this week might not be much different against the first-place Texans.

CBS Sports writer Pete Prisco believes the Titans’ struggles will continue, falling 31-21 to the Texans.

“The Texans are playing on a short week, but they looked better on offense against Dallas with Nico Collins back. The Titans will have trouble stopping them this week, so look for the Texans and C.J. Stroud to play well. Will Levis won’t keep up,” Prisco writes.

Advertisement

The Titans will have to stop Houston’s multi-dimensional offense with Joe Mixon on the ground and Collins and Tank Dell through the air. Tennessee has the No. 2 overall defense this season, so it should provide a good test for C.J. Stroud and the Texans offense, but it still doesn’t make them a favorite.

If the Titans want to win against the Texans, they will have to pressure Stroud and take advantage of their offensive line, which has proven to be suspect at times during the season.

When it comes to the Titans’ offense, it needs to take care of the ball. Giving the Texans shorter fields will be the easiest way to lose the game, so if the Titans can prevent the Texans from scoring up close on short drives, they will have a chance to be competitive against their division rival.

Kickoff between the Titans and Texans is set for 12 noon CT tomorrow. The game can be watched on CBS or streamed on Paramount+.

Make sure you bookmark Tennessee Titans on SI for the latest news, exclusive interviews, film breakdowns and so much more!

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending