Connect with us

Culture

Keegan Bradley makes Team USA’s Presidents Cup roster but Justin Thomas excluded

Published

on

Keegan Bradley makes Team USA’s Presidents Cup roster but Justin Thomas excluded

By going chalk, United States captain Jim Furyk has created intrigue ahead of this month’s Presidents Cup.

Furyk selected Nos. 7-12 on the team standings for his six captain’s picks, announced on Tuesday. The move means Ryder Cup captain Keegan Bradley will be playing for Team USA for the first time in a decade, but longtime American stalwart Justin Thomas will be left at home.

The other American picks were Sam Burns, Russell Henley, Max Homa, Brian Harman and Tony Finau. Scottie Scheffler, Xander Schauffele, Collin Morikawa, Wyndham Clark, Patrick Cantlay and Sahith Theegala were the six automatic selections to the team.

The Presidents Cup is at Royal Montreal Golf Club from Sept. 26-29.

“Just trying to put the puzzle pieces together,” Furyk said in explaining his pick, calling it a “tough omission” but otherwise not offering an explanation to Golf Channel for leaving out Thomas. The 31-year-old was No. 19 on the points standings.

Advertisement

Bradley was initially slated to be a captain’s assistant for Furyk, his only chance to get team leadership experience ahead of the 2025 Ryder Cup at Bethpage Black in New York. Instead, he’ll be relieved of those duties, Furyk said, and will instead be allowed to focus on playing.

International team captain Mike Weir selected Christiaan Bezuidenhout, Corey Conners, Mackenzie Hughes, Si Woo Kim, Min Woo Lee and Taylor Pendrith. Conners, Hughes and Pendrith are all Canadians, giving the team a true maple flavor with a Canadian captain and three players. They’ll join Hideki Matsuyama, Sungjae Im, Adam Scott, Tom Kim, Jason Day and Byeong Hun An.

What to think about the United States team

This is simultaneously unsurprising and incredibly disappointing. Furyrk going chalk with the players ranked No. 7-12 saves himself from criticism because he can say “It’s fair,” but it means the U.S. has a team that fails at both current form and ushering in young talent. Max Homa has dropped to No. 86 on DataGolf amid a mess of a season, and Brian Harman has just one top-10 finish since March. Meanwhile, Justin Thomas is a U.S. Cup legend and is having a much better season than both of them. Thomas is 9-3-2 at Presidents Cups and finished T14 at the Tour Championship, and Akshay Bhatia won the Texas Open this year. It could have been invaluable to get the 22-year-old rising star in the team room for the future. It all feels like a missed opportunity that neither brings the best team nor helps the team going forward. — Brody Miller

Furyk might have gone straight down the list and picked the next six players on the U.S. Presidents Cup standings list, but a few of these selections are still baffling. Harman and Homa have been outplayed by several players who would have been excellent fits for the squad — including Thomas, who is widely known as one of the best American match-play players of this generation. Harman was likely picked for his driving accuracy in preparation for a tight and narrow Royal Montreal, and Homa will provide the fire and spirit that comes naturally to him in team environments. But think about Bhatia or even someone like 20-year-old Nick Dunlap. This year’s Cup could have been the perfect opportunity to prepare young blood for future team events, and instead, Furyk went with an older set of picks who aren’t even necessarily playing that well right now. Statistics most likely played a huge role in these decisions, in addition to partner fit. But you can’t ignore recent form, and it appears that Furyk did exactly that. — Gabby Herzig

What to think about the International team

Weir gives his native Canadians love, but maybe not the ones we thought. It would have been impossible for Weir to leave out Lee or Kim — two of his top talents — or Bezuidenhout, who is having a great year, so it essentially left three decisions to make. You could argue Conners is one of the five best international players, so that’s a no-brainer. Same with Pendrith, who has jumped to No. 25 in the world in DataGolf with a career year. It’s the choice of Hughes over potentially better talents in Adam Hadwin and Nick Taylor that’s so tough to make. Both Hadwin and Taylor have struggled mightily the last few months, so I get it, but Taylor is a killer with two big boy wins in the 2024 WM Phoenix Open and the 2023 Canadian Open, until an absolute mess of a summer. That stings. (Leaving off Australian Cam Davis is the right move. His nice win in Detroit was more of an outlier.) — Miller

Advertisement

Weir considered a variety of factors in his captain’s picks. Still, the Canadian home game element and an emphasis on recent form seem to have dominated his decision-making process. Of Weir’s captain’s picks, the three Canadians will relish playing on familiar turf in front of a supportive crowd. Hughes — who came in ranked No. 15 in the International Team standings — was notably left off the squad in 2022. He’s also known to welcome leadership roles, and should be an excellent fit for the team room. Pendrith and Conners got the nod, seemingly over Hadwin and Taylor, who are perhaps the more recognizable and fiery Canadians. The choice indicated that Weir prioritized consistency and recent tournament results. Then you have Kim: He brought some memorable heat to the 2022 matches and was undoubtedly a no-brainer pick for the locker room energy. Plus, Weir specifically mentioned Kim’s putting, which has been shaky as of late, but seems to be improving with a putter switch. Bezuidenhout sneaked into the FedEx top 30 and put together an underrated season, and Lee has emerged as one of the best drivers on the PGA Tour and has cemented himself as an easy fan favorite. Overall, not too many surprises here, besides the Hughes curveball and Davis being skipped over at No. 8 in the standings. Weir’s picks are strong and represent a deliberate, versatile strategy. — Herzig

Required reading

(Top photo: Keyur Khamar / PGA Tour via Getty Images)

Culture

Can You Match the Places These Authors Lived With Settings in Their Books?

Published

on

Can You Match the Places These Authors Lived With Settings in Their Books?

A strong sense of place can deeply influence a story, and in some cases, the setting can even feel like a character itself. This week’s literary geography quiz highlights places where authors were born (or lived) that later became locations in their books. To play, just make your selection in the multiple-choice list and the correct answer will be revealed. At the end of the quiz, you’ll find links to the works if you’d like to do further reading.

Continue Reading

Culture

Book Review: ‘America, U.S.A.,’ by Eddie S. Glaude Jr.

Published

on

Book Review: ‘America, U.S.A.,’ by Eddie S. Glaude Jr.

AMERICA, U.S.A.: How Race Shadows the Nation’s Anniversaries, by Eddie S. Glaude Jr.


For those of us in the national memory-keeping business, anniversaries hold near-totemic power. Satisfyingly round units of time, ideally bearing fancy, Latin-derived names, serve as the overburdened pegs on which to hang think pieces and museum exhibits, revisionist documentaries and maudlin public ceremonies. The arbitrary nature of such occasions is precisely what gives them their charge, inviting us to set aside complacency and submit to a comprehensive check-in.

In his new book, “America, U.S.A.,” Eddie S. Glaude Jr. presents an intriguing variation on the genre, seeing the country’s 250th birthday as an anniversary of anniversaries: 50 years since the malaise-ridden, schlock-heavy Bicentennial. A century since the subdued Prohibition-era Sesquicentennial. A century and a half since telegraphed reports of George Armstrong Custer’s defeat by the Lakota and Cheyenne at Little Bighorn rudely interrupted the Gilded Age Republic’s 100th birthday party.

If an anniversary offers a snapshot of a moment, the core of Glaude’s book is an old-timey photo album, a collection of notable episodes from earlier national reckonings, long-ago glances in the mirror. An estimable scholar of Black history, politics and religion at Princeton — best known for “Begin Again,” his 2020 meditation on James Baldwin’s relevance for our times — Glaude focuses, as his subtitle puts it, on “how race shadows the nation’s anniversaries.”

Such celebrations, he contends, have never really been the moments for honest self-reflection they are often advertised to be. Instead, the nation usually shatters the mirror, refusing to accept what it prefers not to see. “American anniversaries are often moments to turn a blind eye to the evils of the past and the present,” Glaude writes, “to suppress the fact of America’s divided soul.”

Advertisement

It’s a clever concept, and, needless to say, perfectly timed. Last year, Glaude notes, the Trump administration executed a hostile takeover of the government’s studiously bipartisan 250th anniversary planning. It is now preparing a program that is certain to conceal more than it reveals about the country ostensibly being celebrated.

Glaude, in no mood for celebration, argues that such omissions and evasions also defined commemorations in the past. In 1875, Frederick Douglass predicted “one grand Centennial hosannah of peace and good will to all the white race of this country.” He was right: The nation reached 100 years old at a crucial moment in the post-Civil War fight over racial equality, with white Northerners ready to give up on Southern Reconstruction. The occasion would help the once-warring sections to reunite around a shared commitment to white supremacy. On May 10, 1876, at the opening of the Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia, the police tried to bar Douglass from the grandstand, until a white politician vouched for him.

The 150th anniversary came soon after a resurgent Ku Klux Klan successfully pushed for a restrictive immigration law aimed at keeping America a “Nordic” nation. At the lavishly funded, lightly attended celebrations in Philadelphia, Black veterans of World War I were excluded from marching in the opening parade. A writer with The Associated Negro Press wondered “what was in the breast of those black men who fought to make America safe for Democracy and on Monday stood on the sidelines, forgotten, as the Nordic strode by in all his vain pride.”

By 1976, when the nation marked its Bicentennial, the violence of the ’60s had destroyed any semblance of consensus. Vietnam and Watergate had eroded trust in the government. The commission initially tasked with organizing the anniversary was disbanded amid reports of corruption. Corporations filled the vacuum, Glaude explains, with “star-spangled whoopee cushions; patriotic toilet seats; Liberty hamburgers; red, white and blue beer cans.” The author, around 8 years old at the time, dimly remembers donning a pair of tricolor trousers.

A half-century later, Glaude is refreshingly honest about the depths of his despair. “I do not love America, and never have, especially now,” he writes in one of the more startling opening sentences I’ve read in some time. He dismisses this year’s Semiquincentennial as reaching back “to a storybook America that requires either the banishment of Black people from view or the reduction of our role in the country’s history, so as to affirm America’s ongoing quest to be a more perfect union.”

Advertisement

Undoubtedly true. But Trump doesn’t own the country, at least not yet, nor the 250th anniversary of one of the most radically liberatory and confusingly contradictory events in world history — an inspiration, as Glaude shows, even to critical observers of the American experiment, like Douglass. Far from the revanchist MAGA-palooza in Washington, I suspect this summer’s unasked-for invitation to national soul-searching may surprise us yet.

Despite his despair, Glaude concludes that “the past still offers resources for us to freedom-dream.” So, too, does this book.


AMERICA, U.S.A.: How Race Shadows the Nation’s Anniversaries | By Eddie S. Glaude Jr. | Crown | 270 pp. | $31

Continue Reading

Culture

Summer’s Best Beach Reads

Published

on

Summer’s Best Beach Reads

Moore is a dependable ingredient in any summer reading soufflé. Her airy novels accomplish what they came to do: entertain and transport, without the pyrotechnics of, say, books that eschew quotation marks. In “Down With the Shipmans,” three sisters, laden with baggage, converge on their late mother’s beach cottage, only to learn that their father and his much younger wife are planning to sell the place.

The stakes are high, the drama is juicy and the views are sublime. Moore even provides two beach dogs — Leo (an unruly pit bull mix) and Cinnamon (“golden retriever, red bandanna, long pink tongue”) — to keep things lively. (Comes out June 2)

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending