Connect with us

Health

Sleep could help erase bad memories, study finds: ‘Therapy for our emotions’

Published

on

Sleep could help erase bad memories, study finds: ‘Therapy for our emotions’

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

Sleep has been shown to have a long list of physical and mental health benefits, and now a new study suggests it could also help to “erase” bad memories.

That’s according to researchers from the University of Hong Kong, who implemented a procedure called “targeted memory reactivation” (TMR) to reactivate positive memories and weaken painful ones during sleep. 

Advertisement

“Recollecting painful or traumatic experiences can be deeply troubling,” the researchers wrote in the findings, which were published in the journal PNAS. “Sleep may offer an opportunity to reduce such suffering.”

DEEP SLEEP CAN KEEP TWO BIG HEALTH PROBLEMS AT BAY, NEW STUDIES SUGGEST

“We developed a procedure to weaken older aversive memories by reactivating newer positive memories during sleep.”

A new study suggests that sleep could help to “erase” bad memories. (iStock)

In the study, a total of 37 participants were shown 48 “nonsense words,” each paired with a different unpleasant image, before going to sleep for the night.

Advertisement

The next evening, they were shown half of the words paired with positive images from four categories: animals, babies, people and scenes. 

ANOTHER REASON TO GET MORE SLEEP AND THIS ONE MIGHT SURPRISE YOU

During the following “non-rapid-eye-movement” sleep, the researchers introduced “auditory memory cues.” 

When the participants woke, they had less memory of the negative images and stronger memory of the positive ones.

Senior woman can't sleep

“Recollecting painful or traumatic experiences can be deeply troubling,” the researchers wrote. “Sleep may offer an opportunity to reduce such suffering.” (iStock)

“Our results were aligned with recent TMR research showing that episodic forgetting could be induced via reactivating interfering memories during sleep,” the researchers wrote in the study.

Advertisement

“Going beyond prior research on neutral memories, our results suggest that TMR preferentially reactivated recently acquired positive memories and weakened older aversive memories, thus altering the fate of emotional experiences.” 

‘I CAN’T SLEEP BECAUSE OF RACING THOUGHTS AT NIGHT — HOW CAN I STOP THEM?’: ASK A DOCTOR

Dr. Earnest Lee Murray, a board-certified neurologist at Jackson-Madison County General Hospital in Jackson, Tennessee, noted that TMR has been a method for treating PTSD and other aversive (bad) memories.  

“This is done by combining sensory cues with therapeutic interventions and then re-presenting these cues during specific sleep phases,” Murray, who was not involved in the study, told Fox News Digital. 

Woman sleeping in bed at night

Many patients have reported improvements in mood and anxiety when sleep was improved, a sleep doctor said. (iStock)

This treatment has been shown to reduce the emotional impact of aversive memories, the neurologist added.

Advertisement

“This study not only shows a suppression or a weakening of aversive memory, but does so by reactivating newer positive memories while the patient is asleep,” Murray said. “This will open the door for additional research in ways to weaken traumatic or other bad memories.”

DO WOMEN NEED MORE SLEEP THAN MEN? HERE’S WHAT EXPERTS THINK

In addition to psychotherapies, medications are sometimes used to suppress nightmares or other aversive memories, he noted. 

“This study continues to show ways to treat these conditions without the use of medications, which oftentimes are fraught with adverse side effects.”

Can't sleep

“This study continues to show ways to treat these conditions without the use of medications, which oftentimes are fraught with adverse side effects,” a sleep doctor said. (iStock)

Alex Dimitriu, MD, a board-certified psychiatrist and sleep medicine doctor and founder of Menlo Park Psychiatry & Sleep Medicine in California, was also not involved in the study, but said it is “fascinating” in what it reveals about how the brain processes memories during sleep.

Advertisement

“Our brains are unpacking, processing and repacking emotions in our sleep,” he told Fox News Digital. “I had suspected this before, and have often told my patients that sleep is like therapy for our emotions.”

      

Many of the doctor’s patients have reported improvements in mood and anxiety when sleep was improved.

“There has been evidence that in REM (dream sleep) in particular, a lot of emotional processing and rehearsal occurs,” Dimitriu said. “In this study, however, the intervention was in non-REM sleep, which shows that emotions are processed in other sleep phases as well.”

man in deep sleep

The process of using TMR to suppress negative emotions and fortify positive memories could have a “tremendous impact” on people with depression or trauma, an expert said. (iStock)

The process of using TMR to suppress negative emotions and fortify positive memories could have a “tremendous impact” on people with depression or trauma, the expert said.

Advertisement

“I am excited to see further research into this area, which essentially means we can learn and change while we are asleep.”

Potential limitations

The study did have some limitations, the researchers noted.

“Our brains are unpacking, processing and repacking emotions in our sleep.”

“First, although our experiment aims to weaken aversive memories, the lab-induced emotional experiences of viewing aversive/positive images may not mimic typical traumatic experiences,” they wrote. 

It can also be difficult to find positive components within some highly traumatic experiences, they noted. 

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

“Future research should explore ways to introduce positive interfering memories, such as positive autobiographical memories or therapy-related memories, to effectively weaken real-life trauma memories,” the researchers stated. 

Man brain electrodes

“The role of REM sleep in modulating emotional memories shall be further investigated,” the study authors wrote. (iStock)

“Second, the role of REM sleep in modulating emotional memories shall be further investigated.”

The study received ethical approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Hong Kong.

For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health

Advertisement

Funders included the Ministry of Science and Technology of China and the National Natural Science Foundation of China, along with other grants.

Fox News Digital reached out to the researchers for comment.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Health

C.D.C. Study Finds Silent Bird Flu Infections in Dairy Veterinarians

Published

on

C.D.C. Study Finds Silent Bird Flu Infections in Dairy Veterinarians

Three dairy veterinarians, including one who worked only in states with no known bird flu outbreaks in cows, had recent, undetected bird flu infections, according to a new study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The results are based on antibody testing of 150 veterinarians working in 46 U.S. states.

The findings were not entirely surprising, experts said, but did suggest that the virus, known as H5N1, could be infecting cows and people in more states than have been officially reported.

“We do not know the extent of this outbreak in the U.S.,” said Seema Lakdawala, a virologist at Emory University. “There are clearly infections happening that we’re missing.”

Since the bird flu outbreak in dairy cows was first reported last March, the virus has been confirmed in more than 950 herds in 16 states. It has also been detected in 68 people, 41 of whom had contact with sick cows. Most people have had mild symptoms.

The new study, which was published in the C.D.C.’s flagship Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, was initially slated for publication several weeks ago but was delayed by the Trump administration’s pause on public communications from health and science agencies.

Advertisement

“It’s important for public health preparedness that we have this data,” said Dr. Nahid Bhadelia, the director of the Boston University Center on Emerging Infectious Diseases.

The study was conducted at a veterinary conference last September; participating vets practiced in 46 different states, as well as in Canada. Of the 150 veterinarians enrolled in the study, 25 of them reported having worked with cows who were either known to have or suspected of having bird flu.

Three of the vets tested positive for antibodies to the virus. None of those three vets had reported working with cows believed to have bird flu. (One had worked with infected poultry.) None recalled any flulike symptoms.

One of the vets worked with cows only in Georgia and South Carolina, states that had not reported any affected herds.

“I think we’ve all suspected that there are many more states, potentially, where the virus is that are not being detected,” Dr. Bhadelia said.

Advertisement

Dr. Lakdawala said that she was surprised that none of the 25 veterinarians who knew that they had worked with infected cows had tested positive for antibodies. But it’s possible that those who knew they were working with infected animals “were taking more precautions,” she said.

None of the three vets who tested positive for antibodies reported wearing masks or goggles. Such precautions are not recommended when working with healthy animals in unaffected regions, the study notes.

Precisely how veterinarians are being infected remains unclear, and vets may have less contact with virus-laden milk than the farm workers who spend their days in milking parlors, Dr. Lakdawala said.

“The vets that we’ve talked to on these farms are involved in all aspects of care for these animals,” she said. “They’re all over these cows, looking at everything.”

The findings highlighted the need for far more testing, experts said, including testing of asymptomatic dairy workers and bovine vets, as well as expanded testing of the nation’s milk supply.

Advertisement

The U.S. Department of Agriculture announced a national program to test bulk samples of milk in December. As of Feb. 7, 40 states were enrolled and actively conducting testing. In Nevada, the bulk testing of milk recently revealed that dairy herds had been infected with a new version of the virus, distinct from the one that had been spreading in dairy cows over the past year.

“The states that haven’t onboarded bulk milk testing should do that, just not assume that because they haven’t had infected herds reported that they have a little bit of leeway,” Dr. Bhadelia said.

When the study was conducted last fall, the virus had been detected in dairy herds in 14 states, as well as in 14 people, four of whom had contact with dairy cows.

Apoorva Mandavilli contributed reporting.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Health

‘I'm a cancer survivor – here's what I've cut from my kitchen’

Published

on

‘I'm a cancer survivor – here's what I've cut from my kitchen’

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

The threat of cancer looms large for many people, yet consumers can take certain smart and preventative steps to lower the risks. 

Michelle Patidar, an integrative nutrition and cancer recovery coach in Chicago, recently shared in an Instagram post that she’s continuing her own fight against cancer even after surviving it — and the specific steps she’s taken since then.

Advertisement

In a recent video she posted on social media, Patidar shared a list of “things you will never find in my kitchen after being diagnosed with cancer at 32.”

EVERYTHING TO KNOW ABOUT MAHA

The recovery coach said that after she finished her cancer treatments, she did a “total kitchen overhaul.”

She wrote, “But don’t get me wrong, I slowly made changes. As things ran out, I replaced them with non-toxic versions.” 

Michelle Patidar (pictured above) has replaced ultra-processed foods with more whole foods — and made other changes in her kitchen and home as well. (Michelle Patidar; iStock)

Advertisement

“It took some time, but I feel so much more in control of my health knowing I eliminated harmful, toxic products from my kitchen!”

THE CANCER PREVENTION DIET: 6 SMARTS TIPS FROM A NUTRITIONIST ON WHAT TO EAT AND WHY

Here’s the full list of items that Patidar said she’s eliminated — and her replacements for them.

Items gone from her kitchen — and their replacements

1. Refined oil is replaced with extra virgin olive oil, avocado oil, coconut oil, ghee and grass-fed butter. 

2. Nonstick cookware is replaced with stainless steel and cast-iron cookware.

Advertisement

3. Aluminum foil is replaced with non-bleached parchment paper. 

4. Plastic containers and sandwich bags are replaced with glass containers and paper bags. 

Frying eggs in a Pan

The cancer survivor avoids nonstick cookware, instead opting for stainless steel and cast-iron options. (iStock)

Patidar considered this one an “easy swap,” by the way, saying she tries to “say no to plastics as often as possible.”

5. Scented candles are replaced with “delicious” essential oils.

FOODS TO EAT, AND NOT TO EAT, TO PREVENT CANCER, ACCORDING TO A DOCTOR AND NUTRITIONIST

Advertisement

6. Plastic water bottles are replaced with glass and stainless steel.

7. Plastic cutting boards are replaced with wood cutting boards. 

DISEASE STARTS ON YOUR PLATE, CARDIOLOGIST SAYS — HERE’S WHAT TO CHANGE

8. Ultra-processed foods are replaced with whole foods and snacks “without added sugars, food dyes and harmful preservatives.”

9. Toxic kitchen cleaning supplies are replaced with non-toxic cleaning products. 

Advertisement

“And wow, what a difference it’s made,” she said.

woman organizing a drawer with kitchen utensils

“I try to say NO to plastics as often as possible,” said the cancer survivor. (iStock)

Patidar told Fox News Digital she’s “come to understand the importance of viewing health from a holistic perspective” as a seven-year cancer survivor. 

“While nutrition and exercise are vital components, it’s crucial to consider other factors, such as our environment and the products we use daily,” she said.

For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health

“Our choices, including the cleaning products we use, the quality of indoor air and water, and the types of cookware we select play a significant role in our overall well-being.”

Advertisement

She added that “even seemingly innocuous items” such as plastic water bottles and storage containers can “contribute to our broader health picture.”

michelle patidar instagram post screenshot

Patidar posted her video on Instagram in Oct. 2024. “It’s important to note that even a single swap from this list,” she said, “can enhance your overall health and is a step toward better cancer prevention.” (Instagram/@revival.health.wellness)

She said she believes that making these changes, “along with switching to safer cookware, has decreased my exposure to harmful chemicals and plastic particles.”

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

Focusing on “quality fats and oils” instead of processed foods has allowed Patidar to lower chronic inflammation, she reported — “crucial for cancer prevention and recovery.”

“Additionally, replacing candles with essential oils has improved my indoor air quality,” she said. “The ‘convenience’ of toxic products often carries a substantial penalty.”

Advertisement

“It’s important to note that even a single swap from this list can enhance your overall health and is a step toward better cancer prevention.”

Continue Reading

Health

Behind R.F.K. Jr.’s Vow to ‘Follow the Science’ on Vaccines

Published

on

Behind R.F.K. Jr.’s Vow to ‘Follow the Science’ on Vaccines

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. spent the first day of his back-to-back confirmation hearings deftly avoiding questions about his views on vaccines. On the second day, when a prominent Republican senator insisted there was no link between vaccines and autism, Mr. Kennedy shot back that a new study “showed the opposite.”

“I just want to follow the science,” Mr. Kennedy declared.

Following the science has been a familiar refrain for Mr. Kennedy, whose confirmation as health secretary appears all but assured in a vote expected Thursday. But the exchange in the Senate raises questions about just what type of science Mr. Kennedy is consulting. It foreshadows how, if confirmed, Mr. Kennedy could continue to sow doubts about vaccines.

Academics have pounced on the study that Mr. Kennedy cited during the hearing, shredding it as methodologically faulty and biased. The study emanated from a network of vaccine skeptics who share some of Mr. Kennedy’s views — an ecosystem that includes the author of the study, the editor of the journal that published it and the advocacy group that financed it.

“We authors were delighted and honored that R.F.K. Jr. referred to our work in his confirmation hearing,” the study’s lead author, Anthony Mawson, said in an email. A spokeswoman for Mr. Kennedy did not respond to a request for comment.

Advertisement

Dr. Mawson, an epidemiologist, said he first met Mr. Kennedy at an autism conference in 2017. Mr. Kennedy cites Dr. Mawson’s research 33 times in his 2023 book, “Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak.”

His study was rejected “without explanation” by several mainstream medical journals, Dr. Mawson said. So he turned for advice to Andrew Wakefield, the author of the 1998 study, now retracted, that sparked the initial furor over vaccines and autism. Mr. Wakefield encouraged him to submit the study to a new journal called Science, Public Health Policy and the Law.

That publication is led by some notable vaccine critics, including three who headlined a Washington rally in 2022 with Mr. Kennedy to protest Covid vaccine mandates.

As the nation’s health secretary, Mr. Kennedy “would have wide powers to advance his favored research studies, publications, or scientific data,” according to Lawrence O. Gostin, a public health law expert at Georgetown University. Mr. Kennedy’s critics fear that the public will have neither the time nor the training to sort through a war that seems to pit one study against another, and that the result will be a rapid decline in confidence in vaccines.

“The Mawson paper epitomizes Kennedy’s consistent inability to distinguish junk science from reliable information,” said Dr. John P. Moore, professor of microbiology and immunology at Weill Cornell Medical College, who said that study and some of the others Mr. Kennedy has cited in the past are published by “fringe journals.”

Advertisement

Mr. Kennedy has said that he is not anti-vaccine, but rather in favor of vaccine safety.

“I support the measles vaccine. I support the polio vaccine,” Mr. Kennedy said on the first day of his confirmation hearings. “I will do nothing as H.H.S. secretary that makes it difficult or discourages people from taking it.”

Mr. Kennedy’s insistence that more research is necessary when it comes to vaccine safety has drawn support from some Republicans, who say they welcome his skepticism.

“I don’t understand why my colleagues all of sudden say we can’t question science,” Senator Markwayne Mullin, Republican of Oklahoma, said during one of Mr. Kennedy’s hearings. He added, “When you start looking at the rise of autism, why wouldn’t we be looking at everything?”

But Michael T. Osterholm, an epidemiologist at the University of Minnesota who has advised administrations of both parties, said Mr. Kennedy’s demands for additional data go too far when they concern vaccines and autism. Mainstream scientists say the issue is settled.

Advertisement

“That’s the equivalent of me saying until Newton comes back and shows me that apple falling from the tree, I do not believe gravity exists,” Dr. Osterholm said.

Doctors who have examined the way Mr. Kennedy uses scientific research say he also has a tendency to cherry-pick particular findings from prominent researchers, as he did during a podcast in 2022.

During that appearance, he cited a study published in the journal Pediatrics in 2000 to suggest that improvements in sanitation and hygiene — and not vaccines — fueled a drop in deaths from infectious diseases during the first half of the 20th century. That is true. But Mr. Kennedy failed to note that the study also reported that vaccines introduced in the second half of the 20th century had “virtually eliminated” deaths from diseases including polio and measles.

During one of his confirmation hearings, Mr. Kennedy cited work by a well-known vaccine scientist, Dr. Gregory Poland, to suggest Black people should follow a different vaccine schedule because they needed fewer antigens, the vaccine components that provoke an immune response.

Dr. Poland did not respond to requests for comment. But he told National Public Radio that his work did not support Mr. Kennedy’s assertion.

Advertisement

Mr. Kennedy and Dr. Mawson have long aired similar concerns about vaccines.

In an appearance before the Mississippi legislature in 2009, Dr. Mawson called for more vaccine safety research and “a more flexible approach to vaccination requirements for school attendance.” In a 2011 lawsuit, Dr. Mawson said the testimony had cost him his job as an epidemiologist at the University of Mississippi Medical Center.

In 2017, Dr. Mawson published a pilot study comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated children.

The study relied on a survey of parents who home-schooled their children and found higher rates of autism among vaccinated children, compared with those who had not been vaccinated. The study was funded in part by Generation Rescue, a nonprofit associated with Jenny McCarthy, a television personality who has promoted claims of a link between vaccines and autism.

Dr. Mawson by that time had established the Chalfont Research Institute, a charity that operates out of his home in Jackson, Miss. The institute reported revenue of just $57 in 2021, the most recent figures available.

Advertisement

In 2019, it received charitable contributions of $160,000, tax records show. The bulk of that money, $150,000, came from the National Vaccine Information Center, a group whose mission includes supporting research on “vaccine-associated deaths, injuries and chronic illness.”

Like Mr. Kennedy, the group’s president and co-founder, Barbara Loe Fisher, has long called for research comparing “total health outcomes” including the risk of autism, in vaccinated and unvaccinated children. When Dr. Mawson approached her group with a proposal, she said, the center reviewed his pilot study of 2017, approved his plan and provided $150,000 in funding.

That money paid for the paper Mr. Kennedy cited at the hearing, during an exchange with Senator Bill Cassidy, Republican of Louisiana and a doctor.

The journal that published the study, Science, Public Health Policy and the Law, advertises itself as peer-reviewed, meaning its research is evaluated by anonymous independent experts before publication. Dr. Mawson said his paper had undergone review by two such experts.

Some people associated with the journal are also associated with Mr. Kennedy.

Advertisement

James Lyons-Weiler, the journal’s editor in chief, described himself as a longtime ally of Mr. Kennedy’s in a yearslong “fight across 20 states” for vaccine exemptions.

“Honored to call him my friend,” he wrote on social media last year.

The journal’s editorial board includes the chief executive and the chief scientific officer of Children’s Health Defense, the nonprofit that Mr. Kennedy led until he began his presidential campaign in 2023.

The board also includes members who sell products or services for people who are concerned about vaccines. One of its editorial board members offers $2,350 telehealth appointments for “post-vaccine syndrome.” Another sells $90 “spike detox” supplements marketed for “vaccine injury syndrome” that is meant to get “you back to that pre-Covid feeling.”

The study by Dr. Mawson that Mr. Kennedy cited at the hearing focused on about 47,000 children enrolled in Florida Medicaid from 1999 to 2011 and looked at billing data to determine their vaccination status.

Advertisement

The study found very few billing records for unvaccinated children with autism — eight who were born prematurely and 54 overall. It concluded that vaccination was significantly associated with higher rates of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism, particularly in infants who were born prematurely.

By contrast, large-scale studies in respected medical journals, including an analysis of five studies involving more than 1.2 million children, have found no association between vaccines and autism.

But even as Dr. Mawson’s research took shape, problems emerged. The paper notes that researchers lost access to the database they used to perform the study. Dr. Alex Morozov, an expert on clinical trial design who met with Dr. Mawson to discuss the study, said he viewed that as a red flag.

Dr. Morozov also said the study had a “fundamental flaw”: It failed to account for the possibility that vaccinated children might have more encounters with the medical system than unvaccinated children, whose illnesses would not be captured by billing data.

The study also failed to account for factors like family history of autism, the child’s gender (boys are diagnosed with higher rates of autism than girls) or the possibility that children might have been vaccinated outside the Florida Medicaid system, said Bertha Hidalgo, an associate professor of epidemiology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Advertisement

Dr. Mawson strongly defended the work, noting that the study “carefully documents both its strengths and limitations,” but contending that critics focused only on the limitations. “Nevertheless,” he said, “further research is needed to replicate the findings and to unravel the mechanisms involved.”

At the Senate hearing, Mr. Cassidy pressed Mr. Kennedy to accept that the vaccines and autism debate was settled. He reminded Mr. Kennedy that he had been shown the study of 1.2 million children that found no link between the two.

“I’m a doc, trying to understand,” Mr. Cassidy said, adding, “Convince me that you will become the public health advocate, but not just churn old information so that there’s never a conclusion.”

To that, Mr. Kennedy replied, “I’m going to be an advocate for strong science. You show me those scientific studies, and you and I can meet about it. And there are other studies as well. I’d love to show those to you.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending