Connect with us

Arkansas

US Supreme Court Punts Case Challenging Arkansas Congressional Map

Published

on

US Supreme Court Punts Case Challenging Arkansas Congressional Map


WASHINGTON, D.C. — A case challenging Arkansas’ congressional districts will go back to the district court where the court will have to apply the new standards adopted in South Carolina’s recently decided racial gerrymandering case. After last month’s Supreme Court decision in the South Carolina case, this is the first racial gerrymandering case to be impacted by the Supreme Court’s decision. 

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision in the South Carolina case, the plaintiffs in the case challenging Arkansas’ map will now have to reach a higher bar in order to bring a successful challenge to the state’s congressional map.

Throughout the 2020 redistricting cycle, Republicans used their map drawing power to strip Black voters of political influence, and Arkansas was no exception. Black voters challenged the state’s congressional map in court, but were not successful in getting the map blocked. 

In June 2023, Black voters — in a previously dismissed lawsuit challenging Arkansas’ congressional map — appealed their case to the Supreme Court after a three-judge panel found that the plaintiffs did not show that “race was the ‘predominant factor’ behind the adoption of Arkansas’s new congressional map.” Their lawsuit, which they filed back in March 2022, argued that the state’s congressional map violates the U.S. and Arkansas Constitutions as well as Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Currently, voters cannot bring Section 2 claims in Arkansas or any state within the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals — the only federal appeals court to explicitly remove private litigants’ ability to sue under Section 2. 

Advertisement

The plaintiffs specifically allege that Black voters in Pulaski County, home to the state capital of Little Rock, were divided across three congressional districts rather than kept together in one district, the 2nd Congressional District. According to the plaintiffs, this was done “to discourage the incentive of the Black voters of the area to vote, and to reduce the significance of their votes.” 

Unlike the majority of cases appealed to the Supreme Court, the Court was required to issue a decision in this case since the plaintiffs challenged the constitutionality of the map under the 14th and 15th Amendments.  

Read the order here.

Learn more about the case here.

Advertisement



Source link

Arkansas

Students need stability to learn. Here’s what Arkansas can do.

Published

on

Students need stability to learn. Here’s what Arkansas can do.


On an ordinary school morning at my alma mater Mineral Springs High School, where I now teach, I walked the same green-and-gold hallways I knew as a teenager. They felt different. Not louder or quieter. Just heavier. The kind of weight you feel in the way students move through the building, in how they sit […]



Source link

Continue Reading

Arkansas

Despite earlier request, Little Rock’s Ken Richardson a no-show during virtual city board meeting | Arkansas Democrat Gazette

Published

on

Despite earlier request, Little Rock’s Ken Richardson a no-show during virtual city board meeting | Arkansas Democrat Gazette


Little Rock City Director Ken Richardson was a no-show at a virtual meeting of the city’s Board of Directors on Tuesday despite previously seeking authorization to attend sessions electronically.

City officials made Tuesday’s agenda-setting meeting a virtual session on the heels of a major winter storm in Arkansas.

Richardson, 59, has not attended meetings since May 2024 after facing a serious health crisis, although he and others have not fully explained his health issues or offered a timeline for when he might be able to return.

Advertisement

After Richardson missed a series of meetings in 2024, the city issued a statement Aug. 1 of that year acknowledging that Richardson had undergone multiple life-threatening surgeries and was hospitalized.

Since 2007, Richardson has represented Ward 2, which encompasses a southern section of the city around Scott Hamilton Drive, Geyer Springs Road and Baseline Road.

His latest four-year term expires Dec. 31, 2026, having been reelected in 2022 without an opponent. The Ward 2 seat will appear on the ballot during the November 2026 election.

Richardson was the only one of the 10 city directors who did not appear via teleconference during Tuesday’s meeting.

In March 2025, the board voted to do away with the virtual-attendance procedures that had allowed members to attend meetings electronically during the covid-19 pandemic and the subsequent period.

Advertisement

Several months after the board changed the rules, a new Arkansas law took effect that requires members of municipal governing bodies to attend meetings in person unless the governor has declared an emergency.

Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders declared a state of emergency Jan. 22 in anticipation of the winter storm.

In a letter addressed to Mayor Frank Scott Jr. in late October, Richardson asked to attend meetings virtually, citing the federal Americans with Disabilities Act.

The city’s Human Resources Department later asked that Richardson and his health care provider complete paperwork detailing his request for reasonable accommodation under the law.

The board typically meets every Tuesday, alternating between formal meetings in which action is taken and agenda-setting meetings in which officials review the agenda for the following week’s meeting or discuss other policy matters.

Advertisement

To date, board members have not been presented with a measure that would authorize Richardson to attend meetings virtually as a disability-related accommodation or for other reasons.

In December, the board rejected a measure sponsored by City Director Lance Hines of Ward 5 that would have called on Richardson to resign. Scott spoke out against the proposal and had pledged to veto it if it passed.

City code lacks provisions that could lead to Richardson’s removal from office based on nonattendance.

Last year, an effort by some of Richardson’s constituents to gather enough signatures from Ward 2 residents to initiate a recall election fell short. At the mid-December deadline, organizer Pam Noble said they obtained fewer than 500 signatures out of the nearly 1,400 required to trigger the election.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Arkansas

Clintons resigned, resolved against MAGA exploitation | Arkansas Democrat Gazette

Published

on

Clintons resigned, resolved against MAGA exploitation | Arkansas Democrat Gazette


John Brummett

jbrummett@arkansasonline.com

John Brummett’s career in news began when he was in high school, as a part-time reporter for the Arkansas Democrat. He moved to the Arkansas Gazette in 1977.

He wrote a political column for the Gazette from 1986 to 1990. He was an editor for the Arkansas Times from 1990 to 1992.

Advertisement

In 1994, his book, “High Wire: From the Back Roads to the Beltway, the Education of Bill Clinton,” was published by Hyperion of New York City. He became a columnist with the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette in 1994. In 2000, he signed a deal with Donrey Media Group, now known as Stephens Media, and wrote for them for 11 years.

He rejoined Democrat-Gazette as a columnist on Oct. 24, 2011.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending