Connect with us

Tennessee

Clemson vs. Tennessee Orange Bowl game prediction, preview

Published

on

Clemson vs. Tennessee Orange Bowl game prediction, preview


Two premier faculty soccer powers meet up within the Orange Bowl trying to finish issues on a excessive notice after stumbling to forgettable late season showings as Tennessee and Clemson sq. off on Friday.

Clemson is the reigning ACC champion after taking out North Carolina and at last making the everlasting change at quarterback, as Cade Klubnik appeared good instead of D.J. Uiagalalei, who transferred out to Oregon State this offseason.

Going bowling: Faculty soccer bowl sport schedule for 2022

Advertisement

Tennessee was the No. 1 ranked offense in faculty soccer a lot of the season earlier than a loss at Georgia ended its excellent season after which a shock loss to unranked South Carolina knocked it out of the Faculty Soccer Playoff hunt.

Huge Orange additionally underwent a quarterback change, albeit involuntarily after phenom starter Hendon Hooker tore his ACL within the Carolina sport, and the Vols shifting to Joe Milton, himself a possible star with a giant arm and operating capacity.

This is what you’ll want to know concerning the sport between the Tigers and the Volunteers, with an up to date prediction and betting data.

Orange Bowl: Clemson vs. Tennessee prediction, preview

The right way to watch, stream

When: Fri., Dec. 30

Advertisement

Time: 8 p.m. ET, 7 p.m. CT

TV: ESPN community

Stream: fuboTV (Strive totally free)

Recreation odds, level unfold, betting strains

Level unfold: Clemson -6 (-118) | Tennessee +6 (-110)

Whole: 63.5 factors | Over -110 | Below -125

Advertisement

Moneyline: Clemson -250 | Tennessee +170

FPI prediction: Tennessee has the slender 57.0 p.c probability to win the sport, in comparison with Clemson at 43.0 p.c, in response to the Soccer Energy Index pc prediction mannequin that picks winners by simulating groups’ seasons 20,000 occasions.

Unfold consensus choose: Clemson -6 (61% of bets are on the Tigers)

Place your bets: Clemson vs. Tennessee picks, predictions for Orange Bowl

+ Vols are 9-3 in opposition to the unfold total this season

Advertisement

+ Tennessee is 0-4 ATS of their final 4 impartial web site video games

+ UT is 4-0 in opposition to the unfold in its final 4 non-conference video games

+ The below is 7-0 in Vols’ final 7 when permitting <170 passing yards final sport

+ Clemson is 7-6 in opposition to the unfold total this season

+ Tigers are 0-4 ATS in final 4 non-conference video games

Advertisement

+ The over is 4-0 in Clemson’s final 4 after a SU win of 20-plus factors

+ Clemson is 4-0 ATS in its final 4 bowl video games

Orange Bowl: Keys to victory

Clemson wins if: Klubnik can get behind the Vols secondary. The Clemson quarterback has loads of choices to chop by any protection with a battery of middleman throws, particularly in opposition to a Tennessee again seven that ranks 127th nationally in opposition to the move and surrendered greater than 450 air yards in three completely different video games. 

Nevertheless it additionally had 20 takeaways, was plus-9 in turnover margin, and positioned fifth within the SEC in scoring protection. Clemson wants Klubnik, who had 279 yards and a TD within the ACC title sport, to be on level from the beginning as Tennessee was reasonably profitable in opposition to the run, permitting 112 yards per sport, and will bottle up Will Shipley (1,110 yards, 15 TDs) greater than he is used to being.

Tennessee wins if: It retains Joe Milton clear within the pocket and runs the ball properly. With how properly UT threw the soccer, it is simple to miss how properly they ran, averaging over 200 yards per sport, a bonus it’s going to should develop with Hooker out of the image after main the staff to No. 3 nationwide and No. 1 SEC marks in passing this 12 months.

Working the ball in opposition to Clemson is a troublesome job when taking a look at this stout defensive entrance that includes the likes of Bryan Bresee and Tyler Davis, however notably not Myles Murphy, who is popping professional. Clemson notably struggled on the again finish at a number of factors this season and by attacking the secondary, the Vols can cancel out the Tigers’ energy up entrance. 

Advertisement

Clemson vs. Tennessee Prediction

Tennessee was the offensive darling of school soccer a lot of the season however with out Hooker, that manufacturing can not help however take a slight step backwards.

