Of the 14 colleges and universities that requested increases in tuition, the Oklahoma State Regents of Higher Education fully approved 11 proposals for the 2024-25 school year.

Presidents of Oklahoma’s public colleges and universities presented their proposals for hikes in tuition and fees on Wednesday to the Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education. The regents voted to approve or deny each request on Thursday.

The average tuition increase was 1.6% for Oklahoma residents attending public institutions for higher education. The highest request came from Northeastern Oklahoma A&M College with a request for a 5.5% increase, or $9 per credit hour, which was approved.

“These students and their parents and their families have to pay these bills and stack debt on their family,” Regent Dustin Hilliary said. “So we take these tuition increases seriously.”

The regents rejected proposals from Eastern Central University and Rogers State University. Langston University’s proposal was partially rejected, with the 3% tuition increase approved but not the 3% increase in fees.

Regents Courtney Warmington and Hilliary were outspoken about voting against proposals from universities that received direct appropriations from the state legislature, including Rogers State University and Langston University.

“Institutions that go around this body and go to the legislature for direct appropriations for projects … didn’t do well today,” Hilliary said.

The University of Oklahoma and Oklahoma State University also received direct appropriations from the legislature. Oklahoma State University did not request any changes in tuition and fees and OU was approved for a 3% tuition increase.

The regents approved requests from:

• The University of Oklahoma for a 3% increase, or $9.72 per credit hour
• The University of Central Oklahoma for a 3.5% increase, or $9.85 per credit hour
• Northeastern State University for a 4% increase, ot $9.90 per credit hour
• Southeastern Oklahoma State University for a 4.6% increase, or $11 per credit hour
• Southwestern Oklahoma State University for a 2.2% increase, or $5.81 per credit hour
• Cameron University for a 2.8% increase, or $6.50 per credit hour
• Oklahoma Panhandle State University for a 2.5% increase, or $7 per credit hour
• Carl Albert State College for a 3.5% increase, or $5 per credit hour
• Connors State College for a 3.2% increase, or $5 per credit hour
• Northeastern Oklahoma A&M College for a 5.5% increase, or $9 per credit hour
• Western Oklahoma State University for a 3.3% increase, or $5 per credit hour
• Langston University for a 2% increase in tuition, or $4.52 per credit hour

Oklahoma Voice is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Oklahoma Voice maintains editorial independence.

Two men were put to death in the US this week—one each in Texas and Oklahoma. Both executions expose the brutal and arbitrary character of this punishment across the states that still practice the death penalty, as well as the abusive childhoods and horrific life experiences of many of those who find themselves on death row. Meanwhile in Missouri, authorities plan an execution in a case where DNA and lack of other evidence proves the condemned man is innocent of the murder for which he wa convicted.

Law on “future dangerousness” condemns Texas death row prisoner

Ramiro Gonzales was executed Wednesday in Texas. He was sentenced to death in 2006 for the kidnapping, rape and murder of 18-year-old Bridget Townsend in 2001. Gonzales, now 41, was also 18 at the time of the crime. The murder went unsolved for more than a year, until Gonzalez confessed to the killing after he was sentenced to life in prison for the abduction and rape of another woman.

The Texas Board of Parole and Pardons voted 7-0 on June 24 to deny Gonzales’ clemency petition and Governor Greg Abbott allowed the execution to proceed. The Republican governor has overseen the execution of 73 people since he took office in 2015 and granted clemency only once.

The US Supreme did not take up Gonzales’ final appeal for clemency or a stay until after his execution, allowing it to proceed. Later Wednesday they declined to take up the case. 

Gonzales was put to death at the state penitentiary in Huntsville. In his final statement, reported by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, the condemned man repeatedly apologized to Townsend’s family. “I can’t put into words the pain I have caused y’all, the hurt, what I took away that I cannot give back. I hope this apology is enough. I lived the rest of this life for you guys to the best of my ability for restitution, restoration taking responsibility.”

He was pronounced dead at 6:50 p.m. following the injection of a single lethal dose of the barbiturate pentobarbital.

Gonzales was sentenced to death according to a contentious aspect of the Texas capital punishment system, which requires capital juries to consider a defendant’s “future dangerousness” to society. The jury must determine, beyond a reasonable doubt, that a defendant is likely to be violent in the future and presents “a continuing threat to society.” Texas is the only state with this statute. Attorneys for Gonzales argued before the Board of Parole and Pardons that their client not only did not pose a danger, but “in fact actively contributes to prison society in exceptional ways.”

At trial, the jury agreed with expert witness Dr. Edward Gripon, a psychiatrist, who testified that Gonzales could likely commit a similar crime in the future if he remained alive because he suffered from an incurable and violence-inducing mental disorder. Two decades later, Gripon wrote in a report that there was no solid research to back up the theory that there is a high likelihood that those who commit sexual assaults will violently reoffend.

Gripon said he no longer stood by this theory, which has been proven unfounded, and that after meeting with Gonzales in 2021 he no longer believed he posed a threat of violently offending again. He said he found Gonzales to be “a significantly different person both mentally and emotionally,” which he said represented “a very positive change.”

While on death row, Gonzales acted as a peer mentor and coordinator in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Faith Based Program, where participants live in special housing and take religion classes. He earned the equivalent of a bachelor’s degree from a theological seminary.

Gonzales’ clemency petition to the Texas board highlighted his religious involvement in prison as well as information about his childhood abuse and mental health problems. The Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC) writes that he “was given up for adoption, sexually abused as a child, and began using drugs at age 15 to cope with the death of his aunt. By the time Mr. Gonzales dropped out of school at age 16, he was still in eighth grade.”

“Ramiro knew he took something from this world he could never give back,” his attorneys wrote in a statement shortly after the execution. “He lived with that shame every day, and it shaped the person he worked so hard to become. If this country’s legal system was intended to encourage rehabilitation, he would be an exemplar.”

But the criminal justice system in America, especially in relation to the death penalty, does not encourage rehabilitation. Nor does it consider the backgrounds of poverty and abuse of individuals who find themselves on the wrong side of the law. Rather, as shown in Gonzales’ case, authorities promote the anti-scientific view that some members of society are “born evil,” must face retribution, and in some cases receive the ultimate penalty.

Texas has executed 588 of the 1,575 prisoners put to death since the US Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty in 1976, far more than in any other state.

Oklahoma: Disregard for a death row inmate’s abusive childhood 

Richard Rojem was executed by the state of Oklahoma on Thursday. Rojem, 66, had been in prison since 1985, making him the longest serving inmate on Oklahoma’s death row. He was convicted of kidnapping, raping and killing his seven-year-old former stepdaughter, Layla Cummings. The young girl’s mutilated body was found in a field in rural Washita County. 

Rojem was injected with a three-drug lethal cocktail at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary in McAlester. When asked for his last words, he said only, “I don’t. I’ve said my goodbyes.” According to Associated Press, he was declared unconscious about 5 minutes after the first drug, the sedative midazolam, began flowing. He stopped breathing at about 10:10 a.m.

Rojem was convicted previously of raping two teenage girls in Michigan. Prosecutors said he was angry at his young victim because she told her mother that he had sexually abused her, leading to his divorce and return to prison for violating his parole.

At Rojem’s clemency hearing, his attorneys argued that DNA evidence taken from the girl’s fingernails did not link him to the crime. But prosecutors said a fingerprint on a cup outside the girl’s home and a condom wrapper found at the crime scene linked Rojem to the murder.

Testifying via video from prison, Rojem said he wasn’t responsible for the victim’s death. “I wasn’t a good human being for the first part of my life, and I don’t deny that,” Rojem said. “But I went to prison. I learned my lesson and I left all that behind.” The Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board voted 5-0 not to recommend to Governor John Stitt that his life be spared.

A Washita County jury convicted Rojem in 1985 after only 45 minutes of deliberations, but his death sentence was twice overturned on appeal due to trial errors. A jury in Custer County handed him his third and final death sentence in 2007. He ran out of appeals in 2017. 

Court records on Rojem’s personal history state that he was from a family with “generational dysfunction,” with alcoholic parents and caretakers. He was born prematurely with an orthopedic deformity and spent the first three years of his life in a full body cast.

His biological father was killed in a bar fight when Rojem was three years old. USA Today reports that, according to the court filings, he was then raised by his 17-year-old mother, living in a “chaotic and overcrowded household” of 13 people in a 1,500-square-foot house.

The documents say he witnessed domestic abuse between his mother and stepfather and was sexually abused by an older stepbrother. The records show he was genetically predisposed to developing psychological disorders, including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Oklahoma has executed 125 people since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976, second only to Texas. According to DPIC, the state has executed more inmates per capita than any other state during this time. It has carried out 13 executions since October 2021, following a nearly six-year hiatus after a series of ghastly executions in 2014 and 2015.

Missouri sets execution date for an innocent man

Missouri has executed 99 people since 1976, third behind Texas and Oklahoma. One of the 13 people on the state’s death row is Marcellus Williams. This month, the Missouri Supreme Court set a September 24, 2024 execution date for Williams, despite a motion filed by the St. Louis County prosecuting attorney to vacate his conviction because newly presented DNA evidence proved he did not commit the murder.

Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell stated that the DNA evidence, “when paired with the relative paucity of other, credible evidence supporting guilt, as well as additional considerations of ineffective assistance of counsel and racial discrimination in jury selection, casts inexorable doubt on Mr. Williams’ conviction and sentence.”

Williams received a last-minute reprieve just hours before his scheduled execution on August 22, 2017. Then-Governor Eric Greitens stayed the execution and convened a board of inquiry to investigate his case. But on June 29, 2023, current governor Mike Parson dissolved this board and the attorney general sought a new execution date. Williams sued the governor, but the Missouri Supreme Court dismissed the lawsuit and scheduled a new date to put him to death.

OKLAHOMA CITY — Oklahoma’s top school board has voted to ignore a judge’s finding that former Norman teacher Summer Boismier should keep her teaching license after posting a link in her classroom to an online library containing banned books.

The Oklahoma State Board of Education on Thursday unanimously voted to reject the judge’s recommendation and instead instructed its own attorney to put together a list of findings, signaling the board members could vote to revoke Boismier’s certification despite being advised against it.

Both Boismier and her attorney, Brady Henderson, denounced the state board’s actions.

“More than a year after Summer Boismier prevailed in her administrative hearing where her accuser failed to prove that she had broken any law, a group of political appointees chose to disregard that result and use their power to make a second attempt to revoke Boismier’s teaching certificate regardless of there being no legitimate factual or legal basis for doing so,” Henderson said.

The board’s attorney will present the report next month to highlight evidence and testimony “that reflect a decision to revoke the teaching certificate of Summer Boismier,” board member Katie Quebedeaux said while reading aloud the directive.

The Oklahoma State Department of Education has pursued revocation on the grounds that among the thousands of books in the catalog, some have sexual content. The teacher has said she never recommended any specific book in the collection.

Boismier said the decision sends “yet another chilling message to teachers, students and the entire state of Oklahoma.”

“The board’s action today means that this fight for free expression will soon move to the courts, where I am confident our rights will be restored and the board’s wrongs rectified,” she said.

After a June 2023 hearing, a judge found the state Department of Education failed to prove Boismier deserved to have her certification taken away, though the state board makes the final decision. Revocation is a penalty typically applied to teachers facing criminal charges, unlike Boismier.

But state Superintendent Ryan Walters said he views his administration’s case for revocation as “pretty open and shut.”

“We’ve heard from parents all over the state,” he said after the meeting. “They don’t want indoctrination in their schools. They want to make sure teachers are obeying the law.”

Walters accused Boismier of breaking state law and attempting to  “push inappropriate material.” However, the teacher and her former school district maintain she never violated the law nor faced any disciplinary action. She has not been charged with a criminal offense.

Boismier has been a target of Walters’ since she resigned from Norman High School in August 2022 in protest of a state law banning certain race and gender concepts from the classroom. The law prompted Norman Public Schools to have teachers remove books from their classrooms until each title could be reviewed.

Boismier made national news at the time when, rather than taking down her books, she covered her shelves with red paper that read, “Books the state doesn’t want you to read.” She also placed QR code links to the Books Unbanned program at the Brooklyn Public Library, which gives teenagers access to its catalog nationwide.

Walters, who at the time was a political candidate running for state superintendent, called for her certification to be revoked because “there is no place for a teacher with a liberal political agenda in the classroom.”

Since her resignation, Boismier moved to New York to work at the Brooklyn library.

She is suing Walters in Oklahoma City federal court, contending he personally owes her $75,000 or more for defamation, slander, libel and false representation.

More than a dozen other educators had their teaching licenses suspended or revoked on Thursday. Most of the affected teachers are facing criminal charges, ranging from first-degree murder to child abuse.

Board suspends Kingfisher coaches

Two of the cases stemmed from an alleged hazing scandal within the Kingfisher High School football program, which has made statewide headlines for more than two years.

The board suspended the license of former head coach Jeff Myers, who was charged in October with felony child neglect. It also accepted the surrendered teaching license of Micah Nall, another former Kingfisher coach facing felony charges of child abuse and perjury.

Myers is accused of ignoring boxing and wrestling matches that took place in his locker room — incidents a former player said were abusive. The former player, Mason Mecklenburg, sued in 2022 and won a $5 million settlement from Kingfisher Public Schools.

Mecklenburg’s father, Justin Mecklenburg, thanked the board for doing what the Kingfisher district and the former Education Department administration had not by suspending Myers’ certification.

“As a parent, you expect that your child will be safe from harm under the supervision of adult teachers and coaches,” Mecklenburg said. “Our son, Mason, along with many other student athletes, endured years of hazing, physical and verbal abuse, and instances of sexual assault under the supervision of Coach Myers. We are hopeful that today’s action will prevent future students from enduring the pain and torture our son experienced.”