Connect with us

Louisiana

Divided states of America: From Oregon to Louisiana, campaigns for secession are taking place at local and state levels – and some are succeeding

Published

on

Divided states of America: From Oregon to Louisiana, campaigns for secession are taking place at local and state levels – and some are succeeding


In an increasingly divided United States of America, a radical solution to resolve fraught political differences is gaining momentum: secession.

Be it the campaign for Texas to quit the US and form its own republic or efforts by red counties in Oregon to join Idaho, movements are gaining support at both local and state levels.

In nearly every case, the campaigns have been formed in conservative areas by voters eager to break away from the progressive leaders who govern them.

Some are a pipe dream. Texas is unlikely to depart the union any time soon, despite the optimism of those leading its ‘Texit’ independence campaign.

Advertisement

But several localized efforts have succeeded – or gained enough support to be taken seriously.

DailyMail.com recently reported that voters in thirteen counties of eastern Oregon now support secession from the state to join Idaho by redrawing state lines.

More than 2,000 miles away in Louisiana, the new city of St George was recently incorporated after wealthy residents controversially voted to separate from Baton Rouge over claims of crime issues and a poor education system.

Here, DailyMail.com explains some of the most prominent and longstanding secession campaigns in the country. 

East Oregon

Travel 200 miles south east of Oregon’s uber-progressive capital, Portland, and you’ll reach Crook County, a picturesque and sparsely populated region where agriculture and livestock drive the local economy.

Advertisement

The way of life is vastly different from that of Portland’s metropolis, which has been blighted in recent years by crime, drug use and homelessness. 

Earlier in May, Crook County became the 13th county in eastern Oregon to formally support starting the process of redrawing the state’s border to create a Greater Idaho. 

More than a dozen fed-up liberal counties in eastern Oregon have voted in support of measures to start negotiations to secede from the state and join conservative Idaho

More than a dozen fed-up liberal counties in eastern Oregon have voted in support of measures to start negotiations to secede from the state and join conservative Idaho 

Crook County became the 13th to approve the Greater Idaho Measure following a vote

Crook County became the 13th to approve the Greater Idaho Measure following a vote 

Supporters say they’re disillusioned by the state’s Democratic leaders, whose efforts to decriminalize drugs and defund police have backfired spectacularly. They want their counties to be absorbed into a ‘Greater Idaho’, essentially joining the neighboring state which is overwhelmingly Republican.

‘The Oregon/Idaho line was established 163 years ago and is now outdated,’ according to the movement. ‘It makes no sense in its current location because it doesn’t match the location of the cultural divide in Oregon.

‘We want an economy that is not held back by Oregon regulations and taxes, including environmental regulations.

Advertisement

‘We’ll still have federal and Idaho regulations, and that’s plenty. Idaho knows how to respect rural counties and their livelihoods.’

The recent vote by Cook County is largely symbolic but indicates majority support in eastern Idaho to open negotiations for the Greater Idaho project.

Campaigners say their wishes can no longer be ignored.

St George, Louisiana

St George became Louisiana’s newest incorporated city in April after a years-long fight which started as a campaign to create a new school district.

The predominantly white, wealthy area has seceded from Baton Rouge, Louisiana’s capital.

Advertisement

The seismic – and highly controversial – victory means St George residents are no longer Baton Rouge taxpayers and will take control of many public services. 

Supporters of the new city claimed that Baton Rouge’s city-parish government is poorly run, with high crime rates and bad schools. 

Opponents labeled their campaign ‘racist’ and said it creates a ‘white enclave’. St George’s population is around 70 percent white, while an estimated 52.4 percent of Baton Rouge are black and African American. Supporters vehemently deny that race is a factor.

The predominantly white, wealthy area of St George has seceded from Baton Rouge, Louisiana's capital

The predominantly white, wealthy area of St George has seceded from Baton Rouge, Louisiana’s capital

The campaign initially started as an attempt to create a new school district for St George. It later became a bolder effort to create the new city. 

In April, after years of legal wrangling, the Louisiana Supreme Court ruled the City of St George could be incorporated, separating it from Baton Rouge.

Advertisement

Their success has given hope to other similar localized campaigns – but also highlights the political and economic consequences of such a radical move.

A 2014 study by the Baton Rouge Area Chamber found that the effects of the partition would be economically devastating for the remainder of Baton Rouge, immediately creating a $53 million budget shortfall.

Texas

The ‘Texit’ movement to withdraw Texas from the United States and form an independent sovereign state has simmered for decades.

Advocates for this radical campaign claim it has been boosted in recent years by broader political divisions in America – not least surrounding the migrant crisis.

But unlike other secession campaigns at a local or state level, breaking away from the United States entirely could prove impossible. Many scholars argue that the constitution does not allow any state to quit the union.

Advertisement

Polling has found growing support in recent years for an independent Texas. 

In 2009, a Rasmussen Reports survey found only 18 percent of people supported secession. A separate poll by Redfield & Wilton Strategies in February 2024 found the total had increased to 33 percent.

Texas independence gained traction after the federal U.S. Border Patrol cut down razor wire along the Texas-Mexico border, only for the state to erect new fencing in defiance

Texas independence gained traction after the federal U.S. Border Patrol cut down razor wire along the Texas-Mexico border, only for the state to erect new fencing in defiance

The leader of the Texas Nationalist Movement (TNM), Daniel Miller, told DailyMail.com in February that political tensions at the border with Mexico ‘highlighted the broken relationship’ between Austin and Washington, D.C.

His comments came amid a stand off between Texas Governor Greg Abbott and President Joe Biden over security measures at the Mexico border.

Miller also made the ambitious claim that independence could be achieved in three decades. His campaign points out that out that Texas has the 8th largest economy in the world, valued at more than $2.4trillion by the IMF, and was a net contributor to the U.S. economy

Advertisement

But experts say it’s unrealistic to expect that Texas could simply withdraw from the US and maintain its economic power.

Joshua Blank, research director of the Texas Politics Project, said supporters of secession didn’t like to think of the downsides, like how federal dollars that paid for public education, transportation, or border security would be replaced.

‘Essentially, the belief is that you can have the same government you have now, but just remove the relationship to the federal government and stop paying federal taxes, and just live in Texas,’ Blank said. ‘That’s just an impossibility.’

Lost Creek, Texas

Secession campaigns in Texas aren’t confined to the statewide attempt to leave the union.

Earlier this month, the wealthy Austin neighborhood of Lost Creek voted to leave the city in response to issues with crime and public services.

Advertisement

Lost Creek was forcibly annexed by Austin in 2015. The controversial measure, which also included the annexation of several other neighborhoods, meant residents became city taxpayers.

But on May 4, Lost Creek and two other areas voted to disannex, which removes them from the city limits and overhauls their taxation and the delivery of certain public services including policing.

Lost Creek, a rich enclave in the west side of Austin, voted with a whooping 91 percent to break away from Austin during a May 4 election

Lost Creek, a rich enclave in the west side of Austin, voted with a whooping 91 percent to break away from Austin during a May 4 election 

Like St George in Louisiana, Lost Creek is a wealthy area which has separated from a city where average incomes are lower and the demographics are more diverse.

‘What an FU to the Mayor and Council of Austin,’ tweeted local retired judge and attorney Bill Aleshire on election night.

Following the vote, Lost Creek’s law enforcement and fire response will now be handled by Travis County. Some public services will still be managed by the city. 

Advertisement

Austin is understaffed by 483 officers after the former mayor and city council went to war with the police in 2020, slashing the department’s budget by a third.

‘We are our own little community, and I think that’s how we should be treated,’ said Lost Creek resident Rachel Cole.

‘State of Jefferson’

The movement spanning swathes of Northern California and southern Oregon to create a ‘State of Jefferson’ epitomizes the view in many rural communities that they are neglected – and misunderstood – by elected leaders in urban capitals.

Efforts to create a State of Jefferson date back to the late 19th, making it one of the oldest secession campaigns of its kind in America.

Today, the movement involves rural, majority conservative areas in Northern California and southern Oregon seeking to create their own state free from their currently liberal-minded leaders.

Advertisement

Like attempts to remove Texas from the US, the likelihood a state of Jefferson will ever be created is tiny – but that has not dampened the efforts of some campaigners.

As recently as 2017, a lawsuit was filed aiming to enlarge California’s legislature, arguing that the senate and assembly were too small for a state of 40 million people. The lawsuit, which gained national attention but was unsuccessful, was intended to force lawmakers into looking at splitting the state.

A year earlier during the 2016 presidential election, California counties inside the proposed state of Jefferson voted overwhelmingly in favor of Donald Trump, while the rest of the state supported Hilary Clinton. The difference was touted by State of Jefferson supporters further credibility for their campaign.

The State of Jefferson already has its own seal which consists of two Xs which represent a ‘double cross’. The seal is intended to illustrate the regions inside the proposed state have been left behind by California and Oregon’s leaders.

Buckhead, Georgia

The campaign to split Buckhead from the city of Atlanta has echoes of the secession efforts in St George and Lost Creek.

Advertisement

Buckhead is an affluent area at the heart of Atlanta’s economy and has more conservative and white residents than many other parts of the city.

Efforts to separate Buckhead from Atlanta date to around 2008 but were delivered a catastrophic blow in March last year when Georgia lawmakers – including several Republicans – voted to reject the movement.

Supporters of secession argued that Buckhead should be a city in its own right because it is responsible for 40 percent of Atlanta’s tax revenues, despite making up less than one fifth of its population.

Bill White, former CEO of the Buckhead Exploratory Committee which campaigned to split the area from Atlanta. White quit the campaign after the idea was rejected by lawmakers

Bill White, former CEO of the Buckhead Exploratory Committee which campaigned to split the area from Atlanta. White quit the campaign after the idea was rejected by lawmakers

Buckhead is an affluent area at the heart of Atlanta's economy and has more conservative and white residents than many other parts of the city

Buckhead is an affluent area at the heart of Atlanta’s economy and has more conservative and white residents than many other parts of the city

They argued that should give them control over their own public services – particularly the police force.

But their arguments also worked against them. Allowing Buckhead to become its own city would be devastating for Atlanta due to the loss of its main commercial area and the tax revenues which come with it.

Advertisement

There was also fierce criticism of an attempt to essentially allow a richer, majority-white neighborhood to divorce itself from the poorer, mostly black city at the heart of the Deep South’s largest urban area.

‘If we jerk the heart out of the city of Atlanta, which is Buckhead, I know our capital city will die,’ said Georgia Senator Frank Ginn, a Danielsville Republican, last year.

Weld County, Colorado

Weld County in the far north of Colorado is touted as one of the richest agricultural areas east of the Rocky Mountains, leading the state’s production of cattle and grain.

But some residents there think state’s Democratic leaders take their contributions for granted.

In the words of one: ‘The state of Colorado is at war with three major economic drivers for Weld County: small businesses, agriculture, and oil and gas.’

Advertisement

That sentiment is a driver behind the ambitious campaign to separate Weld County, which has voted Republican in every presidential election since 1968, from Colorado and join Wyoming to the north.

All states have at least some support for secession from the country, according to a recent poll

All states have at least some support for secession from the country, according to a recent poll 

Leaders of the campaign have registered a political committee named ‘Weld County Wyoming’ to try and get a referendum on the idea.

But the efforts have come up against fierce opposition, even within the county itself. 

Tommy Butler, a councilmember in Weld County’s most populous city, Greeley, said: ‘I absolutely love living in Colorado. For those that don’t love living here, there are certainly less ridiculous ways of moving to Wyoming.’



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Louisiana

Should it be easier to send teens to adult prison? Louisiana voters will decide. • Louisiana Illuminator

Published

on

Should it be easier to send teens to adult prison? Louisiana voters will decide. • Louisiana Illuminator


Louisiana voters will decide whether to make it easier to send younger teenagers to adult prisons in a constitutional proposal next spring.

The Louisiana Legislature approved Senate Bill 2 Friday with a 70-25 vote in the House of Representatives and 28-10 vote in the Senate. The measure will be on the March 29 ballot that will also feature a major rewrite of state financial policy

It would remove constitutional limits on crimes that can get people under age 17 sentenced as adults. Legislators would then have to enact new laws outlining how courts could send those minors to adult facilities. 

Republican Gov. Jeff Landry backed the proposal and sat in the Louisiana House of Representatives as legislators debated and voted for the bill Friday. Still, it barely made it through the legislative process. The proposal only received 70 votes in the House, the exact number it needed to advance to voters. 

Advertisement

Ahead of the narrow victory, Republican leaders appeared anxious to get through the House vote quickly and moved to cut off debate and questioning early. House Speaker Phillip DeVillier, R-Eunice, also told Rep. Denise Marcelle, D-Baton Rouge, she had missed a deadline to amend the legislation and refused to let her bring up her proposed change for debate or a vote. 

One of the sponsors of the legislation, Rep. Debbie Villio, R-Kenner, also made a last-minute change to the bill to limit the offenses for which youth could be moved to adult prisons to just felonies, in part to address reservations lawmakers had about moving more young people into adult facilities. Prior to that change, the amendment would have allowed the Legislature to draft new laws to move minors to adult prisons for “any crime.” 

Fifteen- and 16-year-olds, and in more restricted circumstances 14-year-olds, already face adult prison sentences for limited crimes without the constitutional amendment. Those offenses include murder, attempted murder, manslaughter, rape, armed robbery, kidnapping, aggravated battery, a second or subsequent burglary of an inhabited dwelling and a second or subsequent violation of some drug crimes.

Youth advocates have said the broadening of that list to new offenses would do lasting harm to young teens caught up in the criminal justice system.

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

Advertisement



Teenagers transferred into adult prisons are at much higher risk for sexual abuse from other inmates and don’t receive the same counseling and educational services available in the juvenile system. Adult sentences are also often years or even decades longer than what youth in juvenile facilities serve, advocates said. 

Supporters of the constitutional amendment, which include the Louisiana District Attorneys Association and Louisiana Sheriffs’ Association, have said prosecutors need a larger list of crimes in order to hold younger teens accountable.

Advertisement

Villio and Sen. Heather Cloud, R-Turkey Creek, the sponsors of the legislation, mentioned a few crimes they think should be added to the list.

Cloud said she would like to make the law applicable to carjacking, drive-by shootings and human trafficking. Villio said she was interested in adding fentanyl offenses. 

Attorneys who represent youth in criminal matters said many of those offenses can be used to transfer teenagers to adult prison under current law. 

They also questioned why human trafficking was being brought up as a concern because prosecutors rarely charge adults with that crime. Any teens accused of the offense are also likely being trafficked themselves, advocates said. 

In an interview Friday, Villio said her intention is to get more crimes that “involve serious bodily injury” added to the list. Youth in the juvenile justice system who attack security guards and other workers at those facilities should receive harsher punishment, she added.

Villio’s proposal comes on the heels of another law that greatly expands the transfer of teens to adult facilities. Earlier this year, Landry and lawmakers passed legislation that treats all 17-year-olds as adults in the criminal justice system. The measure took away discretion from district attorneys to put accused 17-year-olds through the juvenile justice system instead of adult courts.

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Louisiana

Louisiana High School Football Scores – Second round of the Playoffs

Published

on

Louisiana High School Football Scores – Second round of the Playoffs


Here are the high school football scores from the second round of the Playoffs for the state of Louisiana:

Non-Select=

Division I=

Advertisement

Airline 42, Westgate 16

Destrehan 63, Shreveport Northwood 21

Neville 44, Covington 13

Ruston 42, Zachary 21

Southside 47, Walker 0

Advertisement

West Monroe 20, Mandeville 9

Division II=

Franklin Parish 35, Brusly 14

Franklinton 42, West Feliciana 21

Iowa 24, Wossman 8

Advertisement

Lakeshore 17, Iota 10

North DeSoto 38, Belle Chasse 14

Opelousas 30, Jennings 19

Division III=

Jena 56, Port Allen 20

Advertisement

Kinder 28, Westlake 12

Oak Grove 62, Mansfield 14

Pine 21, Kaplan 6

St. James 48, Donaldsonville 6

Sterlington 49, Lakeside 18

Advertisement

Union Parish 42, Red River 8

Division IV=

Franklin 22, DeQuincy 19

General Trass (Lake Providence) 38, North Iberville 6

Haynesville 61, Montgomery 0

Advertisement

Jeanerette 46, Grand Lake 24

Logansport 49, Elton 12

Mangham 44, West St. John 6

South Plaquemines 21, East Feliciana 6

Select=

Advertisement

Division I=

Alexandria 49, Evangel Christian Academy 6

Baton Rouge Catholic 42, East Jefferson 0

C.E. Byrd 37, Saint Paul’s 15

John Curtis Christian 28, Acadiana 27

Advertisement

Karr 56, Huntington 6

Division II=

E.D. White 51, Livingston Collegiate Academy 14

Leesville 42, Loyola Prep 24

Madison Prep 34, St. Charles Catholic 20

Advertisement

Shaw 49, Loranger 14

Vandebilt Catholic 49, Hannan 9

Division III=

Baton Rouge Episcopal 24, Pope John Paul 7

Bunkie 39, Amite 14

Advertisement

Calvary Baptist Academy 38, De La Salle 0

Dunham 42, Parkview Baptist 0

Lafayette Christian Academy 35, NDHS 28

New Iberia Catholic 59, Northlake Christian 22

Newman 49, D’Arbonne Woods 19

Advertisement

Sumner 48, Slaughter 28

Division IV=

Ascension Catholic 58, Opelousas Catholic 13

Covenant Christian Academy 41, Central Catholic 13

Kentwood 42, Ascension Episcopal 16

Advertisement

Ouachita Christian 28, Pointe Coupee Catholic 6

Riverside Academy 49, Hamilton Christian Academy 6

St. Edmund Catholic 78, St. Martin’s 37

Vermilion Catholic 47, Westminster Christian 17



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Louisiana

Will Sutton: Focus on Louisiana “tax reform” while lawmakers aim to jail 14-year-olds

Published

on

Will Sutton: Focus on Louisiana “tax reform” while lawmakers aim to jail 14-year-olds


If things go according to conservative lawmakers’ plan, Louisiana children will be tried as adults and sent to adult prisons more often in the future, because the Legislature could increase the number of crimes for which minors can be prosecuted as adults. 

Oh, you thought Gov. Jeff Landry’s third special legislative session was all about tax reform?

You’re not wrong. Taxation is the main focus. But it’s not the only agenda item.

Even as lawmakers see crime decline across Louisiana, many still preach the myth that sending more children to adult facilities makes us all safer. It allows them to campaign on “lock ’em up” and “tough on crime” platforms.

Advertisement

State Sens. Heather Cloud, R-Turkey Creek, and Jay Morris, R-West Monroe, and state Rep. Debbie Villio, R-Kenner, quietly secured legislative approval of a proposed constitutional amendment toward that end in the just-ended special session. They were able to do it because most Louisianans remained focused on Gov. Jeff Landry’s efforts to reduce personal income taxes on the rich while raising Louisiana’s combined sales tax rate to the highest in the nation.

All the noise about tax reform provided the perfect cover for Cloud, Morris and Villio to find new ways to punish our youth. Their Senate Bill 2 glided through the legislative process without so much as a minor headwind.

Truth be told, Landry was right to call his third special session this year to push his tax reform ideas.

For far too long we haven’t had serious legislative debates about how best to raise Louisiana from near the bottom among states where businesses want to relocate and bring good jobs. The problem with focusing solely on tax reform is that businesses consider more than just taxation when they locate or expand. They also consider housing quality, employee-friendly laws and practices, quality K-12 and higher education, public safety and other quality-of-life factors.

Fortunately, overall crime has been declining in Louisiana.

Advertisement

That apparently means little to politicians who want to make crime more than a party-line talking point. Some simply want to put more people, especially minors, behind bars. The proposed constitutional amendment, if approved by voters, would allow lawmakers to treat 14-, 15- and 16-year-olds as adults without asking citizens if that’s what they want.

Our state constitution already allows lawmakers to authorize — by a two-thirds vote in each chamber — special juvenile procedures for minors charged with specific offenses:

  • First- or second-degree murder
  • Manslaughter
  • Aggravated rape
  • Armed robbery
  • Aggravated burglary
  • Aggravated kidnapping
  • Attempted first-degree murder
  • Attempted second-degree murder
  • Forcible rape
  • Simple rape
  • Second-degree kidnapping.
  • A second or subsequent aggravated battery
  • A second or subsequent aggravated burglary
  • A second or subsequent offense of burglary of an inhabited dwelling
  • A second or subsequent felony-grade violation of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Law or prohibited transactions in drug-related objects, involving the manufacture, distribution, or possession with intent to distribute controlled dangerous substances.

If approved by voters, SB2’s proposed constitutional amendment would eliminate that list and let lawmakers alone — by a two-thirds vote, without voters’ consent — decide which crimes should be “adult” offenses for minors

Imagine the Legislature deciding that a 14-year-old should be tried as an adult because he stole from a store or got into a fight at school. SB2 proponents say some children can’t be rehabilitated. Sigh.

Fortunately, voters will get to decide whether such scared-straight tactics make sense — or will actually attract more businesses to Louisiana. Do SB2’s sponsors really think businesses will come here because we incarcerate more youth? Shouldn’t we instead promote early childhood education and care, healthy living and higher literacy rates?

The governor, the Louisiana District Attorneys Association and the Louisiana Sheriffs Association have endorsed SB2. But not everyone agrees with them. 

Advertisement

“Senate Bill 2 is unnecessary and has the potential to end juvenile justice in Louisiana,” Laramie Griffin, founder of Evolve Louisiana, shared with me. “This bill does nothing to improve public safety.” Griffin added that the bill has an “invisible list,” meaning lawmakers could “add whichever law they choose without public vote.”

The proposed amendment will appear on the next statewide ballot, likely in March. A “yes” vote would let lawmakers decide which crimes committed by minors can land them behind bars with adult criminals. A “no” vote would keep the current list and rule in the constitution.

Let’s not wait to get through the holidays, the new year and Carnival to focus on what this means.

Now is the time to launch a “Vote No!” campaign.

Let’s tell the world that we can be business-friendly, socially responsible and compassionate toward children who make mistakes.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending