Connect with us

Florida

New Law Endangers The Quality Of Florida Higher Education

Published

on

New Law  Endangers The Quality Of Florida Higher Education


Florida Governor, Ron DeSantis and Florida’s Republican-controlled legislature have had their sights skilled on education-related laws for the previous month. They’ve handed a flurry of controversial legal guidelines, together with the so-called “don’t say homosexual” invoice. A regulation that has drawn much less consideration is one which makes technical adjustments to how Florida’s public schools and universities work with accrediting businesses, non-profit organizations that confirm the standard of schools and resolve whether or not college students will pay for his or her education utilizing federal monetary support. The adjustments may undermine the power of accreditors to guard college students from poorly performing schools, resulting in poorer outcomes for college kids, fewer school graduates, and extra pupil mortgage defaults.

The regulation requires schools and universities to hunt a brand new accrediting company each 5 to 10 years. The regulation additionally permits these establishments to sue accreditors if they’re “negatively impacted by retaliatory motion taken in opposition to postsecondary training establishment by an accrediting company or affiliation.” As a part of their job, Accreditors are required to inform establishments if the training they’re offering just isn’t ok. Taking actions that would negatively impression an establishment ensures that college students don’t attend low-quality applications. That is like your favourite take-out place being allowed to sue the well being inspector for citing well being code violations within the restaurant kitchen.

Advertisement

What do Accreditors do and why does it matter?

One of many major roles of accreditors is to make sure establishments present a suitable high quality of training. For instance, by making certain that the establishment employs correctly skilled and certified college, making certain that college students have adequate educational assist and that college students are literally graduating from the college. Encouraging establishments to always hop from one accreditor to a different, doubtlessly permitting them to cover poor high quality training, is horrible for college kids.

A part of the impetus for this regulation appears to have been questions raised by The Southern Affiliation of Schools and Faculties Fee on Schools (SACSCOC), the company that presently accredits most Florida schools and universities. SACSOC had inquired about potential undue political affect being exercised over Florida State College and the College of Florida by state training officers. Along with instructional high quality, accreditors be certain that schools and universities can function freed from political interference.

Accreditation is meant to guard college students by making certain that the applications they enroll in present high quality training. It additionally ensures that college students can obtain federal monetary support, one thing not out there to college students attending an unaccredited establishment. With out federal monetary support, which incorporates Pell Grants and federal pupil loans, many/most schools within the nation can be compelled to shut their doorways. By forcing establishments to hunt a brand new accreditor each 5 years, this new regulation encourages poorly performing establishments to hunt out accreditors that may permit decrease requirements whereas threatening these with larger requirements with retaliation in the event that they do their jobs correctly.

The availability permitting Florida colleges to sue their accreditor for any motion taken that negatively impacts the college is prone to make new potential accreditors cautious of taking up Florida establishments. The regulation does a poor job of specifying what is taken into account “retaliatory motion,” making it unclear what accreditor actions would run afoul of it.

Advertisement

Since accreditors assist guarantee college high quality, accreditors can be derelict of their obligation if they didn’t generally take actions which may negatively impression an establishment. For instance, a for-profit school in Florida was as soon as discovered responsible of utilizing strippers to induce college students to enroll in applications that offered poor training, all to make sure that school may get the scholars Pell Grant and pupil mortgage {dollars}. Public schools, fortunately, have not often acted as poorly as this. However, making it tougher for accreditors to carry establishments accountable makes it more difficult to maintain instructional requirements up and political affect out of Florida larger training. If warning colleges and college students about areas of concern may result in authorized motion, it is going to hinder accreditors from doing their job successfully.

How will this impression college students?

College students depend on their college being accredited. With out that, they may not have the ability to entry monetary support, switch credit to different establishments or have their undergraduate work be accepted as ample for graduate college functions. Some skilled licensing boards won’t permit graduates from unaccredited applications to take a seat for licensure; the ramifications are virtually limitless. By giving colleges the power to sue their accreditors, it’s attainable that some accreditation businesses may refuse to work with Florida colleges, doubtlessly leaving college students who enrolled caught with no transferrable credit and no entry to monetary assist. Or it implies that accreditors gained’t do what they’re purported to do to make sure acceptable ranges of high quality, which additionally places college students in danger.

Gaining accreditation is an enormous enterprise for any college. That’s the reason most colleges don’t change accreditors until they completely should. The transition course of may take a number of years, throughout which era the college would wish to work with two completely different accreditors on the identical time, doubtlessly with two completely different units of requirements.

The invoice permits establishments to stay with their present accreditor if they can not safe a brand new one earlier than their present accreditation interval expires. So, after huge quantities of effort and cash are expended, Florida schools would possibly find yourself again the place they began.

Florida schools deserve the knowledge of working with accreditors to make sure the training they provide is top of the range. College students need to know that somebody is making certain the school they attend will present them with a high-quality training. This regulation will get in the way in which of each these objectives.

Advertisement

Learn extra tales on larger training

Biden Plans To Pause Federal Pupil Mortgage Funds Till August

Increased Training Has A Morale Drawback, Opposing Increased Pay Will Make It Worse

Division Of Training Broadcasts Pupil Mortgage Forgiveness Fixes



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Florida

Fatal crash in Lake County claims life of Florida woman Tuesday morning

Published

on

Fatal crash in Lake County claims life of Florida woman Tuesday morning


What we know: A 23-year-old woman from Altoona was killed Tuesday morning in a crash involving a dump truck and a sedan on County Road 439 near County Road 44A, authorities said.

The Florida Highway Patrol said the crash occurred at approximately 8:23 a.m. when a 1994 dump truck traveling northbound on CR-439 encountered stopped traffic. The driver, a 28-year-old man from Leesburg, attempted to brake but veered into the southbound lane, colliding head-on with a 2019 Toyota Corolla.

Advertisement

The driver of the Corolla was transported to AdventHealth Waterman Hospital, where she was pronounced dead, troopers said. The dump truck driver was not injured and remained at the scene.

Both directions of CR-439 remain blocked as authorities continue to investigate. No additional details have been released.

A full media release will be provided as more information becomes available.

Advertisement

The Source: The information in this article comes from the Florida Highway Patrol.

STAY CONNECTED WITH FOX 35 ORLANDO:

Advertisement
Lake CountyCrime and Public SafetyNewsTraffic



Source link

Continue Reading

Florida

Florida man acquitted of murder charge years after deadly dispute with neighbor over cat

Published

on

Florida man acquitted of murder charge years after deadly dispute with neighbor over cat


A years-long legal battle over a deadly confrontation has ended with a jury acquitting a man of second-degree murder charges stemming from a dispute over a cat.

Advertisement

James Taylor, 41, was fatally shot during an argument with his neighbor. 

What led to the deadly confrontation?

The backstory:

Advertisement

The incident occurred on October 20, 2021, in Southeast Marion County, north of Umatilla, and reportedly began when Taylor’s cat crossed onto the neighbor’s property, leading to a confrontation. 

According to investigators, the neighbor, Clifton Anthony Bliss Jr., armed himself with a rifle and approached Taylor’s home, where the argument escalated.

The sheriff’s office arrested Bliss Jr. on a second-degree murder charge. Last week, a jury found Bliss Jr. not guilty after determining his actions were reasonable under the circumstances.

Advertisement

What they’re saying:

Taylor’s fiancée, Crystal Mitchell, expressed disbelief over the tragedy. “For that to end up like that? It’s unbelievable,” she said. Mitchell, who declined to appear on camera, said Taylor was a helpful neighbor, adding, “James wasn’t the kind to walk around and just threaten anybody and everybody with violence — that was not him.”

Advertisement

Legal experts say such cases hinge on proving an imminent threat of deadly force.

Criminal defense attorney Michael Panella, who was not involved in the case, emphasized the importance of de-escalation in conflicts. 

“Your best self-defense are … nonverbal and verbal cues, being able to de-escalate something and actually removing yourself from a dangerous situation,” Panella said. “The last resort, the absolute last resort, is using deadly force.”

Advertisement

Bliss Jr. declined to comment on his acquittal. 

Mitchell hopes her story reminds others that violence is never the answer.

Advertisement

STAY CONNECTED WITH FOX 35 ORLANDO:

The Source: This story was written based on information shared by the Marion County Sheriff’s Office, and the victim’s fiancée, Crystal Mitchell.

Marion CountyCrime and Public Safety
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Florida

Florida legislative leaders push back on DeSantis’ call for special session on immigration

Published

on

Florida legislative leaders push back on DeSantis’ call for special session on immigration



CBS News Miami

Live

MIAMI – Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is calling for a special legislative session to align state policies with President-elect Donald Trump’s promised crackdown on illegal immigration, but the move has drawn resistance from Republican leaders in the state legislature.

Advertisement

Florida House Speaker Daniel Perez and Senate President Ben Albritton sent a joint letter Monday dismissing the notion of a special session as “premature” and criticizing the governor’s proposals as lacking substance.

The session is currently scheduled for the week of Jan. 27, shortly after Trump’s inauguration.

“As you know, this Legislature will address illegal immigration, condominiums, petition initiatives and hurricane recovery this session, which starts in 50 days. Calling a special session at this time is premature,” the letter reads.

Republican leaders emphasized their support for Trump and his immigration agenda but argued that acting without detailed guidance from the federal government could hinder the incoming administration’s efforts.

“It is completely irresponsible to get out ahead of any announcements President Trump will make, especially when uninformed or ill-timed state action could potentially impair or impede the success of President Trump’s forthcoming efforts to end illegal immigration, close our borders and protect the sovereignty of our nation,” they wrote.

Advertisement

The letter also took issue with the governor’s approach, saying he had presented only “fragments of ideas” without actual bill language or meaningful details for lawmakers to consider.

Read the memo in its entirety: 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending