Connect with us

Arkansas

Arkansas agency’s rule change on state IDs and gender prompts safety debate and pushback

Published

on

Arkansas agency’s rule change on state IDs and gender prompts safety debate and pushback



The emergency rule leaves only a narrow way to change sex on documents, which could itself soon be closed.

An emergency rule mandating that all Arkansas driver’s licenses and state ID cards show the bearer’s sex as it’s recorded on a birth certificate went into effect on Thursday after approval by the Arkansas Legislative Council.

Top officials at the Department of Finance and Administration, which issued the rule, say it accounts for a need for the police to know the sex of people they encounter. They invoked public safety as a core rationale for the policy change.

Transgender rights activists and the ACLU of Arkansas, however, are pushing back. They say the policy would likely lead to sex-based discrimination and threatens the safety and wellbeing of trans and gender non-conforming people in the state.

Advertisement

A driver’s license, DFA Secretary Jim Hudson told the Arkansas Legislative Council on Thursday, “is a document that law enforcement relies upon, and if law enforcement cannot have confidence [in] information about the person they’re encountering, I do believe that is a public safety issue.”

“There is potential for confusion under the existing policy that we rescinded.”

State Sen. Clarke Tucker, D-Little Rock, disagreed.

“What you all are telling me is ‘we want law enforcement to have the most accurate information possible when they’re presented with a person,’ and to me, there’s no distinction between gender, height and weight on that, which are obviously also objectively verifiable.”

Height and weight on a state ID are self-reported, the same as gender was under the previous policy.

Advertisement

Hudson and Assistant Commissioner Paul Gehring did not city specific problems with the then-current policy over the 14 years it had been in place, saying that the emergency rule change is proactive.

A ‘dangerous proposition’

Sarah Everett, director of policy at the ACLU of Arkansas, took issue with the idea of requiring IDs to show sex assigned at birth.

“They’re implying a couple of things,” Everett said in a Monday interview. “One is that law enforcement treats people differently based on sex, which is illegal, and that trans people are somehow inherently dangerous.”

U.S. Supreme Court precedent, she said, holds that discrimination based on gender expression is, legally speaking, sex-based discrimination.

Advertisement

“Obviously there’s no basis,” Everett said, for the idea that police must know a person’s sex assigned at birth.

“It’s just it’s kind of a scary and dangerous proposition that trans people should be required to out themselves to law enforcement and anyone else who needs to see their identification,” she said.

“No officer is going to be confused when a woman hands him a driver’s license that says ‘F.’ But he may be confused and may react questionably at best if a woman hands him a driver’s license that says ‘male.’”

‘Going forward’

Since 2010, Arkansas has allowed ID holders to change the gender shown, without any questions asked, and to use the gender-neutral designation “X” in addition to “male” and female.”

Across the nation, 21 other states and the District of Columbia continue to allow state IDs to be marked “M,” “F” or “X.” The practice is also allowed on U.S. passports.

Advertisement

From now on, people in Arkansas with a gender marker of “X” on their passport must choose between male or female on their state ID, Gehring said before the Legislative Council on Thursday.

All current licenses and IDs will remain valid until their printed expiration date regardless of the sex marker shown on them.

In Arkansas, there is no option to designate a newborn as intersex on a birth certificate or to later change one’s sex to anything besides male or female.

Gehring said that the previous policy of “no questions asked” changes to sex markers was based on a departmental memo, which was not codified in state law or agency rules.

The change, he said, seeks to ensure that everything on a state ID is based on existing documentation.

Advertisement

The agency’s primary concern with the rule change was the X designation on a state ID, rather than male or female markers which differ from other documentation. This is because a marker of “X” is not “verifiable,” said Scott Hardin, a representative from the DFA.

But any sex markers that might differ from those on a person’s birth certificate, he said, are inherently unreliable and perhaps even inherently fraudulent.

Hardin said that the agency sees the issue of sex markers on state IDs as a pressing concern but that their emergency rule change was not made in response to existing problems on the ground or calls to action from the public or law enforcement.

The emergency rule, Hardin said, has “a sense of urgency” meant “to ensure nothing does happen going forward… [because] there’s a real possibility that something could happen if we’re not to address this.”

Wide-ranging consequences.

Max Calabotta, the Northwest Arkansas Coordinator at the trans rights advocacy group Intransitive, said that the consequences of a mismatch between a person’s outward appearance and the sex shown on their ID are wide-ranging.

Advertisement

These can include “being misgendered and denied housing, being misgendered and then being mistreated in the hospital when you’re in crisis, being misgendered by a police officer who has a gun and potentially the power to kill you.”

“I have a beard and I have a deep voice,” he said. “You don’t need to know anything else, none of the rest of how my body works.”

The new rule, he said, means that the only option for people to change the gender marker on their ID would likely cost many thousands of dollars in a complex and difficult process.

Under the new rules, Arkansas state IDs can only show male or female and that must match the sex on the holder’s birth certificate. It isn’t impossible for a transitioning person to change the sex on their birth certificate, but the bar to do so is set very high.

It can be changed by court order only after sex reassignment surgery. “Normally an attorney is needed for this type of action,” notes an explanation on the Arkansas Department of Health’s website.

Advertisement

The combination of medical bills and legal fees that are pre-requisites for obtaining a driver’s license with a different name or sex means a heavy burden for a bureaucratic process that’s practically free in other places.

Adding to this, transgender and gender non-conforming people are far more likely than the general population to be living below the poverty line, according to data from the University of California-Los Angeles, putting transition therapy, let alone legal counsel, far out of reach.

By contrast, for Calabotta, who was born in New York State and moved to Arkansas as a young child, there were no such hoops for them to jump through when changing the sex on their birth certificate.

“I just had to fill out a form and send them I didn’t have to provide a bunch of proof.”

Everett said that even this less attainable loophole could itself be in danger of further restrictions or even elimination.

Advertisement

“The only reason we haven’t seen an attack on that yet is because we’re not in a regular legislative session,” she said, noting that there are legislative bills in other states seeking to restrict that process.

Everett said that the ACLU of Arkansas’ policy is not to announce any potential legal action they might take until after filing a complaint, but that they are “looking at our options when it comes to litigation.”

An emergency rule like this only stays in effect for three months. Hardin said the DFA is already in the process of drafting a permanent rule change which will allow for a 30-day public comment period.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Arkansas

Arkansas parish hit by multiple vandalism incidents

Published

on

Arkansas parish hit by multiple vandalism incidents


Police are investigating after a parish in Arkansas was struck by three vandalism incidents in recent months, including the destruction of a statue of Mary on the parish grounds. 

Advertisement

Father Joseph Chan, the pastor at St. Leo Church in Hartford, Arkansas, told CNA that the incidents of vandalism began early last year. The parish is part of the Diocese of Little Rock. 

“The first was on February 26, 2023,” he said. “Our St. Leo sign and notification board had words/letters removed/jumbled to reflect body parts; for example, the letter ‘M’ was removed from the word ‘Mass’.”

“The second was on March 10, 2024, which involved graffiti to our sacristy door,” the pastor said. “Sprayed was a racial slur commonly directed towards African Americans.”

The most recent incident occurred on July 13. “Toppled to the ground were an angel and Mary statues,” Chan said. “Mary’s neck was broken.  The statue of Jesus was seemingly untouched.”

“All three incidents happened within 18 months,” the priest noted. 

Advertisement
A vandalized statue of Mary, the Mother of God, at St. Leo Parish in Hartford, Arkansas, July 2024. Fr. Joseph Chan
A vandalized statue of Mary, the Mother of God, at St. Leo Parish in Hartford, Arkansas, July 2024. Fr. Joseph Chan

Law enforcement is investigating the crimes. 

“Police were notified but no suspects were identified tied to the vandalism to our knowledge,” Chan said. 

The pastor said parishioners have suffered “sadness” over the incidents. 

Mary Radley, a parishioner of the church, told the Arkansas Catholic this week that the parish has “filed with our insurance company to see how much money we will have to repair the damage.”

Chan, meanwhile, told the local outlet that “all parishes should have some sort of safeguards against vandalism,” but ”because it is the work of evil, prayer is the best antidote.”

Multiple Catholic parishes and holy sites have suffered vandalism in the U.S. in recent months and years. 

Advertisement

A statue of the Blessed Mother in a prayer garden on the grounds of the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception was damaged by an assailant earlier this year.

Catholic churches, schools, and cemeteries throughout the Archdiocese of Cincinnati, meanwhile, were targeted by pro-abortion vandalism ahead of a major statewide vote on abortion laws. 

Catholic facilities in Texas and Colorado were also targeted last year with vandalism. 

(Story continues below)

Advertisement

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio told EWTN News in March that the numerous attacks against Catholic churches are “not a focus or [has] the attention of [the Biden administration] or this Justice Department.”

“They can’t find a single person or any of these people that were responsible for these, what is a pretty concerted effort to attack Catholic churches in America,” Rubio said.





Source link

Continue Reading

Arkansas

Arkansas school districts consider implementing new state cell phone, mental health program • Arkansas Advocate

Published

on

Arkansas school districts consider implementing new state cell phone, mental health program • Arkansas Advocate


More than 200 Arkansas school districts have expressed interest in a new pilot program to reduce cell phone access with the goal of improving students’ mental health, according to the Arkansas Department of Education.

In early July, Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Education Secretary Jacob Oliva issued a letter to superintendents inviting them to participate in the program, which grew out of a meeting with school leaders in June centered on mental health. 

As part of the pilot program, the University of Arkansas’ Office for Education Policy will examine how students’ mental health may be impacted by reduced access to cell phones and social media. A smaller group of districts from the pilot program will participate in the UA study.

Cell phone policies at Arkansas schools vary among districts and individual classrooms. While some teachers collect phones at the start of instructional time, others allow students to access their devices after completing assignments.

Advertisement

Bentonville West High School piloted a program last year that required cell phones to be silenced and stored during class. Bentonville School District Director of Communications Leslee Wright said the initiative was a “remarkable success,” with 86% of staff reporting a positive impact. Administrators also recorded a 57% reduction in verbal or physical aggression offenses and a 51% reduction in drug-related offenses, she said. 

Bentonville High School is developing its own program modeled off the one implemented at Bentonville West, which will continue its program this fall, Wright said. Meanwhile, all middle and junior high schools in the district will participate in the state’s pilot program.

Arkansas governor, education secretary call on schools to join mental health pilot project

Additionally, the district has tracked computer screen time for two years “to identify some limitations, knowing that face-to-face instruction, activity and play are necessary for healthy development,” she said. 

“We believe there’s significant value in reducing screen time for our students, whether on laptops or cell phones,” Wright said.

Advertisement

Arkansas’ pilot program will provide funding for phone storage devices to reduce screen time and social media use during the school day, according to a press release. More exposure to social media increases kids’ risk of mental health problems, Sanders and Oliva wrote in their letter. 

More than 200,000 students could be affected by the program, ADE spokeswoman Kimberly Mundell said. Interested districts submitted information to ADE through their education cooperatives, and based on the initial estimate, ADE will request $8 million in appropriation, she said. 

An initial small group of schools interested in the pilot “that were further down the road” in implementing cell policy changes will be reimbursed directly, Mundell said. The pilot was opened to all districts as interest grew, so those districts will be reimbursed through the co-ops, she said. 

The program will also provide funding for telehealth mental health services, as well as support in locating mental health providers and navigating insurance matters, according to the release. All districts will have access to the telehealth services and the process for accessing the funds will be determined after a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is completed, Mundell said.

Bethany Ratermann, senior director of communications for LISA Academy Public Charter Schools, said final funding amounts will determine the exact number of students who participate, but they would like to include 6-12th graders. 

Advertisement

LISA Academy, which operates 11 schools on nine campuses across Arkansas, decided to implement the pilot as a way to prioritize students’ mental health as the charter organization works “to educate well rounded students as part of our updated LISA 2.0 program model,” Ratermann said. 

Administrators hope to learn more about home usage through family feedback, and look forward to working with the U of A “to analyze this survey data and hope to arrive at conclusions that will benefit all students,” she said. 

Let us know what you think…

The possibility of a reduction in issues with bullying, mental health and drugs, as well as interest from principals and the ability to purchase lockable devices for free were all reasons participating in the pilot program appealed to the DeQueen School District, Superintendent Jason Sanders said.

DeQueen’s school board on Monday approved participation in the pilot, which will be implemented at the middle school and junior high campuses. Students in 6-9th grade will receive YONDR pouches that will be magnetically locked while on campus, but parents can still see where their child is on apps like Live 360, Sanders said.

Advertisement

“Of course nothing is perfect, and we will have to work around some challenges such as Apple watches and dummy phones put in the pouches,” he said. “We also approved a policy for those campuses reflecting such.”

DeQueen’s previous policy required middle and junior high students to secure their phones on their person, backpack or locker during the instructional day. Sanders said he’ll be interested to compare the data on mental health referrals and discipline between school years with lockable devices and those without.

Research study

The effect of cell phones and social media on students’ mental health has become a hot topic, but there haven’t been many peer-reviewed studies on the issue, said Sarah McKenzie, executive director of the University of Arkansas’ Office for Education Policy.

Besides being a newer issue, another problem is “everything intersects, so it’s hard to find causal evidence about things,” McKenzie said.

“For all the talk about it, there hasn’t been any actual research, or much actual research about how this would impact kids,” she said. “It’s mostly been anecdotal.”

Advertisement

Protection of kids on social media platforms advances in U.S. Senate

McKenzie is working with Kristin Higgins, Department Head of Counseling, Leadership and Research Methods at the U of A, to develop a year-long study about the effects of the pilot program on students’ mental health. McKenzie said their research will involve focus groups with students, teachers and parents, and interviews with superintendents about the implementation of the pilot program. 

Research will also include the administration of a short, general depression and anxiety screener to students in the fall and at the end of the academic year to see if there’s a reduction in feelings of unhappiness, she said.

“The idea is if they’re paying more attention in class and they’re feeling less anxious then they’re going to learn more,” she said. 

Analyzing learning data won’t occur until after test scores are released later in 2025, McKenzie said. However, preliminary results from the initial surveys and focus groups should be available before the new year, providing a baseline prior to implementation of the pilot. The final report on student survey outcomes will likely be released next summer, she said. 

Advertisement

Calls for more research on this topic are occurring at the national level. U.S. Sens. Tom Cotton, Republican of Arkansas, and Tim Kaine, Democrat of Virginia, introduced legislation in November to require the U.S. Department of Education to “conduct a study regarding the use of mobile devices in elementary and secondary schools, and to establish a pilot program of awarding grants to enable certain schools to create a school environment free of mobile devices.”

The study in that bill, which was referred to committee, could take a long time to complete, McKenzie said.

“In the spirit of [the Office for Education Policy], our idea is to try to get the information to the people who need it as quickly as possible in the best way we can,” she said. “I imagine there will be a lot more studies, but this one should add to the knowledge that we have so far, which is actually not very much.”

Restriction considerations

At the Fayetteville School District, Assistant Superintendent of Teaching and Learning Courtney Morawski said the ongoing conversation around cell phones now is “how do we protect instructional time in a manageable way” while honoring new research that says there should be restrictions in place.

Arkansas NetChoice case differs from U.S. Supreme Court case, but both involve First Amendment

Advertisement

Fayetteville will implement the state pilot program (most likely in 7-12th grades) in the upcoming school year, “a transition year,” with the goal of having phone restrictions for the entire day for all K-12 students during the 2025-2026 academic year, Morwaski said.

The district received approval to spend $233,000 on storage devices through the state’s pilot program, but officials are still working through plan specifics, including what products to purchase, she said.

Because technology has become integrated into students’ daily lives, there’s much to consider in terms of implementing restrictions. Though educators want to be careful about how much time kids spend in front of a computer, learning often involves some screen time, Morawski said. But what students are being asked to do can be done on a Chromebook, which has protections phones don’t have, she said. 

Cell phones can be vital for students monitoring health conditions like diabetes, so Morawski said they’re looking at devices with different locks for kids that need to access their phone regularly. Additionally, they’re working with health and special education staff to make sure they’re considering students who rely on their phones for specific needs.

“We absolutely acknowledge and understand that,” Morawski said. “We’d never want to put a student at risk.”

Advertisement

Phones have also become a way to communicate in active shooter situations, but Morawski said one company they’ve spoken with noted that limiting students’ ability to share misinformation can help officials track down facts about an emergency situation more quickly and safely. Limiting access to phones can also help students better focus on a teacher who’s trained to follow certain protocols during a crisis, she said.

Another possible upside to the program is the potential for a reduction in bullying. 

“We do believe after talking to many other districts who have done this in other states that it lowers incidents of bullying drastically, and so we know that is something we want to work towards in all of our schools,” Morawski said. “We want students to feel safe and secure and we do think that this will be a step that will make a difference in their safety at school, but also offline hopefully or when they’re out of school.”

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arkansas

Arkansas football expecting 15 4-stars among 50 prospects visiting for Hogwild Hangout | Arkansas Democrat Gazette

Published

on

Arkansas football expecting 15 4-stars among 50 prospects visiting for Hogwild Hangout | Arkansas Democrat Gazette


Arkansas is expected to host more than 50 prospects, including at least 15 4-star recruits, for the Hogwild Hangout recruiting event Saturday. 

The event starts at 11 a.m. and will end around 4 p.m. It is expected to be the last big recruiting event held this summer with the dead period starting Aug. 1 and running until Aug. 31. 

Numerous commitments along with prospects from the 2025, 2026, 2027 and 2028 classes are expected to attend. 

Class of 2025 Arkansas commitments:

Advertisement

QB Grayson Wilson — 6-3, 205 pounds, of Conway

• Rated a 4-star prospect by Rivals and ESPN, is rated Rivals’ No. 6 dual-threat quarterback

WR Antonio Jordan — 6-6, 230 pounds, of Warren

• Chose Arkansas over Florida State, South Carolina, Ole Miss and others 

LB Tavion Wallace — 6-1, 215 pounds, of Jesup (Ga.) Wayne County

Advertisement

• Consensus 4-star prospect, ESPN’s No. 4 inside linebacker

S Taijh Overton — 6-2, 180 pounds, of Mobile (Ala.) Williamson

• Consensus 3-star recruit, had offers from Florida State, Missouri, Ole Miss, Central Florida and others 

ATH Quentin Murphy — 6-1, 205 pounds, of LR Parkview

• Consensus 3-star prospect, has other offers from Georgia Tech, Ole Miss, Oregon and Oklahoma

Advertisement

OL Blake Cherry — 6-6, 280 pounds, of Owasso, Okla.

• Consensus 3-star recruit who chose Arkansas over Texas A&M, TCU, Kansas State, Kansas and Nebraska

OL Kash Courtney — 6-5, 270 pounds, of Carthage, Texas

• Consensus 3-star prospect who chose Arkansas over Texas Tech, Houston, West Virginia, Duke and others

CB Nigel Pringle — 6-1, 180 pounds, of Houston North Shore 

Advertisement

• On3.com 3-star recruit who had offers from Oregon, Houston, Arizona, Kansas, Arizona State and others

DE Trent Sellers — 6-5, 240 pounds, of Moblie, (Ala.) Faith Academy

• On3.com 3-star prospect with offers from Ole Miss, Nebraska, Mississippi State and others 

OL Connor Howes — 6-6, 300 pounds, of Kissimmee (Fla.) Osceola

• On3.com 4-star recruit, No. 14 offensive tackle and No. 150 overall prospect

Advertisement

LB JJ Shelton — 6-1, 205 pounds, of Dallas South Oak Cliff 

• Consensus 3-star recruit who had other offers from Ohio State, Auburn, Notre Dame, TCU and others 

P Gavin Rush — 6-3, 185 pounds, of Franklin (Tenn.) Page, 

• Pledged to Arkansas as a preferred walk-on over scholarship offers from Air Force, Western Kentucky and Army

Non-committed prospects:

Advertisement

’25 CB Aidan Anding — 6-0, 165 pounds, of Ruston, La.

• Consensus 3-star with Arkansas, Texas, LSU and Miami offers

’25 RB Cameron Settles — 6-0, 198 pounds, of LR Parkview 

• On3.com 3-star prospect who officially visited Arkansas in June 

’25 TE Dakotah Terrell — 6-7, 215 pounds, of Pocola, Okla. 

Advertisement

• On3.com 3-star recruit with Arkansas, Oklahoma, Michigan and Texas A&M offers 

’25 WR Josiah Warrior-Benson — 6-3, 210 pounds, of Maumelle

• Has an Arkansas State offer

’25 OL Bryson Weathers — 6-6, 285 pounds, of Cabot

• Has interest from Arkansas and Florida State

Advertisement

’26 RB Racine Guillory Jr. — 5-9, 170 pounds, of  Aldeo, Texas 

• Consensus 4-star prospect with Arkansas, Texas, Southern Cal and Oklahoma offers

’26 RB TJ Hodges — 6-1, 175 pounds, of Marked Tree 

• On3.com 4-star prospect with Arkansas, Oregon, Florida State and Ole Miss offers

’26 DE Jordan Harris — 6-6, 220 pounds, of Maumelle

Advertisement

• Has offers from Arkansas, Missouri, Ole Miss and SMU

’26 OL Jahlon Harris — 6-6, 330 pounds, of Maumelle

• Has offers from Missouri and Arkansas State 

’26 Noah Best — 6-3, 290 pounds, of Midlothian, Texas

• ESPN 3-star prospect with Arkansas, Missouri, LSU and Oklahoma offers 

Advertisement

’26 DB Lebron Bauer — 5-11, 160 pounds, of Allen, Texas 

• Arkansas, Texas Tech and Arizona State offers 

’26 S Jordan Deck — 6-2, 185 pounds, of Frisco, (Texas) Lone Star 

• 247Sports 4-star prospect with Arkansas, Penn State, LSU and Oklahoma offers 

’26 QB Jayvon Gilmore — 6-6, 190 pounds, of Elgin, (S.C.) Gaffney 

Advertisement

• On3.com 3-star with top five of Arkansas, Virginia Tech, Louisville, Texas A&M and N.C. State 

’26 TE Landon Pace — 6-3, 230 pounds, of St. Louis University HS

• Son of former Ohio State and NFL offensive lineman Orlando Pace

’26 DL Anthony Kennedy — 6-6, 280 pounds, of Maumelle 

• ESPN 4-star with Arkansas, Georgia, Auburn, Tennessee and Texas A&M offers

Advertisement

’26 WR Caleb ‘The Jet’ Smith — 5-10, 160 pounds, of Allen, Texas

• On3.com 3-star recruit with Arkansas, Nebraska, Louisville and Baylor offers

’26 OL Cody Taylor — 6-3, 280 pounds, of Greenwood

• On3.com 3-star recruit with Ole Miss, Vanderbilt, Kentucky and Virginia Tech offers

’26 DE Colton Yarbrough — 6-5, 240 pounds, of Durant, Okla.

Advertisement

• 247Sports 4-star prospect with Arkansas, Oklahoma St., Oregon and Georgia offers

’26 OL Desmond Green — 6-5, 350 pounds, of St. Stephen, (S.C.) Timberland

• Rivals 4-star recruit with South Carolina, Georgia, Clemson and Florida offers

’26 OL Blaise Thomassie — 6-5, 270 pounds, of Baton Rouge, (La.) Catholic

• Rivals 4-star recruit with Arkansas, Oregon and Florida State offers

Advertisement

’26 OL Bryce Gilmore — 6-4, 270 pounds, of Prosper, Texas

• Rated a 4-star by three of four recruiting services and has Arkansas, Nebraska and California offers

’26 OL Deminio Patterson — 6-4, 320 pounds, of Joe T. Robinson 

• Has an offer from Ole Miss

’26 OL Tucker Young — 6-5, 300 pounds, of Hot Springs Lakeside

Advertisement

• Has offers from Arkansas and Memphis

’26 DB Adam Auston — 6-2, 200 pounds, Lawton, (Okla.) MacArthur 

• On3.com 3-star recruit with Arkansas, Oklahoma State, Kansas State and Baylor offers

’26 WR Tre’von McGory — 6-0, 175 pounds, of Germantown, Tenn.

• On3.com 3-star prospect with Arkansas, Auburn, Tennessee and Missouri offers

Advertisement

’26 WR Blair Irvin III — 6-1, 170 pounds, of Bentonville

• Kansas State, Minnesota and UNLV offers

’26 WR Dequane Prevo — 5-9, 160 pounds, of  Texarkana, (Texas) Liberty-Eylau

• ESPN 4-star prospect with Arkansas, Texas, Texas A&M and Oklahoma offers

’26 QB Jackson Presley — 6-2, 190 pounds, of Kalispell, (MT.) Glacier

Advertisement

• On3.com 3-star recruit with Arkansas, Texas A&M, Florida State and Colorado offers 

’26 DB Caden Harris — 6-0, 165 pounds, of Brownsville, (Tenn.) Haywood

• On3.com 4-star with Arkansas, Tennessee, Ole Miss and Alabama offers 

’26 LB Jakore Smith — 6-1, 190 pounds, of LR Parkview 

• 247Sports 4-star recruit with Arkansas, Tennessee, Alabama and Ole Miss offers 

Advertisement

’26 Tylen Mathews — 6-0, 170 pounds, of Lake Cormorant, Miss. 

• On3.com 3-star recruit with Arkansas, Ole Miss, Tennessee and Auburn offers 

’26 S Kyndrick Williams — 6-1,185 pounds, of Fayetteville 

• Has an offer from UNLV

’26 WR Blake McLane — 6-3, 190 pounds, of McKinney, (Texas) Frisco Emerson

Advertisement

• Attended an Arkansas camp in June

’27 LB/DE Ba’Roc Willis — 6-2, 220 pounds, of Moody, Ala.

• Has offers from Arkansas, Alabama, Auburn and Florida State

’27 DB Jayden Anding — 6-0, 165 pounds, of Ruston, La. 

• Has offers from Arkansas and Miami and is the brother of Arkansas ’26 DB target Aidan Anding

Advertisement

’27 DE-TE Hayden Sublette — 6-4, 220 pounds, of Maumelle

• Earned an offer from Arkansas after attending camp in June 

’28 WR David Thomas — 5-11, 160 pounds, of Stillwater, Okla.

• Has offers from Arkansas and Oklahoma State



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending