Connect with us

Dallas, TX

Here’s what’s happening on the old Pearl C. Anderson property

Published

on

Here’s what’s happening on the old Pearl C. Anderson property


This summer Watermark South Dallas will celebrate three years of Sunday services and five years since we purchased the former Pearl C. Anderson Learning Center. Watermark’s involvement in South Dallas started over 15 years ago with various Watermark members serving alongside South Dallas leaders through several nonprofit organizations. Then, in 2019, after DISD placed several shuttered schools up for public auction, Watermark acquired the current property in the “as-is” condition as the only bidder. The next year was spent removing about 70 cubic tons of debris and conducting significant environmental abatement and repairs.

So far, we’ve finished about 24,000 square feet of the 190,000-square-foot property. We have worked to honor the legacy of Pearl C. Anderson in the South Dallas community through the ways we have preserved certain aspects and designs within the building. The heart of our campus is the original cafeteria from the Pearl C. Anderson Learning Center, which will hopefully feel familiar to all former students and faculty who visit.

Our first church service was on June 20, 2021. Three years later, we welcome about 120 adults and 60 kids and students each Sunday. Throughout the week, we hold men’s and women’s Bible studies, host community events, and try to be good neighbors by serving our surrounding areas with initiatives like trash cleanup days and summer day camps for kids.

Beyond church services, our goal has been to use the space to meet the needs of the surrounding community through providing meeting spaces for Young Life, Fellowship of Christian Athletes and other organizations. On Wednesdays and Saturdays, the Dallas Tigers host youth sports games, and our fields are filled with the sounds of players, coaches and fans taking part in a time-honored Texas tradition: football. Two ministries, Watermark Community Development Corporation and Watermark Health, operate consistently at our church as well.

Advertisement

Opinion

Get smart opinions on the topics North Texans care about.

Watermark Community Development Corporation provides services to financially empower the community, including financial education, matched savings programs, job placements, career training workshops and business owner support. So far in South Dallas, Watermark Community Development Corp. has had the privilege to work with 152 participants to purchase 12 strategic assets such as homes, vehicles, educations, or business assets, and gain access to $87,800 in matched funds to further economic opportunities. We’ve seen 154 job placements through our Job Connection Program, pairing each career seeker with a mentor who walks with them through their first six months of employment for support and encouragement. Forty-one local businesses have participated in the Business Cohort, a 10-week class for entrepreneurs, and we have invested $192,000 of cash, in-kind services and grant funding to help see these businesses continue to thrive and contribute to the community.

Watermark Health operates a mobile clinic on our campus twice a week, providing care for urgent and chronic medical conditions such as treatment for cough or cold, minor injuries or pain, various infections, school physicals and hypertension management.

Most recently, Watermark Health has been able to offer a vision clinic with free lenses for students as they return to school. In partnership with Texas Health Resources, we have added a blood pressure kiosk to our lobby to allow residents the ability to take their blood pressure regularly and connect with services for follow-up care. All services are provided for free, with no insurance required.

Advertisement

To date, over 2,000 patients have been cared for through our mobile clinic in the South Dallas area as we seek to treat our neighbors’ physical needs and care for them spiritually and emotionally. A secondary goal of the mobile clinic is to help keep our city’s emergency rooms from being overcrowded with non-emergent needs. More than 30% of patients indicated they would have gone to the ER if Watermark Health’s services weren’t available, and 36% said they would have had no access to care.

Over these last five years, we have learned much from the South Dallas community and are so grateful for the patience, hospitality and partnership many have shown us. We have had the opportunity to host weddings, funerals, trainings and networking events on our campus, and met with dozens of community and church leaders and local non-profits to continue to find additional ways to collaborate.

During community meetings over the last few years, South Dallas residents consistently identified four major community needs: healthcare, jobs, food, and youth development.

To those ends, from 2022 to 2024, we pursued a zoning change to adapt our building for additional uses to meet some of these needs – specifically zoning that would allow us to provide a more robust approach to medical care and food access as well as vocational training and job opportunities.

While our zoning request was ultimately denied in early 2024, we plan to meet the same needs the community identified, but within a more limited scope.

Advertisement

We will continue to host weekly church services and community events and operate Watermark Health’s mobile clinic. We also intend to expand the Watermark Community Development Corporation’s involvement through job training, financial services, and economic empowerment initiatives. Our most immediate project is to renovate an additional 10,000 square feet of the property to accommodate more space for current and future ministry activities.

So, after five years of being a neighbor, we want to say thank you to South Dallas. It’s truly been our joy to learn from other churches, ministries and nonprofits who have been a part of the community for so many years. We have witnessed firsthand the way so many of our neighbors reflect the love of Christ to serve one another and their community.

We’re honored to work collaboratively with you. We hope to continue together for many more years to come.

Todd Anders, Timothy Ateek, Ben Caldwell, Mickey Friedrich, Blake Holmes and Rob Thomas are the elders of Watermark Community Church.

We welcome your thoughts in a letter to the editor. See the guidelines and submit your letter here. If you have problems with the form, you can submit via email at letters@dallasnews.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Dallas, TX

Here's why the city of Dallas wasn't held liable in the Botham Jean shooting

Published

on

Here's why the city of Dallas wasn't held liable in the Botham Jean shooting


Advertisement

A Dallas appellate attorney says he is not surprised at the award handed down in the wrongful death civil trial of former Dallas Police Officer Amber Guyger.

It was a record number for a case where a police officer — off duty, but in uniform — killed an innocent man, Botham Jean.

Appellate attorney Thad Spalding says he’s not surprised at Wednesday’s $98.6 million judgment for the Jean family in the wrongful death lawsuit against Guyger.

Advertisement

“I think it’s a very natural reaction to what the facts they were presented with,” he said.

The family was awarded $38.6 million in compensatory damages and $60 million in punitive damages.

Advertisement

“It’s hard to quantify the loss of a loved one,” Spalding said. “And so the way this law works is we put this in the hands of the jurors who get to hear the witnesses, get to hear the family members and decide based on that testimony.”

Family attorney Daryl K. Washington said the city should share in liability with Guyger, but the city filed a motion to be removed from the lawsuit, which was granted.

“The city of Dallas hired Amber Guyger. The city of Dallas was responsible for training Amber Guyger on the night that Botham was killed,” Washington said. “The city of Dallas, the police officers protected Amber Guyger. And yet when you have a situation like this, they kick police officers under the bus, and they run away from the liability.”

Advertisement

A U.S. Supreme Court case decided in 1978 called Monell Liability keeps municipalities, in many instances, from exposure in these kinds of excessive force civil rights violation cases.

“What the U.S. Supreme Court said under the civil rights statute that this case was brought under is that a city is not responsible in that same way for its officers’ conduct,” Spalding said.

Advertisement

So while Guyger was considered acting as a police officer, although off duty when she fatally shot Jean in his own apartment, the city has no financial responsibility for her actions.

Advertisement

“In any other scenario, if you’re driving a truck for a company, and you crash into somebody, and you’re negligent when you do that, you’re acting within the scope of your employment,” said Spalding. “And so your employer is responsible.”

Spalding has appeared before the Fifth Circuit and Supreme Court in Monell Liability cases. He says in order to win against Monell Liability, you have to prove one thing.

“It essentially requires that incidents like this have happened multiple times in the past, that the city was aware of these incidents having happened, and that they didn’t do anything about it,” he explained. “It’s what’s called ‘deliberate indifference.’”

Advertisement

For Jean’s family and others, it’s a high bar to cross, which is why, more times than not, cities are dismissed from these types of lawsuits.



Source link

Continue Reading

Dallas, TX

Ken Paxton sues Dallas over voter-approved amendment to decriminalize marijuana

Published

on

Ken Paxton sues Dallas over voter-approved amendment to decriminalize marijuana


Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has sued the City of Dallas after it adopted a voter-approved charter amendment that decriminalizes possessing less than 4 ounces of marijuana.

Advertisement

About 67 percent of Dallas voters approved Proposition R in the November election. 

The amendment prohibits Dallas Police from making arrests or issuing citations for possession of up to 4 ounces marijuana. It also blocks the smell of marijuana from being used as probable cause for search or seizure and prohibits the use of city resources for THC tests, except as a part of a violent felony or felony narcotics investigation.

The City of Dallas directed the city to comply with the amendment earlier this week.

Advertisement

Recreational marijuana is still illegal in Texas.

Paxton’s lawsuit says that municipalities cannot refuse to enforce Texas drug laws.

Advertisement

“Cities cannot pick and choose which State laws they follow. The City of Dallas has no authority to override Texas drug laws or prohibit the police from enforcing them. This is a backdoor attempt to violate the Texas Constitution, and any city that tries to constrain police in this fashion will be met swiftly with a lawsuit by my office.” wrote Paxton in a statement.

The lawsuit is far from a surprise.

In January 2024, Paxton sued cities who passed similar measures, including Denton, Austin, San Marcos, Killeen and Elgin.

Advertisement

Judges overturned Paxton’s lawsuits against Austin and San Marcos.

The lawsuit against the city names Dallas Mayor Eric Johnson, city council members, interim city manager Kimberly Tolbert and interim police chief Michael Igo.

Advertisement

On Tuesday, Dallas City Council member Cara Mendelsohn proposed adding a clause to the amendment stating that Proposition R would not be enforced unless the state legalized marijuana. Council members voted against it.

“This is such a waste of your tax dollars. 4oz of marijuana is illegal in TX & USA. Now [Ken Paxton] will have to waste his time suing [The City of Dallas] and the city will waste tax dollars defending a losing case. We’ve put ourselves & the [Dallas Police Department] in a terrible position to violate our oath of office to uphold the law,” Mendelsohn wrote in a social media post.

Paxton’s office is requesting a trial to issue a permanent injunction to stop the city from implementing Proposition R.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Dallas, TX

Letters to the Editor — Educated students, power source subsidies, Dallas Wings, Cowboys

Published

on

Letters to the Editor — Educated students,  power source subsidies, Dallas Wings, Cowboys


Schools need driver’s ed

Re: “Dallas County Grads Likely Won’t Earn Enough — Study finds that students aren’t leaving school with skills, education sufficient to support themselves,” Monday editorial.

All of us who live in Dallas have a vested interest in the future success of our kids. There have been some disconnects between local schools and the needs of local businesses.

In my industry, auto sales, we’ve had a shortage of quality technicians and sales people. Many local schools have outstanding auto tech programs, and graduate students who could become very successful sales people. Both of these jobs have the potential to pay six figures within a relatively short period of time. Often a technician is making more money than his classmate who pursued a four-year degree.

Opinion

Advertisement

Get smart opinions on the topics North Texans care about.

The disconnect comes with graduating students who can be hired and covered by insurance. An applicant without a driver’s license is not employable in our industry as they are uninsurable. Driver’s education has been removed from most high schools, leaving the task of getting a driver’s license up to the student on their own time.

A student who lives in a family that can afford a car for them to practice in and the expense of the class has no issues getting a driver’s license. Unfortunately many students don’t have the available car, time nor money to do this.

Don Herring, Dallas

Students lack stability

You state fairly that students aren’t pursuing skills, education sufficient to support themselves.

Advertisement

It’s hard when the economically insecure are consumed with problems such as hunger, lack of shelter, poor living conditions, health issues and sleep deprivation.

Children need some stability to perform at all in school. Texas ranks last in most measurements supporting families. A struggling entrance almost guarantees a struggling exit and nonperforming results.

James Roberts, Dallas

Stop subsidizing power

Re: “Abbott supports more nuclear power — Office calls for supply chain upgrades, research network to turn vision into reality,” Tuesday news story.

I support no tax subsidies for nuclear plants (or for fossil plants or solar and wind farms or electric vehicles).

Advertisement

Are we now talking about equal opportunity power source subsidies? What ever happened to the idea that the government should not be picking electric power source winners and losers by providing subsidies?

Since when should the government be subsidizing private industry? Shouldn’t power sources be chosen based on the economic benefits those sources bring to the market place rather than government subsidies?

Government subsidies distort the real price of electricity hidden by the taxes we pay. There must be compelling evidence such subsidies are in the public interest, and the real cost of the subsidies must be disclosed.

Thomas L. Darte, Greenville

Learn from voucher failures

Gov. Greg Abbott and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick have already declared their intention to have the Texas Legislature vote on school vouchers. Why can’t Texas politicians learn from other states that have tried school vouchers and eliminated them due to the high cost of the program?

Advertisement

Arizona enacted school vouchers in 2022 and this year faced a $1.4 billion budget shortfall, much of which was a result of voucher spending.

Texas public schools need adequate funding, and that is where the governor’s focus should be. Rural school districts are to be congratulated for opposing the governor’s support of school vouchers.

Jack Noteware, McKinney

People have spoken

Re: “School voucher crusade is anything but conservative,” by Glenn Rogers, Nov. 13 Opinion.

Thank you, Glenn Rogers, for your thoughts on the continued push for school vouchers. Once again, Gov. Greg Abbot and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick seem willing to go to any extremes to promote their own agendas and that of their billionaire donors.

Advertisement

It doesn’t seem to matter to them that the people have spoken through their representatives against vouchers. As Rogers points out, it ‘s our public schools and teachers who are paying the price for their unyielding crusade. Quit holding them hostage!

Adele Younkin, Grapevine

Wings need seats

Re: “Can Bueckers have Clark-like impact?” by Kevin Sherrington, Sports Quick Take.

I’m delighted that the Wings got the first pick in the WNBA draft. Paige Bueckers is an excellent possible first choice, although there are other strong candidates.

Bueckers’ college coach Geno Auriemma hurt his credibility with his persistence that Bueckers was better than Caitlin Clark. He’s had to eat his words in many interviews since.

Advertisement

There has never been a player like Clark. Bueckers’ stats don’t compare; in fact, she’s not even in second place. Kelsey Plum is.

Wait till end of WNBA season next year and compare Bueckers’ rookie stats to Clark’s. Let’s see if it’s close. And you can’t ever overlook how Clark makes all the other players around her better and her enormous fan appeal.

A real disaster is that the Wings stadium only holds 6,000 seats. Can’t compare fan appeal if you don’t have seats to sell.

Larry Huddleston, Cedar Hill

Cowboys’ sky already fell

Re: “Is sky falling? Cowboys make some progress, but can’t catch Texans after metal falls,” by David Moore, Tuesday SportsDay column.

Advertisement

Is the sky falling? Nope, the sky fell several weeks ago. It fell when Jerry Jones decided to make the second worst decision in his career. Namely paying Dak Prescott millions, and now Prescott is smiling all the way to the bank.

Don Skaggs, Garland

We welcome your thoughts in a letter to the editor. See the guidelines and submit your letter here. If you have problems with the form, you can submit via email at letters@dallasnews.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending