Connect with us

Louisiana

Louisiana House advances prison-reimbursement rates, drunk driving bills

Published

on

Louisiana House advances prison-reimbursement rates, drunk driving bills


play

Advertisement
  • A Louisiana bill to increase the daily reimbursement rate for housing state inmates advanced with bipartisan support.
  • The proposed rate would increase from $26.39 to $29.39 per day, starting in the 2027-28 fiscal year.
  • Lawmakers acknowledge the proposed increase is a step forward but still does not cover the full costs for local facilities.
  • A separate bill also advanced, seeking to impose stricter penalties for repeat DWI offenders.

BATON ROUGE — A bill to raise the daily reimbursement rate for housing state inmates advanced with broad bipartisan support Tuesday, as Louisiana lawmakers seek to ease financial pressure on local correctional facilities while acknowledging the increase still falls short of covering true costs.

The House Appropriations Committee also advanced House Bill 82 by Rep. Debbie Villio, R-Kenner, which seeks to impose stricter penalties on individuals convicted of a third or fourth offense for impaired driving.

Penalties include increasing mandatory minimum sentences and raising fines. A person guilty of a third DWI would spend at least five years in prison, while a fourth offense would result in 12 years with no parole or probation.

House Bill 143, the prison-reimbursement bill authored by Rep. Tony Bacala, R-Prairieville, focuses on increasing the per diem rate paid to local correctional facilities that house state inmates. The bill would increase the rate from $26.39 to $29.39 beginning in Fiscal Year 2027-28 and each year after.

The prison-reimbursement bill moved forward with no opposition, signaling widespread agreement among lawmakers that adjustments are overdue.

Advertisement

The bill carries a fiscal note of approximately $17 million, but Bacala said this would not be entirely new spending. He described the measure as a way to align existing appropriations with statutory requirements, noting that the increase has effectively already been budgeted for Fiscal Year 2026-27.

The discussion around HB 143 centers on the growing role of local correctional facilities, often overseen by parish sheriffs. These facilities have expanded services for inmates in recent years, offering programs such as GED education, technical training and work-release opportunities that allow certain inmates to transition back into the workforce.

Despite these enhancements, reimbursement rates from the state have not kept pace with the rising costs and expanded responsibilities.

Advertisement

Bacala acknowledged that the proposed increase still does not fully meet the needs of local facilities.

“This bill doesn’t even pay them a fair rate. It just pays them a more fair rate,” he said, highlighting that lawmakers see the measure as a step in the right direction rather than a final solution.

Rep. Alonzo Knox, D-New Orleans, voiced support for the proposal, calling it “more than fair,” while also suggesting that additional increases may be considered in the future as budget conditions allow.



Source link

Advertisement

Louisiana

Stephanie Grace: What Louisiana’s Republicans could teach California’s Democrats

Published

on

Stephanie Grace: What Louisiana’s Republicans could teach California’s Democrats


In 2024, California voters went for Kamala Harris over Donald Trump by 20 points. In 2025, they approved a ballot proposition designed to counter Texas Republicans’ audacious, Trump-backed redistricting plan by nearly 30 points.

In 2026, there’s a not-so-far-fetched possibility that the state, one of the nation’s bluest, will replace self-appointed Trump troll Gavin Newsom in the governor’s office with — get this — a Republican.

That the state’s Democrats are increasingly alarmed by this nightmare scenario has nothing to do with shifting political winds, and everything to do with California’s adoption in 2011 of the open primary, the same system long used in Louisiana.

So, as voters here are currently decoding new party primary rules to elect a U.S. senator and a few other top officials, Californians are grappling with one of the quirks of the system that Louisianans know and still love, according to polls: When Republicans, Democrats and everyone else run on one primary ballot, pretty much anything can happen.

Advertisement

In this case, a whole bunch of Democrats signed up, any of whom would be a heavy favorite against any Republican runoff opponent.

But because none of them has caught momentum or taken one for the team and dropped out, polls are showing that two Republicans could claim the top two primary slots, leaving Democratic voters with a deeply unpalatable choice come November.

If any of this sounds familiar to Louisianans, it should. Republicans in our state faced just such a scenario three decades ago.







Stephanie_Grace_--_Hi_res_head_shot

Advertisement

Columnist Stephanie Grace


Louisiana’s Senate seat in 1996 was vacant, courtesy of J. Bennett Johnston’s retirement. At the time, the state was still regularly electing Democrats, but a shift was already underway, and Republicans thought they had a good shot at electing one of their own for the first time since Reconstruction.

But which one?

Four candidates who were considered mainstream conservative signed up: U.S. Rep. Jimmy Hayes, legislator Chuck McMains, New Orleans City Council member Peggy Wilson and businessman Bill Linder. So did former legislator Woody Jenkins, who had a firm base of Christian conservatives but was considered more right-wing than the others, and therefore less electable.

Advertisement

As they struggled to stand out, two Democrats, former state treasurer Mary Landrieu and attorney general Richard Ieyoub, stubbornly held the one-two spots in polls, potentially leaving Republicans shut out.

And there was another complication. Also in the race was Republican David Duke, the former Klansman and legislator who five years earlier made worldwide news by getting into a gubernatorial runoff. As folks in Louisiana politics knew, Duke was a wild card who often got more support on election day than he showed in public polls.

The prospect of an all-Democrat runoff or one pitting a Democrat against Duke was too much for Republican leaders, including the presidential campaign of Bob Dole, who understood that a Duke runoff candidacy would be an embarrassment for the party beyond Louisiana’s borders. And so a group led by then-U.S. Rep. Bob Livingston and his fellow GOP members of the state congressional delegation came up with a plan.

They would pick one of the Republicans, dominate the news cycle by staging a steady rollout of endorsements and signal to GOP voters to fall in line if they wanted a candidate in the runoff. While any one of the more mainstream candidates would have likely been a smarter and more personally appealing choice, Jenkins consistently polled just ahead of them, so he got the nod.

It came awfully close to working.

Advertisement

Jenkins finished first in the primary with 26% to Landrieu’s 22% and Ieyoub’s 20%, followed by Duke at 12%. Nobody else topped 6%. But then in the runoff, he fell 5,788 votes short, suggesting it’s highly likely that a different Republican could have won. Instead, Landrieu served three terms before the state’s gradual shift to the right finally came for her in 2014 — in the person, ironically, of the now-endangered Bill Cassidy.

I called Livingston recently to see if, given this experience, he might have some advice for California Democrats. He declined — “I think they’re crazy,” he said — but did have some thoughts about the Republicans.

“If polls show you’ve got a chance at two Republicans in the runoff, my advice is to stay firm,” he said.

He said he wasn’t happy to see Trump endorse one of them, Steve Hilton, because that might shift enough votes from fellow Republican Chad Bianco to allow a Democrat into the top tier.

“I think that was a mistake,” Livingston said.

Advertisement

Indeed, if the Democrats can’t find a way to choose among their own — and as of now they haven’t — it might well end up being a mistake that saves them come primary day on June 2.

It’s certainly a reminder that Louisiana’s traditional way of voting can be either charming or challenging, but is rarely boring.



Source link

Continue Reading

Louisiana

Louisiana Republicans move to eliminate court office won by exonerated man

Published

on

Louisiana Republicans move to eliminate court office won by exonerated man


A man imprisoned for nearly 30 years before being exonerated won a landmark election in New Orleans promising to fix a judicial system that failed him. Now, Louisiana’s governor, Jeff Landry, and the Republican-controlled state legislature are racing to eliminate his job before he can be sworn in.

Calvin Duncan won 68% of the vote last November to become the Orleans parish clerk of criminal court after pledging to reform the justice system based on his own experience fighting to access court records while in maximum security prison.

Duncan rebuilt his life, in part by running for and winning the clerk’s office. But Louisiana state senate Republicans on Wednesday voted to scrap Duncan’s new job as part of a broader effort to streamline the judiciary in New Orleans, a Democratic hub with a predominantly Black electorate. The state legislature is largely Republican and white – and the deeply red state has been leading efforts to gut the Voting Rights Act.

Duncan’s swearing-in is scheduled for 4 May.

Advertisement

He told the Associated Press he believes he’s being retaliated against by Louisiana officials who have long denied his innocence, even though his name is listed on the National Registry of Exonerations.

Republicans say it isn’t personal and defend the effort as a step toward government efficiency.

“The citizens of New Orleans overwhelmingly said: ‘I want to give this person a chance, he can make a difference,’” Duncan, a Democrat, told lawmakers during a March committee hearing. “What this bill does, it says, ‘Thank you but you wasted your time.’ It disenfranchises everybody.”

The case started with the 1981 murder of 23-year-old David Yeager and landed Duncan in prison for more than 28 years. In 2011, on the eve of a hearing to consider new evidence, prosecutors offered to reduce Duncan’s sentence to time served if he pleaded guilty to manslaughter and armed robbery. Duncan was freed, but he didn’t give up trying to clear his name.

Finally, in 2021, a judge agreed that he had been unjustly convicted and vacated Duncan’s sentence altogether.

Advertisement

As state attorney general in 2023, Landry opposed Duncan’s petition to be compensated for his wrongful conviction. Duncan withdrew the petition after Landry’s successor, Liz Murrill, threatened to go after Duncan’s law license in the state. When Duncan ran for clerk, Murrill vowed to take “further action” against him if he did not stop calling himself “exonerated”.

Landry and Murrill have pointed to Duncan having accepted the 2011 plea deal for manslaughter and armed robbery.

“The attorney general made it clear during the election that if I continued to accurately speak about my innocence and exoneration that I would face consequences from her office,” Duncan told the Associated Press. “We are seeing those consequences today as she and the governor try to undo the will of 68% of voters in New Orleans.”

Murrill said she had “no involvement” in the move to eliminate the office.

Landry told the AP that eliminating Duncan’s elected office was about improving “government efficiency” and “cleaning up a system in [New Orleans] that has been plagued by dysfunction and corruption for years”.

Advertisement

Proponents of consolidating the criminal court clerk with the civil court clerk say the offices are combined in other parishes. Terminating the criminal court clerk position would save the state an estimated $27,300, according to the office of the legislative auditor, which added that the costs of combining clerks’ offices were “unknown”.

The bill’s Republican author, state senator Jay Morris, who represents a district in north Louisiana, acknowledged that once Duncan’s elected position is eliminated, the civil court clerk might struggle to handle the influx of cases. The solution, he says, is to “hire someone”.

Other New Orleans elected judicial officials whose jobs may be eliminated in the future would be allowed to serve out their terms – but not Duncan.

Morris told lawmakers that the goal is to pass the law in time to prevent Duncan from taking office before the start of his four-year term.

The bill, on track to be passed by the GOP-controlled house and approved by Landry, would immediately go into effect with the governor’s signature.

Advertisement

“I have never seen something so barbaric,” state senator Royce Duplessis, a Democrat representing New Orleans, said on the senate floor. “I understand politics and I know you all are going to vote how you are going to vote. But just know, when we are all done here, history has a record.”

Duncan, 62, was the driving force behind a 2020 US supreme court decision that ended non-unanimous jury convictions. He has also founded a non-profit dedicated to expanding incarcerated people’s access to the court system. He has said being elected to the clerk’s office was the culmination of his life’s work.



Source link

Continue Reading

Louisiana

New Louisiana bill aims to protect workers who take time off for organ donation

Published

on

New Louisiana bill aims to protect workers who take time off for organ donation


BATON ROUGE, La. (WAFB) – A new push at the Louisiana State Capitol is aiming to remove a major barrier to organ donation by protecting workers who choose to save a life.

Baton Rouge attorney Andrea Angee is co-leading the effort, drawing from a deeply personal experience that inspired her advocacy.

In 2020, Angee’s mother went into kidney failure. Determined to help, Angee made the decision to donate one of her own kidneys.

“It’s very difficult to articulate… I just wanted my mother to live,” Angee said.

Advertisement

The procedure and recovery kept her out of work for about four weeks. While Angee said she was fortunate to have an employer who supported her during that time, she says many others may not have that same security.

“Nobody should have to make a choice between saving a life or keeping a job, but that’s the reality that we face right now,” she said.

Angee is now advocating for Senate Bill 409, sponsored by Sen. Brach Myers, which would provide job protection along with paid and unpaid leave for people who choose to become living organ donors.

Supporters say the measure could help increase the number of donors by removing financial and employment risks that often discourage people from stepping forward.

According to advocates, about 2,000 people in Louisiana are currently waiting for a transplant.

Advertisement

Angee believes offering job security could encourage more people, especially those hoping to help loved ones, to consider donation.

“There are many people who are willing to consider living donation, especially if it’s a loved one… they want to step up and save their life,” she said. “But the reality is, they have to question whether they’ll have a job to come back to if they don’t have leave protection.”

She says no one should have to pay a price to save someone’s life, especially when so many are still waiting.

“The moment is now to do it,” Angee said.

You can read the entire bill here.

Advertisement

Click here to report a typo. Please include the headline.

Click here to subscribe to our WAFB 9 News daily digest and breaking news alerts delivered straight to your email inbox.

Watch the latest WAFB news and weather now.

Copyright 2026 WAFB. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending