South-Carolina
Oregon pioneered a radical drug policy. Now it's reconsidering.
Oregon voters passed the most liberal drug law in the country in November 2020, decriminalizing possession for small amounts of hard drugs.
Under Ballot Measure 110, instead of arresting drug users, police now give them a citation and point them towards treatment. The law passed with 58% of the vote and also funneled hundreds of millions of dollars in cannabis tax revenue to fund new recovery programs.
But more than three years later, the drug crisis in Oregon – like many other places battling the fentanyl crisis – has gotten worse. And that’s prompted a fierce political debate in Oregon about whether Measure 110 has succeeded or failed.
Addressing Measure 110 is one of the priorities for Oregon lawmakers, as they start their new legislative session this week. Democrats, who control the legislature and the governor’s office, have indicated they’re open to recriminalizing drugs, which could effectively end the most controversial piece of this legislative experiment.
A citation system many say isn’t working
Kristyna Wentz-Graff / OPB
/
OPB
On a gray November afternoon in downtown Portland, Officer Joey Yoo stood hunched over a city-issued mountain bike.
The sidewalk was dotted with tiny scraps of tinfoil used for smoking fentanyl. Down the block, a man officers said was high on meth was raging about his stuff being stolen.
“Do you have any questions while I’m talking to you about why I’m giving you this citation?” Yoo asked a young man he stopped for using fentanyl in public. NPR is not using his name because he was in no condition to give us permission to do so.
The man was staring down at the ground, not making eye contact with Yoo. The little he said was hardly audible.
“What brought you out here?” Yoo asked.
“Drugs, I guess,” the man replied.
“Do you have any family here?” Yoo asked.
The man didn’t appear to respond.
Then, Yoo handed the man several slips of paper. One was a $100 citation. Another had the phone number to a state-funded hotline. If the man were to call and get assessed for addiction, the fine and citation would go away.
“You don’t have to go into treatment, but they’ll give you information about how to get the treatment,” Yoo said. “That’s all you have to do.”
Court records show the man never made the call.
And that’s typical.
So far, police have handed out more than 7,000 citations, but as of December, only a few hundred people had called the hotline to get assessed for a substance use disorder. And even fewer accessed treatment through the citation system.
This exchange – a citation for drug use, instead of an arrest – is a direct result of Measure 110.
Advocates for the measure argued the criminal justice system didn’t effectively treat addiction. They also said it disproportionately harmed people of color. Before it passed, the state estimated it would reduce racial disparities in conviction rates.
Back on the street, Officer Yoo said handing out citations doesn’t appear to move people from using drugs on the streets into treatment programs.
“The same people I gave a citation to yesterday, today I see doing the same thing,” Yoo said.
A heated debate in the state capital
Kristyna Wentz-Graff / OPB
/
OPB
What’s happening here on the streets of Portland has led to a passionate debate about substance use and drug policy in Oregon.
Opioid overdoses have surged across the state since Measure 110 passed. In 2019, 280 people died from unintentional opiate overdoses in Oregon. In 2022, that was up to 956 deaths, according to the state health authority – a 241% increase.
A number of researchers have said there isn’t evidence that Measure 110 is the cause.
One study published in September by the Journal of the American Medical Association Psychiatry, looked at Oregon and Washington, where drug possession was also decriminalized for several months in 2021. Researchers say they found no evidence between “legal changes that removed or substantially reduced criminal penalties for drug possession in Oregon and Washington and fatal drug overdose rates.”
At least one study, however, did find that Measure 110 caused 182 additional overdose deaths in Oregon in 2021. That study, published in the Journal of Health Economics, said those additional deaths represented, “a 23% increase over the number of unintentional drug overdose deaths predicted if Oregon had not decriminalized drugs.”
Brandon del Pozo, an assistant professor of medicine at Brown University who studies the overdose crisis and substance use, said that study should be taken with a “grain of salt” because it doesn’t control for fentanyl’s entry into Oregon’s drug supply.
Kristyna Wentz-Graff / OPB
/
OPB
“In virtually every state, fentanyl is intimately linked to overdose,” said del Pozo, who also spent 23 years as a police officer, in January during a symposium on Measure 110 in Oregon.
During the past several months in Salem, Oregon’s state capital, health experts, law enforcement, and members of the public have offered deeply divided testimony to Oregon lawmakers about what should happen to Measure 110. Hundreds of people submitted testimony, including some who argued that taking away criminal penalties for drug use hadn’t worked. Others said they’re concerned about safety.
“The police occasionally come in and clean up a specific area with their superficial presence and the drug market moves along to another corner,” Lisa Schroeder, who owns Mother’s Bistro & Bar in downtown Portland, testified. “The quality of life of our citizenry, from the user to the general population, is suffering.”
Cat and Chad Sewell own Sewell Sweets, a bakeshop in Salem. In written testimony, the Sewell’s said they’ve witnessed drug use leading to conflicts outside their business.
“The scenes that we see day in and day out leave us frustrated and questioning just how safe the longevity of our business and livelihood is,” they wrote.
Kristyna Wentz-Graff / OPB
/
OPB
Addiction doctors and criminal justice experts in Oregon said that a lot happened between 2020 and now besides Measure 110: not just the fentanyl crisis, but also the pandemic, which taxed the healthcare system, and a growing crisis of homelessness.
Dr. Andy Mendenhall is an addiction medicine physician and the CEO of Central City Concern, a social service organization in Portland that gets a small amount of money from Measure 110. He testified at one of the hearings in Salem, and in an interview after, said it’s understandable people are frustrated.
“They’re reasonably questioning why this is happening – why it’s all not fixed,” he told OPB. “Folks are experiencing their own despair, seeing the suffering of others… There’s a ton of compassion fatigue.”
Kristyna Wentz-Graff / OPB
/
OPB
Mendenhall said people are pointing at Measure 110 and saying it’s the reason for Oregon’s problems, “when in reality it is our decades-long, underbuilt system of behavioral health, substance use disorders, shelter and affordable housing – that are the primary drivers.”
Some treatment providers have testified that if lawmakers recriminalize drugs it will just take Oregon back to a different system that wasn’t working.
“Arrest records – it impacts people looking for employment, it impacts their housing, it perpetuates a cycle of poverty,” testified Shannon Jones Isadore, CEO of the Oregon Change Clinic, a recovery program that specializes in working with African American and veteran communities in Portland.
“A better solution is to dramatically increase our street services and outreach where there can be adequate care available for everyone,” she said.
Amid the debate about how – or even whether to change the law – there’s general agreement that whatever should happen next to Measure 110, Oregon made a radical change to its drug laws before the infrastructure was in place to really support it.
Still, treatment has expanded
There are parts of the law that aren’t being debated.
The influx of money towards recovery expanded the state’s detox capacity, funded new staff such as drug and alcohol counselors, and increased culturally specific treatment programs. Still, a recent study from state health officials found Oregon was years away from being able to treat everyone who needed it.
Joe Bazeghi helps run Recovery Works Northwest, which opened a new 16-bed detox facility during the fall of 2023.
“It’s Measure 110 funded,” Bazeghi said, during a tour in December. “The purchase, the retrofit, the remodel as well as supplying of this facility was accomplished with support from Measure 110.”
Kristyna Wentz-Graff / OPB
/
OPB
The facility opens to a high ceiling with a staircase that goes to a second floor. There’s a dining room, game area and off to one side, a living room for recovery group meetings.
The detox center is evidence that Measure 110 is working, Bazeghi said.
“Measure 110 is providing treatment resources that otherwise would not exist,” he said. “It’s working as well as could ever possibly be expected of a brand new system that had to be built.”
Most of the people here are really sick, withdrawing from fentanyl.
A woman named Aleah is one of them. NPR is just identifying her by her first name, because she was still a patient in the detox facility when we spoke with her.
Kristyna Wentz-Graff / OPB
/
OPB
“I feel a lot better than I did yesterday,” Aleah said.
She’d been at the facility for five days. She said she drove 250 miles from Eastern Oregon to Recovery Works because it’s where she was able to get a bed. Her boyfriend also wanted her to come here so they could both get sober, she said. While we were talking, her boyfriend, Trey Rubin, who’d just completed residential treatment, walked up and stood outside one of the windows.
“I wish I could come out,” Aleah said, pressing her hand against the screen of an open window to meet his hand on the other side.
“At least we can talk through a window,” she said. “You look so good.”
Rubin recently moved into a sober house in Portland.
“I want to be successful and do things in my life and that’s definitely the first step,” Rubin said. “You can’t really do anything if you’re not clean, you know.”
He said he’s thinking about what he may do now that he’s not using drugs.
“I love dirt bikes and writing,” he said. “I don’t know exactly what I want to do yet. But maybe want to go to school to be an X-ray technician or something like that.”
Oregon has faced some criticism for how slow the expansion of treatment programs such as the one that helped Aleah and Rubin has been. But if anything, state lawmakers say they want to invest more in recovery programs, even if they’re considering other changes.
Oregon’s 2024 legislative session got underway this week, where lawmakers are expected to debate Measure 110’s future.
By early March, lawmakers could decide exactly what that future will be. Oregon Senate Majority Leader Kate Lieber – who co-chaired the legislature’s addiction committee – told Oregon Public Broadcasting that she’s not advocating for Measure 110 to be repealed. But she and other top lawmakers have said they support recriminalizing drug possession so long as there are ways for the criminal justice system to direct people into the treatment programs Measure 110 has helped to expand.
“We knew that we didn’t want to go backwards on what was happening with regard to the war on drugs, we can’t go back to that – but people are dying of overdoses on the street,” Lieber said.
“The state of the drug crisis in Oregon is unacceptable.”
Copyright 2024 Oregon Public Broadcasting
South-Carolina
Shane Beamer offers latest on LaNorris Sellers, South Carolina football
South Carolina football coach Shane Beamer is embracing the new world of revenue sharing in college athletics, which means waiting for his star quarterback to work out a deal with the program before “officially” returning.
On Dec. 13, multiple reports said LaNorris Sellers is “finalizing a deal” to return to the Gamecocks in 2026 instead of forgoing eligibility to enter the 2026 NFL Draft.
“We’ve had great conversations,” Beamer said Dec. 17 on 107.5 the game. “I think there are some details that need to be worked out and things like that. Let’s face it. Nowadays, these guys have agents and whatnot. So, there are a lot of different aspects of every player on our team that’s different than before.”
The 6-foot-3, 240-pound Sellers has been linked to transfer portal rumors, especially after his breakout year in 2024 when the Gamecocks went 9-3. He was offered lucrative deals from other programs but returned for 2025.
“All indications I’ve had from LaNorris are, he wants to be here, and he knows that the job is not finished,” Beamer said. “There’s a lot of excitement about 2026. He and a lot of our other players that are returning feel that same way.”
Beamer made some significant changes after finishing at 4-8 with his worst record yet in the last five years. He fired three offensive coaches, including coordinator and quarterbacks coach Mike Shula and most recently hired Kendal Briles from TCU to fill his spot.
Briles was confident Sellers would return when asked Dec. 12.
Sellers was sacked 42 times this season, the second-most in the country. He finished with 2,437 passing yards and 13 touchdowns to go with just five rushing touchdowns and 270 rushing yards, a decrease in all four categories from 2024.
“My conversations with LaNorris have been fantastic,” Beamer said. “This isn’t just since the end of the season. This is regularly throughout the season, before the season ended and since the season has ended just in regards to how we get better and how he gets better as a quarterback. He will be the first to tell you, he needs to play better, and we have to coach him better. We have to be better around him, and we all have to be accountable, and he understands that.”
Lulu Kesin covers South Carolina athletics for The Greenville News and the USA TODAY Network. Email her at LKesin@usatodayco.com. Follow her on X@Lulukesin and Bluesky@bylulukesin.bsky.social
South-Carolina
South Carolina Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 results for Dec. 17, 2025
Powerball, Mega Millions jackpots: What to know in case you win
Here’s what to know in case you win the Powerball or Mega Millions jackpot.
Just the FAQs, USA TODAY
The South Carolina Education Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big. Here’s a look at Dec. 17, 2025, results for each game:
Winning Powerball numbers from Dec. 17 drawing
25-33-53-62-66, Powerball: 17, Power Play: 4
Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Pick 3 Plus FIREBALL numbers from Dec. 17 drawing
Midday: 2-4-1, FB: 1
Evening: 9-0-3, FB: 8
Check Pick 3 Plus FIREBALL payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Pick 4 Plus FIREBALL numbers from Dec. 17 drawing
Midday: 7-4-3-2, FB: 1
Evening: 6-8-8-9, FB: 8
Check Pick 4 Plus FIREBALL payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Cash Pop numbers from Dec. 17 drawing
Midday: 10
Evening: 15
Check Cash Pop payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Palmetto Cash 5 numbers from Dec. 17 drawing
04-13-19-23-37
Check Palmetto Cash 5 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Powerball Double Play numbers from Dec. 17 drawing
24-43-65-66-68, Powerball: 03
Check Powerball Double Play payouts and previous drawings here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize
The South Carolina Education Lottery provides multiple ways to claim prizes, depending on the amount won:
For prizes up to $500, you can redeem your winnings directly at any authorized South Carolina Education Lottery retailer. Simply present your signed winning ticket at the retailer for an immediate payout.
Winnings $501 to $100,000, may be redeemed by mailing your signed winning ticket along with a completed claim form and a copy of a government-issued photo ID to the South Carolina Education Lottery Claims Center. For security, keep copies of your documents and use registered mail to ensure the safe arrival of your ticket.
SC Education Lottery
P.O. Box 11039
Columbia, SC 29211-1039
For large winnings above $100,000, claims must be made in person at the South Carolina Education Lottery Headquarters in Columbia. To claim, bring your signed winning ticket, a completed claim form, a government-issued photo ID, and your Social Security card for identity verification. Winners of large prizes may also set up an Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) for convenient direct deposit of winnings.
Columbia Claims Center
1303 Assembly Street
Columbia, SC 29201
Claim Deadline: All prizes must be claimed within 180 days of the draw date for draw games.
For more details and to access the claim form, visit the South Carolina Lottery claim page.
When are the South Carolina Lottery drawings held?
- Powerball: 10:59 p.m. ET on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
- Mega Millions: 11 p.m. ET on Tuesday and Friday.
- Pick 3: Daily at 12:59 p.m. (Midday) and 6:59 p.m. (Evening).
- Pick 4: Daily at 12:59 p.m. (Midday) and 6:59 p.m. (Evening).
- Cash Pop: Daily at 12:59 p.m. (Midday) and 6:59 p.m. (Evening).
- Palmetto Cash 5: 6:59 p.m. ET daily.
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a South Carolina editor. You can send feedback using this form.
South-Carolina
David Pascoe: ‘South Carolina Isn’t Run by Republicans’ – FITSNews
by DAVID PASCOE
***
Republicans have a supermajority in South Carolina; yet, our state is more liberal than the purple states that border us. John Adams once said, “facts are stubborn things.” Well, the facts prove our State Republican leadership gets its playbook from the Democratic Party.
In 2024, I was one of the only elected officials to endorse conservative Republican JD Chaplin in his campaign against liberal Democrat Gerald Malloy, who blocked every single pro-law enforcement bill in the General Assembly. Malloy was one of the most powerful lawyer-legislators in the state and teamed often with Republicans on the Judiciary Committee to stifle conservative legislation. I met with Republicans in both Houses of the General Assembly and tried to rally them to support the REPUBLICAN nominee. They refused because they either feared Malloy and feared the lawyer-legislators in power who supported him. In my endorsement of Chaplin, I stated that the two-party system in South Carolina is not R vs. D but those who strive to serve others vs. those who strive to serve themselves. Luckily, JD Chaplin beat Gerald Malloy without the help of any Republican leadership in the General Assembly.
In our state, we have witnessed the liberal Republican Party establishment demonize and attempt to defeat conservative fighters because they are members of the Freedom Caucus. They use political consultants (The Swamp Parasites) giving them offices on State House property to attack the Freedom Caucus, the very men and women who exemplify what it means to be a conservative and fight against corruption and cronyism. The leadership in the General Assembly would rather work with liberal Democrats than work together with their fellow Republicans. But here is a coincidental fact – 30% of the General Assembly are lawyer-legislators; less than 10% of Freedom Caucus members are lawyer-legislators.
***
Let me tell you the core reason we are a liberal state and why I have enemies: conservatives are not really in charge of South Carolina. The lawyer-legislator uniparty is.
Nearly 30% of the General Assembly are lawyers. They control all of the money, the judiciary, and the most important committees. That is not representative government. That’s a cartel.
When lawyers gain unchecked political power, they do not just write laws. They shape the system to benefit themselves. They design rules that ordinary citizens cannot understand, navigate, or challenge. That is exactly what has happened in South Carolina.
For over 30 years, liberal Republicans have controlled the State House. Liberal control has given us a judicial system dominated by legislative insiders. We have judges effectively chosen by the same lawyers who practice before them. We have legislative privilege routinely abused to delay cases, rearrange court dockets, and keep powerful clients out of trouble.
***
***
What we have is a uniparty. A trial lawyer uniparty. Republicans and Democrats alike who share two things in common: they are lawyers who benefit from controlling the courts, and they cannot stand me because I am about to stand in their way as Attorney General. Their bank accounts cannot afford for me to win.
I have seen this system up close. I spent decades as a prosecutor. I led the State House Corruption Probe that exposed a pay-to-play culture operating at the highest levels of government. That investigation did not make me popular in Columbia. It did, however, make something very clear. Corruption does not thrive in chaos. It thrives in systems designed to protect insiders and punish anyone who challenges them.
The most powerful examples of this system are the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. These Committees are where judicial reform and pro-life legislation go to die. It is where lawyer-legislators protect their influence. It is where bills that threaten legislative control of the courts quietly disappear. This is not about party labels. It is about power. Worst of all, it is often about using public service for personal profit.
Under this system, lawyer-legislators decide which judges are allowed to be considered. And then they walk into courtrooms across South Carolina expecting favorable treatment from the very judges whose careers they control. That is not separation of powers. That is consolidation of power.
***

RELATED | BOUGHT AND PAID FOR
***
Families lose. Crime victims lose. Small businesses lose. And public trust evaporates.
This system did not develop by accident. It was built deliberately, layer by layer, and it continues because too many elected officials tolerate it. I’ve spent the last five years calling it out, which is the reason self dealing RINOs will stop at nothing to take down my campaign for Attorney General.
Bring. It. On.
The liberal Republicans aren’t winning this battle. As your next Attorney General, I will dismantle the lawyer-legislator uniparty for good, starting with Weston Newton’s stranglehold on this state. And more importantly, I will make it impossible for them to profit from their public service
If South Carolina wants real reform, it has to start by breaking the trial lawyer uniparty’s grip on the judiciary. It has to restore balance. It has to put citizens back ahead of insiders. I did not spend my career prosecuting corruption to stay quiet now. This system can be fixed. But only if we are honest about who really runs it.
Join me in this fight and let’s crush corruption in South Carolina.
***
ABOUT THE AUTHOR…

David Pascoe is solicitor for South Carolina’s first judicial circuit, which includes Calhoun, Dorchester and Orangeburg counties. He is a Republican candidate for attorney general of the Palmetto State.
***
WANNA SOUND OFF?
Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our articles? Or an issue you’d like to address proactively? We have an open microphone policy! Submit your letter to the editor (or guest column) via email HERE. Got a tip for a story? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question or a glitch to report? CLICK HERE.
-
Iowa4 days agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Washington1 week agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa5 days agoHow much snow did Iowa get? See Iowa’s latest snowfall totals
-
Maine2 days agoElementary-aged student killed in school bus crash in southern Maine
-
Maryland4 days agoFrigid temperatures to start the week in Maryland
-
Technology1 week agoThe Game Awards are losing their luster
-
South Dakota4 days agoNature: Snow in South Dakota
-
Nebraska1 week agoNebraska lands commitment from DL Jayden Travers adding to early Top 5 recruiting class