Connect with us

Science

E.P.A. to Tighten Tailpipe Rules for the Biggest Polluters on the Road

Published

on

E.P.A. to Tighten Tailpipe Rules for the Biggest Polluters on the Road

WASHINGTON — The Biden administration on Monday proposed strict new limits on air pollution from buses, supply vans, tractor-trailers and different heavy vans — the primary time in additional than 20 years that tailpipe requirements have been tightened for the most important polluters on the street.

The brand new draft rule from the Environmental Safety Company would require heavy-duty vans to cut back emissions of nitrogen dioxide by 90 % by 2031. Nitrogen dioxide is linked to lung most cancers, coronary heart illness and untimely demise.

The E.P.A. additionally introduced plans to barely tighten truck emissions of carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gasoline that’s driving local weather change. The brand new guidelines for nitrogen oxide air pollution would apply to vans starting with the mannequin yr 2027, whereas the carbon dioxide guidelines would apply to vans beginning with the mannequin yr 2024.

The truck air pollution rule is the newest in a sequence of latest air pollution insurance policies beneath President Biden, who’s searching for to cut back the emissions which might be dangerously warming the planet and rebuild environmental requirements that had been weakened by President Donald J. Trump.

Vice President Kamala Harris introduced the proposal, together with a set of different federal clear transportation actions, together with the expenditure of $5.5 billion to assist states buy low or zero-emission transit buses, and $17 million to switch diesel faculty buses with electrical variations in underserved communities.

Advertisement

Late final yr, the E.P.A. tightened requirements on auto air pollution and introduced new guidelines governing methane, a climate-warming gasoline that leaks from oil and gasoline wells. This yr, the company is anticipated to roll out new restrictions on greenhouse gases and on industrial soot launched by energy vegetation.

The administration is portraying the truck rule introduced Monday as central to Mr. Biden’s agenda of environmental justice, as many communities of colour are situated alongside highways and are topic to elevated ranges of air pollution.

“Seventy-two million persons are estimated to reside close to truck freight routes in America, and they’re extra more likely to be individuals of colour and people with decrease incomes,” the E.P.A. administrator, Michael S. Regan, stated. “These overburdened communities are straight uncovered to air pollution that causes respiratory and cardiovascular issues, amongst different severe and expensive well being results. These new requirements will drastically lower harmful air pollution by harnessing current developments in automobile applied sciences from throughout the trucking trade because it advances towards a zero-emissions transportation future.”

Public well being consultants welcomed the transfer. “Cleansing up vans is a important step to reaching the president’s imaginative and prescient not solely of environmental justice but in addition the most cancers moonshot,” stated Paul Billings, a senior vp on the American Lung Affiliation. “Diesel gasoline is a recognized carcinogen.”

The brand new limits would stop as much as 2,100 untimely deaths, 6,700 hospital admissions and emergency division visits, 18,000 circumstances of bronchial asthma in youngsters, 78,000 misplaced days of labor and 1.1 million misplaced days of college by the yr 2045, in line with E.P. A. estimates.

Advertisement

The company estimates that the financial advantages of the rule could possibly be as much as $250 billion and stated these advantages “would exceed its prices by billions of {dollars}.”

However truckers and producers say the rule is simply too stringent and expensive, and that compliance might ship larger costs rippling by the economic system.

“This new normal merely is probably not technologically possible,” stated Jed Mandel, president of the Truck and Engine Producers Affiliation, an trade group. “We’re apprehensive about the fee. There’s a potential of hostile impacts on the economic system and jobs. No one desires to see union jobs laid off. Common lunch-pail, blue collar employees.”

Jay Grimes, director of federal affairs for the Proprietor-Operator Impartial Drivers Affiliation, stated new restrictions could be particularly onerous for small truckers, which he stated comprise 90 % of the trade.

“We’ve seen for the reason that begin of the pandemic the efforts truckers are making each day to maintain the availability chain secure,” Mr. Grimes stated. “Greater costs on the small enterprise aspect are going to get handed right down to customers within the provide chain.”

Advertisement

The federal authorities final up to date its truck emissions rule in 2001, when the E.P.A. required business vans to chop emissions of nitrogen dioxide by 95 % over 10 years. That contributed to a 40 % drop in nationwide nitrogen dioxide emissions, the company stated. It estimates that the brand new rule will contribute to a 60 % drop in emissions by 2045.

The E.P.A. known as the brand new rule the primary in a three-step “Clear Vans Plan” — a sequence of fresh air and local weather change rules over the following three years designed to cut back air pollution from vans and buses and to speed up the transition to a way forward for all-electric, zero-pollution autos.

After a primary yr through which President Biden tried to push formidable local weather laws by Congress, solely to see it stall, the administration is utilizing its regulatory equipment to attempt to curb air pollution.

The E.P.A. is engaged on new limits for auto air pollution, due out subsequent yr, which it hopes will speed up a transition to electrical autos. ​​Mr. Biden has pledged that half of all new automobiles bought in america by 2030 will likely be electrical autos.

Whereas the brand new truck rules will lower air pollution that harms human well being, they gained’t do a lot to cut back emissions that heat the planet, local weather consultants stated.

Advertisement

The proposed rules would require some vans, 17 of the 33 classes of professional quality vans, to decrease their carbon dioxide emissions. That’s designed to bolster gross sales of all-electric vans in america, from fewer than 1,000 in 2020 to about 1.5 % of whole truck gross sales, or roughly 10,000 vans, in 2027.

However with a purpose to put america on a path towards a transition to all-electric vans, the forthcoming truck guidelines must be much more stringent, consultants stated.

“It’s nice to see that the rule is driving 90 % discount in air air pollution in heavy-duty autos and on the identical time opening the door to decreasing greenhouse gasoline air pollution,” stated Drew Kodjak, govt director of the Worldwide Council on Clear Transportation, a analysis group. “However we’ve received this factor known as local weather change and we’ve actually received to begin driving electrification within the heavy-duty truck sector. My massive concern is that the proposal as it’s written won’t try this.”

Advocates for warehouse employees, lots of whom are uncovered to fixed diesel air pollution, stated they want rules that substitute diesel-fueled vans with electrical or zero-emissions autos.

“Chopping emissions wherever is nice,” stated Yana Kalmyka, an organizer with Warehouse Employees for Justice. “However should you’re occupied with a neighborhood that has tens of 1000’s of vans a day passing by it, electrification is the one simply answer. The rule isn’t addressing different industrial truck pollution comparable to soot, and we all know that black and brown communities are dealing with cumulative burdens from these pollution.”

Advertisement

Transportation is the most important single supply of greenhouse gases generated by america, representing 29 % of the nation’s whole emissions.

The E.P.A. has stated it intends to create one other set of greenhouse gasoline guidelines for vans, starting as quickly as mannequin yr 2030, that will likely be “considerably stronger” than the present requirements, and designed to hurry the transition to all-electric vans.

“Ready for one more few years to do the following set of greenhouse gasoline requirements for vans is flawed. We simply don’t have time,” stated Margo Oge, an professional on electrical autos who headed the E.P.A.’s Workplace of Transportation and Air High quality from 1994 to 2012. “My hope is that they are going to use this time to strengthen the usual now.”

The rule introduced Monday will likely be open for public remark for 46 days, and the E.P.A. is anticipated to finalize it by the top of 2022.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Science

Cluster of farmworkers diagnosed with rare animal-borne disease in Ventura County

Published

on

Cluster of farmworkers diagnosed with rare animal-borne disease in Ventura County

A cluster of workers at Ventura County berry farms have been diagnosed with a rare disease often transmitted through sick animals’ urine, according to a public health advisory distributed to local doctors by county health officials Tuesday.

The bacterial infection, leptospirosis, has resulted in severe symptoms for some workers, including meningitis, an inflammation of the brain lining and spinal cord. Symptoms for mild cases included headaches and fevers.

The disease, which can be fatal, rarely spreads from human to human, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Ventura County Public Health has not given an official case count but said it had not identified any cases outside of the agriculture sector. The county’s agriculture commissioner was aware of 18 cases, the Ventura County Star reported.

Advertisement

The health department said it was first contacted by a local physician in October, who reported an unusual trend in symptoms among hospital patients.

After launching an investigation, the department identified leptospirosis as a probable cause of the illness and found most patients worked on caneberry farms that utilize hoop houses — greenhouse structures to shelter the crops.

As the investigation to identify any additional cases and the exact sources of exposure continues, Ventura County Public Health has asked healthcare providers to consider a leptospirosis diagnosis for sick agricultural workers, particularly berry harvesters.

Rodents are a common source and transmitter of disease, though other mammals — including livestock, cats and dogs — can transmit it as well.

The disease is spread through bodily fluids, such as urine, and is often contracted through cuts and abrasions that contact contaminated water and soil, where the bacteria can survive for months.

Advertisement

Humans can also contract the illness through contaminated food; however, the county health agency has found no known health risks to the general public, including through the contact or consumption of caneberries such as raspberries and blackberries.

Symptom onset typically occurs between two and 30 days after exposure, and symptoms can last for months if untreated, according to the CDC.

The illness often begins with mild symptoms, with fevers, chills, vomiting and headaches. Some cases can then enter a second, more severe phase that can result in kidney or liver failure.

Ventura County Public Health recommends agriculture and berry harvesters regularly rinse any cuts with soap and water and cover them with bandages. They also recommend wearing waterproof clothing and protection while working outdoors, including gloves and long-sleeve shirts and pants.

While there is no evidence of spread to the larger community, according to the department, residents should wash hands frequently and work to control rodents around their property if possible.

Advertisement

Pet owners can consult a veterinarian about leptospirosis vaccinations and should keep pets away from ponds, lakes and other natural bodies of water.

Continue Reading

Science

Political stress: Can you stay engaged without sacrificing your mental health?

Published

on

Political stress: Can you stay engaged without sacrificing your mental health?

It’s been two weeks since Donald Trump won the presidential election, but Stacey Lamirand’s brain hasn’t stopped churning.

“I still think about the election all the time,” said the 60-year-old Bay Area resident, who wanted a Kamala Harris victory so badly that she flew to Pennsylvania and knocked on voters’ doors in the final days of the campaign. “I honestly don’t know what to do about that.”

Neither do the psychologists and political scientists who have been tracking the country’s slide toward toxic levels of partisanship.

Fully 69% of U.S. adults found the presidential election a significant source of stress in their lives, the American Psychological Assn. said in its latest Stress in America report.

The distress was present across the political spectrum, with 80% of Republicans, 79% of Democrats and 73% of independents surveyed saying they were stressed about the country’s future.

Advertisement

That’s unhealthy for the body politic — and for voters themselves. Stress can cause muscle tension, headaches, sleep problems and loss of appetite. Chronic stress can inflict more serious damage to the immune system and make people more vulnerable to heart attacks, strokes, diabetes, infertility, clinical anxiety, depression and other ailments.

In most circumstances, the sound medical advice is to disengage from the source of stress, therapists said. But when stress is coming from politics, that prescription pits the health of the individual against the health of the nation.

“I’m worried about people totally withdrawing from politics because it’s unpleasant,” said Aaron Weinschenk, a political scientist at the University of Wisconsin–Green Bay who studies political behavior and elections. “We don’t want them to do that. But we also don’t want them to feel sick.”

Modern life is full of stressors of all kinds: paying bills, pleasing difficult bosses, getting along with frenemies, caring for children or aging parents (or both).

The stress that stems from politics isn’t fundamentally different from other kinds of stress. What’s unique about it is the way it encompasses and enhances other sources of stress, said Brett Ford, a social psychologist at the University of Toronto who studies the link between emotions and political engagement.

Advertisement

For instance, she said, elections have the potential to make everyday stressors like money and health concerns more difficult to manage as candidates debate policies that could raise the price of gas or cut off access to certain kinds of medical care.

Layered on top of that is the fact that political disagreements have morphed into moral conflicts that are perceived as pitting good against evil.

“When someone comes into power who is not on the same page as you morally, that can hit very deeply,” Ford said.

Partisanship and polarization have raised the stakes as well. Voters who feel a strong connection to a political party become more invested in its success. That can make a loss at the ballot box feel like a personal defeat, she said.

There’s also the fact that we have limited control over the outcome of an election. A patient with heart disease can improve their prognosis by taking medicine, changing their diet, getting more exercise or quitting smoking. But a person with political stress is largely at the mercy of others.

Advertisement

“Politics is many forms of stress all rolled into one,” Ford said.

Weinschenk observed this firsthand the day after the election.

“I could feel it when I went into my classroom,” said the professor, whose research has found that people with political anxiety aren’t necessarily anxious in general. “I have a student who’s transgender and a couple of students who are gay. Their emotional state was so closed down.”

That’s almost to be expected in a place like Wisconsin, whose swing-state status caused residents to be bombarded with political messages. The more campaign ads a person is exposed to, the greater the risk of being diagnosed with anxiety, depression or another psychological ailment, according to a 2022 study in the journal PLOS One.

Political messages seem designed to keep voters “emotionally on edge,” said Vaile Wright, a licensed psychologist in Villa Park, Ill., and a member of the APA’s Stress in America team.

Advertisement

“It encourages emotion to drive our decision-making behavior, as opposed to logic,” Wright said. “When we’re really emotionally stimulated, it makes it so much more challenging to have civil conversation. For politicians, I think that’s powerful, because emotions can be very easily manipulated.”

Making voters feel anxious is a tried-and-true way to grab their attention, said Christopher Ojeda, a political scientist at UC Merced who studies mental health and politics.

“Feelings of anxiety can be mobilizing, definitely,” he said. “That’s why politicians make fear appeals — they want people to get engaged.”

On the other hand, “feelings of depression are demobilizing and take you out of the political system,” said Ojeda, author of “The Sad Citizen: How Politics is Depressing and Why it Matters.”

“What [these feelings] can tell you is, ‘Things aren’t going the way I want them to. Maybe I need to step back,’” he said.

Advertisement

Genessa Krasnow has been seeing a lot of that since the election.

The Seattle entrepreneur, who also campaigned for Harris, said it grates on her to see people laughing in restaurants “as if nothing had happened.” At a recent book club meeting, her fellow group members were willing to let her vent about politics for five minutes, but they weren’t interested in discussing ways they could counteract the incoming president.

“They’re in a state of disengagement,” said Krasnow, who is 56. She, meanwhile, is looking for new ways to reach young voters.

“I am exhausted. I am so sad,” she said. “But I don’t believe that disengaging is the answer.”

That’s the fundamental trade-off, Ojeda said, and there’s no one-size-fits-all solution.

Advertisement

“Everyone has to make a decision about how much engagement they can tolerate without undermining their psychological well-being,” he said.

Lamirand took steps to protect her mental health by cutting social media ties with people whose values aren’t aligned with hers. But she will remain politically active and expects to volunteer for phone-banking duty soon.

“Doing something is the only thing that allows me to feel better,” Lamirand said. “It allows me to feel some level of control.”

Ideally, Ford said, people would not have to choose between being politically active and preserving their mental health. She is investigating ways to help people feel hopeful, inspired and compassionate about political challenges, since these emotions can motivate action without triggering stress and anxiety.

“We want to counteract this pattern where the more involved you are, the worse you are,” Ford said.

Advertisement

The benefits would be felt across the political spectrum. In the APA survey, similar shares of Democrats, Republicans and independents agreed with statements like, “It causes me stress that politicians aren’t talking about the things that are most important to me,” and, “The political climate has caused strain between my family members and me.”

“Both sides are very invested in this country, and that is a good thing,” Wright said. “Antipathy and hopelessness really doesn’t serve us in the long run.”

Continue Reading

Science

Video: SpaceX Unable to Recover Booster Stage During Sixth Test Flight

Published

on

Video: SpaceX Unable to Recover Booster Stage During Sixth Test Flight

President-elect Donald Trump joined Elon Musk in Texas and watched the launch from a nearby location on Tuesday. While the Starship’s giant booster stage was unable to repeat a “chopsticks” landing, the vehicle’s upper stage successfully splashed down in the Indian Ocean.

Continue Reading

Trending