Connect with us

Austin, TX

Will Minneapolis vote drive Uber, Lyft to leave Minnesota? Here's how their departure and return played out in Austin, Texas

Published

on

Will Minneapolis vote drive Uber, Lyft to leave Minnesota? Here's how their departure and return played out in Austin, Texas


Uber and Lyft are threatening to stop service in the Twin Cities. And they’ve done it before in Austin, Texas — only to return a year later.

The Minneapolis City Council on Thursday overrode a veto by Mayor Jacob Frey on an ordinance guaranteeing rideshare drivers a boost in pay and protections beginning May 1. While it’s a boon for drivers, the rideshare companies argue the cost is too high.

While other cities states have raised driver pay, it was only Austin in 2016 where Uber and Lyft opted to leave. There, however, their departure was prompted by the city council approving a measure requiring drivers to submit to fingerprint background checks, which could reveal criminal records. Texas lawmakers later signed off on a law putting rideshare regulation under state, not city, jurisdiction.

Sergio Avedian, with the website “The Rideshare Guy,” believes Minneapolis’ fate will be different.

Advertisement

Your gift today creates a more connected Minnesota. MPR News is your trusted resource for election coverage, reporting and breaking news. With your support, MPR News brings accessible, courageous journalism and authentic conversation to everyone – free of paywalls and barriers. Your gift makes a difference.

“I’m pretty sure a lot of passengers are going to get stranded,” Avedian said. He pointed to a study, ordered by Gov. Tim Walz, which recorded 18 million rideshare trips in the metro in 2022. “Obviously, the cabs are not going to replace the Uber and Lyft demand that exists.”

Avedian believes with more than a month until the ordinance’s start date, there’s hope for negotiation. Without an agreement, Lyft says it will end service in Minneapolis; Uber plans to cease operations in the entire metro area.

Walz joined Frey this week in condemning the ordinance. He instead suggested a statewide solution might be the answer, which is up for discussion at the Legislature. Last Spring, Walz vetoed a bill setting minimum pay requirements and enhanced protection for drivers.

In the interim without Uber and Lyft, smaller companies cropped up in Austin, Texas, to meet demand — though they were later undercut by the duopoly. Avedian believes something similar could happen in the Twin Cities within a few months.

Advertisement

“It’s not an easy thing to do. Obviously, they have to onboard a lot of drivers and they have to onboard all the passengers. I don’t think it will reach the scale immediately,” he said.



Source link

Austin, TX

Texas law age-restricting app stores blocked by federal judge

Published

on

Texas law age-restricting app stores blocked by federal judge


08 January 2019, Hessen, Rüsselsheim: ILLUSTRATION – The App Store (M) logo can be seen on the screen of an iPhone. Photo: Silas Stein/dpa (Photo by Silas Stein/picture alliance via Getty Images)

A federal judge has blocked a Texas law aimed at keeping minors from using app stores without an adult’s consent. 

The decision is a win for major developers of app stores represented in the federal lawsuit, including Apple, Google and Amazon. 

Advertisement

Texas app store law blocked

What we know:

Senate Bill 2420 would have gone into effect on Jan. 1, requiring anyone under the age of 18 in Texas to get parental consent to download an app or make an in-app purchase. 

Advertisement

U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman in Austin issued a preliminary injunction against the law, saying it likely violates the First Amendment.

The case against the law, known as the App Store Accountability Act, was brought by Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) on behalf of operators of app stores (like Google, Apple, and Amazon) and developers of mobile apps (like YouTube, Audible, Apple TV, IMDB, and Goodreads).

Advertisement

What’s next:

The law can not go into effect as litigation proceeds. 

Texas AG Ken Paxton is the sole defendant in the case, and is enjoined from enforcing or allowing enforcement of the law during that time. 

Advertisement

Texas lawsuit over SB 2420

The backstory:

Attorneys for the CCIA argued the law violates First Amendment free speech rights. Before the Austin court hearing last week, CCIA Senior VP Stephanie Joyce issued the following statement:

Advertisement

“We shall show the judge that this law is unconstitutional and should not take effect. This law is grossly overbroad, involves forced-speech mandates, and is not remotely tailored to its stated purpose. It is a deeply flawed statute that the Court should block under the First Amendment.”

Other cell phone restrictions

Dig deeper:

Advertisement

Australia recently passed a total social media ban for people under age 16. Texas attempted a similar law with House Bill 18, which was enjoined prior to SB 2420. 

A recent report about a school in Kentucky with a cellphone ban quoted administrators about an unexpected benefit. They claim a 61 percent increase in books being checked out from its library since the ban started.

Advertisement

In that Kentucky report, 38 percent of their disciplinary issues involved violating the cellphone ban. The administrators said they hope that number will drop after students come back from the holiday break. It’s too early to tell if that kind of data will be collected as part of the TEA review.

The Source: Information in this article came from a federal court filing and previous FOX Local coverage. 

TexasTexas PoliticsTechnology
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Texas camps add flood sirens after Camp Mystic tragedy

Published

on

Texas camps add flood sirens after Camp Mystic tragedy


Enter your email and we’ll send a secure one-click link to sign in.

KXAN Austin is a part of Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.

Advertisement

KXAN Austin is a part of Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Nexstar Media Group, Inc. is a leading, diversified media company that produces and distributes engaging local and national news, sports, and entertainment content across its television and digital platforms. The My Nexstar sign-in works across the Nexstar network — including The CW, NewsNation, The Hill, and more. Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Austin, TX

3,000 Waymos recalled after several close calls with Austin ISD students

Published

on

3,000 Waymos recalled after several close calls with Austin ISD students


TEXAS — The self-driving taxi known as Waymo is taking a break in Austin.

Since the beginning of the 2025-2026 school year, Austin Independent School District (AISD) has recorded at least 20 stop-arm violations committed by the autonomous vehicles.

Cameras installed on school buses through the district’s Stop-Arm Camera Program show Waymo vehicles passing buses when they brake and have their stop arm extended. In some instances, the self-driving vehicles come close to hitting students getting off the bus.

“There’s not a similar pattern,” said Travis Pickford, assistant chief of the Austin ISD Police Department. “There’s not consistency there, other than the Waymo’s are consistently passing our buses.”

Advertisement

Pickford said despite Waymo operating in Austin for years, the district only found out about the stop-arm violations this year when they switched to a new vendor for the Stop-Arm Camera Program.

AISD and Waymo have gone back and forth on this issue, with AISD notifying the company of the violations and the district’s demands for a software update. Waymo replied in November, saying its vehicles have been updated. 

Nonetheless, there were more violations cited by AISD, totaling at least 20 violations as of Nov. 20. And the issue, according to Pickford, is not exclusive to AISD.

“Eanes, Pflugerville, Leander, Round Rock, Del Valle, just to name those five,” he said. “I can only assume that if we’re seeing violations on our buses, it’s entirely possible that violations are occurring in those districts as well.”

“It’s our position and our belief that they need to stop operating while our school buses are out on the roadway,” Pickford said.

Advertisement

Because of the violations, Waymo voluntarily recalled more than 3,000 vehicles in its fleet.

Mauricio Peña, Waymo’s chief safety officer, said:

“While we are incredibly proud of our strong safety record showing Waymo experiences twelve times fewer injury crashes involving pedestrians than human drivers, holding the highest safety standards means recognizing when our behavior should be better.

“As a result, we have made the decision to file a voluntary software recall with NHTSA related to appropriately slowing and stopping in these scenarios. We will continue analyzing our vehicles’ performance and making necessary fixes as part of our commitment to continuous improvement.”

The recall report from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) also cites the stop arm violations are cause for the recall, stating:

Advertisement

“Prior to the affected Waymo ADS [automated driving system] receiving the remedy described in this report, in certain circumstances, Waymo vehicles that were stopped or stopping for a school bus with its red lights flashing and/or the stop arm extended would proceed again before the school bus had deactivated its flashing lights and/or retracted its stop arm.”

As Waymo plans to expand operations into San Antonio and Dallas, Pickford urged the company to ensure all vehicles are following the law before putting more students in the state in harm’s way.

“[People need to] be a voice and be a part of whatever safety working group is coming together to discuss Waymo or any autonomous vehicle operation in their area,” Pickford said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending