Oklahoma
Ryan Walters announces signing bonuses for rural Oklahoma teachers, despite past controversy
The Oklahoma State Department of Education announced it will offer another round of signing bonuses to attract teachers to rural schools. Meanwhile, the agency is reportedly negotiating a settlement agreement with two teachers it paid previous bonuses to in error.
State Superintendent Ryan Walters said on Monday his agency will offer signing bonuses of $15,000 to $25,000 to secondary math and science teachers who agree to work in a public school in rural Oklahoma for the next school year.
A similar signing bonus program from the agency lured more than 500 certified educators back to Oklahoma schools last year, but it stirred significant controversy and attracted scrutiny from lawmakers when a few teachers were later told to return the money they had been paid.
“I am thrilled to continue bringing in highly qualified teachers to Oklahoma classrooms,” Walters said in a statement. “Oklahoma is a great place to live and work, and we are making it easier than ever for teachers to come to our great state and have an enormous impact on our young people.”
Eligible teachers cannot have taught in an Oklahoma public school in the 2023-24 school year. They must have a teaching certification for secondary math or science and be hired to teach in a rural school for the 2024-25 year.
The agency provided a list of 384 schools that fit the definition of a rural locale, according to criteria from the National Center for Education Statistics. One school on the list no longer exists, Sovereign Community School.
The Education Department called the program the “most successful teacher recruitment effort in state history.”
The agency awarded bonuses last year to a handful of teachers who didn’t meet the criteria and, months later, demanded they repay. Walters informed the state Legislature his agency also had mistakenly underpaid other recipients.
Two of the teachers who were told to repay their bonuses, Kay Bojorquez and Kristina Stadelman, sued the department and Walters in Oklahoma County District Court, alleging breach of contract and defamation.
Their attorney, Mark Hammons, said they have reached a tentative settlement with the Education Department and intend to finalize it this week.
Both teachers were approved for the program and received bonuses of $50,000 in October and November. In January, they received letters from the agency, informing them they never actually qualified and owed the full $50,000 back.
More than $20,000 of each bonus was withheld for taxes, and Bojorquez, of Osage County, and Stadelman, of Oklahoma County, had spent the rest of the money before the Education Department demanded they return it, according to their lawsuit.
Walters said the errant bonuses were the result of the teachers putting “misinformation” in their applications. That statement was defamatory, Bojorquez and Stadelman said. The teachers asked a judge to order Walters to pay them at least $75,000 each for defamation.
The Education Department and Walters have since countersued the teachers, asking for the full bonuses to be returned plus the cost of attorney fees. The agency said Bojorquez and Stadelman, by applying for and accepting the bonuses, represented that they hadn’t taught in an Oklahoma public school the previous year when, in fact, they had.
The two teachers said they truthfully reported their work history. They contend the situation was caused by the agency’s “own alleged negligence or malfeasance in giving such approval.”
“It would be financially impossible for the plaintiff to repay the signing bonus,” their lawsuit states.
Oklahoma Voice is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Oklahoma Voice maintains editorial independence.
Oklahoma
Failed report, recorded calls offer look inside Oklahoma County Jail
OKLAHOMA CITY (KOKH) — A recent state inspection and recorded jail phone calls from a former inmate are offering two perspectives on conditions inside the Oklahoma County Detention Center.
An unannounced inspection conducted May 5 by the Oklahoma State Department of Health found the jail was “not in substantial compliance” with multiple standards, citing deficiencies involving staffing, inmate safety, sanitation, food service, maintenance, and medical reporting.
At the same time, FOX 25 obtained recorded phone calls made by former inmate Brent Swadley while he was being held at the jail awaiting sentencing after his fraud conviction. Swadley has since been transferred to another facility.
The inspection provides an official snapshot of conditions inside the jail. Swadley’s recorded calls provide one inmate’s firsthand account.
The Health Department’s inspection identified numerous concerns throughout the facility.
Among the findings:
- Just seven detention officers were assigned to supervise 1,502 inmates on the day of the inspection.
- Inspectors found 2,471 required inmate safety checks had not been documented.
- Investigators cited sanitation concerns, including grime, pooled liquid, damaged flooring in the kitchen and dirty mop buckets stored near food preparation areas.
- The report found deficiencies involving food service and adequate diet.
- Inspectors documented multiple inmates sleeping on the floor because of insufficient beds.
- Investigators also found several instances where inmates required outside medical treatment but the Health Department was not notified as required.
In recorded calls obtained by FOX 25, Swadley described what he says he experienced while housed at the jail.
“It ain’t good people here that’s the problem at all,” Swadley said in one call. “It’s the rules and the policies and the mindset that they’re forced to adapt.”
In another call, he expressed sympathy for detention staff.
“I say all the times to the staff, the nurses, the guards… I don’t know how they do it. I don’t know how they put up with, I mean, literally honey, this would break your heart if you saw it and witnessed these inmates treat them like crap,” he said.
While inspectors documented sanitation concerns throughout the facility, Swadley described additional conditions he says he witnessed, including mice, maggots and odors he compared to an animal kennel. Those specific allegations were not documented in the state inspection report.
The inspection also found deficiencies involving food service. In multiple recorded calls, Swadley described being served cold meals.
“The grits and everything came… it was cold, like room temperature,” he said. “They need so much help in there.”
He also complained about the nutritional quality of the meals.
“We don’t get any dairy of any kind. No milk, no nothing. And of course, no fresh fruit or vegetables at all,” Swadley said in another call.
Along with suffering a severe injury to his finger after getting stuck in a jail door, Swadley described other health concerns while incarcerated, including elevated blood pressure and an incident in which he said he passed out after visiting the jail’s medical unit.
In another series of calls, Swadley described hearing a mentally ill inmate scream for hours overnight and said the experience left him wanting to comfort the man.
“I just want to go up there and give him a hug,” Swadley said. “Even God loves you.”
He also described the challenges unique to county jails, where inmates are constantly arriving and leaving while awaiting trial.
“They’ve got so many people moving in and out of here so quick that you don’t know what’s up or down,” he said.
Despite his criticisms, Swadley repeatedly said he believes conditions could improve.
“They have the capability of making this place effective,” he said.
FOX 25 asked both the Oklahoma County Detention Center and the Oklahoma State Department of Health about the inspection findings and the conditions described in Swadley’s recorded calls.
Jail officials declined to comment on Swadley’s time at the facility, citing a court order.
“With respect to the comments attributed to Mr. Swadley, we are under a court order not to discuss or release any information on Mr. Swadley’s time in the facility,” Oklahoma County Detention Center Communications Director Mark Opgrande said in a statement.
Regarding the inspection, Opgrande said the detention center is preparing a comprehensive response for the Health Department but is “not in a position to comment on specific findings, corrective actions, staffing, or operational matters related to the inspection at this time.”
The Oklahoma State Department of Health told FOX 25 it has not conducted a follow-up inspection since May and therefore cannot determine whether any deficiencies have been corrected.
Agency spokesman Erica Rankin also said Oklahoma law does not require detention facilities to submit corrective action plans following an inspection.
According to the Health Department, inspectors will review previously cited deficiencies during the jail’s next inspection, and any enforcement decisions will be based on the results of that review and the agency’s statutory authority.
The Oklahoma County Detention Center continues to undergo renovations while county officials move forward with plans for a replacement jail facility.
Oklahoma
J.D. PicKell: ‘Oklahoma is going to be a wagon once again’
The Oklahoma Sooners will face a difficult challenge trying to return to the College Football Playoff in 2026. That road starts on Sept. 4 against the UTEP Miners.
After the season opener, Oklahoma’s schedule quickly becomes one of the most difficult in college football. ESPN’s Football Power Index (FPI), which is designed to project a team’s future performance, ranks Oklahoma’s schedule as the second-toughest in the country behind only the Arkansas Razorbacks.
That challenging schedule is one of the reasons some analysts remain skeptical of Oklahoma heading into the 2026 season. The FPI predicts a 7-5 season for the Sooners. However, On3’s J.D. PicKell believes Oklahoma has the talent to overcome its schedule and remain one of the nation’s best teams.
“The schedule is brutal,” PicKell said. “The schedule was brutal last year. You had a quarterback with nine fingers and no run game. Find your way to the College Football Playoff. I’m going down with the ship here. I think Oklahoma is going to be a wagon once again.”
Oklahoma’s path to another playoff appearance will not be easy, but last season showed this team can overcome adversity. The Sooners navigated a difficult SEC schedule with an injured quarterback, a struggling rushing attack and one of the toughest conference transitions in college football.
With quarterback John Mateer returning healthy, a loaded defense and an improved offense expected to take a step forward, Oklahoma has the pieces to prove the schedule is not an obstacle but instead an opportunity to establish itself as a true national championship contender.
Contact/Follow us @SoonersWire on X (formerly known as Twitter), and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Oklahoma news, notes, and opinions. You can also follow Jaron on X @jaronspor.
Oklahoma
Farmers, environmental group react to Oklahoma poultry litter settlement
Oklahomans are reacting to a nearly $44 million settlement between the state and six poultry companies, with a Creek County farmer warning of statewide impacts and an environmental group calling the deal a win for the watershed.
Attorney General Gentner Drummond announced the settlement Monday, resolving a lawsuit over poultry litter pollution in the Illinois River Watershed.
Farmer worried about statewide impact
Matt Barton is a fifth-generation farmer in Oilton. He doesn’t live near the Illinois River Watershed, but he’s worried the new settlement could affect farmers across the state.
“It doesn’t have to be the Illinois watershed with the current settlement. It says any at-risk watershed. And anyone can define a watershed as at-risk at any time,” Barton said.
Barton isn’t a poultry farmer, but he uses poultry litter as fertilizer, and says it’s hard to beat.
“It’s much better for the soil, much better for growth. It lasts three years compared to one year with commercial fertilizer,” Barton said.
Rising fertilizer costs add to concerns
Barton says at a time when alternative fertilizer prices are going up, he’s worried the new regulation could have a downstream effect that hurts rural farmers.
Regular fertilizer prices have climbed due to conflicts overseas, making chicken litter even more cost-effective by comparison, Barton says.
“We love the idea of using an all-natural product that’s processed through another animal, to use to feed our animals with growth from the land,” Barton said.
Environmental group sees settlement differently
The group Save the Illinois River sees the settlement differently. In a statement, the group said clean water and agriculture can coexist, and that the settlement will finally allow people to start removing the pollution after nearly two decades of fighting in court.
“Save the Illinois River, Inc. (STIR) is pleased to see that the State of Oklahoma and all of the Defendants have reached a settlement in the long-standing lawsuit involving poultry litter pollution in the Illinois River Watershed. We have continued to believe that a comprehensive settlement would be beneficial to the community at-large, the environment and water quality in the watershed, our local farmers and agricultural growers, and the settling defendants. We have continually stressed that clean water and agriculture interests can co-exist for the benefit of all. We commend the Oklahoma Attorney General’s pursuit of this decades old lawsuit and Judge Gregory Frizzel’s well-reasoned opinion on behalf of Oklahoma’s most prized scenic waters. We also commend the defendants in the lawsuit for recognizing their corporate responsibility in reaching a settlement. Most importantly, as we continue to analyze the terms of the settlement, we hope and trust that this process will lead to the remediation of previous pollution and that the restoration of impaired waters can immediately begin. STIR has advocated for greater protection for the waters in the Illinois River Watershed. The United States District Court’s Judgment offered that protection. We look forward to seeing if the Court will approve the proposed settlement.”
Barton says farmers care about the land just as much.
“No one’s going to take better care of the land than the guy who has to feed his family from that land,” Barton said.
Lawmaker cautiously optimistic
State Rep. David Hardin, a former poultry farmer who represents part of the Illinois River Watershed in the House, said he’s cautiously optimistic about the settlement but says it remains to be seen what impact it will have once implemented.
What’s next
The state still has to formally set aside a previous December judgment and dismiss the lawsuit before the settlement takes effect.
Previous Stories:
Oklahoma reaches $44 million settlement in poultry waste lawsuit
‘Please don’t let our way of life die’: Gov. Stitt hears from poultry producers in Adair County
Stitt to meet with state poultry producers amid waste runoff lawsuit
Federal judge approves poultry lawsuit settlement between Tulsa and 6 poultry producers
-
Louisiana6 minutes agoLouisiana pastor ordered to stay away from home of man he attacked
-
Maine12 minutes agoIn Maine, Bobby Charles vs. Hannah Pingree is the race that matters | Opinion
-
Maryland18 minutes agoMaryland confirms 5 new measles cases, bringing year’s total to 9 – WTOP News
-
Michigan24 minutes agoMichigan health expert talks impact of Canadian wildfire smoke: There’s really a long list of who is at risk”
-
Massachusetts30 minutes agoThe science behind Massachusetts’ wildfire smoke-darkened skies
-
Minnesota36 minutes agoMinnesota United Statement on International Friendly | Minnesota United FC
-
Mississippi42 minutes agoGPS data tracks boat Mississippi teen Nolan Wells was on before he went missing
-
Missouri48 minutes agoMissouri teen Gabbriana Boyster shot dead in home as mom makes horrifying discovery; 3 friends charged