Connect with us

North Carolina

Government ethics groups protest ‘dark money’ bill to open NC elections to more anonymous spending

Published

on

Government ethics groups protest ‘dark money’ bill to open NC elections to more anonymous spending


As state lawmakers prepare to pass a bill allowing corporations and anonymous donors to more directly fund individual politicians in North Carolina, advocates for government ethics and transparency flocked to the state legislature Thursday to denounce the changes.

Under current state law, politicians must disclose who’s giving their campaigns money. They can’t take money from corporations at all. And they can only take a maximum of $6,400 from individual people and political groups.

But now, critics say the changes North Carolina’s Republican legislative leaders are proposing would create a massive loophole: Allowing for unlimited amounts of untraceable “dark money” to flow into politicians’ campaigns, by using state political parties as the middleman, and without the public being able to see who’s behind it.

“The ability to oversee and understand who’s influencing our elections is really diminished by this policy,” said Ann Webb of the government ethics reform group Common Cause North Carolina.

Advertisement

The state Senate voted to approve the changes last week, prompting all the chamber’s Democratic members to skip the vote in protest. The state House plans to vote on approving the changes Tuesday afternoon.

Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper could veto the bill — on Tuesday Cooper’s office told WRAL that “political donations should be more transparent, not less” — but Republicans have enough votes in the legislature to override Cooper’s vetoes, and they have done so every time this session.

Republican leaders say the change will level the playing field in the race for governor, to replace the term-limited Cooper.

The latest campaign finance records show Democratic nominee Josh Stein had raised $19.1 million as of February, with $12.7 million left to spend.

Republican nominee Mark Robinson was millions of dollars behind, having raised $10.7 million in that same period, with $4.5 million left to spend.

Advertisement

Super PACs spending millions

While North Carolina’s current campaign finance laws mostly set strict limits on how much money politicians can take from a single source, there are limited exceptions: They can personally loan their own campaigns as much money as they want, and political parties can also give candidates as much as they want.

The new changes to state law would loosen up the rules for state political parties, allowing them to now take money from a type of federal political action committee commonly called Super PACs.

Unlike individual politicians or political parties, Super PACs can keep their donors secret. They can also receive unlimited amounts of funding, including from otherwise banned sources such as labor unions and corporations. For that reason, Super PACs haven’t been allowed to donate money directly to politicians or political parties in North Carolina.

Democrats say the changes are clearly intended to let corporations and others give anonymously to Robinson’s campaign, by giving their money to Super PACs which could then route it through the NCGOP to Robinson.

A Robinson campaign spokesman declined to comment. House Speaker Tim Moore confirmed last week the changes are aimed at the governor’s race, although he said he hadn’t personally spoken with Robinson about it.

Advertisement

“The way the rules have been interpreted seemed to give a balance in favor of the way the Democrats did it,” Moore said.

That’s a reference to a 2020 memo from the North Carolina State Board of Elections, which indicated that a major national Democratic group had taken the necessary extra steps to keep its funds separate depending on where the money came from — which allowed it to send some of its money to the state Democratic Party without breaking state laws.

A similar Republican group had not taken the same steps to be allowed to legally give to the North Carolina Republican Party; GOP leaders say that’s why the law needs to be changed.

“What we’re seeking to do is to level the playing field,” Moore said.

Tied to bill targeting protesters

The campaign finance changes have received further criticism for the way they’ve passed through the legislature, with limited debated and tacked onto an unrelated bill targeting protesters.

Advertisement

Republican lawmakers initially proposed banning people from wearing masks in public for health reasons, saying they believe protesters have taken advantage of that rule, and Covid-era norms on mask-wearing, to hide their identities at demonstrations. Banning masks would make it easier for police to search, detain and potentially arrest people for wearing masks that hide part of their faces, the proposal’s supporters and critics all said.

But after that proposal received widespread backlash, including from fellow GOP lawmakers, legislative leaders agreed to a compromise that would allow people to still wear masks in public to stop the spread of diseases, but clarified that it has to be a medical-grade mask.

The bill will also increase criminal penalties for protesters who block a road, and allow civil lawsuits against the organizers of protests that end up blocking a road, even if the organizer wasn’t personally present.

“Protesting is a part of democracy,” said Dawn Blagrove, a prominent Black Lives Matter activist who leads the group Emancipate North Carolina. “To chill the right to protest is a surefire sign that you are afraid of the people. And when you are afraid of the people you are afraid of their power.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Carolina

Judge strikes down one North Carolina abortion restriction but upholds another

Published

on

Judge strikes down one North Carolina abortion restriction but upholds another


RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — A federal judge ruled Friday that a provision in North Carolina’s abortion laws requiring doctors to document the location of a pregnancy before prescribing abortion pills should be blocked permanently, affirming that it was too vague to be enforced reasonably.

The implementation of that requirement was already halted last year by U.S. District Judge Catherine Eagles until a lawsuit challenging portions of the abortion law enacted by the Republican-dominated General Assembly in 2023 was litigated further. Eagles now says a permanent injunction would be issued at some point.

But Eagles on Friday restored enforcement of another provision that she had previously blocked that required abortions after 12 weeks of pregnancy to be performed in hospitals. In light of the 2022 U.S. Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, she wrote, the lawmakers “need only offer rational speculation for its legislative decisions regulating abortion.”

In this case, legislators contended the hospital requirement would protect maternal health by reducing risks to some women who could experience major complications after 12 weeks, Eagles said. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic and a physician who initially sued offered “credible and largely uncontroverted medical and scientific evidence” that the hospital requirement “will unnecessarily make such abortions more dangerous for many women and more expensive,” Eagles added.

Advertisement

But “the plaintiffs have not negated every conceivable basis the General Assembly may have had for enacting the hospitalization requirement,” Eagles, who was nominated to the bench by President Barack Obama, wrote in vacating a preliminary injunction on the hospital requirement.

Unlike challenges in other states like South Carolina and Florida that sought to fully strike down abortion laws, Eagles’ decisions still mean most of North Carolina’s abortion law updated since the end of Roe v. Wade is in place. GOP state lawmakers overrode Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper’s veto and enacted the law in May 2023 . It narrowed abortion access significantly from the previous state ban on most abortions from after 20 weeks to now after 12 weeks. The hospital requirement would apply to exceptions to the ban after 12 weeks, such as in cases of rape or incest or “life-limiting” fetal anomalies.

Eagles on Friday affirmed blocking the clause in the abortion law requiring physicians to document the “intrauterine location of a pregnancy” before distributing medication abortion.

Lawyers representing House Speaker Tim Moore and Senate leader Phil Berger defending the law argued the documentation protected the health of women with ectopic pregnancies, which can be dangerous and when ruptured may be similar to the expected symptoms of a medication abortion, according to the opinion.

But Eagles wrote a medication abortion doesn’t exacerbate the risks of an ectopic pregnancy. And she remained convinced that the law is unconstitutionally vague and subjects abortion providers to claims that they broke the law — and possible penalties — if they can’t locate an embryo through an ultrasound because the pregnancy is so new.

Advertisement

The provision “violates the plaintiffs’ constitutional due process rights,” she wrote.

Spokespeople for Planned Parenthood, Berger and Moore didn’t respond to emails late Friday seeking comment. Eagles’ upcoming final judgement can be appealed.

State Attorney General Josh Stein, a Democrat, abortion-rights supporter and 2024 candidate for governor, was officially a lawsuit defendant. But lawyers from his office had asked Eagles to block the two provisions, largely agreeing with Planned Parenthood’s arguments.

The lawsuit was initially filed in June 2023 and contained other challenges to the abortion law that the legislature quickly addressed with new legislation. Eagles issued a preliminary injunction last September blocking the two provision still at issue on Friday. Eagles said last month she would make a final decision in the case without going through a full trial.

North Carolina still remains a destination for many out-of-state women seeking abortions, as most states in the U.S. South have implemented laws banning abortion after six weeks of pregnancy — before many women know they are pregnant — or near-total bans.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

AMBER Alert issued for missing child in North Carolina

Published

on

AMBER Alert issued for missing child in North Carolina


An AMBER Alert has been issued for a missing child in Durham, North Carolina, who police said they believe has been abducted by his biological mother.

Nine-year-old Geon King-Parriett was last seen at approximately 6:03 p.m. on Thursday, Durham Police Department said in a statement shared with Newsweek. The DPD described the child as a Black male, approximately 4 feet, 10 inches tall and weighing 100 pounds.

King-Parriett has brown hair and brown eyes, the police said. He was last seen wearing an all black outfit which included a black hoodie and black sweatpants.

His mother, Mariah King, is described as a 33-year-old Black female. She is 5 feet, 4 inches tall and weighs 140 pounds. She also has brown hair and brown eyes and was last seen wearing gray sweat pants and a black crop top, and was wearing her hair up.

Advertisement
Missing child Geon King-Parriett a 9-year-old boy. An AMBER Alert has been issued for the child who has gone missing in Durham, North Carolina. He is believed to have been abducted by his mother.

Durham Police Department

According to a report from local news station WRAL, the pair walked away from 202 S Benjamine Street on Thursday.

Social media users have been commenting on the Durham Police Department’s Facebook post, expressing criticism over how the AMBER alert was issued.

One user wrote, “Whoever sent out the Amber alerts needs to be fired. Both of them contained ZERO useful information, and the second alert wasn’t even correct.”

Another user wrote, “Whoever did the amber alert needs to rethink how they send an amber alert it gave no description or anything at all.”

Newsweek emailed the Durham Police Department for comment on the criticism regarding the AMBER alert, and a representative advised Newsweek that The North Carolina Center for Missing Persons issues the Amber Alerts that are sent out to wireless phones.

Advertisement

Newsweek has reached out to The North Carolina Center for Missing Persons for comment.

Police are asking anyone with information to contact the Durham Police Department at 919-475-2511 or to call 911.

What is an AMBER Alert?

The term AMBER Alert refers to the emergency response system that shares information about child abduction in order to mobilize the public into locating the child.

The “AMBER” stands for “America’s Missing: Broadcast Emergency Response.”

The emergency message means that a child has been abducted and is in imminent danger.

Advertisement

It was named after Amber Hagerman, a 9-year-old girl who was abducted and murdered in Texas in 1996.

The alert system functions by using media broadcasts, highway signs and other communication channels to share descriptions of the child, suspect and any vehicles involved.

As of 2023, 1,200 children were found through the AMBER Alert system and 180 children were rescued because of the emergency alerts.

Recent AMBER Alerts

A Wisconsin toddler remains missing months after an AMBER Alert was issued. The child’s mother and her boyfriend are currently facing child neglect charges.

3-year-old Elijah Vue was last seen on February 20 in Two Rivers while he was staying with his mother’s boyfriend, Jesse Vang. Vang took a nap and woke up three hours later to find the child gone.

Advertisement

The AMBER Alert said that “He was last seen wearing gray sweat pants, long sleeve dark colored shirt and red and green dinosaur slip on shoes.”

In June, an AMBER Alert Review was requested following the murder of a child in Louisiana.

Rep. Dixon McMakin said that the AMBER Alert system was “not as efficient or effective as it should be,” after it took “hours to issue” in the wake of the disappearance of two girls, Erin and Jalie Brunett on June 13.

Four-year-old Erin Brunett was found dead hours later. Her mother was also killed.

Update, 7/26/24, 10:45 a.m. ET: This piece was updated with additional comment from the Durham Police Department.

Advertisement

Do you have a story Newsweek should be covering? Do you have any questions about this story? Contact LiveNews@newsweek.com

Uncommon Knowledge

Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.

Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Carolina

North Carolina high school teacher arrested for ‘indecent liberties’ with student

Published

on

North Carolina high school teacher arrested for ‘indecent liberties’ with student


A North Carolina high school teacher was arrested Wednesday for allegedly sexually abusing a student, police said.

Britney Marie Vernon, 39, was hit with three counts of felony indecent liberties with a student and three counts of felony sex acts with a student, according to the Randolph County Sheriff’s Office.

The disturbing assault allegations against the Randleman High School teacher were first reported on July 1.

Britney Marie Vernon was charged with three counts of felony indecent liberties with a student and three counts of felony sex acts with a student. WFMY

Police did not share the details or disclose if more than one student was allegedly targeted by Vernon, but said the accusations were troubling enough to issue a warrant.

Advertisement

The sheriff also did not clarify whether the alleged victim was Vernon’s student or their age.

The age of consent in North Carolina is 16.

Vernon is a Career and Technical Education Teacher (CTE) within the high school’s Health Services department, according to its webpage.


The sheriff also did not clarify whether the alleged victim was Vernon's student or their age.
Vernon was a teacher at Randleman High School in North Carolina. Randleman High School

She began her teaching career at Randleman High on August 21, 2023, but had been a part of the Randolph County School System since August 2018, a spokesperson told WFMY 2 News.

Vernon has since been suspended without pay.

She is being held on a $75,000 unsecured bond and is due back in court on Aug. 12.

Advertisement

Randleman is a city with a population of 4,600 and is 20 miles south of Greensboro.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending