Connect with us

Oklahoma

Why the debate over Cabinet appointments between Gov. Stitt and AG Drummond? | Analysis

Published

on

Why the debate over Cabinet appointments between Gov. Stitt and AG Drummond? | Analysis


For the past couple of weeks, Gov. Kevin Stitt and Attorney General Gentner Drummond have waged a battle of rhetoric.

The governor has complained that Drummond “weaponized” the AG’s office after he issued an opinion that Stitt saw as an attack on his ability to choose who he wants to serve on his Cabinet. Drummond countered the governor doesn’t understand the issue and that he is only enforcing existing law.

While the debate has continued, Stitt lost two Cabinet secretaries, vetoed a bill that would have protected two more and filed a lawsuit in Oklahoma County District Court for “clarification.”

So what, exactly, going on?

Advertisement

From the 30,000-foot level, the answer is simple: The governor is pushing back against limits on his power while the AG looks to his political future and Cleveland County residents and their state senator were unhappy with a turnpike plan.

What’s behind the debate between the governor and the attorney general?

A few years back, during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, state lawmakers granted the governor extraordinary authority that previous Oklahoma governors didn’t have. Keep in mind the Oklahoma Constitution is, at its heart, a populist document that makes the 149-member Legislature the most powerful branch of state government.

During the pandemic, some of that power was shifted to Stitt. However, as concern over the pandemic faded, lawmakers took some of that power back.

Advertisement

At the same time, a controversy involving a turnpike expansion plan exploded. With Drummond watching from the sidelines — and planning his political future — Sen. Mary Boren, a Democrat from Norman, raised questions about the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority’s ACCESS plan on behalf of her constituents.

More: War of words: Stitt and Drummond at odds over state officials holding dual positions

The turnpike authority played political hardball so Boren availed herself to a rule that allows lawmakers to request opinions from the attorney general. Boren requested an opinion from Drummond about Tim Gatz’s role as the head of the turnpike authority, the Oklahoma Department of Transportation and a member of the governor’s Cabinet.

Remember: In Oklahoma, the law states that public officials are required to act in accordance with an attorney general’s opinion unless or until the opinion is set aside by a court. In addition, AG opinions that address the constitutionality of a statute are considered advisory. So Drummond’s official opinion could have punch.

It did.

Advertisement

During a news conference, Stitt attempted to question Boren’s reasoning for seeking an attorney general’s opinion, implying that Boren was attacking Gatz, now at ground zero of the controversy. The governor’s question also criticized Boren’s vote against confirming Gatz: “The only person that voted against him was a lady named Mary Boren and apparently, she supposedly requested this opinion, so maybe she has an ax to grind, I don’t know,” the governor said.

What the governor didn’t say, though, was Boren was well within her rights as a state lawmaker to request an AG’s opinion. Members of the Legislature regularly request opinions from the AG’s office. In addition, Boren has, for more than a year, raised questions about the ACCESS Oklahoma turnpike expansion plan and its effect on residents in her district. The issue wasn’t necessarily an ax to grind, it was a lawmaker responding to her constituents.

Still, if the objective was to remove Gatz as head of the turnpike authority, that goal was successful. Gatz stepped down from that post but remains as the head of the Transportation Department and as an adviser to the governor.

Opinions, rhetoric and ‘unnecessary’ legislation

With the attorney general and the governor now deep in a war of words, state lawmakers attempted to solve the problem by passing Senate Bill 1196, which would have carved out two more exemptions for members of the governor’s Cabinet. That measure, which carried House Majority Leader Jon Echols’ name, passed both the House and Senate by large margins this week.

But the governor vetoed the bill late Tuesday, issuing a media statement that called the measure “unnecessary.”

Advertisement

And, to be fair, the governor may have a point. All governors seek advice. And each governor should have wide latitude in who he or she can get that advice from. Since Oklahoma law allows the governor to name Cabinet secretaries — which can be paid or unpaid advisers — Stitt has the authority to name who he wants to his Cabinet, with the “advice and consent” of the state Senate. The salaries for those advisers are part of the governor’s budget.

Stitt is also correct in pointing out that other Oklahoma governors have had Cabinet secretaries who also headed state agencies. During the term of then-Gov. Henry Bellmon, Sandy Garrett, who also held the elected post of state schools superintendent, was Bellmon’s Cabinet secretary for education. Garrett was a Democrat; Bellmon was a Republican.

Still, while Stitt has some valid arguments, so does Drummond. The attorney general focused on the statute that limits dual service, particularly with Gatz, who served not only in the governor’s Cabinet but also as head of both the Transportation Department and the turnpike authority. Since there wasn’t a specific exemption for Gatz, Drummond’s opinion stood and Gatz was forced to resign.

So what happens next?

For his part, the governor has turned to Oklahoma County District Court, asking the court to “clarify” his appointment authority. Drummond, a skilled attorney, replied that he looks forward to making his case in court.

Advertisement

In the meantime, lawmakers could attempt to override the governor’s veto of SB 1196 (remember it passed by large margins in both houses), but it’s also March, and the Legislature’s priority isn’t a fight between the governor and the attorney general. The Legislature’s priority is to craft a budget and get it done before the May 31 deadline.

As for Stitt and Drummond, it looks like their fight won’t be decided by media statements but could, instead, be decided by District Court Judge Richard Ogden — at least for now.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Oklahoma

Lawmakers Make 1st Move Towards Bringing Business Courts To Oklahoma

Published

on

Lawmakers Make 1st Move Towards Bringing Business Courts To Oklahoma


At the Capitol, the state legislature is making the first move to bring business courts to the state.

Lawmakers say this will help with the backlog in county courts.

Oklahoma will become the 26th state to have business courts.

But this is just the first step – creating a task force to figure out what the court will look like here in the state.

Advertisement

This idea of a business court has been a big push from Governor Stitt – who deemed it one of his four priorities during budget negotiations last week.

He says this will help clear some backlog in county courts having a specific area to settle business disputes and commercial litigations between businesses.

With this being a new idea in the state, the actual legislation would create an 11-person task force to figure out exactly how to implement a business court. Then it would green-light the courts in Tulsa and Oklahoma County in 2026. 

“The need that it would provide would come out of the task force meetings they are very there’s a clear direction in this bill for them to come up with that plan but when you have contractual disputes many states have found wisdom in creating these courts,” said Senate Pro Tem Greg Treat (R-Oklahoma City).

The bill passed out of the senate with only four no votes, it will now move to the state house for consideration.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Oklahoma

Josh Heupel describes emotions of returning to Oklahoma in 2024

Published

on

Josh Heupel describes emotions of returning to Oklahoma in 2024


Josh Heupel is going to have quite the trip back to Oklahoma now that the Sooners are in the SEC.

Not only is Heupel a legend as a Sooner, he coached with them in 2004 as a GA and eventually as an assistant and offensive coordinator from 2006-14. With the Sooners now in the SEC and Tennessee looming on the schedule, Heupel will have all the feelings come back.

Oklahoma and Heupel pretty much go hand in hand, except when Tennessee has to play the Sooners.

“You know, for me, from my coaching career to playing career, you know a lot of great relationships, a lot of great memories,” Heupel said at the SEC Meetings.

Advertisement

“So many people that have been a huge part of helping me as a player, grow as man, helped me in this profession as well. So a lot of great memories, a lot of people that I still stay in touch with. Sister lives back there, dad lives back there as well. So it will be unique d to go back and play inside of that stadium, being on the other sideline.”

Tennessee hits the road to Norman, Oklahoma on September 21st as the Volunteers’ SEC opener. It’ll be quite the show.

There’s going to be a very high ceiling on the Tennessee Volunteers this season, with Andy Staples arguing that he thinks the Volunteers could make their first trip to the College Football Playoff in 2024. That’s in no small part due to a relatively manageable schedule compared to their peers. This is a big opportunity for Heupel.

“Very intriguing team,” Andy Staples said. “Tennessee is one of these. Ole Miss is one of these. I explain to people, as divisions go away in these various leagues, like the Big Ten and the SEC, schedule draw means a lot. Tennessee’s schedule draw is not Georgia‘s schedule draw, it’s not Florida‘s schedule draw. It is much closer to Ole Miss’ schedule draw. Therefore, I am making Tennessee’s ceiling a Playoff berth.”

Ultimately, Cody Bellaire agreed that a potential Playoff run is on the table for Tennessee. That’s largely because of what Nico Iamaleava and the rest of the offense is capable of doing in 2024.

Advertisement

“Yes, and you know what helps a Playoff run,” Bellaire said. “Having a generational quarterback. Nico Iamaleava has a chance to bring Tennessee back into the Playoff conversation and light up the scoreboard like we saw when Hendon Hooker was taking snaps for the Vols.

“He was the number one player in the country for On3 for a reason. He has elite arm talent. He’s a dynamic athlete. He’s got all the tools that Josh Heupel is looking for at the quarterback position.”

Seems like Heupel has the tools to get this team to the promised land. Maybe Oklahoma could spoil the party as well.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oklahoma

$15 Big Macs? As inflation drives up fast food prices nationally, here’s how OKC compares

Published

on

$15 Big Macs? As inflation drives up fast food prices nationally, here’s how OKC compares


play

Across the nation families looking for a quick option to feed the family have seen prices rise as inflation has taken a bite out of the fast-food experience.

Advertisement

The Bureau of Labor Statistics’ latest reading from the so-called fast-food index saw annual inflation for the sector come in at 4.8%.

The BLS also found that prices in “limited-service restaurants” increased by 47% since 2014.

Fast food has become a staple of the American diet meaning that price increases at the drive-thru can make a major impact.

Between 2013 and 2016 36.6% of adults consumed fast food on a given day, according to a 2018 CDC study. Market research company Drive Research reported in 2023 that 65% of respondents ate fast food once a week.

A team of USA TODAY reporters surveyed combo meal prices from across the country for five major hamburger chains.

Advertisement

Here’s what we found.

How have fast-food prices increased in the past decade?

Carls Jr. Hardees experienced a more than double price increase between 2014 and 2024. Wendy’s followed, with a nearly double price increase during that same time period.

How do burger prices compare across the country? How much are burgers in Oklahoma City?

The USA TODAY team surveyed locations of McDonald’s, Burger King, Wendy’s, Carls Jr./Hardees and Five Guys in 18 markets across the country. The team asked for the price of the restaurants signature combo with cheese, in a medium size before tax.

A Big Mac combo was most affordable in Houston, Texas where a medium sized meal rounded out to $7.89.

Advertisement

On the opposite side, Seattle residents will pay close to $15 for a Big Mac Combo.

In Oklahoma City, a medium sized Big Mac Combo costs a little over $9.

Wendy’s is one of the more affordable fast-food options in the U.S. In downtown Columbus, Ohio a Wendy’s Dave’s cheeseburger meal is $9.29 – the cheapest of the 18 cities USA TODAY reporters surveyed.

In Oklahoma City, a Wendy’s Dave’s cheeseburger meal is $9.89.

Out of the 15 plus cities surveyed, the most expensive combo was a cheeseburger, regular fries and drink from Five Guys in Chicago.

Advertisement

In Oklahoma City, this combo is about $20.50.

What was the average cost of each fast food restaurant’s signature meal?

When looking at 2014 prices – which were obtained through menus found on the website fastfoodmenuprices.com in the Internet Archive’s Wayback machine – we found that Carls Jr./Hardees had the cheapest signature meal a decade ago, with the quarter pound thick burger combo priced at $5.29 (the closest listed equivalent to the Famous Star combo). The website uses a singular data point while USA TODAY’s comparison is an average.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending