ATLANTA — John Eastman, the lawyer who developed methods to dam certification of the 2020 election, is “most likely a goal” within the legal investigation into efforts to overturn Donald J. Trump’s election loss in Georgia, one in all Mr. Eastman’s legal professionals stated on Wednesday. Mr. Eastman spent the morning showing earlier than an Atlanta particular grand jury trying into the matter.

The assertion that Mr. Eastman may face indictment within the Georgia case got here from Harvey Silverglate, a well known Boston-area legal protection lawyer and civil liberties advocate who’s representing Mr. Eastman.

Mr. Silverglate stated that his shopper had not been recognized as a goal by Fulton County prosecutors in Atlanta, as various different pro-Trump figures have been, together with Rudolph W. Giuliani, the previous New York Metropolis mayor who served as Mr. Trump’s private lawyer after the November 2020 election.

Nonetheless, in a telephone interview on Wednesday morning, Mr. Silverglate stated of Mr. Eastman: “I feel he’s most likely a goal, however I don’t assume he’s a reputable goal,” including that he believed Mr. Eastman had damaged no legal guidelines in Georgia.

“I don’t assume my shopper goes to be convicted of something,” Mr. Silverglate stated. “If he’s indicted, a movement to dismiss will finish the case.”

In a quick telephone interview after he left the Fulton County courthouse — the place he appeared behind closed doorways in entrance of the particular grand jury — Mr. Eastman stated that he by no means sought to overturn the November 2020 election however somewhat was calling for investigations into what he described as “illegality” within the course of.

“We actually take difficulty with the district legal professional’s workplace showing, apparently, to criminalize contested authorized theories,” he stated. In a press release, Mr. Silverglate and one other of Mr. Eastman’s legal professionals, Charles Burnham, stated they suggested Mr. Eastman “to say legal professional shopper privilege and the constitutional proper to stay silent the place applicable” in Wednesday’s grand jury look.

Mr. Eastman was an obscure conservative lawyer till he emerged as a central determine in efforts to maintain Mr. Trump in energy in 2020 by deploying slates of pretend electors in various swing states. His testimony within the Georgia case was sought by Fani T. Willis, the Fulton County district legal professional, who was contemplating bringing a multi-defendant racketeering or conspiracy case over what she has characterised as “any coordinated makes an attempt to unlawfully alter the end result of the 2020 elections on this state.”

Mr. Eastman appeared remotely earlier than a Georgia State Senate panel on Dec. 3, 2020, and made various false claims concerning the election, amongst them asserting that “the variety of underaged people who had been allowed to register” within the state “quantities allegedly as much as roughly 66,000 individuals.” (The Georgia Secretary of State’s workplace has stated that solely 4 individuals below 18 registered to vote and all 4 had been 18 by the point they voted.)

Citing such bogus irregularities, Mr. Eastman stated “the election can’t be validly licensed” and the choice “devolves again to the legislature.”

In a submitting in July, Ms. Willis’s workplace pointed to the looks, saying he had “suggested lawmakers that they’d each the lawful authority and a ‘obligation’ to exchange the Democratic Get together’s slate” although it “had been licensed because the duly appointed electors for the State of Georgia.” Ms. Willis’s workplace additionally stated there was proof that Mr. Eastman’s “look and testimony on the listening to was a part of a multistate, coordinated plan by the Trump Marketing campaign to affect the outcomes of the November 2020 election in Georgia and elsewhere.”

Just lately unearthed e mail site visitors exhibits that Mr. Eastman was persevering with to seek for proof of election fraud even after Mr. Trump left workplace. Hours after President Biden’s inauguration, Mr. Eastman proposed in an e mail to Mr. Giuliani that they problem the end result of two runoff elections in Georgia for Senate seats that had been gained two weeks earlier by Democrats. (The e-mail was despatched together with a plea to Mr. Giuliani to assist him accumulate a $270,000 bill to the Trump marketing campaign.)

“A number of us have now staked our reputations on the claims of election fraud,” Mr. Eastman wrote, “and this is able to be a technique to collect proof.”

Norman Eisen, who served as particular counsel to the Home Judiciary Committee through the first impeachment and trial of Donald Trump, stated that Mr. Eastman might be charged below the state’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, also known as RICO, which makes it against the law to interact in patterns of exercise in furtherance of a legal scheme.

“The district legal professional has made abundantly clear that she’s pursuing a RICO case, and Eastman is among the masterminds of the alleged RICO enterprise right here, led by Donald Trump however considerably enabled by Eastman and different attorneys to overturn the reputable Georgia election outcomes, and illegitimately, or unlawfully, foist a false electoral slate on Georgia and Congress,” Mr. Eisen stated.

Mr. Silverglate stated that Mr. Eastman’s efforts didn’t quantity to against the law, noting that there have been “no threats, no coercion” concerned. “There was an try to see if they might discover a technique to change the outcomes of the electoral depend,” he stated.

He added: “There was an try to see if there was a method ahead. And I don’t perceive how that is legal.”

Within the joint assertion by Mr. Eastman’s legal professionals, they stated that the Georgia prosecutors had “set itself on an unprecedented path of criminalizing controversial or disfavored authorized theories, probably in hopes that the federal authorities will observe its lead. Criminalization of unpopular authorized theories is towards each American custom and would have ended the careers of John Adams, Ruth Ginsburg, Thurgood Marshall and lots of different now-celebrated American legal professionals.”

A spokesperson for the district legal professional’s workplace declined to touch upon Wednesday.

Mr. Eastman can also be dealing with authorized hassle outdoors Georgia. In June, federal brokers armed with a search warrant seized his telephone, stopping him as he was leaving a restaurant in New Mexico. And his actions have been excoriated by witnesses testifying to the Home committee investigating the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol. One White Home lawyer, Eric Herschmann, was alarmed by Mr. Eastman’s actions and, utilizing a vulgarity, suggested him to “get an ideal” legal protection lawyer. “You’re going to wish it,” he recalled telling him.