Connect with us

Science

Pandemic concerns may prime people to discriminate against Asians and Latinos

Published

on

Pandemic concerns may prime people to discriminate against Asians and Latinos

People who find themselves primed to consider the COVID-19 pandemic usually tend to discriminate towards Asian and Latino People, a brand new research suggests.

The findings, described this week within the Proceedings of the Nationwide Academy of Sciences, spotlight one more means that the pandemic has ramped up discrimination towards racial and ethnic minority teams — one which may be as widespread as it’s troublesome to detect.

“What it exhibits is that considerations about COVID generally have the potential to harm any group that’s perceived as ‘immigrant’ or ‘foreigner,’” mentioned Karthick Ramakrishnan, a political scientist at UC Riverside who was not concerned within the work. That might assist clarify “why we’re seeing considerations and studies of hate incidents in surveys [of] Latinos, Asians and different communities of shade,” he mentioned.

It’s no secret that anti-Asian violence has risen throughout the U.S. for the reason that pandemic started. Inflammatory rhetoric by former President Trump that demonized immigrants and blamed China for the pandemic served to vilify a gaggle of People based mostly on their ethnic heritage. And in cities across the U.S., studies of violence directed at Asian People soared by 164% within the first quarter of 2021 in contrast with the identical interval a 12 months prior.

Advertisement

Even in California, the place greater than 15% of residents have Asian ancestry, reported incidents jumped by 107% in 2020, in response to a report from the state lawyer normal.

The authors of the brand new research wished to see if there have been much less excessive however doubtlessly extra commonplace methods wherein folks may discriminate towards Asians — and members of different minority teams — because of the pandemic.

“Has the pandemic elevated the much less seen, on a regular basis types of social discrimination towards Asians?” the researchers wrote. “Moreover, though many think about East Asians the first victims of COVID-19-related racism, has pandemic-related discrimination affected different racial/ethnic minority teams as nicely?”

Advertisement

Questions like these are troublesome to reply, as a result of asking folks straight whether or not they have interaction in discriminatory conduct isn’t prone to yield an sincere response. That’s as a result of individuals who do deal with others in a different way based mostly on their race or ethnicity is perhaps reluctant to acknowledge it, mentioned Neeraj Kaushal, an economist at Columbia College who co-led the research with colleague Yao Lu, a sociologist.

So the researchers took a unique tack.

In August of 2020, they despatched a survey to five,000 American adults by way of YouGov, a public opinion analysis agency. Nearly all of respondents have been white.

Half of the surveys started with a brief paragraph concerning the state of the pandemic, adopted by a number of questions on how COVID-19 had affected the well being, employment and earnings of themselves and their households. This fashion, COVID-19 can be prime of thoughts when the respondents bought to the survey’s third part.

On this last portion, the contributors have been requested to think about that they have been searching for a roommate within the “Massive Metropolis” and had positioned an internet advert to seek out one. They have been then proven a hypothetical e-mail response from an individual whose identify signaled their race or ethnicity: white, Black, Latino, East Asian or South Asian. (The potential roommate’s gender all the time corresponded with that of the survey taker.)

Advertisement

After studying the randomly chosen response — all of which have been equivalent, aside from the identify — contributors have been requested a number of questions concerning the potential roommate’s monetary stability, cultural compatibility, duty and courteousness. They have been additionally requested to fee how possible they have been to reply to the individual and whether or not they have been concerned about dwelling with her or him. They responded on a 0-to-10 scale, with 10 representing “extraordinarily” and 0 representing “under no circumstances.”

That’s what the “experimental” model of the research appeared like. In the meantime, the opposite half of the surveys flipped the studying order and put the questions on a possible roommate on the very prime. Solely after they have been answered did contributors learn the details about COVID-19 and ponder its affect on their lives.

The researchers discovered a hanging impact amongst those that have been extraordinarily unlikely to reply to or think about an Asian or Hispanic room-seeker (that’s, those that scored their solutions as 0, 1 or 2 on that 10-point scale).

For instance, 11.4% of those that had been primed to consider COVID-19 earlier than contemplating a possible roommate indicated a robust unwillingness to reply to Latino room seekers — far increased than the 4.7% of contributors within the management group who shared this view.

The pandemic-primed group was additionally extra prone to be very unwilling to reply to East Asian room-seekers (9.7% vs 4.3%), in addition to to South Asians (11.1% vs 7.1%).

Advertisement

The impact held for different questions, too. For instance, 14.4% of primed contributors indicated they have been extraordinarily bored with dwelling with a Latino roommate, in contrast with 6.3% of the management group. The identical impact held towards South Asians (15.6% vs 9.9%) and East Asians (14.1% vs 7%).

In all three instances, serious about the pandemic brought on survey-takers to understand members of those minority teams as “extraordinarily culturally incompatible,” the research authors wrote.

“Moreover, the 2 Asian teams have been extra prone to be disparaged as extraordinarily irresponsible and discourteous,” and Latinos and South Asians have been extra prone to be considered as financially unstable.

COVID-19-priming, nevertheless, didn’t appear to affect prejudice or intent to discriminate towards white or Black room-seekers, the authors discovered. The authors had a potential rationalization as to why.

“Whites are perceived as most ‘American,’ adopted by Blacks,” they wrote. “These two teams might thus be much less susceptible to pandemic-related discrimination, notably whether it is rooted in xenophobia.”

Advertisement

These findings point out that the pandemic could also be heightening a generalized anti-foreigner sentiment — and that folks in these teams, regardless of their citizenship or what number of generations of their household have lived within the U.S., are perceived in some quarters as “perpetual foreigners,” because the research authors put it.

The researchers additionally examined whether or not components such because the participant’s political opinions and degree of contact with members of minority teams earlier than the pandemic — together with the political progressiveness and ethnic variety of their dwelling county — might have coloured their views of their hypothetical potential roommate.

They discovered that whereas reminders of COVID-19 elevated damaging attitudes towards Latinos, prior social contact with them appeared to cut back that damaging impact.

The identical couldn’t be mentioned of the damaging views about Asians, which remained primarily unaffected by the sociopolitical components that the researchers examined.

Often, larger contact with minority populations reduces prejudice, mentioned Min Zhou, a sociologist at UCLA who was not concerned within the research.

Advertisement

“However for Asians, due to China, it doesn’t matter,” she mentioned, pointing to worsening U.S.-China relations by the pandemic as a purpose why. “That imagined enemy or actual enemy — it’s very highly effective, at this second.”

Zhou drew an instance from not-too-distant U.S. historical past: the damaging attitudes directed towards People of Japanese ancestry throughout World Struggle II. These sentiments resulted in a coverage that despatched greater than 110,000 folks to internment camps.

Decreasing anti-minority bias shifting ahead will finally require extra analysis that identifies the various ranges — each excessive and on a regular basis — on which this type of prejudice and discrimination operates.

“If we need to … scale back prejudice, we must always get to the foundation of it,” Zhou mentioned.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Science

Cluster of farmworkers diagnosed with rare animal-borne disease in Ventura County

Published

on

Cluster of farmworkers diagnosed with rare animal-borne disease in Ventura County

A cluster of workers at Ventura County berry farms have been diagnosed with a rare disease often transmitted through sick animals’ urine, according to a public health advisory distributed to local doctors by county health officials Tuesday.

The bacterial infection, leptospirosis, has resulted in severe symptoms for some workers, including meningitis, an inflammation of the brain lining and spinal cord. Symptoms for mild cases included headaches and fevers.

The disease, which can be fatal, rarely spreads from human to human, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Ventura County Public Health has not given an official case count but said it had not identified any cases outside of the agriculture sector. The county’s agriculture commissioner was aware of 18 cases, the Ventura County Star reported.

Advertisement

The health department said it was first contacted by a local physician in October, who reported an unusual trend in symptoms among hospital patients.

After launching an investigation, the department identified leptospirosis as a probable cause of the illness and found most patients worked on caneberry farms that utilize hoop houses — greenhouse structures to shelter the crops.

As the investigation to identify any additional cases and the exact sources of exposure continues, Ventura County Public Health has asked healthcare providers to consider a leptospirosis diagnosis for sick agricultural workers, particularly berry harvesters.

Rodents are a common source and transmitter of disease, though other mammals — including livestock, cats and dogs — can transmit it as well.

The disease is spread through bodily fluids, such as urine, and is often contracted through cuts and abrasions that contact contaminated water and soil, where the bacteria can survive for months.

Advertisement

Humans can also contract the illness through contaminated food; however, the county health agency has found no known health risks to the general public, including through the contact or consumption of caneberries such as raspberries and blackberries.

Symptom onset typically occurs between two and 30 days after exposure, and symptoms can last for months if untreated, according to the CDC.

The illness often begins with mild symptoms, with fevers, chills, vomiting and headaches. Some cases can then enter a second, more severe phase that can result in kidney or liver failure.

Ventura County Public Health recommends agriculture and berry harvesters regularly rinse any cuts with soap and water and cover them with bandages. They also recommend wearing waterproof clothing and protection while working outdoors, including gloves and long-sleeve shirts and pants.

While there is no evidence of spread to the larger community, according to the department, residents should wash hands frequently and work to control rodents around their property if possible.

Advertisement

Pet owners can consult a veterinarian about leptospirosis vaccinations and should keep pets away from ponds, lakes and other natural bodies of water.

Continue Reading

Science

Political stress: Can you stay engaged without sacrificing your mental health?

Published

on

Political stress: Can you stay engaged without sacrificing your mental health?

It’s been two weeks since Donald Trump won the presidential election, but Stacey Lamirand’s brain hasn’t stopped churning.

“I still think about the election all the time,” said the 60-year-old Bay Area resident, who wanted a Kamala Harris victory so badly that she flew to Pennsylvania and knocked on voters’ doors in the final days of the campaign. “I honestly don’t know what to do about that.”

Neither do the psychologists and political scientists who have been tracking the country’s slide toward toxic levels of partisanship.

Fully 69% of U.S. adults found the presidential election a significant source of stress in their lives, the American Psychological Assn. said in its latest Stress in America report.

The distress was present across the political spectrum, with 80% of Republicans, 79% of Democrats and 73% of independents surveyed saying they were stressed about the country’s future.

Advertisement

That’s unhealthy for the body politic — and for voters themselves. Stress can cause muscle tension, headaches, sleep problems and loss of appetite. Chronic stress can inflict more serious damage to the immune system and make people more vulnerable to heart attacks, strokes, diabetes, infertility, clinical anxiety, depression and other ailments.

In most circumstances, the sound medical advice is to disengage from the source of stress, therapists said. But when stress is coming from politics, that prescription pits the health of the individual against the health of the nation.

“I’m worried about people totally withdrawing from politics because it’s unpleasant,” said Aaron Weinschenk, a political scientist at the University of Wisconsin–Green Bay who studies political behavior and elections. “We don’t want them to do that. But we also don’t want them to feel sick.”

Modern life is full of stressors of all kinds: paying bills, pleasing difficult bosses, getting along with frenemies, caring for children or aging parents (or both).

The stress that stems from politics isn’t fundamentally different from other kinds of stress. What’s unique about it is the way it encompasses and enhances other sources of stress, said Brett Ford, a social psychologist at the University of Toronto who studies the link between emotions and political engagement.

Advertisement

For instance, she said, elections have the potential to make everyday stressors like money and health concerns more difficult to manage as candidates debate policies that could raise the price of gas or cut off access to certain kinds of medical care.

Layered on top of that is the fact that political disagreements have morphed into moral conflicts that are perceived as pitting good against evil.

“When someone comes into power who is not on the same page as you morally, that can hit very deeply,” Ford said.

Partisanship and polarization have raised the stakes as well. Voters who feel a strong connection to a political party become more invested in its success. That can make a loss at the ballot box feel like a personal defeat, she said.

There’s also the fact that we have limited control over the outcome of an election. A patient with heart disease can improve their prognosis by taking medicine, changing their diet, getting more exercise or quitting smoking. But a person with political stress is largely at the mercy of others.

Advertisement

“Politics is many forms of stress all rolled into one,” Ford said.

Weinschenk observed this firsthand the day after the election.

“I could feel it when I went into my classroom,” said the professor, whose research has found that people with political anxiety aren’t necessarily anxious in general. “I have a student who’s transgender and a couple of students who are gay. Their emotional state was so closed down.”

That’s almost to be expected in a place like Wisconsin, whose swing-state status caused residents to be bombarded with political messages. The more campaign ads a person is exposed to, the greater the risk of being diagnosed with anxiety, depression or another psychological ailment, according to a 2022 study in the journal PLOS One.

Political messages seem designed to keep voters “emotionally on edge,” said Vaile Wright, a licensed psychologist in Villa Park, Ill., and a member of the APA’s Stress in America team.

Advertisement

“It encourages emotion to drive our decision-making behavior, as opposed to logic,” Wright said. “When we’re really emotionally stimulated, it makes it so much more challenging to have civil conversation. For politicians, I think that’s powerful, because emotions can be very easily manipulated.”

Making voters feel anxious is a tried-and-true way to grab their attention, said Christopher Ojeda, a political scientist at UC Merced who studies mental health and politics.

“Feelings of anxiety can be mobilizing, definitely,” he said. “That’s why politicians make fear appeals — they want people to get engaged.”

On the other hand, “feelings of depression are demobilizing and take you out of the political system,” said Ojeda, author of “The Sad Citizen: How Politics is Depressing and Why it Matters.”

“What [these feelings] can tell you is, ‘Things aren’t going the way I want them to. Maybe I need to step back,’” he said.

Advertisement

Genessa Krasnow has been seeing a lot of that since the election.

The Seattle entrepreneur, who also campaigned for Harris, said it grates on her to see people laughing in restaurants “as if nothing had happened.” At a recent book club meeting, her fellow group members were willing to let her vent about politics for five minutes, but they weren’t interested in discussing ways they could counteract the incoming president.

“They’re in a state of disengagement,” said Krasnow, who is 56. She, meanwhile, is looking for new ways to reach young voters.

“I am exhausted. I am so sad,” she said. “But I don’t believe that disengaging is the answer.”

That’s the fundamental trade-off, Ojeda said, and there’s no one-size-fits-all solution.

Advertisement

“Everyone has to make a decision about how much engagement they can tolerate without undermining their psychological well-being,” he said.

Lamirand took steps to protect her mental health by cutting social media ties with people whose values aren’t aligned with hers. But she will remain politically active and expects to volunteer for phone-banking duty soon.

“Doing something is the only thing that allows me to feel better,” Lamirand said. “It allows me to feel some level of control.”

Ideally, Ford said, people would not have to choose between being politically active and preserving their mental health. She is investigating ways to help people feel hopeful, inspired and compassionate about political challenges, since these emotions can motivate action without triggering stress and anxiety.

“We want to counteract this pattern where the more involved you are, the worse you are,” Ford said.

Advertisement

The benefits would be felt across the political spectrum. In the APA survey, similar shares of Democrats, Republicans and independents agreed with statements like, “It causes me stress that politicians aren’t talking about the things that are most important to me,” and, “The political climate has caused strain between my family members and me.”

“Both sides are very invested in this country, and that is a good thing,” Wright said. “Antipathy and hopelessness really doesn’t serve us in the long run.”

Continue Reading

Science

Video: SpaceX Unable to Recover Booster Stage During Sixth Test Flight

Published

on

Video: SpaceX Unable to Recover Booster Stage During Sixth Test Flight

President-elect Donald Trump joined Elon Musk in Texas and watched the launch from a nearby location on Tuesday. While the Starship’s giant booster stage was unable to repeat a “chopsticks” landing, the vehicle’s upper stage successfully splashed down in the Indian Ocean.

Continue Reading

Trending