Connect with us

Maryland

Hogan administration pausing state’s participation in multi-state alliance for strictest vehicle emissions standards – Maryland Matters

Published

on

Hogan administration pausing state’s participation in multi-state alliance for strictest vehicle emissions standards – Maryland Matters


Maryland has been following California’s powerful emissions guidelines for gross sales of latest vehicles and lightweight obligation vans for 15 years. Picture from inventory.adobe.com.

The Hogan administration is pausing the state’s participation in a multi-state alliance that requires new autos bought in Maryland to satisfy the identical emissions requirements as these bought in California, a state official stated Monday.

The administration’s determination was revealed Monday morning at a gathering of the Air High quality Management Advisory Council, which advises the Maryland Division of the Setting on proposed air high quality guidelines and rules and evaluates laws proposed by the Common Meeting and state companies.

Though the emissions requirements weren’t on the agenda, an environmentalist requested an official of MDE through the on-line assembly whether or not the Hogan administration deliberate to observe California’s newly-adopted, extra stringent emissions requirements. The official, Chris Hoagland, director of Air and Radiation at MDE, stated Gov. Larry Hogan (R) didn’t plan to signal an order adopting the so-called Superior Clear Vehicles II regulation.

Lindsey Mendelson, the transportation coverage specialist on the Maryland chapter of the Sierra Membership who raised the query on the air high quality council assembly, stated she was “very disenchanted” by the administration’s determination.

Advertisement

“It’s low-hanging fruit,” she stated. “There’s completely no purpose that the governor shouldn’t undertake the legislation.”

Maryland has adopted California’s emissions pointers for brand spanking new vehicles and lightweight vans since 2007 — an association that started for 2011 mannequin yr vehicles and vans. In all, 14 states have been utilizing California rules, moderately than weaker federal guidelines, as a yardstick for automobile emissions for a number of years.

However the authentic settlement is expiring, and states have been weighing whether or not to re-up for California’s new, harder requirements, which require automobile producers to promote an growing proportion of latest zero-emission passenger vehicles and light-duty vans in mannequin years 2026 by 2035. The present association runs by the mannequin 2025 yr.

The regulation — which aligns with laws handed by the Maryland Common Meeting earlier this yr — requires states to permit solely new zero-emissions autos to be bought after 2035.

The Hogan administration needed to resolve by the top of this yr whether or not to observe California’s new Superior Clear Vehicles II regulation, which was adopted by California’s highly effective Air High quality Board in August. Delaware, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington state have already signed on.

Advertisement

With the Hogan administration opting out, Gov.-elect Wes Moore (D) should resolve subsequent yr whether or not to deliver the state again into the consortium. However even when he does, mannequin yr 2027 autos bought within the state could have weaker emissions requirements than these bought within the states that conform to abide by the California mannequin, as a result of auto producers require a two-year discover of a state’s emissions guidelines. States that observe the California plan shall be required to make sure that a minimum of 43% of the brand new vehicles and light-duty vans bought in mannequin yr 2027 are zero emissions or plugged-in hybrids.

The Hogan administration provided no public clarification for why the state gained’t observe California’s extra stringent requirements. The choice contradicts a suggestion from the Maryland Local weather Change Fee, which Hogan’s Setting secretary, Horacio Tablada, co-chairs.

Earlier this fall, Home Setting and Transportation Committee Chair Kumar Barve (D-Montgomery), together with the chair of that panel’s Motor Automobile and Transportation subcommittee, Del. David Fraser-Hidalgo (D-Montgomery), and Del. Marc Korman (D-Montgomery), chair of the Home Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation and the Setting, wrote to Hogan, calling the adoption of the Superior Clear Vehicles II regulation “our greatest alternative thus far to considerably mitigate the nation’s main supply of harmful air and local weather pollution and scale back the State’s reliance on pricey, risky fossil fuels.”

“The ACC II rule in Maryland will additional incentivize automotive producers to speed up manufacturing of pollution-free vehicles and, in the end, get extra of them into frontline communities,” the lawmakers wrote. “This shall be an necessary step in lowering the pricey well being impacts of noxious emissions.”

Peter Kitzmiller, president of the Maryland Auto Sellers Affiliation, stated Monday that auto producers and sellers are already getting ready for the transition to zero-emissions autos, whatever the state’s emissions guidelines for brand spanking new vehicles and lightweight vans. At the moment, about 3.5% of the autos on the highway in Maryland emit zero emissions, he stated.

Advertisement

“The manufactures are spending tens of billions of {dollars} and the sellers are spending tens of millions of {dollars} in infrastructure to prepare for this,” Kitzmiller stated. “That is clearly the way in which the market goes to go. Are we going to get there as rapidly as a few of the rules require us to? I don’t know.”

This summer time, when California introduced its newest stringent rules for emissions of latest autos, a number of auto producers applauded them, saying they offered certainty and stability for the business. A Ford Motor Firm govt referred to as it “a landmark customary,” and reiterated the corporate’s dedication to constructing zero-emissions autos.

The Hogan administration’s plan to not undertake the brand new California regulation is paying homage to its determination two years in the past to say no to formally be part of the Transportation and Local weather Initiative (TCI), a collaborative effort of mid-Atlantic and Northeastern states to arrange a carbon “cap-and-invest” mannequin to transportation emissions — although Maryland officers had been a part of the preliminary planning for the regional alliance.

Moore, who takes workplace on Jan. 18, has promised a strong local weather agenda, however has provided few specifics. His transition crew’s local weather coverage committee is holding a virtual town hall meeting on Tuesday night. Leaders of the Air High quality Management Advisory Council have promised to place the California emissions rules on the agenda for its subsequent assembly in March.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maryland

Maryland Senate race poll shows Democrat Alsobrooks leading GOP's Hogan, despite 1 in 3 not knowing who she is

Published

on

Maryland Senate race poll shows Democrat Alsobrooks leading GOP's Hogan, despite 1 in 3 not knowing who she is


Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

The Democratic candidate for senate in Maryland is leading her GOP rival despite more than a third of eligible voters not recognizing her name.

Advertisement

A poll published by Gonzales Research & Media Services this week found that Prince George’s County Executive Angela Alsobrooks has pulled ahead of Republican former Governor Larry Hogan by five points — 46% to 41%.

Alsobrooks’ current success in the polls comes as a surprise, given the Democratic candidate’s continued struggles with low name recognition among voters.

The Gonzales poll found that approximately 34% of registered voters do not recognize Alsobrooks by name. This includes approximately 33% of independents who do not recognize Alsobrooks, as well as 17% of eligible voters registered with the Democratic Party.

NEW POLL REVEALS REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE DEADLOCKED WITH DEM IN CRUCIAL DEEP BLUE STATE

Maryland Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate and Prince George’s County Executive Angela Alsobrooks speaks at a campaign event on Gun Violence Awareness Day at Kentland Community Center in Landover, Maryland. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Advertisement

Notably, 72% of total eligible voters told the pollster that they did not recognize the Democratic candidate.

MARYLAND DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE SAYS THERE SHOULD BE NO LIMIT ON ABORTION

The winner of the November election will succeed Democratic Sen. Ben Cardin, who is retiring this year after serving nearly two decades in the Senate and nearly six decades as a state and then federal lawmaker.

With Democrats trying to protect their fragile Senate majority, Hogan’s late entry into the race in February gave them an unexpected headache in a state previously considered safe territory. 

Larry Hogan wins GOP Senate nomination in Maryland

Former two-term Gov. Larry Hogan of Maryland celebrates his victory in the 2024 Maryland Republican Senate primary, in Annapolis, Maryland. (Fox News – Paul Steinhauser)

Hogan left the governor’s office at the beginning of 2023 with very positive approval and favorable ratings.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

A vocal Republican critic of former President Trump who previously flirted with a 2024 White House run, Hogan has repeatedly said that he will not vote for the former president in November’s election. In the spring, he stood out from most other Republicans for publicly calling for the guilty verdicts in Trump’s criminal trial to be respected.

The Gonzales Research & Media Services poll was conducted from Aug. 24 to Aug. 30 and surveyed 820 self-described likely voters via phone interviews.

Fox News Digital’s Paul Steinhauser contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maryland

Guns flood the nation’s capital. Maryland, D.C. attorneys general point at top sellers.

Published

on

Guns flood the nation’s capital. Maryland, D.C. attorneys general point at top sellers.



The lawsuit announced on Tuesday claims three stores sold one person 34 guns over six months and ignored the buyer’s red flags.

play

The nation’s capital is grappling with a deadly flood of weapons. Prosecutors are pointing fingers at three federally licensed gun stores in Maryland.

Attorneys general of Maryland and Washington D.C. filed a lawsuit Tuesday against three gun shops for selling firearms to a straw purchaser – the same stores identified as the top retailers of recovered crime guns in Maryland between August 2020 and July 2021, according to a report commissioned by the state attorney general’s office.

According to the lawsuit, the three stores in Montgomery County, Maryland, roughly 25 miles northwest of Washington D.C., collectively sold 34 semiautomatic pistols to one person in six months. Only two remained with the purchaser, while the rest are presumed to be trafficked, prosecutors said.

Some have been recovered from people accused of assault, a stabbing, and drug distribution, the lawsuit added, while most remain unaccounted for.

“Federally licensed gun dealers know the law and they know what to look for to spot possibleillegal trafficking. As this lawsuit demonstrates, gun dealers cannot just choose to ignore these warning signs and guardrails,” said Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown. “Let this be a warning to other dealers who put public safety at risk to make a profit: We are watching, and we will hold you accountable for illegal conduct that fuels gun violence across our region.”

Advertisement

The lawsuit comes as public health experts and gun safety advocates warn about an alarming level of gun violence across the nation — guns are the leading killer of children in the U.S. and kill nearly 50,000 people a year. Lawsuits in other states have also targeted sellers and traffickers as culprits in gun crimes, including New Jersey, Michigan, and Philadelphia.

Lawsuit: Man bought 34 guns in 6 months

Three federally licensed gun stores – Engage Armament, United Gun Shop and Atlantic Guns – collectively sold Demetrius Minor, an “obvious straw purchaser,” 34 guns between April 6 and October 5, 2021, according to the lawsuit filed in Montgomery County Circuit Court.

According to Engage Armament’s records cited in the lawsuit, Minor spent more than $31,000 at the one store for at least 25 guns. In July 2021 alone, he came to the store at least four times and bought five guns, prosecutors said.

Minor gave many of the weapons to a relative, Donald Willis, a Washington D.C. resident with a record of violent felonies, the lawsuit said, and Willis then spread the guns to other “dangerous individuals.” Minor has been convicted for his role in the straw sales. But Tuesday’s lawsuit said the stores “who chose profits over safety” have faced no consequences for their “critical role in fueling gun violence” in the D.C. metro region.

Advertisement

At least nine of the weapons, which the lawsuit contends were “illegally sold,” were found at crime scenes in Washington D.C. and surrounding Maryland suburbs. “Many more are likely in the hands of other individuals legally barred from possessing firearms and will be used in future crimes,” the lawsuit said.

The lawsuit cites a federally required form to buy a gun — the ATF firearms transaction record — which is used to determine whether a gun sale is legal. The form notes that straw purchases are illegal, meaning the firearm must go to the person who legally bought it. It also states that the seller is responsible for ensuring the sale is legal, and simply conducting a background check does not fulfill obligations.

The lawsuit notes that just as straw purchases are illegal, it is also against the law for a firearm dealer to help advance illegal sales, and federal law requires licensed dealers to report when an unlicensed buyer purchases two or more handguns within five days.

Atlantic Guns denied the straw sales allegations in a statement to USA TODAY on Tuesday.

“Atlantic Guns, Inc. has never and will never knowingly sell to someone who we have reason to believe is committing a straw purchase,” the store said, declining to comment further before review of the lawsuit.

Advertisement

Engage Armament and United Gun Shop didn’t immediately return USA TODAY’s requests for comment.

Cities and states across U.S. go after sellers to battle gun violence

The lawsuit Tuesday is the latest to sweep the nation as cities and victims of shootings target firearm stores and traffickers to battle gun violence.

Last July, Philadelphia announced a lawsuit against three vendors that the city said were the source of more than 1,300 crime guns between 2015 and 2019. The weapons were used in shootings, a home invasion, drug crimes, vehicle theft, and more, according to the city.

Three Missouri men were charged earlier this year for illegally selling guns to the people who fired shots into the Super Bowl victory parade that killed a mother and injured over 20 people earlier this year.

Advertisement

In Michigan, the parents of a 14-year-old Oxford High School student who was severely injured in a 2021 mass killing, named a gun store as one of the defendants in a lawsuit, alleging Acme Shooting Goods negligently and illegally sold the firearm used in the school assault that killed four people and wounded seven others. Acme sold the gun to the shooter’s father while ignoring signs it was a straw purchase, the lawsuit alleged.

In July 2023, a northern Indiana gun shop that police called a key supplier of Chicago’s criminal firearms market announced it was closing its doors after Chicago sued Westforth Sports in 2021 over what it said was a pattern of illegal gun sales.

A USA TODAY investigation earlier this year found the majority of guns used in crimes are sold by a small fraction of the nation’s gun shops. Two of the Maryland gun shops named in Tuesday’s lawsuit – United and Atlantic – were on a list by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives of stores that sold at least 25 guns traced to a crime over a year that were purchased within the past three years.

Contributing: Nick Penzenstadler and Grace Hauck, USA TODAY



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maryland

Declines in revenue, federal aid drive cuts in proposed transportation projects – Maryland Matters

Published

on

Declines in revenue, federal aid drive cuts in proposed transportation projects – Maryland Matters


Transportation projects around the state will be put on hold as officials grapple with ongoing budget constraints and a growing list of expensive projects.

A combination of budget pressures has created a $1.3 billion funding gap over a six year period, which Transportation Secretary Paul Wiedefeld said forced his department to defer projects across the state.

“We just don’t have enough dollars to do what we have to do within our means. So that’s what we’ve had to do,” he said.

The agency Tuesday released a draft of its latest Consolidated Transportation Program, a six-year budget that contains $19 billion in projects around the state. Wiedefeld said the draft required tough choices to address the budget gap, a “historical issue” that continues.

Advertisement

Wiedefeld said the state’s transportation funding shortfall is driven, in part, by an end to federal COVID-19 aid. Other factors include inflation, increased construction costs, less than expected revenue from the state’s gas tax, and reduced federal funding.

“The biggest one we do is we take a look at our financial forecast and all the ups and downs that may occur in the financial forecast,” Wiedefeld told reporters during a briefing Friday. “And so, in doing that, what we learned was that some of the projections that we had in terms of the growth of some of our sources were not growing at that rate, particularly our largest source of revenue, the motor fuel tax. There were some others that were either not growing or remaining flat again, not growing to the level that we’d hoped for.”

Wiedefeld said that resulted in roughly a $350 million decline in projected revenues over the six-year period of fiscal 2025-2030.

“At the same time, our operating costs continue to grow at a rate a little bit more significant that we have projected,” said Wiedefeld, adding $300 million in projected costs over the six-year period.

Counties scramble for answers, options as state signals deferral of transportation requests

Advertisement

Additionally, lawmakers earlier this year restored proposed cuts in state aid to local governments as part of Highway User Revenues as well as proposed cuts to transit systems run by 23 counties and Baltimore City. Restoration of those proposed cuts added another $400 million over six years, Wiedefeld said.

“So those three things basically are our realities that put pressure on the financial forecast,” he said.

Finally, Wiedefeld said the amount of federal aid is falling short of expectations.

“We were pushing all the modes to really buckle down and see where else we could get federal dollars for delivering projects,” he said. “We were shooting for roughly 80% federal, 20% local match, overall for the program. Basically, we were not able to achieve that, and we’re probably not going to be able to achieve that into the future.”

Instead, Wiedefeld said the state now expects a 75-25 split. “That 5%, although it sounds small, is significant, obviously, when you think of the amount of federal dollars that would bring down,” he said.

Advertisement

The resulting lack of revenue means counties will see priority projects not already underway slowed down or paused

“In effect, projects that are into the future — larger projects that we want to construct — we have to slow those down in terms of the process to get them to construction, until we have available dollars to pick that back up,” Wiedefeld said.

One large project that could suffer is the proposed widening of the American Legion Bridge.

“So, on the American Legion bridge, obviously, we have the record of decision for this, you know, larger improvement there,” said Wiedefeld. “But given the stress that we’re under, we’re going to have the state highway particularly focus on the pure state of good repair issues around the American Legion bridge.”

The state applied for a federal grant to help pay for the costs of repairing “structural issues with the bridge,” he said. “So that’s where we’ll be focusing,” Wiedefeld said.

Advertisement

News of the delays was delivered to county leaders by Wiedefeld and transportation officials during the Maryland Association of Counties summer conference last month.

The transportation secretary said he will also seek to slow down the purchase of zero-emissions buses in the coming years, as some major bus manufacturers are having issues with the performance of electric buses, as well as availability.

Moore warns of difficult fiscal decisions ahead

A new clean diesel bus costs the state $750,000. A hybrid bus costs about $1 million each. A new electric bus costs $1.4 million each.

“So, as you play that over the program period, if you defer that, it actually saves a lot of dollars,” Wiedefeld said. “It allows us not to dig deeper into operating cuts, that we would have to do, or system preservation cuts.”

Advertisement

Wiedefeld said he will not request cuts to his department’s operating budget as he did last year when he cut 8% across the board. He will also not request cuts to county aid or local transit networks.

“What we’ve done is we’ve gone through all those projects, and we’re going to defer those projects at a logical deferred point,” Wiedefeld said. “So basically, some of those projects were in different levels of study. We want to make sure that they stop at a point where we don’t lose any of the effort that we had done, but we don’t have the available funds right now to continue those projects. What you’ll see in the capital program is basically those projects that will be deferred.”

A year ago, Wiedefeld proposed cuts to county shares of highway user revenues and to local transportation networks.

Highway user revenues — decimated in cuts more than a decade ago — had yet to be restored to previous levels. Proposed cuts, nixed this spring by the General Assembly, would have eliminated planned increases in future years.

“Even so, the fiscal 2025 funding for HUR (highway user revenues) falls significantly short of Maryland’s appropriate and historic funding levels, even without adjusting for inflation,” the association of county governments said in a post on its website. “This gap becomes even more pronounced when accounting for rising road maintenance and materials costs.”

Advertisement

The association said it would continue to seek restoration of state highway aid.

“MACo and county leaders will continue urging Maryland policymakers to advance a sustainable plan to address critical infrastructure needs across the state,” the group said in its statement. “Proper restoration of the HUR formula should be a priority in advancing solutions that create sensible and reliable support for all locally maintained roadways.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending