Connect with us

Florida

Not Just Florida. How “Don’t Say Gay” Legislation Compares In Other States.

Published

on


Florida has attracted appreciable consideration for its “Parental Rights in Schooling” regulation. It’s not a brand new legislative notion; for instance, a present political candidate in New Hampshire twelve years in the past was pushing laws to bar “pro-gay” curriculum from the classroom. However at the moment these gag legal guidelines have swept throughout the nation, with related laws is showing in at the very least a dozen different states. Every invoice has its personal explicit language; how does the laws evaluate? Let’s think about how a number of states are approaching the problem.

Florida’s regulation consists of this language:

Advertisement

Classroom instruction by college personnel or third events on sexual orientation or gender id could not happen in kindergarten via grade 3 or in a way that isn’t age-appropriate or developmentally applicable for college kids in accordance with state requirements.

That signifies that the invoice doesn’t technically goal LGBTQ content material, although it raises questions on what it might prohibit. In spite of everything, heterosexuality is a sexual orientation, and “boy” and “woman” are gender identities.

Alabama

HB 322 began out as a rest room invoice (Sponsor Rep. Scott Stadthagen stated, “Nearly each college district on this state is coping with this concern with reverse genders wanting to make use of reverse loos. I discover this to be a security concern. It’s for cover of our college students.”) It was amended to incorporate language declaring that anybody educating in grades Ok-5 “shall not interact in classroom dialogue or present classroom instruction relating to sexual orientation or gender id” that isn’t “age applicable or developmentally applicable.” On this regulation, “interact” is an issue phrase, suggesting that even when college students convey the subjects up, lecturers ought to refuse to proceed the dialogue.

Advertisement

Georgia

Georgia’s SB 613 seems useless for this 12 months, but it surely’s nonetheless price noting. Its language forbids faculties to “promote, compel or encourage classroom of sexual orientation or gender id in major grade ranges,” however the invoice is exclusive in that it sought to increase these prohibitions to any personal or personal faculties that obtain state cash. Latest voucher payments, just like the one which struggled within the Georgia legislature this 12 months, sometimes embrace a non-interference requirement to ensure that authorities cash doesn’t include authorities strings; SB 613 runs instantly counter to that.

Indiana

An Indiana anti-CRT invoice consists of this clause.

A scholar enrolled at a state academic establishment shall not be required to interact in any type of obligatory gender or sexual range coaching or counseling.

Advertisement

A number of states observe this explicit template.

Iowa.

SF 2024 bans any “instruction referring to gender id” from kindergarten courses. In grades 1 via 6, such instruction could solely be supplied with parental consent. Iowa defines “gender id” as “a gender-related id of an individual, whatever the particular person’s assigned intercourse at beginning.”

Kentucky

One other anti-CRT invoice with a sexual range coaching provision

Advertisement

No scholar enrolled at a public postsecondary training establishment shall be required to interact in any type of obligatory gender or sexual range coaching or counseling.

Louisiana

Louisiana is contemplating a invoice that’s brief and sweeping. No trainer or presenter could “cowl” the subjects of gender id or sexual orientation “in any classroom dialogue or instruction” in grade Ok-8. Moreover, no trainer, college worker, or presenter “shall talk about his personal sexual orientation or gender id with college students” in grades Ok-12.

An modification clarifies that “class dialogue” means dialogue held in the course of the time between the start and finish of sophistication, however past the curious selection of “his,” the invoice raises many questions. Ought to lecturers by no means point out something about their household life? Would household pictures be forbidden on Louisiana trainer desks? And what precisely does it imply to “cowl” a subject? A trainer whose lesson plan stated she was going to “cowl” a subject can be justly criticized by a supervisor for vagueness.

Missouri

Advertisement

Missouri’s ant-CRT invoice consists of the range coaching clause, this time for all public college college students.

No pupil in any public college shall be required to interact in any type of obligatory gender or sexual range coaching or counseling.

Ohio

HB 616 addresses anti-CRT issues and follows Florida in prohibiting “any curriculum or educational supplies on [sic] sexual orientation or gender id.” It goes additional by additionally prohibiting any such instruction for grades 4-12 that “will not be age-appropriate or developmentally applicable.” As with Florida’s regulation, this invoice weaponizes these imprecise phrases by giving any citizen the facility to file a criticism towards any college district or trainer they really feel has violated the regulation.

Oklahoma

Advertisement

Oklahoma has one other instance of an anti-CRT invoice with the range coaching prohibition.

No enrolled scholar of an establishment of upper training inside The Oklahoma State System of Increased Schooling shall be required to interact in any type of obligatory gender or sexual range coaching or counseling;

Like a number of of those items of laws, this one is being challenged in courtroom.

South Carolina.

A invoice launched final November folds LGBTQ objects along with objects included by many states in ant-critical race principle laws. It prohibits requiring a person “to affirm, settle for, undertake, or adhere” to ideas together with “the existence of genders apart from female and male,” gender fluidity, nonbinary pronouns, and that race and intercourse are “social constructs.” It additionally says that state-funded entities could not

Advertisement

topic minors below the age of eighteen to instruction, displays, discussions, counseling, or supplies in any medium that contain the next controversial and age-inappropriate subjects, that are reserved for fogeys and authorized guardians to debate with and clarify to their kids in accordance with their household values:

The checklist consists of sexual existence, acts or practices, and gender id or existence.

Tennessee

Tennessee’s HB 800 is among the most repressive payments within the nation. No public or constitution college in state can be allowed to make use of textbooks or educational supplies that “promote, normalize, help, or handle lesbian, homosexual, bi-sexual, or transgender (LGBT) points or life-style.”

A proposed modification permits faculties to maintain books they bought earlier than July of 2022. Nevertheless, this can be a true Don’t Say Homosexual invoice— that phrase “handle” goes far past “promote” right into a world wherein LGBTQ points can not even be talked about.

Advertisement

Texas

Texas doesn’t have any invoice within the pipeline, however Lt. Governor Dan Patrick want to have one like Florida’s and since their laws doesn’t get again to work till subsequent spring, he has requested for Schooling Committee hearings to handle the problem.

Whereas the final issues expressed are related, these payments range significantly. They ceaselessly relaxation on ill-defined language. As an example, whereas individuals could possibly outline the acute reaches of the continuum, “age applicable” doesn’t draw a brilliant, clear line.

Many states are bundling their Don’t Say Homosexual language in with their anti-CRT payments. Some states are treading calmly, with the oft-copied injunction towards range coaching, whereas others like Tennessee and Louisiana would actually forbid saying the phrase “homosexual” in a classroom. And in these circumstances, phrase selection issues; there’s a giant distinction between “selling” one thing and “normalizing” or “addressing” it.

A few of these payments are usually not going to make it, however so long as there are political factors to be scored, the language goes to maintain coming again. Keep tuned and maintain watching your state capital.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Florida

Florida State Football Recruiting: Blue chip safety Zae Thomas commits

Published

on

Florida State Football Recruiting: Blue chip safety Zae Thomas commits


Florida State has landed another verbal commitment for #Tribe25, and this one is from a true Seminole in every sense of the word.

Gregory “Zae” Thomas is a 6’2”, 190 pound defensive back who plays for American Heritage in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. He is currently ranked as the 292nd best player in the nation by 247Sports Composite (25th best safety, 42nd best player in FL).

Thomas chose the Seminoles over 30 other offers from the likes of the Clemson Tigers, Iowa Hawkeyes, Kentucky Wildcats, Louisville Cardinals, LSU Tigers, Miami Hurricanes, Oklahoma Sooners, Penn State Nittany Lions, Tennessee Volunteers, Texas A&M Aggies, UCF Golden Knights, and Wisconsin Badgers.

Back in the names to know and visitor preview articles that mentioned him, I wrote that I believe Zae Thomas is simply destined to play for Florida State. He checks some amazing boxes. Thomas has Seminole Tribe heritage. He plays for the high school where DBs coach Pat Surtain held his first head coaching position, overlapping with Surtain for a year. He is the rare defensive back who loves to tackle and he has the positional flexibility and size that Surtain and defensive coordinator Adam Fuller love.

Advertisement

In an otherwise middling DB cycle, Thomas is a bright spot with a very high ceiling- I’d easily have him ranked as a top 150 player nationally. He does an excellent job mirroring receivers in coverage and has no issues jamming at the line. I would expect him to be a regular on special teams and as he learns the playbook, I think he’ll enter the mix in either the corner or safety rotation sooner than later.

Check out Tomahawk Nation’s most recent Official Recruiting and Transfer Portal Thread to interact with the Three Stars and for more information about FSU recruiting.



Source link

Continue Reading

Florida

DeSantis, extremist Republicans hammering, wounding DEI • Florida Phoenix

Published

on

DeSantis, extremist Republicans hammering, wounding DEI • Florida Phoenix


On June 2, a three-member panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled that the Fearless Fund — a Black-woman owned venture capital firm in Atlanta — violated the 1866 Civil Rights Act by awarding monetary grants to qualified Black women.

In a mind-blowing ruling, two of the three judges declared that grants disbursed by the nonprofit arm of the Fearless Fund “likely violated the federal Civil Rights Act of 1866,” casting doubt on the future of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs across the country.

The judges said the fund “was unlikely to enjoy First Amendment protection and that its program inflicts irreparable harm on the plaintiffs, an anonymous group of three white and Asian women,” as described by Fearless Fund attorney Alphonso David.

The judges chose to ignore the damage that centuries or racism, discrimination, and exclusion has inflicted on African Americans.

Advertisement

“Black and brown women received 0.39% of all venture capital funded, although we are 20% of the U.S. population. Of the entrepreneurial demographic, they are the least funded.” said Fearless Fund CEO and Founder Arian Simone.

“We founded the Fearless Fund to solve racial disparities. We were told that we violated the 1866 law, which was put in place to protect us and give us some level of economic freedom. They’re saying you must give your money to white men. It’s beyond disturbing … it doesn’t make sense.”

‘Small infusions of money’

Simone, an angel investor, entrepreneur, philanthropist, author, and PR and marketing specialist, said the fund gives grants of between $20,000 and $30,000 to each woman chosen, although it has made some seven-figure investments, she said, explaining that the grants are “small infusions of money to help with job creation, marketing, and cashflow management.”

“These women are on Forbes Inc.’s List — they are phenomenal and past deserving. Who has been harmed?” Simone asked during an appearance on MSNBC.

This court ruling is in direct conflict with the stated aims of diversity, equity, and inclusion programs — and a slap in face to Simone and her colleague, co-founder and general partner Ayana Parsons.

Advertisement

Despite the firm’s work to even the scales in favor of Black female businessowners, the court has ruled that the Fearless Fund must give money to white men even though white men as a group already receive 99% of funding.

Simone issued a statement in reaction to the ruling.

“In this fearless moment, we should all be motivated to fight after today’s decision. This is devastating for the Fearless Fund and Foundation, and for the women in which we have invested,” she said.

“I am shattered for every girl of color who has a dream but will grow up in a nation determined not to give her a shot to live it. On their behalf, we will turn the pain into purpose and fight with all our might. America is supposed to be a nation where one has the freedom to achieve, the freedom to earn, and the freedom to prosper. Yet, when we have attempted to level the playing field for underrepresented groups, our freedoms were stifled.”

The numbers

The need for programs like the Fearless Fund is borne out by the numbers.

Advertisement

According to nonprofit advocacy group digitalundivided, less than 1% of venture capital goes to businesses owned by Black and Hispanic women.

Meanwhile, “only 2% of investment professionals at venture capital firms were Black women in 2022, according to a study conducted every two years by Deloitte and Venture Forward, the nonprofit arm of the National Venture Capital Association, and the consulting firm Deloitte,” the Associated Press reported.

Just 1% of investment partners were Black women, the news agency said.

The Fearless Fund has directed more than $30 million to more than 41 enterprises run by women of color and empowered these marginalized people to reach and exceed their full potentials.

I agree with Simone that the lawsuit brought by Edward Blum and the American Alliance for Equal Rights is part of an anti-America campaign focused on reversing equal rights and the hard-earned gains made by African Americans.

Advertisement

This latest judicial setback is the most recent in a culture war waged by Gov. Ron DeSantis, his ideological toady Christopher Rufo, and other extremist Republicans in what amounts to a multi-pronged national conservative mugging of DEI.

DEI serves as a proxy for Republicans extremists intent on the systematic disenfranchisement of African Americans in education, business, the workplace, and just about every aspect of their lives.

Defenders of the status quo love to pretend that racism doesn’t exist, and they insult African Americans and others by their refusal to acknowledge the deeply corrosive effects of structural barriers, the intolerance, virulent racism, bias, and stolen opportunities that bigotry and discrimination engender.

But as Morgan Simon notes in a Forbes analysis, the ruling “is just the tip of the iceberg of a broader vision certain legal activists have for society at large, one that brushes racial inequity under our collective rug.”

Economic foundation

I applaud Simone and Parsons for developing a model to build a strong economic foundation for Black and brown women. But these women understand that they can’t climb this mountain alone. They had corporate investors including Bank of America, Carta, The Jump Fund, and JPMorganChase.

Advertisement

Since the rash of lawsuits and legal challenges, a number of the institutions and businesses that support DEI have been knocked off-balance or scared off.

DeSantis is knee-deep in all this, using his office to dismantle DEI in Florida. Last May, the governor signed a bill into law that bans Florida’s public colleges and universities from spending money on diversity, equity, and inclusion programs.

“If you look at the way this has actually been implemented across the country, DEI is better viewed as standing for discrimination, exclusion, and indoctrination. And that has no place in our public institutions,” DeSantis told reporters at a news conference at the time.

While college administrators argue their so-called DEI efforts represent an effective strategy to repair decades of exclusionary practices; Republican leaders insist they violate free speech, break antidiscrimination laws, and misuse public money.

According to the National Education Association, more than a dozen states have passed anti-DEI laws, including Florida, Texas, North Carolina, North Dakota, Tennessee, and Utah. These laws have forced the shuttering of multicultural and LGBTQ+ centers and have hobbled college staff working on issues such as financial aid and against sexual assault. At least 24 states are considering doing the same.

Advertisement

George Floyd effect

According to a report from the World Economic Forum, companies across the nation pledged donations to Black organizations and vowed to support Black-owned businesses following George Floyd’s murder by a Minneapolis police officer in 2020.

“This tragedy served as a catalyst for increased financial support for Black entrepreneurs, with a reported $850 million to $1.2 billion in VC investments directed towards Black-founded startups in 2020,” the report said.

Since then, however, venture capital funding to Black founded companies sank as the images of the Floyd killing faded, donor fatigue took hold, and many in the mainstream questioned the need to correct systemic inequities they say they didn’t create or benefit from.

“Venture capital investments in Black-founded startups plummeted by 45% in 2022,” the report said.

We are only 70 years removed from a centuries-old American apartheid system. Seventy years of a semblance of freedom. But there are those who still dehumanize African Americans and bolster systems that methodically deny oppressed Black people access to good jobs, businesses, quality education, housing, and the freedom to vote.

Advertisement

In 2024, Black people have nothing to lose. They may as well go for broke.

They have to first acknowledge the reality that African Americans were never considered in the American calculus. Which means that they have to think outside the box, as Simone and Parsons have.

More people need to make sacrifices to become financially literate, buy land, and grow wealth. They must use all the mechanisms available to secure those things they need. That includes becoming more intentional in using their $1.6 trillion in spending power not for baubles but to finance a range of start-ups, venture capital projects, job creators, businesspeople, businesses, and development projects.

Billions of dollars

I am no economist, but imagine if, as a group, Black people in America opted out of international and domestic travel for one year. Doing that would allow them to amass about $109.4 billion.

Imagine what they could do with this pot. They could fund venture capital and start-up projects, create a slew of businesses to cater not just Black people but to any consumers needing those services, build apartment buildings, homes, hotels, convention centers, meeting spaces and ancillary projects.

Advertisement

I’ve been stuck on the hospitality sphere because of the myriad possibilities. The money saved could pay for architects, construction engineers, and other professions. Most importantly, the money could be used to set up programs to train and hire hotel employees at every level, as well as managers, desk clerks, electricians, and engineers.

Sounds like one hell of a plan.

But wait.

Ed Blum and the rest of those tight ass party poopers would probably go to court to try to convince judges that it’s unconstitutional for Black people to save all that money without making sure that white men and women were intimately involved and, of course, got their cut. For no other reason than their race.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Florida

Post-Boomers: Will Florida real estate appeal to the next generations? | Home Front

Published

on

Post-Boomers: Will Florida real estate appeal to the next generations? | Home Front


Florida has always proven a desired destination for those entering the next chapter of life, most recently fueled by the number of Baby Boomers reaching retirement age running between 3.5 and 4 million annually. Born from 1946 to 1964, Baby Boomers represent one of the largest generational cohorts with approximately 76 million people representing the wealthiest and, therefore, the most enabled in history.

Florida’s appeal has been undeniable, as evidenced by its consistent ranking in the top-three destination states of all online home searches in the U.S., regardless of age. This isn’t surprising given our state’s weather, lack of state income tax, and attractive lifestyle options. Indeed, Boomers make up 41% of Florida’s homeowners and, as Millennials age and the first Gen Xers approach retirement, the demand for housing in Florida will accelerate.

The demographic shift presents challenges and opportunities to accommodate Boomers’ housing needs and preferences. A 2021 AARP survey found that 77% of Americans over 50 plan to stay in their homes as long as possible, signaling a growing market for home modifications, expansions, and community-based support systems to aid aging in place. This choice to stay put lies heavily in favorable tax laws, current low-rate mortgages, and the desire to remain in familiar communities.

Advertisement

With what is described as “The Great Wealth Transfer,” Baby Boomers are passing an estimated $70 trillion to the next generation. This transfer includes wealth in cash and existing homes bequeathed to relatives.

Logic suggests an enormous lift in real estate demand and opportunities for the state. Yet that assumption implies a consistent perspective on real estate from generation to generation for which evidence may suggest otherwise. Shaped by impressionable events such as the Great Recession and volatility in housing values, Millennials approach real estate with more caution and lower overall expectations, choosing to allocate less in primary residences while diversifying more into other forms of investments.

Also among the distinctions may be desired home size. Boomers own twice as many large homes with three or more bedrooms as Millennials. This trend indicates a potential sharp rise in available larger home inventory as Boomers choose to relocate or pass and a question as to whether the next generation will have a similar appetite to absorb. If not, values may not trend with the overall rate of appreciation seen with smaller homes.

Further, as the top second home market in the country, the shift from one generation to another may also be felt in this housing category. While Baby Boomers viewed second homes as investments for retirement, a place for multigenerational family gatherings, and avenues to legacy building, there is evidence Millennials place greater value on flexibility and the thought of experiences in different locations made possible through renting rather than owning a resort property.

Advertisement

By 2030, all Boomers will be at least 65, presenting Florida’s real estate market with challenges and opportunities. This evolution will influence home sales, new construction development, and community planning across the state. Sheer demographic and wealth statistics strongly suggest Florida will continue to be a winner among states as it relates to real estate.

In the end, it may depend on whether children, despite their initial protests, become more and more like their parents when they age as so often we have discovered.

Budge Huskey is chief executive officer of Premier Sotheby’s International Realty.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending