Connect with us

North Carolina

Lawsuits could torpedo red light cameras in North Carolina

Published

on

Lawsuits could torpedo red light cameras in North Carolina


By day, Brian Ceccarelli works as a software program engineer in Cary. However by evening, he’s a self-described “crimson gentle robber.”

For greater than a decade, Ceccarelli, 61, has been on a mission to rid North Carolina of automated crimson gentle cameras, which {photograph} autos operating crimson lights after which mail the drivers fines. In 2010, he sued the city of Cary after receiving his second digicam quotation, arguing the size of time given for yellow lights was too quick. Bringing a white board to the courtroom, he served as each professional witness and plaintiff. He misplaced in 2013, however the city quickly shuttered its program.

At the moment, Ceccarelli operates the “Purple Gentle Robber” web site, which recruits plaintiffs to file authorized challenges in opposition to what he believes are flawed, harmful and unconstitutional native visitors techniques.

And he’s discovered some takers.

Advertisement

Persons are additionally studying…

A number of ongoing instances in opposition to crimson gentle digicam techniques in North Carolina might scale back the already dwindling variety of municipalities that function them.

Advertisement

Automated crimson gentle digicam packages exist in 4 North Carolina cities: Raleigh, Fayetteville, Wilmington and Greenville. However in March, the N.C. Court docket of Appeals unanimously dominated Greenville’s program violated state regulation by not giving a minimum of 90% of the fines collected from its digicam program to public Ok-12 faculties.

Greenville had been giving a minimum of 90% of its crimson gentle fines to the native Pitt County Faculties, however the metropolis would then bill the district to have a part of the cash despatched again. Maintaining extra of the cash allowed Greenville to self-fund its digicam program to a higher diploma, argues Paul Stam of the Apex-based Stam Legislation Agency, which is representing plaintiffs Eric Fearrington and Craig Malmrose of their case in opposition to Greenville.

Stam, who goes by Skip, served 16 years within the N.C. Common Meeting, representing southern Wake County. A Republican, he served as Speaker Professional Tempore from 2013 to 2016. He started to see crimson gentle cameras as a problem after Ceccarelli, a constituent, reached out regarding Cary’s program. By Ceccarelli, Stam additionally grew satisfied the period of time given for yellow lights all through the state was too quick.

“The digicam just isn’t the issue,” he stated. “The digicam reveals the issue.”

Kevin Lacy, the state visitors engineer with the N.C. Division of Transportation, pushed again on this assertion.

Advertisement

“There isn’t an issue with yellow lights,” Lacy stated. “The authorized groups which have give you this strategy have accomplished a wonderful job of making a substantial quantity of doubt, which is their job.”

Greenville has appealed the Fearrington ruling to the N.C. Supreme Court docket, which has but to resolve whether or not it should hear the case. Stam anticipates town will finish its digicam program whether it is made to pay for it by different means, comparable to elevating taxes or diverting cash from different departments. And town instructed he is likely to be proper.

Requested how town may reply if the Fearrington ruling isn’t overturned, Greenville spokesperson Brock Letchworth stated town “will think about whether or not it desires to proceed this system contemplating a brand new contract would seemingly embody elevated prices for town.” Letchworth famous Greenville has up to date its funding system to adjust to the appellate ruling in the intervening time.

In 2006, town of Excessive Level folded its crimson gentle digicam program after the State Court docket of Appeals dominated town needed to give extra of its superb income to the native public faculties.

In line with Stam, neither Fayetteville nor Wilmington are utilizing their crimson gentle digicam revenues in compliance with state regulation. In July, his agency filed a lawsuit in opposition to town of Wilmington and can quickly do the identical to Fayetteville.

Advertisement

Most of his crimson gentle digicam plaintiffs, Stam stated, got here to his agency after visiting Ceccarelli’s Purple Gentle Robber web site.

Raleigh’s crimson gentle program is exclusive

In the way it funds its SafeLight crimson gentle digicam program, Raleigh will get to play by its personal guidelines.

When the Common Meeting granted Wake County municipalities the suitable to put in crimson gentle cameras in 2001, it allowed them to make use of the fines they collected to cowl the packages’ prices. Any remaining funds would then go to native faculties. For this reason Raleigh was capable of give solely 9% of its SafeLight quotation cash to Wake County Public Faculties final 12 months, in line with Rob Murray, spokesman for town’s transportation division.

Stam stated he made it a degree within the Common Meeting to cease different municipalities from receiving this sort of funding exception.

Raleigh started its SafeLight digicam system in 2003 and issued practically 30,000 citations final 12 months. The quotation is $50, with one other $50 added for late funds. The cameras are operated by Conduent, a New Jersey-based IT administration firm.

Advertisement

Raleigh strategically locates its cameras at high-risk intersections utilizing information on collision varieties and frequency, Murray stated.

“Prior third-party evaluations, particularly on Raleigh’s program, have proven this instrument (Purple Gentle Cameras) have a dramatic impression on lowering angle crashes,” Murray wrote in an e mail to The Information & Observer.

Whereas analysis backs this assertion, the general success of crimson gentle cameras is combined.

“The effectiveness of red-light digicam packages has been a supply of controversy within the analysis neighborhood,” the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention states on-line. “The methodologies used to evaluate effectiveness have various, as have the conclusions drawn from totally different research.”

A 2019 analysis paper from the College of North Carolina Freeway Security Analysis Middle discovered the presence of crimson gentle cameras sometimes elevated rear-end crashes whereas lowering side-impact crashes. It beneficial the cameras are finest positioned at intersections with a higher ratio of angled crashes to rear-end ones.

Advertisement

A 2004 research by two N.C. A&T State College professors was much less favorable to the cameras. Over an almost five-year interval, Mark Burkey and Kofi Obeng analyzed greater than 300 intersections in Greensboro. They discovered a 40% enhance in rear-end crashes, aspect crashes, and general collisions at intersections with crimson gentle cameras.

Greensboro shut down its digicam program the next 12 months.

The variety of cities with automated crimson gentle cameras in the US peaked in 2012 at 533, in line with the Insurance coverage Institute for Freeway Security, a nonprofit funded by auto firms, and has since dropped to beneath 350.

In North Carolina, native governments should obtain authorization from the Common Meeting to function a crimson gentle digicam program. Since gaining this proper in 2001, Charlotte, Cary, Chapel Hill, Knightdale, Greensboro and Excessive Level have all shut down their digicam packages.

‘It was meant to be a security instrument’

All visitors lights in North Carolina observe requirements set by the Federal Freeway Administration’s Guide on Uniform Site visitors Management Units. The guide states all yellow lights ought to final between three and 6 seconds, with particular person state and native departments factoring in pace restrict, terrain and pace notion to find out the time.

Advertisement

Lacy of the state Division of Transportation stated the problem isn’t within the size of yellow lights however within the crimson gentle digicam packages that penalize drivers who enter intersections fractionally too late. North Carolina, he defined, is an all-red state, that means visitors lights will momentarily sit at crimson in all instructions between colour adjustments. Thus, he stated, there’s no actual danger of an accident when a automotive drives by an intersection the tiniest bit late, although an automatic digicam may nonetheless ding the driving force.

“They’re sending out all these tickets for individuals who, by the letter of the regulation, ran the crimson gentle, however the crimson gentle digicam was not meant to be an enforcement instrument,” Lacy stated. “It was meant to be a security instrument to stop individuals from operating crimson lights and getting in wrecks.”

Lacy instructed the digicam packages could be improved in the event that they centered on penalizing drivers who entered intersections after the all-red intervals.

In his challenges to the remaining crimson gentle techniques, Stam and his companions have argued the engineering ideas behind the size of yellow lights is flawed. They’ve invited Ceccarelli to talk as an professional witness, but his arguments so far haven’t prevailed.

One other argument the Stam Legislation Agency has levied in opposition to crimson gentle digicam techniques is that they inherently violate the state structure.

Advertisement

In 2018, Stam filed a separate lawsuit in opposition to town of Greenville and Pitt County Faculties alleging crimson gentle digicam techniques violated Article II, Part 24, of the state structure which bans the Common Meeting from creating native payments “referring to well being, sanitation, and the abatement of nuisances.”

But this didn’t sway the state Supreme Court docket, which in June declined to contemplate overturning the Court docket of Appeals’ unanimous ruling which allowed crimson gentle digicam techniques to proceed working within the state.

This story was produced with monetary help from a coalition of companions led by Innovate Raleigh as a part of an impartial journalism fellowship program. The N&O maintains full editorial management of the work.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Carolina

TRANSFER PORTAL: Former NC State, South Carolina EDGE Terrell Dawkins Commits To North Texas

Published

on

TRANSFER PORTAL: Former NC State, South Carolina EDGE Terrell Dawkins Commits To North Texas


Preparing for their second season in the American Athletic Conference, the North Texas picked up a late commitment to bolster their defensive line group.

6’4″ 249-pound Terrell Dawkins announced his commitment to North Texas on X Thursday after spending the last two seasons in the SEC with the South Carolina Gamecocks. He will have one season of eligibility remaining.

RECRUITING: New Mexico Gatorade Player of The Year Visiting UTSA & UTEP in June

Advertisement

2024 will mark Dawkins’ sixth season of college football. He spent 2019, 2020, and 2021 at NC State and then transferred to Columbia for 2022 and 2023. Over the course of the previous five seasons, he has appeared in 35 games with six starts. His most productive season came in 2020 when he totaled 36 tackles with nine tackles for loss, 4.5 sacks, and two forced fumbles.

5 Interesting G5 Receivers Still In The Transfer Portal

Following that 2020 season, Dawkins struggled to return to form, dealing with the effects of multiple lower body injuries. The North Carolina native’s career tackle total is 45.

North Texas are slated to being the 2024 campaign at South Alabama on August 31 after a 5-7 record last season.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Carolina

North Carolina politicians react to Former President Trump's guilty verdict in historic trial

Published

on

North Carolina politicians react to Former President Trump's guilty verdict in historic trial


RALEIGH, N.C. (WTVD) — North Carolina politicians and lawmakers are responding after Former President Donald Trump was found guilty of 34 counts in a criminal trial on Thursday in New York City.

The trial marks the first time in history that a former U.S. president has been tried on criminal charges. The charges were all related to a 2016 hush money payment Trump made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels.

North Carolina Congressman Wiley Nickel, a Democrat, said in a statement he was “glad to finally have some honesty” with regard to Trump.

“Here’s the thing: The American people have been lied to enough by the former President. It’s no wonder that trust in government is at an all-time low,” said Congressman Wiley Nickel. “I’m glad to finally have some honesty and truth from this verdict so that our country can begin to heal from President Trump’s divisive rhetoric and extremism. Donald Trump should never be in a position of power again.”

Advertisement

LIVE BLOG: Latest updates from Donald Trump’s hush money trial

On the other side of the aisle, Sen. Thom Tillis wrote on social media that he was shocked by the jury’s verdict, and said he felt the trial was politically motivated.

“I am shocked by the verdict considering that this case should have never been brought forward. From the beginning, it was clear that a radical, politically-motivated state prosecutor was using the full weight of his office to go after President Trump at the same time he turned a blind eye to violent criminals. I expect and hope that President Trump will appeal this verdict to address fundamental questions, including whether President Trump received a fair trial and whether the Manhattan D.A. even had jurisdiction on a federal election matter.”

Tillis’ shock was also met by NCGOP Chairman Jason SImmons who wrote :

“The lawfare perpetrated by far-left Democrats, from President Biden down to the Manhattan DA, has reached its inevitable sad conclusion. Today’s sham verdict is a stain on the rule of law and a grotesque attack on President Trump, his family, & all citizens who value due process.”

Advertisement

Congressman Don Davis, who represents North Carolina’s 1st district, also released a statement in response to the jury’s verdict.

“Our country operates under the rule of law. The jury, with the most intimate knowledge of the case, has delivered its verdict, and former President Donald Trump now has the right to seek an appeal.”

North Carolina Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson, who was formally endorsed by Trump during a rally in Greensboro, said the trial is being used by Democrats as a way to weaponize the government against the former president, and called it a “sham.”

“The Democrats know they can’t beat President Trump at the polls so they weaponize our government against him. The voters should decide this election and I believe we will reject this sham trial by putting President Donald Trump back in office this November.”

This is a developing story.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2024 WTVD-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

North Carolina must invest in its teachers

Published

on

North Carolina must invest in its teachers


In 2023 state policymakers were confronted with alarming data: teacher vacancies had hit record highs. Not only did 1 in every 18 classrooms lack a licensed teacher, but districts serving the greatest share of Black students and students from families with low incomes faced the greatest shortages. In other words, the teacher shortage had reached crisis levels, demanding a dramatic response from lawmakers.

Sadly, that response never came. Now the teacher vacancy problem has gotten worse.

On the 40th day of the 2023-24 school year, 6,006 classroom teaching positions were vacant, smashing the prior year’s record by 18 percent. This year, more than one in every 16 lacked a licensed teacher over a month into the school year.

These vacancies continue to be associated with the demographics of the district. Districts with more students from families with low incomes and districts with more Black students tend to experience higher teacher vacancy rates. The association has grown even more stark this year.

Advertisement

As a result, it’s disproportionately Black students and economically disadvantaged students who pay the price for lawmakers’ unwillingness to make the necessary investments to attract and retain certified teachers in every classroom.

Of course, all students suffer from teacher vacancies. And it’s not just the students assigned to an unlicensed teacher.

Teacher vacancies increase the demands on the teachers who have persisted despite state policymakers’ efforts to drive them from the classroom. Vacancies create larger class sizes. They require experienced teachers to assist untrained, novice teachers and to fill in when substitutes are nowhere to be found. This leaves our best teachers with less time to lesson plan, individualize instruction, assist less experienced colleagues, or find regular opportunities to decompress from an increasingly difficult, stressful job.

As vacancies rise year after year, an increasing number of teachers are taking on more responsibilities to fill in the holes.

Advertisement

It should come as no surprise that North Carolina’s teacher vacancy problem has worsened. The 2023 budget failed to include any meaningful efforts to reverse their war on the teaching profession. In spite of the teacher shortage crisis, legislators cut public school budgets and provided meager pay raises of only 3.6 percent, barely keeping pace with inflation. Average teacher pay is 23 percent below the national average. Our schools remain among the worst-funded in America, and our teachers continue to earn salaries that dramatically trail their peers in other industries.

Legislators know that teachers remain the most important in-school factor for boosting academic achievement. Yet they have instead chosen to prioritize a massive expansion of the state’s private school voucher program to benefit wealthy families already enrolled in private schools. While investments in teachers have been shown to boost academic performance, statewide voucher programs have produced unprecedented drops in test scores for voucher students.

The voucher expansion also sends a clear message to public school teachers: state leaders would rather subsidize their wealthy donors than provide teachers with competitive salaries, repair dilapidated school buildings, or give teachers adequate support staff such as teacher assistants, nurses, and school psychologists.

Legislators’ failure to support teachers and improve their working conditions is at the heart of the long-running Leandro court case, which requires that all children have access to highly qualified teachers. The case has spurred a detailed, research-based, multi-year plan to increase investments in educators and students in order to provide the basic level of schooling promised under our state constitution. Unfortunately, legislative leaders have fought tooth and nail to get the plan thrown out by the courts, sending educators (and students) another clear message: they’re uninterested in making things better.

The legislature has continued to meddle in how teachers can do their jobs. The Parents’ Bill of Rights creates purposefully ambiguous restrictions on how teachers approach subjects related to sexual identity and limits their ability to support trans students or others exploring their gender identity. The bill also allows bad actors to file information requests and objections to instructional materials, chilling instruction on controversial subjects while taking up teachers’ limited time and resources.

Advertisement

Other bills targeting teachers’ instructional practices could be revived this year. For example, HB 187, which seeks to create a chilling effect around an honest teaching of history and current events, is awaiting action in the state senate. Additionally, a high-profile public official has referred to educators as “wicked people” and believes teachers are indoctrinating their students.

Is it any wonder that teacher vacancies continue to rise?

It doesn’t have to be this way. There are several obvious steps that the legislature could take to attract and retain excellent, well-trained professionals in every classroom:

  • Large, across-the-board pay raises
  • Proper staffing levels for support staff such as teacher assistants, psychologists, nurses, counselors, and social workers
  • Capital improvements to ensure each school offers a healthy, inviting learning environment
  • Restoration of professional development and early career mentoring funds

Not coincidentally, these are all elements of the Leandro Plan.

If legislators want to address the teacher vacancy crisis, they can and must implement evidence-based policies. Using research-backed strategies would break down barriers that make academic success more difficult for Black students and students from families with low incomes. It’s time to work together with our teachers to support and uplift them.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending