Connect with us

South-Carolina

Nancy Mace reveals why she voted to oust McCarthy with shock vote: South Carolina Republicans says GOP leader ‘didn’t live up to his word’ – and the House needs a Speaker who ‘tells the truth’

Published

on

Nancy Mace reveals why she voted to oust McCarthy with shock vote: South Carolina Republicans says GOP leader ‘didn’t live up to his word’ – and the House needs a Speaker who ‘tells the truth’


On a suspense-filled day in Congress, South Carolina Republican Rep. Nancy stunned some of her colleagues by casting the seventh vote to vacate the chair and oust Speaker McCarthy.

Mace had backed McCarthy back in January when Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz and other Republicans forced him to clear a series of votes to become speaker.

On Tuesday, there were murmurs inside the chamber when she announced her surprise vote, making her one of eight Republicans to push him out. She accused McCarthy of breaking his word.

‘You make a promise you should keep it,’ Mace told reporters outside the Capitol. As a fiscal conservative I am angry. As a woman I am deeply frustrated,’ she said.

Advertisement

Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) voted to vacate the chair. She was one of eight Republicans to do so, in a move that forced the ouster of Speaker Kevin McCarthy

The move by GOP rebels to oust McCarthy, seen here swarmed by reporters after a vote to oust him from the speaker's chair, helped cast the House into chaos. Republicans were set to meet Tuesday night to try to forge a path forwared

The move by GOP rebels to oust McCarthy, seen here swarmed by reporters after a vote to oust him from the speaker’s chair, helped cast the House into chaos. Republicans were set to meet Tuesday night to try to forge a path forwared

‘It’s not ideological. It’s about having a leader in our nation who will tell the truth, who you can trust,’ she said. ‘I am looking for a speaker who will tell the truth.’ 

She blasted out a seven-part tweet explaining her position. 

‘Today I voted for the Motion to Vacate and remove the Speaker. This isn’t about left vs right. This isn’t about ideology. This is about trust and keeping your word. This is about making Congress do it’s job,’ she wrote in her post on X.

McCarthy, in a blunt press conference after announcing he would not put his name forward to try to regain the speakership, revealed obvious frustration with Mace.

‘Nancy Mace is a whole ‘nother story,’ he said, after talking about another member who resisted his pleas for support.

Advertisement

He said he phoned Mace’s chief of staff to ask, ‘Where have I not kept my word?’ 

‘You know what her chief of staff said? You have kept her word, 100 per cent,’ he said. Then he quipped that if the aide gets fired, ‘I’ll still give him a job.’ 

A regular on cable television, Mace said after January 6 that former President Donald Trump’s ‘entire legacy was wiped out.’

Trump at the time called her a ‘grandstanding loser.’

But Mace, whose coastal district includes Charleston and Hilton Head, has veered closer to the MAGA base and has defended Trump, who is facing multiple indictments.

Advertisement
Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., and Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., right, confer in the hallway near the House chamber in late September. She backed a resolution by Gaetz to vacate the chair on Tuesday

Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., and Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., right, confer in the hallway near the House chamber in late September. She backed a resolution by Gaetz to vacate the chair on Tuesday

Mace said her vote was about 'keeping your word'

Mace said her vote was about ‘keeping your word’

She blasted out a tweet about her concerns

She blasted out a tweet about her concerns

‘I promised the Lowcountry I would be an independent voice in Congress. That I would call the balls and strikes and do the right thing regardless of party. The Speaker has not lived up to his word on how the House would operate,’ she wrote.

She blasted McCarthy for the failure to push through individual appropriations bills, which  preceded the government shutdown crisis where McCarthy moved a 45-day temporary government funding measure that passed aided by Democratic support.  

‘No budget, no separate spending bills until it was too late, a CR which takes spending power out of the hands of the people and puts all the power into the hands of a select few.’

She added: ‘There has also been no action on many issues we care about and were promised. We were promised we would move on women’s issues and legislation to keep our communities safe. Those things never happened … With the current Speaker, this chaos will continue. We need a fresh start so we can get back to the people’s business free of these distractions.’

Mace stunned lawmakers with her decision to join hard right conservatives voting to oust McCarthy

Mace stunned lawmakers with her decision to join hard right conservatives voting to oust McCarthy

Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy told reporters Mace's chief of staff told him that he kept his word '100 per cent' of the time

Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy told reporters Mace’s chief of staff told him that he kept his word ‘100 per cent’ of the time

She told reporters McCarthy had broken a pledge to help women get access to birth control after the Supreme Court struck down Roe v. Wade. 

Advertisement

‘Nancy Mace is the only member of the GOP YOLO caucus,’ wrote Tim Miller of the Bulwark, using the term for You Only Live Once.

The others voting to oust McCarthy included hard right conservatives. Voting to oust him were Reps. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), Ken Buck (R-Colo.), Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), Eli Crane (R-Ariz.), Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), Bob Good (R-Va.), and Matt Rosendale (R-Mont.), along with Mace.

Mace was among those piling on Gaetz several months ago when he tried to torpedo McCarthy.

‘Matt Gaetz is a fraud. Every time he voted against Kevin McCarthy last week he sent out a fundraising email,’ she said at the time.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

South-Carolina

What Can South Carolina Learn From California's Wildfires? – FITSNews

Published

on

What Can South Carolina Learn From California's Wildfires? – FITSNews


by DIANE HARDY

As a business owner in the city of Greenville, South Carolina I was concerned when city employees shared reports of discrimination against white men in Greenville’s police department (to be clear, they were referring to the city police department, not Greenville County Sheriff’s Office). As I dug deeper, I learned that the hiring practices they described likely stemmed from Greenville’s full-throated embrace of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion via the adoption of a 40-page document titled, DEI – Demonstrating Commitment to DEI through Action

The document (.pdf) contains, among other things, pages upon pages of detailed graphs and pie charts separating all city employees into one of seven racial categories. Next, it encourages acquiring the preferred percentages in each category so city employees can racially reflect Greenville demographics. 

Spending taxpayer resources to create a document outlining plans to expand equity (which is not the same thing as equality) in hiring is one thing – but what are the real-world consequences of this new vision for our community? 

Advertisement

Would most Upstate citizens support this vision? 

***

A book cover with colorful squares

Description automatically generated

***

What does the document mean, for example when it states, “the purpose of the DEI Initiative is to establish a road map for future actions… we recognize DEI is a journey, not a program. Our success is built not on promises but on action.”

One might wonder if other cities in our state have similar “action” plans? 

Also, what specific actions are they talking about? In Greenville, it started with the hiring of a Chief Diversity Officer within a posted salary range of $86,400 – $121,200 – an employee who is tasked with, amongst other things, designing and implementing “citywide customized diversity programs and training” while also coordinating an annual “Equality Index submission to the Human Rights Campaign.” For those of you unfamiliar with its work, the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) is a discredited left-wing non-profit responsible for creating report cards on adherence to ever-changing LGBTQ+ standards

The salary for this new DEI Officer? Let’s just say it stands in sharp contrast to the pay range of a new police officer who is expected to put his or her life on the line for $53,000 – $58,000

This plan also involves a reshuffling of the city police’s priorities. No longer is reducing serious crime listed as the department’s top priority. Strategic goal No. 1 is now “supporting DEI initiatives.” Let that sink in for a moment— reducing serious crime along with maintaining safety and order are now secondary to DEI for Greenville police.

Advertisement

As of January 2025, this remains on page one of the Greenville police department’s strategic plan for 2023–2027:

***

A group of buildings and a river

Description automatically generated with medium confidence
(Greenville Police Strategic Plan)

***

Of course, we are all heartbroken by what we are witnessing with the tragic fires in Los Angeles, but the crisis has also caused many to think about local governmental policies – and how they impact responses during disasters. Sadly, Californians are learning the hard way that not having the most qualified people in positions of authority and public safety can have deadly consequences. Many are now realizing it’s best to hire people based on merit, not melanin content or sexuality.

Unfortunately, the problems with these policies usually don’t come to light until there is a tragedy. 

While the list of local governmental failures in southern California regarding the fires is long, one of the issues being explored is whether DEI initiatives adversely impacted the effectiveness of the agency’s response. Los Angeles deputy fire chief Kristine Larson has been blasted for saying: 

“You want to see somebody that responds to your house, your emergency, whether it’s a medical call or a fire call, that looks like you. It gives that person a little more ease, knowing that somebody might understand their situation better.”

In my opinion, this is a racist statement. Are we really supposed to believe when someone calls for the fire department to rescue them, they are thinking, “boy, I hope they have the same skin color as me?” However, this idea doesn’t seem too dissimilar from what we find in Greenville’s DEI plan.

Advertisement

“Our sworn police and fire personnel represent 40% of the City’s employee base and are the most visibly public facing departments within the community,” it stated. “Therefore, building public safety departments that reflect the makeup of our community is an important business objective.” 

***

In addition to outlining race-based hiring ratios, DEI initiatives have many ripple effects, including countless training sessions which are required for all city employees. Here’s one example of trainings sponsored by the Greenville fire department for all its staff: 

  • Age and Gender Diversity Training 
  • Racial Inequity in the Fire Service
  • Improving Diversity and Inclusion in Your Workplace 
  • Understanding and Preventing Microaggressions 

Is this really the best use of their time and taxpayers’ money? 

DEI impacts extend beyond hiring practices and training procedures. Greenville’s mayor and fire chief are both members of the Racial Equity Economic Mobility Commission, which purports to push for change in the areas of “racial inequities and social justice.” The city has established LGBTQ+ liaisons in the city manager’s office and the police department. Even the Greenville Chamber of Commerce hosts city employees at their Greenville Chamber DEI Summit

In addition to jeopardizing public safety, are these policies putting Greenville taxpayers at risk for legal payouts? The DEI plan states that the city has worked “to ensure our projects and programs are developed in accordance with civil rights laws.” I am not a lawyer, but while it is very possible these plans as written may be legal, the fallout from implementing them may become problematic given the U.S. supreme court’s 2023 ruling against affirmative action (and other reverse discrimination cases currently working their way through the courts).

After all, the reason I explored this in the first place was because of alleged discrimination in the Greenville police department.

Advertisement

There certainly seems to be a vested interest in maintaining DEI programs that likely extends beyond ideology. There is a lot of money to be made in DEI consulting work, continuing education and employee training, but California has shown us the price paid for policies like these can be much, much steeper than just monetary consequences. 

I just hope we can have real dialogue on this topic in South Carolina before it’s too late. 

***

ABOUT THE AUTHOR …

Diane Hardy is a former nurse anesthetist turned entrepreneur, who recently opened her second franchise bakery in Greenville.  She is the Executive Director of the Mom and Pop Alliance of SC, which she founded during Covid upon discovering South Carolina’s over 400,000 small businesses had little representation in our State House. The Alliance provides education, communication, and advocacy for SC’s family-owned businesses. Her passion for South Carolina’s small business is strong, and as such she donates her time to the organization, accepting no salary or government funding.  Her love for our state isn’t new.  Before launching the Mom and Pop Alliance she was the founder and host of The Palmetto Panel (2014-2019), an annual statewide conference highlighting issues impacting South Carolina.  Diane has a bachelor’s degree in nursing and psychology from Michigan State as well as a master’s degree from MUSC.

***

WANNA SOUND OFF?

Got something you’d like to say in response to one of our articles? Or an issue you’d like to address proactively? We have an open microphone policy! Submit your letter to the editor (or guest column) via email HERE. Got a tip for a story? CLICK HERE. Got a technical question or a glitch to report? CLICK HERE.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

SC leaders urge parents to protect their child’s personal info after PowerSchool data breach

Published

on

SC leaders urge parents to protect their child’s personal info after PowerSchool data breach


COLUMBIA, S.C. (WIS) – In the wake of a data breach affecting most South Carolina school districts, state leaders are releasing some tips and tricks for parents seeking to protect their children’s personal information.

The South Carolina Department of Education (SCDE) said the data breach occurred the night of Jan. 7 when an “international incident” caused those with “unauthorized access” to obtain customer data from PowerSchool’s Student Information Systems, including personally identifiable information.

Only four South Carolina school districts were not affected by the data breach:

  • Edgefield County School District
  • Greenville County Schools
  • Horry County Schools
  • Richland County School District Two

Leaders with the South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs released a few tips to keep in mind for parents to safeguard their children’s information and avoid cyber threats:

Check if your child has a credit report. SCDCA said a child under the age of 18 generally will not have a credit report, so finding one under their name could be a sign of identity theft. SCDCA encourages parents to contact the three major credit reporting agencies (Experian, TransUnion, and Equifax) and ask them to manually search their child’s social security number to ensure there was no file created under their name.

Advertisement

Consider a protected consumer freeze. SCDCA said parents should consider creating a credit file in their child’s name and then freeze it, preventing creditors from accessing the file.

Be on guard. SCDCA cautioned parents to never provide personal information to someone you don’t know. They said the government will never call, email, text or instant message over social media to demand money or personal information.

If you believe someone is using your child’s information, you can contact SCDCA’s Identity Theft Unit at (800) 922-1594 or by submitting an Identity Theft Intake Form by clicking here.

Feel more informed, prepared, and connected with WIS. For more free content like this, subscribe to our email newsletter, and download our apps. Have feedback that can help us improve? Click here.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

Davion Everett scores 21 to propel South Carolina State over Maryland Eastern Shore 78-64

Published

on

Davion Everett scores 21 to propel South Carolina State over Maryland Eastern Shore 78-64


Associated Press

ORANGEBURG, S.C. (AP) — Davion Everett had 21 points to help South Carolina State defeat Maryland-Eastern Shore 78-64 on Monday night.

Everett added eight rebounds for the Bulldogs (9-10, 3-1 Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference). Omar Croskey scored 14 and Drayton Jones finished with 12 points and seven rebounds.

Advertisement

Kyrell Shaw finished with 18 points for the Hawks (4-15, 0-3). Ketron Shaw totaled 15 points, seven rebounds and four assists. Chris Flippin had 12 points and six rebounds.

___

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending