In recent months, Georgian officials have signaled a desire to improve ties with the Trump administration. Members of the Georgian Dream government have pointed to renewed diplomatic contacts and commercially driven initiatives—including plans for a 70-story Trump Tower Tbilisi—as signs that relations with Washington may be improving after several years of tension.

But as Georgian Dream works to repair relations with the United States, they have expanded ties with counterparts in China, including through a 2023 strategic partnership; they have pursued closer engagement with the Iranian regime, including via high-level Georgian attendance at Iranian state ceremonies, and have been implicated in Iranian sanctions evasion schemes; and they have also faced growing scrutiny over the government’s role in sanctions evasion linked to Russian authorities. At home, Georgian Dream has launched a sweeping crackdown on dissent prompted by the approval of repressive laws and a 2024 decision suspending European Union (EU) negotiations that spurned citizens’ overwhelming support for European integration and closer ties with democratic partners. Georgian Dream has also sought to reframe Euro-Atlantic integration as a source of instability and conflict rather than a guarantor of Georgia’s long-term security and prosperity. Journalists, political opponents, students, artists, and ordinary citizens have been imprisoned, and authorities have passed laws aimed at curbing free expression. The US State Department noted that parliamentary elections that had preceded the EU decision were marred by vote buying and voter intimidation. Georgia is rated Partly Free in Freedom House’s Freedom in the World; its score fell to 51 in the 2026 edition, having lost 7 points in the past two years alone.

It is in the United States’ strategic interest to prevent Georgia from drifting further toward US adversaries. Washington should want to keep Georgia anchored in the democratic, Euro-Atlantic community because Georgia’s trajectory will shape the balance of influence between democratic and authoritarian powers in a strategically important region. But that does not mean the United States should normalize relations on Georgian Dream’s terms. The Trump administration should instead treat the release of Georgia’s political prisoners as a clear first test of whether Georgian Dream is truly prepared to make deals that can improve relations with the United States.

Imprisoned for speaking out

The Trump administration has already demonstrated that sustained pressure and high-level diplomacy can secure the release of political prisoners. Notably, under Special Envoy John Coale’s efforts, hundreds of detainees have been released from Belarus’s prisons in recent months. Georgia’s political prisoners deserve similar attention.

Some of the most emblematic cases of political imprisonment illustrate the breadth of Georgian Dream’s crackdown. Journalist Mzia Amaglobeli, founder of the independent outlets Batumelebi and Netgazeti, is one of the country’s most internationally recognized detainees. The two outlets were known among other things for exposing ruling-party violations in 2024 elections, and her detention since January 2025 on disproportionate charges signals to Georgia’s journalists that reporting the facts carries serious risk.

Zviad Tsetskhladze, a young activist associated with pro-European demonstrations that erupted after EU negotiations were suspended, was arrested while protesting in December 2024; he remains in prison in Tbilisi and has emerged as a symbol of the government’s repression of student and youth activism. The crackdown has also extended beyond traditional political actors. Andro Chichinadze, a well-known Georgian actor, and Paata Burchuladze, an internationally recognized opera singer who often sang at demonstrations, have both been imprisoned for protest activities amid the widening crackdown. Opposition figures including Giorgi Vashadze, Zurab Japaridze, Nika Melia, and Elene Khoshtaria—an opposition politician and mother of four—have also faced detention or prosecution.

These cases reflect a broader pattern in which state institutions, including the judiciary and prosecutorial system, are increasingly being used to raise the cost of dissent and weaken Georgia’s democratic opposition. Independent monitoring organizations have documented systemic judicial bias, excessive use of pretrial detention, and politically motivated prosecutions tied to peaceful protest activity. Within a few years, politically motivated detention has skyrocketed. Compared to just a few isolated cases before 2024 there are now 113 individuals deprived of liberty in cases widely regarded as politically motivated, according to Georgian human rights defenders; 58 are currently serving their sentences, and an additional 55 are in pretrial detention.

A path toward freedom

The Trump administration’s National Security Strategy provides a clear basis for making political prisoner releases central to any reset. It affirms that Americans’ “rights of free speech, freedom of religion and of conscience, and the right to choose and steer our common government are core rights that must never be infringed,” and adds that the United States will press countries that “share, or say they share,” those principles to uphold them “in letter and spirit.” The Georgian government claims to share those principles, but its treatment of political prisoners is the clearest test of whether that claim has meaning.

The United States should not normalize repression in Georgia simply because Georgian Dream has decided to seek warmer relations with Washington through diplomatic outreach and business deals. If the ruling party wants closer ties with the United States, Washington should demand concrete steps to reverse democratic backsliding—including restoring political pluralism, protecting civil society and independent media, and ensuring free and fair elections—in return for deeper engagement. These reforms are essential to keeping Georgia anchored in the Euro-Atlantic community and preventing further drift toward authoritarian powers whose interests run counter to free societies. The release of political prisoners should be treated as the minimum benchmark—not the final one.

So long as Georgian Dream continues to crack down on its own citizens, weaken democratic institutions, and deepen ties with US adversaries, the United States and its democratic partners should continue imposing costs on those responsible. That includes sustained sanctions, visa bans, and targeted measures against Georgian Dream officials, judges, prosecutors, and enablers implicated in democratic backsliding and politically motivated repression.

The Georgian public remains overwhelmingly supportive of democracy and Euro-Atlantic integration. US policy should reflect solidarity with those aspirations—not acceptance of the government’s accelerating authoritarian trajectory.

ATLANTA — A north Georgia congressman is calling for the impeachment of an Atlanta federal judge after a judicial investigation found she engaged in on-the-job sexual misconduct and lied to investigators about it.

U.S. Rep. Clay Fuller, whose district covers much of northwest Georgia, joined fellow Georgia Republican Rep. Andrew Clyde in filing impeachment resolutions against U.S. District Judge Eleanor Ross.

Clyde wrote on social media that Ross’ “deeply disturbing actions prove she is incapable of displaying integrity or impartiality. She must be impeached and removed from the bench.”

The resolutions come months after Ross was privately disciplined following an investigation into allegations involving a high-ranking police officer and workplace misconduct.

The investigation began after a law clerk reported that Ross had engaged in sexual activity with a uniformed police officer inside her chambers while staff members were nearby, according to findings released through the federal judiciary’s disciplinary process.

The investigation also looked into allegations that Ross improperly supervised clerks and mistreated staff.

A special committee appointed to investigate found evidence supporting claims that Ross had an extramarital sexual relationship with the officer, attended a partisan political event and initially denied the allegations when questioned by Chief Judge William Pryor of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Ross later acknowledged the relationship, according to the committee’s findings.

The committee also reviewed security footage and visitor logs showing a police officer frequently visited the judge’s chambers during lunch hours.

Multiple law clerks reported seeing someone matching the officer’s description, and some told investigators they overheard what they believed was sexual activity.

The committee did not find evidence supporting allegations of abusive behavior toward staff, though clerks described what investigators called an “eggshell culture.”

Ross received a private reprimand as a result of the investigation.

A person who answered the phone in Ross’ chambers told The Associated Press the judge had no comment.

The House Judiciary Committee would decide whether to move forward with any impeachment proceedings.

Federal judges serve lifetime appointments and can only be removed through impeachment.

Ross was nominated to the federal bench in 2014 by then-President Barack Obama and confirmed by the U.S. Senate later that year.

Separately, the Atlanta Police Department has said it is investigating whether the officer identified in the judicial findings is one of its employees.

Depend on us to keep you posted.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Republican gubernatorial candidate Rick Jackson is facing renewed scrutiny over his stance on Georgia’s abortion law, as audio recordings obtained by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and HuffPost surface amid heightened attention to the law’s real-world consequences — including the death of Amber Thurman, a Georgia woman whose delayed abortion care made national headlines, as reported by CBS News.

Jackson is pushing back against those reports about comments he made regarding abortion restrictions in Georgia, saying recent coverage mischaracterized his position on the state’s abortion law.

According to the recordings, Jackson expressed support for further restrictions beyond Georgia’s current six-week abortion law and discussed potential enforcement measures aimed at doctors who violate state abortion regulations.

Georgia currently prohibits most abortions after cardiac activity can be detected, typically around six weeks into a pregnancy. The law includes exceptions for rape and incest when certain reporting requirements are met, as well as exceptions involving medical emergencies and fetal abnormalities.

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that during an April campaign stop in east Georgia, Jackson was asked about enforcing the state’s abortion law and whether doctors could manipulate records to avoid liability.

“What do you think you could do as governor to go after doctors who just do something like that?” one attendee asked, according to audio.

“Well, you basically make it against the law, No. 1,” Jackson responded. “No. 2, they have to have evidence to prove in order to not have liability themselves.”

Later in the conversation, the attendee raised concerns about the law’s rape exception and argued that women seeking abortions under that provision should have to prove they were raped.

According to both the AJC and HuffPost, Jackson responded that a pregnancy resulting from rape is “still a life” and appeared to agree with the attendee’s comments about proving rape claims.

The comments have drawn attention because Georgia’s current law – called the LIFE Act-  already requires documentation in cases involving rape or incest.

In a statement to CBS News Atlanta, Jackson’s campaign said reports suggesting he supports removing those exceptions are inaccurate.

“That’s an incorrect framing based on ‘Democratic spin,’” the campaign said. “Rick strongly supports Georgia’s current Heartbeat law and will defend it as governor.”

“As the AJC reported today, the current law allows an abortion up to 20 weeks of pregnancy in cases in which an official police report has been filed alleging the offense of rape or incest,” the statement said. “Rick believes we have a strong pro-life law in place and he wants to keep it as it is.”

The campaign pointed to a questionnaire completed for Georgia Life Alliance, saying both Jackson and his Republican runoff opponent, Lt. Gov. Burt Jones, expressed support for the law’s existing exceptions for rape, incest and the life of the mother.

Jones has also voiced support for broader abortion restrictions and has aligned himself with anti-abortion groups during his political career.

Abortion remains one of the most closely watched issues in Georgia politics following the state’s six-week abortion law, which has faced multiple legal challenges since Thurman’s death and the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision overturning Roe v. Wade.

Jackson’s comments and his campaign’s response come as voters prepare to decide between him and Jones in the Republican runoff for governor on June 16.