Milton has the arm to go deep and Clemson will give him just a few deep photographs, however the Tigers have sufficient energy up entrance to use sufficient stress on the Volunteers quarterback so he will not have the ability to take benefit typically sufficient.

Klubnik is an knowledgeable passer, a former 5-star recruit from Texas, and whereas he might not have the form of studs at receiver that Clemson has produced within the CFP period, there’s sufficient to adequately push the Vols’ sluggish again seven out of place. Which, in flip, will assist open operating lanes in shut vary for Shipley to maneuver the chains, lengthen drives, and run the clock late within the sport.

Often, the groups that may run the ball and play higher protection wins these video games. On paper, that benefit belongs to Clemson, however not with out a struggle.

Faculty Soccer HQ Orange Bowl prediction: Clemson 37, Tennessee 30 (Clemson -6, Over 66)


Extra faculty soccer from SI: High 25 Rankings | Schedule | All Groups

Advertisement

Observe Faculty Soccer HQ: Bookmark | Rankings | Fb



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Tennessee

Watch: Gretchen Walsh Cracks NCAA Record in 100 Butterfly (Tennessee Invite Day 2 Race Videos)

Published

on

Watch: Gretchen Walsh Cracks NCAA Record in 100 Butterfly (Tennessee Invite Day 2 Race Videos)


2024 Tennessee Invite

The third day of the 2024 Tennessee Invite saw lots of action, with the unique setup of the meet, the A-finals were contested in a 1-on-1 format that brought many fans to their feet and proved to bring an extra layer of excitement to the meet.  UVA’s Gretchen Walsh built on that excitement to continue her record-breaking streak, shattering her own American, US Open, and NCAA Record in the 100 butterfly with a time of 47.35.

Even though the day might be over, you can relive all of the action with the race videos below. Courtesy of the University of Virginia. 

WOMEN’S 200 MEDLEY RELAY- TIMED FINALS

  • NCAA Record: 1:31.73, Virginia- 2023
  • 2025 NCAA ‘A’ Cut: 1:36.24
  • 2025 NCAA ‘B’ Cut: 1:36.76
  1. Virginia A- 1:32.58 A
  2. Tennessee A- 1:34.35 A
  3. Virginia B- 1:35.89
  4. Tennessee B- 1:37.94
  5. Kentucky A- 1:39.66
  6. Kentucky B- 1::41.35

Race Video:

MEN’S 200 MEDLEY RELAY- TIMED FINALS

  • NCAA Record: 1:20.15, Florida- 2024
  • 2025 NCAA ‘A’ Cut: 1:23.62
  • 2025 NCAA ‘B’ Cut: 1:23.90
  1. Tennessee A- 1:21.71 A
  2. Tennessee B- 1:25.31
  3. Kentucky A- 1:26.75
  4. Kentucky B- 1:27.48
  5. Virginia A- DQ
  6. Virginia B- DQ

Race Video:

Advertisement

WOMEN’S 100 FLY – FINALS

  • NCAA Record: 47.42, Gretchen Walsh (UVA) – 2024  47.35, Gretchen Walsh (UVA)- 2024
  • 2025 NCAA ‘A’ Cut: 50.52
  • 2025 NCAA ‘B’ Cut: 53.34
  • 2024 NCAA Cutline: 51.88
  1. Gretchen Walsh (UVA)- 47.35 *New NCAA Record*
  2. Claire Curzan (UVA)- 49.50 A
  3. Josephine Fuller (TENN)- 51.51 B
  4. Sara Stolter (TENN)- 52.15 B
  5. Maggie Schalow (UVA)- 52.33 B
  6. Emily Brown (TENN)- 52.85 B
  7. Lydia Hanlon (UKY)- 53.85
  8. Maddy Hartley (UKY)- 54.33

Race Videos:

A-Final

B-Final

C-Final

Advertisement

MEN’S 100 FLY – FINALS

  • NCAA Record: 42.80, Caeleb Dressel (FLOR) – 2018
  • 2025 NCAA ‘A’ Cut: 44.51
  • 2025 NCAA ‘B’ Cut: 46.80
  • 2024 NCAA Cutline: 45.37
  1. Jordan Crooks (TENN)- 43.77 A
  2. Spencer Nicholas- 44.41 A
  3. Gui Caribe (TENN)- 45.18 B
  4. Hayden Bellotti (UVA)- 45.85 B
  5. Martin Espernberger (TENN)- 46.29 B
  6. Ryan Merani (UKY)- 47.12
  7. Simon Lins (UVA)- 47.43
  8. Logan Ingerick (UKY)- 48.29

Race Videos:

A-Final

B-Final

Advertisement

C-Final

WOMEN’S 400 IM – FINALS

  • NCAA Record: 3:54.60, Ella Eastin (STAN) – 2018
  • 2025 NCAA ‘A’ Cut: 4:03.62
  • 2025 NCAA “B’ Cut: 4:16.78
  • 2024 NCAA Cutline: 4:10.74
  1. Leah Hayes (UVA)- 4:01.34 A
  2. Ella Jansen (TENN)- 4:06.29 B
  3. Ella Bathurst (UVA)- 4:09.53 B
  4. Emma Redman (4:11.33)- 4:11.33 B
  5. Kate McCarville (TENN)- 4:11.39 B
  6. Emily Brown (TENN)- 4:13.17 B
  7. Marie Bell (UKY)- 4:17.57
  8. Fernanda De Goeij (UKY)- 4:19.56

Race Videos: 

A-Final

B-Final

Advertisement

C-Final

MEN’S 400 IM – FINALS

  • NCAA Record: 3:28.82, Leon Marchand (ASU) – 2023
  • 2025 NCAA ‘A’ Cut: 3:38.37
  • 2025 NCAA “B’ Cut: 3:49.53
  • 2024 NCAA Cutline: 3:42.93
  1. Levi Sandidge (UKY)- 3:42.52 B
  2. Tony Laurito (TENN)- 3:44.06 B
  3. Matt Styczen (UVA)- 3:44.95 B
  4. Dillon Wright (UVA)- 3:45.45 B
  5. Colin Bitz (UVA)- 3:46.13 B
  6. Gus Rothrock (TENN)- 3:46.47 B
  7. Aidan Crisci (TENN)- 3:47.84 B
  8. Jackson Mussler (UKY)- 3:54.39

Race Videos: 

A-Final 

No Race Video Currently Available

Advertisement

B-Final

C-Final

WOMEN’S 200 FREE – FINALS

  • NCAA Record: 1:39.10, Missy Franklin (CAL) – 2015
  • 2025 NCAA ‘A’ Cut: 1:42.60
  • 2025 NCAA “B’ Cut: 1:46.85
  • 2024 NCAA Cutline: 1:44.80
  1. Aimee Canny (UVA)- 1:42.67 B
  2. Camille Spink (TENN)- 1:43.57 B
  3. Anna Moesch (UVA)- 1:43.12 B
  4. Cavan Gormsen (UVA)- 1:44.85 B
  5. Julia Mrozinski (TENN)- 1:45.64 B
  6. Sara Stolter (TENN)- 1:46.33 B
  7. Lauren West (UKY)- 1:46.46 B
  8. Katy Jost (UKY)- 1:48.10

Race Videos: 

A-Final 

Advertisement

B-Final

C-Final

Advertisement

MEN’S 200 FREE – FINALS

  • NCAA Record: 1:28.81, Luke Hobson (TEX) – 2024
  • 2025 NCAA ‘A’ Cut: 1:31.21
  • 2025 NCAA “B’ Cut: 1:35.35
  • 2024 NCAA Cutline: 1:32.93
  1. Nikoli Blackman (TENN)- 1:32.12
  2. Sebastien Sergile (UVA)- 1:32.38
  3. David King (UVA)- 1:33.19
  4. Joaquin Vargas (TENN)- 1:34.67
  5. Jack Stelter (TENN)- 1:35.82
  6. Connor Boyle (UVA)- 1:36.54
  7. Justin Peresse (UKY)- 1:36.66
  8. Caue Gluck (UKY)- 1:36.93

Race Videos: 

A-Final 

B-Final

C-Final

Advertisement

WOMEN’S 100 BREAST – FINALS

  • NCAA Record: 55.73, Lilly King (IU) – 2019
  • 2025 NCAA ‘A’ Cut: 58.01
  • 2025 NCAA “B’ Cut: 1:01.22
  • 2024 NCAA Cutline: 59.75
  1. McKenzie Siroky (TENN)- 58:00
  2. Aimee Canny (UVA)- 58.64
  3. Emelie Fast (TENN)- 58.41
  4. Emma Weber (UVA)- 58.67
  5. Zoe Skirboll (UVA)- 59.23
  6. Bridget Engel (UKY)- 59.83
  7. Hannah Marinovich (TENN)- 1:00.54
  8. Olivia Mendenhall (UKY)- 1:03.08

Race Videos:

A-Final

B-Final

Advertisement

C-Final

MEN’S 100 BREAST – FINALS

  • NCAA Record: 49.53, Liam Bell (CAL) – 2024
  • 2025 NCAA ‘A’ Cut: 51.02
  • 2025 NCAA “B’ Cut: 53.43
  • 2024 NCAA Cutline: 51.89
  1. Noah Nichols (UVA)- 51.32 B
  2. Adomas Gatulis (UKY)- 52.85 B
  3. Kevin Houseman (TENN)- 53.10 B
  4. Jed Garner (TENN)- 53.30 B
  5. Jay Gerloff (UVA)- 53.40 B
  6. Jonathan Rom (UKY)- 53.73
  7. Grayson Nye (TENN)- 53.79
  8. Matt Heilman (UVA)- 53.84

Race Videos:

A-Final

B-Final

Advertisement

 

WOMEN’S 100 BACK – FINALS

  • NCAA Record: 48.10, Gretchen Walsh (UVA) – 2024
  • 2025 NCAA ‘A’ Cut: 50.66
  • 2025 NCAA “B’ Cut: 53.53
  • 2024 NCAA Cutline: 52.28
  1. Claire Curzan (UVA)- 49.37  A
  2. Josephine Fuller (TENN)- 51.06 B
  3. Charlotte Wilson (UVA)- 52.01 B
  4. Reilly Tiltmann (UVA)- 52.51 B
  5. Lexi Stephens (TENN)- 52.55 B
  6. Sophie Brison (TENN)- 53.21 B
  7. Grace Frericks (UKY)- 53.47 B
  8. Torie Buerger (UKY)- 53.83

Race Videos:

A-Final

B-Final

Advertisement

C-Final

MEN’S 100 BACK – FINALS

  • NCAA Record: 43.35, Luca Urlando (UGA) – 2022
  • 2025 NCAA ‘A’ Cut: 44.48
  • 2025 NCAA “B’ Cut: 47.16
  • 2024 NCAA Cutline: 45.56

Results:

  1. Harrison Lierz (TENN)- 45.25
  2. Jack Aikins (UVA)- 45.84
  3. Lamar Taylor (TENN)- 46.32
  4. Nick Simons (TENN)- 46.67
  5. Will Thompson (UVA)- 46.99
  6. Devin Naoroz (UKY)- 47.06
  7. Szymon Mieczkowski (UKY)-47.67
  8. Max Berg (UKY)- 48.93

Race Videos:

A-Final

Advertisement

B-Final

C-Final





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tennessee

Tennessee reading law: Less than 1% of third graders held back in 2024

Published

on

Tennessee reading law: Less than 1% of third graders held back in 2024


Just 0.88% of Tennessee public school third graders were held back this year under the state’s controversial reading law, despite 60% of the class falling short of a state reading benchmark this spring.

With around 74,000 third graders enrolled in the 2023-24 school year statewide, that works out to 655 students who were retained, according to data from the Tennessee Department of Education. The state reading law took effect last year and led to the retention of 1.2% of third graders in 2023, which came out to 898 students.

The law primarily determines children’s reading proficiency by their English language arts scores on the standardized Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program, or TCAP, test.

The 60% who fell short on this year’s TCAP represent roughly 50,000 students. However, that number does not include students who were exempt from being held back. Here are those exemptions, including how many students met them:

Advertisement
  • 11,468: Students with disabilities or suspected disabilities that may impact their reading
  • 3,511: Students who are English learners with less than two years of English language arts instruction
  • 2,596: Students who were held back in a previous grade
  • 2,345: Students who had other exemptions determined by their local education leaders

Exemptions were up to the districts to sort out. The remaining students had to successfully take one of the state’s many “pathways” to avoid being held back.

Here’s a look at how those students fared.

How Tennessee third graders moved on to fourth grade

Third graders who scored “below” or “approaching” expectations on the English language arts section of the TCAP had several options to avoid being held back.

Retakes were offered to third graders shortly after the spring TCAP. A total of 3,274 made a passing score and moved on to fourth grade. Another 99 students won an appeal because they faced a catastrophic circumstance around the time they took the TCAP.

Advertisement

Third graders who scored as approaching proficiency had three options to move on to fourth grade. Here’s how many qualified for each one:

  • 1,124: Enrolled in summer school, met 90% attendance and showed adequate growth
  • 7,426: Opted into state-provided tutoring for the entirety of fourth grade
  • 3,262: Scored in the 50th percentile or higher of a state-approved universal reading screener and opted into state-provided tutoring for the entirety of fourth grade
  • 2,895: Won a parent appeal and opted into an academic remediation plan in fourth grade, which includes tutoring

Third graders who scored as below proficiency had one option to move on to fourth grade. Here’s how many qualified:

  • 3,411: Enrolled in summer school, met a 90% attendance rate and opted into state-provided tutoring for the entirety of fourth grade

Students who qualified for tutoring in fourth grade must meet an individualized growth goal by the end of fourth grade. This growth goal does not apply to two groups who opted into tutoring: Those who won an appeal, or those who scored as “approaching” on the third grade TCAP and scored in the 50th percentile or higher on the third grade universal reading screener.

A total of 1,950 third graders who fell short on the spring TCAP either did not enroll again or had data that has not been reported to the state. The data reflects reports from districts as of Sept. 6, according to the state department of education.

How the Tennessee reading law affected fourth graders

Fourth graders who enrolled in yearlong tutoring to avoid being held back in third grade must pass the English language arts section of the TCAP or hit individualized growth goals set by the state. However, the reading law does not mandate that they be held back if they do not meet those goals.

Instead, it requires the student’s parents or legal guardians, principal and English language arts teacher to determine what’s best. They can either decide to retain the child or promote them to fifth grade with state-provided tutoring in place.

Advertisement

According to the state department of education, here’s how fourth graders enrolled in tutoring this year fared:

  • 5,389: Promoted to fifth grade with tutoring in place
  • 3,996: Met adequate growth goals
  • 1,740: Scored proficient on their spring TCAP English language arts section
  • 132: Retained in fourth grade

A total of 906 fourth graders either did not enroll again or had data that was not reported by their district, according to the state education department.

Where can I learn more?

More information on the third grade reading and retention law from the Tennessee Department of Education can be found at tn.gov/education/learning-acceleration.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tennessee

Former Titans Coach Named Top Candidate for Jets

Published

on

Former Titans Coach Named Top Candidate for Jets


Former Tennessee Titans head coach Mike Vrabel remains a hot name, and he may have another head-coaching job as soon as next season.

Albert Breer of Sports Illustrated recently named a bunch of potential candidates for the New York Jets job in 2025, and Vrabel was at the top of his list.

“Mike Vrabel makes the most sense to me, mostly because he won’t stand down to an owner, and that’s exactly what the New York Jets need,” Breer wrote.

The problem with that is Jets owner Woody Johnson is known to be a meddler, so he a Vrabel-Johnson partnership may never actually come to fruition.

Advertisement

Still, Vrabel could end up being a perfect fit for the Jets from a stylistic perspective given that New York is built upon a strong defense.

It’s not the first time that Vrabel has been linked to Gang Green, either.

Vrabel actually did a very solid job during his time with the Titans, going 54-45 while making three playoff appearances—including a pair of AFC South titles—across five seasons.

Things went south over Vrabel’s final two years in Tennessee, with the Titans going just 13-21 during that span. However, it is becoming increasingly obvious that the problem was not with Vrabel.

Vrabel is currently serving as an assistant for the Cleveland Browns, but it seems like only a matter of time before he lands a better job elsewhere.

Advertisement

The 49-year-old also had a 14-year NFL playing career from 1997 through 2010, spending time with the Pittsburgh Steelers, New England Patriots and Kansas City Chiefs. He won three Super Bowls with the Patriots and also made a Pro Bowl with the squad in 2007.

The Jets have been one of the league’s most disappointing teams this season, as they are just 3-8 in spite of having one of the most star-studded rosters in the sport.

Make sure you bookmark Tennessee Titans on SI for the latest news, exclusive interviews, film breakdowns and so much more!



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending