Connect with us

Science

Saturn's moon looked like a snowy Utah landscape in my mind. The reality is just as compelling

Published

on

Saturn's moon looked like a snowy Utah landscape in my mind. The reality is just as compelling

Twenty years ago today, I watched TV coverage of a probe descending toward the surface of Titan, a moon of Saturn, while outside my home in Utah snow dusted a rocky mountain outcrop I’d nicknamed Titan — both after the moon and a painting of it.

When the probe — named Huygens, for the 17th century Dutch astronomer Christiaan Huygens who discovered that world — transmitted its first pictures, the painted moonscape clashed with the real one. The artwork, from the 1940s, was shown to be utterly wrong.

Chesley Bonestell’s “Saturn as Seen From Titan,” appeared with other planetary scenes in Life magazine, showing what were then considered to be astronomically accurate views of the solar system for the first time. An architectural illustrator and Hollywood matte painter, Bonestell would make a career of space art. His work inspired the very scientists whose research would render many of his paintings factually obsolete.

The Titan illustration is his most famous space scene. In it, Saturn hangs over windswept snow and brown cliffs and outcroppings. The crags frame a glowing Saturn, floating huge, rings nearly edge-on, like a giant’s belt-buckle. Part of the planet is shadowed, blending into the cobalt-turquoise sky. The whole of it is weirdly grand.

What the Huygens probe revealed — a hazy, frigid, dusky-orange world — and what the ethereal painting promised could not be more different.

Advertisement

The first color view of Titan’s surface, which was returned on Jan. 14, 2005, by the European Space Agency Huygens probe, following processing to add reflection spectra data.

(NASA)

Released from NASA’s Cassini spacecraft, the Huygens probe descended by parachute for some 2.5 hours before surviving its landing. The European Space Agency craft remains humans’ farthest footfall, some 750 million miles away from Earth.

With a thick nitrogen-methane atmosphere, Titan’s sky is choked with organic compounds, dust and aerosols. This is a world of hydrocarbon seas and vistas of sand and icy rocks. The cold — minus-274 degrees Farenheit — is perhaps the only commonality with Bonestell’s view. (The real Titan may not be as romantic as Bonestell’s, but it is promising: In three years NASA’s Dragonfly mission will send a helicopter to explore Titan’s habitability for life.)

Advertisement

The Huygens-Bonestell discrepancy wasn’t the first time that our visions of the solar system were upended by data. Space exploration is, after all, a form of “ground-truthing.”

When spacecraft first reached Mars in the 1960s, the notion of canals built by Martians had to be discarded, though later images would show clear evidence of surface water. The sci-fi jungles of Venus pictured in pulp magazines? Probes showed instead a dense atmosphere and hellish-hot surface. Our own moon’s mountains, long portrayed as sharp and alpine, are instead muscular and rounded.

Yet our obsolete visions retain value.

In 1944, Bonestell’s illustration offered a compelling answer to the question, “Why explore space?” And even now, knowing it’s far from accurate, the painting’s faint path of light leads us between the cliffs and toward Saturn with this message: If we stay only where we are, then knowledge does too, in or near the frigid lavender of shadows.

Bonestell’s informed-but-imagined solar system evokes the sublime, the sense of being small then empowered in the face of the grand. The scientists who built the Huygens probe that made Titan real were, in their way, doing the same. Both endeavors are examples of the rigors of curiosity born from awe.

Advertisement

This is not, as critics of space exploration suggest, a form of belittling or ignoring our terrestrial challenges. Quite the opposite. The sublime strengthens our bonds with the cosmos and all it signifies: beauty and dread, imagination and fact, the thrill of discovery and fear of the unknown. Painted or transmitted, other worlds can fire the imagination and at the same time underline the value of the one we inhabit. That mountain outcrop I still think of as Titan reminds me of the painting, the probe, space “out there” and the space I occupy right here on Earth.

Christopher Cokinos is the author of “Still as Bright: An Illuminating History of the Moon from Antiquity to Tomorrow.” He lives in northern Utah.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Science

Moderate Drinking Raises Cancer Risks While Offering Few Benefits

Published

on

Moderate Drinking Raises Cancer Risks While Offering Few Benefits

Among both men and women, drinking just one alcoholic beverage a day increases the risk of liver cirrhosis, esophageal cancer, oral cancer and various types of injuries, according to a federal analysis of alcohol’s health effects issued on Tuesday.

Women face a higher risk of developing liver cancer at this level of drinking, but a lower risk of diabetes. And while one alcoholic drink daily also reduces the likelihood of strokes caused by blood clots among both men and women, the report found, even occasional heavy drinking negates the benefits.

The report, prepared by an outside scientific review panel under the auspices of the Department of Health and Human Services, is one of two competing assessments that will be used to shape the influential U.S. Dietary Guidelines, which are to be updated this year.

The government has for several decades recommended a limit of two standard alcoholic drinks per day for men and one for women.

In December, a review of the data by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine supported this advice, finding that moderate drinking was linked to fewer heart attack and stroke deaths, and fewer deaths overall, compared with no drinking.

Advertisement

But some experts fear that the harms of moderate drinking have been understated, particularly the risk of cancer, which is the leading cause of death among people under 85, according to the American Cancer Society.

In 2020, the last time the dietary guidelines came up for review, scientific advisers suggested lowering the recommendation to one drink daily for both men and women. That advice did not appear in the final guidelines.

The analysis from the National Academies tied moderate drinking in women to a small but significant increase in breast cancer, but said there was insufficient evidence to tie alcohol to other cancers.

This month, however, the U.S. Surgeon General, citing mounting scientific evidence, called for labeling alcohol with cancer warnings similar to those that appear on cigarettes. The report issued on Tuesday found that the increased cancer risk comes with any amount of alcohol consumption and rises with higher levels of drinking.

Drinking is linked to a higher risk of death for seven types of cancer, including breast cancer, colorectal cancer, liver cancer as well as cancers of the oral cavity, pharynx and larynx and esophagus.

Advertisement

Men and women are both vulnerable to these health harms, but women are much more likely to develop a cancer linked to drinking, the report said.

“Among the U.S. population, the risk of dying from alcohol use begins at low levels of average use,” the report said. “Higher levels of alcohol consumption are linked with progressively higher mortality risk.”

Those who consume more than seven drinks per week have a one in 1,000 risk of dying from a condition related to alcohol. The risk increases to one in 100 if consumption is more than nine drinks a week.

This article will be updated.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Science

What to do if you have to evacuate without your medications

Published

on

What to do if you have to evacuate without your medications

The Los Angeles fires have forced thousands to evacuate indefinitely from their homes, often without necessary medications or medical devices. Here’s what to do if you find yourself without access to the things you need to stay on top of chronic conditions.

Go directly to the pharmacy

If the fire has closed your doctor’s office, or if wait times will keep you from getting your medicine when you need it, you can go directly to a pharmacy to replace needed medications, said Dr. Richard Dang, assistant professor of clinical pharmacy at the USC Mann School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences.

“We definitely don’t want patients to wait days without medication, and physicians are probably slammed as well with the requests that are coming in on top of their regular patient load,” he said.

If you typically get prescriptions from a chain pharmacy like CVS or Walgreens and your usual branch is closed or otherwise inaccessible due to the fires, you can request a refill from any other pharmacy in that chain.

Advertisement

If you’ve evacuated to an area without a branch of your usual pharmacy nearby, you can go to any nearby pharmacy and request to have your prescriptions transferred to that location. If, for example, you typically get prescriptions from Rite Aid but have evacuated to an area with only a Walgreens nearby, you can go to Walgreens and ask to have your prescription transferred there.

If neither your pharmacy nor your physician is reachable because of the disaster, California law allows pharmacists to dispense a “reasonable amount” of medication without a prescription at their discretion to see patients through until they can get a regular supply.

Don’t worry about what’s in-network for now

The California Department of Managed Health Care on Jan. 9 ordered all insurance providers licensed to operate in the state to suspend prescription refill limits for members affected by the fires who need to replace necessary medications.

The order also allows consumers to fill existing prescriptions or obtain new ones at out-of-network pharmacies without any additional costs beyond what they would have paid at in-network outlets.

“There are so many barriers to getting meds. Patients don’t need any more right now, given the situation,” said Dr. Rita Shane, vice president and chief pharmacy officer at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.

Advertisement

If you are having trouble contacting or getting the services you need from your health insurer, you can contact the DMHC Help Center at www.DMHC.ca.gov or 888-466-2219 (TDD: 1-877-688-9891) for free assistance.

Call your insurance provider to replace devices and equipment

The state order also mandates that insurance companies replace medical equipment or supplies for people who have lost or can’t access theirs because of the fires.

Call your healthcare plan provider to figure out the best way to replace any necessary equipment. Every healthcare plan is required to have a toll-free number prominently displayed on its website to assist fire disaster victims.

Organizations can help

If you’re not sure where to start or don’t typically have health insurance, you can dial 211 or visit 211LA.org for community organizations that can help with emergency medication access and other services in a disaster.

Don’t wait

The fires have upended thousands of lives in Los Angeles County. While there are a dizzying number of things to take care of in the wake of an evacuation, your health should be a priority, Shane said.

Advertisement

“The most important thing is to tell people to get their refills sooner rather than later,” she said.

Insurers, pharmacies and doctors offices will likely be dealing with high caseloads and may have longer wait times than usual. Sorting out prescriptions and device replacement without the documents you’d typically have on hand may take longer.

“The last thing we want is for people to end up in the emergency departments,” Shane said. “They could be in a situation of having to wait for a long time, and we wouldn’t want people to miss doses of medications that are really important for their well-being.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Science

A Stargazers’ Guide to Watching the Full Moon Pass Mars and the a New Come

Published

on

A Stargazers’ Guide to Watching the Full Moon Pass Mars and the a New Come

The first full moon of the year will glide through the sky on Monday night. For lucky stargazers in some parts of the world, it will also pass in front of the more-brilliantly-red-than-usual Mars in an event known as a lunar occultation.

But that’s not all January’s sky has to offer. A new comet, expected to be the brightest of the year, is nearing its closest approach to the sun on Monday — though spotting it, at least in northern skies, will be tricky.

According to NASA, a lunar occultation occurs when the moon passes in front of an object, like a distant planet, that appears much smaller in the sky. An occultation is similar to a solar eclipse — when the moon obscures the sun — but much less grand.

Lunar occultations can happen several times a year and when the moon is in any phase. Earlier this month, a crescent moon that slipped over Saturn was visible for people in Europe, northern Africa and parts of Greenland and Russia.

Mars has been appearing bigger and brighter in the night sky as it nears Earth. It is approaching what is known as opposition, which occurs when Mars is on the opposite side of Earth as the sun. During opposition, Mars is closer to us than usual and its face is fully lit by the sun as viewed from our world, making for spectacular views of the Red Planet.

Advertisement

Mars is in opposition every 26 months. This year, it reaches opposition on Jan. 15 at 9:32 p.m. Eastern time. But the planet has been steadily growing more brilliant since November.

Only people in North America and parts of Africa will be able to see the moon occult Mars on Monday. Elsewhere, Mars will just appear close to the moon, a celestial occurrence known as a conjunction. The occultation will last for more than an hour in some places and be visible with the unaided eye, though binoculars or a telescope will enhance the view.

The event will begin at different times, depending on where you live. According to a chart published by the International Occultation Timing Association, Mars will disappear behind the moon on Monday at 6:21 p.m. in Seattle, 9:16 p.m. in Washington, D.C., and 9:21 p.m. in New York City, all local times. Observers in Montreal will see the occultation start at 9:25 p.m., and in Accra, Ghana, at 4:53 a.m., before sunrise on Tuesday.

Comet ATLAS, or C/2024 G3 to astronomers, was spotted last April by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System and shares the name of many other comets discovered by the network of telescopes, including Tsuchinshan-ATLAS, which blazed through the sky last October.

Like all comets, C/2024 G3 is a frozen chunk of material left over from the formation of the solar system that has begun to melt as it approaches the sun. It will reach perihelion, or its closest approach to the sun, on Jan. 13, and come within 8.4 million miles of the solar surface.

Advertisement

Some comets disintegrate from the heat. But if they survive the encounter, perihelion is when they are expected to be brightest — though being so close to the sun can make them difficult to see.

Some observers in the Northern Hemisphere have already spotted Comet ATLAS, a fuzzy dot with a short tail, low on the eastern horizon before sunrise. Because of its altitude and the light of dawn, it is difficult to see, especially without binoculars or a telescope.

Closer to perihelion, those with an unobstructed view of the western horizon may be able to catch the comet in the evening near the setting sun. Interactive star maps like this one can help with figuring out where and when to look.

If Comet ATLAS survives perihelion, it will migrate to skies in the Southern Hemisphere in the latter half of January, and be visible there in the evenings after sunset. As the comet moves away from the sun it will climb higher in the sky, but also grow dimmer each day.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending