Connect with us

Politics

What to Watch For on Day 2 of Jackson’s Confirmation Hearing

Published

on

What to Watch For on Day 2 of Jackson’s Confirmation Hearing

After a day of tone-setting opening statements, Day 2 of Decide Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court docket affirmation listening to guarantees to steer deeper into substance, and probably partisan combating, because the 22 members of the Senate Judiciary Committee query the nominee on Tuesday.

There’s little doubt that Decide Jackson will finally be confirmed by the Senate as the primary Black feminine justice, owing to each Democratic management of the chamber and assist from some Republicans for her earlier appointments.

However in a marathon day of questioning that’s anticipated to start out at 9 a.m. and run into the night time, committee members of each events might spend their time on Tuesday utilizing Decide Jackson’s nomination to make political arguments. Many have already signaled their intent to look at her considering on contentious social subjects. Republicans have additionally hinted at a method of portraying her as comfortable on crime.

Here’s what to observe for as Decide Jackson faces questions.

One of many fundamental traces of questioning on Tuesday will virtually actually middle on the method Decide Jackson takes in deciding instances, and members of each events have expressed an curiosity in urgent her to say extra.

Advertisement

Seemingly anticipating this dialogue, Decide Jackson advised committee members on Monday that her method was characterised by easy, unbiased considering.

“I consider the details, and I interpret and apply the regulation to the details of the case earlier than me, with out worry or favor, in keeping with my judicial oath,” she stated.

Primarily based on senators’ opening statements on Monday, nevertheless, the query is more likely to come up once more.

A number of Republican senators expressed issues about how Decide Jackson would interpret the Structure, echoing questions she has answered in previous hearings. These largely stem from the long-running debate over whether or not the Structure ought to be utilized because it was understood on the time it was adopted, or seen as a “residing doc” that evolves with the instances.

On Monday, senators additionally hinted that they deliberate to press Decide Jackson on how she would method instances that contact on divisive political questions.

Advertisement

A number of Republicans, together with Senator Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, gave the impression to be making ready to query Decide Jackson on how problems with race ought to issue into judicial decision-making.

Senator Jon Ossoff, Democrat of Georgia, stated on Monday that he hoped to listen to about how Decide Jackson would contemplate instances pertaining to First Modification protections, and disputes over government struggle powers.

If confirmed, Decide Jackson could be the primary former federal public defender to serve on the Supreme Court docket.

Democrats have largely celebrated Decide Jackson’s expertise representing prison defendants, arguing that it brings an necessary perspective to the bench, particularly in instances targeted on civil rights. Republicans on the committee, together with Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, additionally expressed admiration for her work on Monday.

When contemplating Decide Jackson for earlier judicial posts, nevertheless, Republicans requested whether or not the identical expertise, which incorporates illustration of detainees on the army jail at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, may colour Decide Jackson’s rulings on insurance policies associated to prison sentencing or immigration.

Advertisement

Decide Jackson has beforehand batted again such questions by saying that she was assigned the Guantánamo instances and that her work didn’t essentially characterize her private views.

However the problem seems more likely to resurface because the four-day listening to continues.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

Trump posts AI-generated video showing Obama getting arrested to 'YMCA'

Published

on

Trump posts AI-generated video showing Obama getting arrested to 'YMCA'

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump posted an AI-generated video of former President Barack Obama being arrested on Sunday, a nod to recent claims made by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.

In the Truth Social post, Trump shared a TikTok video of various Democrats, including Obama, saying that “No one is above the law.”

Later in the 45-second AI-generated video, Trump and Obama are seen sitting in the Oval Office before Obama is arrested by agents as the song “YMCA” plays. 

The AI-generated version of Trump grins as Obama is apprehended and eventually thrown in a jail cell. The AI-generated Obama is also seen wearing an orange jumpsuit behind bars.

Advertisement

OBAMA OFFICIALS ADMITTED THEY HAD NO ‘EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE’ OF TRUMP-RUSSIA COLLUSION: HOUSE INTEL TRANSCRIPTS

President Donald Trump shared a fake AI video that showed former President Barack Obama being arrested. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

The video surfaced amid allegations from Gabbard that Obama and his intel chiefs manufactured the Russia collusion narrative.

“The implications of this are frankly nothing short of historic,” Gabbard said on Fox News Channel’s Sunday episode of “Sunday Morning Futures.” 

“Over 100 documents that we released on Friday really detail and provide evidence of how this treasonous conspiracy was directed by President Obama just weeks before he was due to leave office after President Trump had already gotten elected,” Gabbard claimed.

Advertisement

WHITE HOUSE WANTS OBAMA INTEL OFFICIALS ‘HELD ACCOUNTABLE’ FOR ROLE PEDDLING 2016 RUSSIA HOAX

Former President Barack Obama in front of a red background

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard claimed former President Barack Obama and his intel chiefs manufactured the Russia collusion narrative. (Associated Press)

Gabbard also said that she planned to send the uncovered documents to the FBI and Department of Justice (DOJ) for a criminal referral.

Documents shared by Gabbard’s office claim that before the 2016 election, there was no evidence of collusion with Russia – and that politically motivated actors distorted the narrative to harm Trump, not in response to new intelligence.

“Creating this piece of manufactured intelligence that claims that Russia had helped Donald Trump get elected contradicted every other assessment that had been made previously in the months leading up to the election that said exactly the opposite, that Russia had neither the intent nor the capability to try to ‘hack the United States election,’” Gabbard told host Maria Bartiromo.

Tulsi Gabbard

Tulsi Gabbard, President Donald Trump’s choice to be the Director of National Intelligence, arrives to appear before the Senate Intelligence Committee for her confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill Thursday, Jan. 30, 2025, in Washington. (AP)

Advertisement

“So the effect of what President Obama and his senior national security team did was subvert the will of the American people, undermining our democratic republic and enacting what would be essentially a years-long coup against President Trump, who was duly elected by the American people,” she added.

Fox News Digital’s Taylor Penley contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Politics

Forget the high road: Newsom takes the fight to Trump and his allies

Published

on

Forget the high road: Newsom takes the fight to Trump and his allies

In a common insult the Trump administration uses against dissidents of federal policy, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller called a California judge a “communist” after she blocked roving immigration arrests based on race alone.

The MAGA-embraced epithet from Gov. Gavin Newsom’s official press office in response, however, was hardly typical for a Democratic politician.

“This fascist cuck in DC continues his assault on democracy and the Constitution, and his attempt to replace the sovereignty of the people with autocracy,” the California governor’s office posted on social media. “Sorry the Constitution hurt your feelings, Stephen. Cry harder.”

Popular among the far right and the gutters of social media, the term is used to insult liberals as weak and is also short for “cuckold,” which refers to the husband of an unfaithful wife.

Advertisement

The low blow sanctioned by a potential 2028 presidential candidate set a new paradigm for the political left that has long embraced Michelle Obama’s “when they go low, we go high” motto to rise above the callousness of Trump and his acolytes.

It’s also an example of Newsom’s more aggressive social media strategy.

This week the governor posted memes of Trump with child molester and accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

Shortly after the Department of Homeland Security detained and handcuffed U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla at a news conference in June, state Assemblymember Joe Patterson (R-Rockland) alleged on X that he would be treated the same way if he interrupted an event held by the governor.

“I’d politely ask you to leave,” retorted Newsom’s communications director, Izzy Gardon. “Though you do not deserve politeness in this moment for this grotesque tweet, you bald little man.” (Patterson later added “Bald little man” to his profile on the social media site.)

Advertisement

The governor and his taxpayer-supported press office joked that HBO had cast Miller as Lord Voldemort — the pasty, hairless super villain in the “Harry Potter” stories — and mocked the scandal-plagued Texas attorney general after he accused Newsom of fomenting lawlessness.

The governor defended the more combative posture at a recent news conference. He noted that Steven Cheung, the White House communications director, had used the word last month when he called Newsom “the biggest cuck in politics.”

“I don’t think they understand any other kind of language, so I have no apologies for standing tall and firm and pushing back against their cruelty,” Newsom said.

Newsom’s advisors say the governor reached a turning point after the president sent California National Guard troops into Los Angeles to protect federal agents from clashes with protesters during immigration sweeps. Since Trump took office in January, the Democratic leader had been walking a fine line between calling out the president and playing nice in hopes of being able to work together after the California wildfires.

The governor said publicly said that the decision to militarize Los Angeles showed him that you can’t work with the president, only for him. With federal troops on the ground, his aides said, Newsom also wanted to stand up for California, concerned about what would happen if he didn’t.

Advertisement

The directive was to match the tactics emanating from the White House and meet Trump and his allies where they are. Forget the high road.

Over the last month, they’ve taken on more fights with Newsom’s critics, reacted more quickly to shoot down misinformation about the governor or California, challenged narratives they find to be untrue, or unfair, and taken many of their own shots.

“Sometimes the best way to challenge a bully is to punch them in the metaphorical face,” said Bob Salladay, Newsom’s top communications advisor. “These tactics may seem extreme to some and they are, but there’s a significant difference here: We’re targeting powerful forces that are ripping apart this country, using their own words and tactics. Trump and Stephen Miller are attacking the powerless like every fascist bully before them.”

Newsom’s aides say the strategy is working.

The governor’s personal social media accounts gained 2.3 million new followers, including over 1 million each on TikTok and Instagram, and more than 883 million views from June 6 to July 6, according to his tallies.

Advertisement

Podcasters and social media influencers, such as Fred Wellman and Brian Tyler Cohen, boosted the interest with their own posts about the governor. On TikTok in particular, there’s a growing ecosystem of people who make videos about his videos.

Newsom’s official state accounts also experienced an exponential rise in followers and engagement in June.

The attention bodes well for a politician considering a bid for president. His aides argue that the strategy benefits California by shutting down misinformation and helping people understand what’s really going on.

“The thing that he does so well these days is that he responds rapidly, and he responds rapidly in a way that’s very snackable to the average consumer of news,” said Karen North, a professor of digital social media at the USC Annenberg School of Communication and Journalism.

North pointed to the adage that “it takes a minute to say a sound bite, but an hour to explain why it is false.”

Advertisement

Republicans have been considered masters of sound bites for decades, and Democrats are often criticized for trying to explain the details of policies when people just want to hear the bottom line.

Newsom is breaking that mold, she said.

“He has emerged as the person willing and able to take on the president, but in some ways, they use the same playbook of quick, engaging responses that are easy for people to understand without any analysis,” North said. “Newsom has the advantage of playing defense as an offense. So when the president says something that is problematic to California or problematic to everyday citizens, Gavin Newsom is laser-focused and ready to strike back without any hesitation, and in a way that’s very simple and very engaging.”

In some ways, the governor learned the hard way after Trump used his platforms to label Newsom as “incompetent” and blame him for the Los Angeles wildfires in January. The president made a barrage of claims at news conferences and on the social media site Truth Social about dry reservoirs, the need to transfer more water from Northern to Southern California, a lack of forest management and empty fire hydrants that went viral, leaving Newsom on the back foot defending himself.

When Trump sent the National Guard into Los Angeles, the governor almost immediately went on the attack to counter the president’s claims that he deployed troops to control lawlessness that Newsom had allowed. The governor’s office said his June 10 speech, which framed Trump as unnecessarily invading an American city for his own political gain, received 41 million views.

Advertisement

Although Newsom’s aggression has received praise from some Democrats, it’s also a “a massive pivot from being a Bannon bro,” said Eric Jaye, a former senior advisor to Newsom turned critic who opposed his 2018 gubernatorial bid.

Jaye is referring to the “This is Gavin Newsom” podcast, where the governor flummoxed Democrats who thought he appeared too chummy with Trump campaign architect Steve Bannon, conservative personality Charlie Kirk and others close to the president.

Newsom billed the show as an opportunity to speak to people with other viewpoints and he delivered on that premise. The governor also received criticism from within his own party for not forcefully challenging the perspectives that directly contradicted Democratic values, such as opposition to abortion rights, and agreeing with Kirk that it’s unfair for transgender athletes to compete in women’s sports.

Jaye credited Newsom with “a very quick turnaround,” which “saved himself.”

But now, with his amped-up social media presence, Newsom runs the risk of offending voters who miss respectful political discourse.

Advertisement

Trump’s derogatory nicknames for his opponents, such as calling Newsom “Newscum” or Elizabeth Warren “Pocahontas,” have not appeared to cause the president much political harm. He embraced “lock her up” chants about Hillary Clinton in 2016 and constantly mocked Joe Biden before the former president dropped out of the 2024 presidential contest. Trump still won both races.

North said Trump also has the benefit of saying things that appear “passionate and reckless,” but people don’t believe he’s going to follow through.

As a potential presidential contender, the question is whether Newsom can use words such as “cuck” and say he wants to change laws to redistrict California to benefit Democrats in the midterm elections without worrying people and seeming too Trump-like to be palatable to voters who detest the president’s antics.

“It has to be disturbing to a lot of people if the new era of politics involves hostile personal attacks,” North said.

Times staff writer Seema Mehta contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Trump directs AG Bondi to work on unsealing grand jury transcripts in Epstein case: 'We are ready'

Published

on

Trump directs AG Bondi to work on unsealing grand jury transcripts in Epstein case: 'We are ready'

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump late Thursday directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to work on releasing grand jury transcripts in the case of Jeffrey Epstein. 

It’s unclear exactly when any testimony may go public. The Justice Department is expected to file Friday asking a judge to unseal transcripts.

The order came after a barrage of criticism against the Trump administration following the release of a joint DOJ-FBI memo that concluded there was no evidence that the disgraced financier had blackmailed powerful people, kept a client list or was killed while in jail. 

The memo has created deep fissures among Trump supporters who have complained of a lack of transparency from the administration. A source told Fox News Digital that FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino had been considering resigning over the matter, though he has not stated anything publicly. 

Advertisement

The president, meanwhile, has pushed back at the criticism, calling the charges a “hoax” and contending that his supporters are being “duped” by Democrats. Trump posted to Truth Social on Friday morning, “If there was a ‘smoking gun’ on Epstein, why didn’t the Dems, who controlled the ‘files’ for four years, and had [then-Attorney General Merrick Garland] and [then-FBI Director James Comey] in charge, use it? BECAUSE THEY HAD NOTHING!!!”

BONDI SHOULD RELEASE ‘CREDIBLE’ EPSTEIN FILES, TRUMP SAYS

FILE: U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi speaks alongside President Donald Trump on recent Supreme Court rulings in the briefing room at the White House on June 27, 2025 in Washington, DC.  (Getty Images)

DOJ BRASS VOWED FULL TRANSPARENCY ON EPSTEIN BEFORE TURNING UP EMPTY-HANDED

Before joining the Trump administration, Bondi was among the staunchest advocates for releasing the Epstein list, telling Fox News’ Sean Hannity in 2024: “It should have come out a long time ago.” 

Advertisement
Epstein/Bondi split

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi said the FBI handed over a “truckload” of Jeffrey Epstein files to the DOJ. (New York State Sex Offender Registry via AP | Getty Images)

The Justice Department released a new batch of Epstein files in February, but the documents revealed no new revelations in the case. Many of the documents had already been released during the federal criminal trial of Epstein’s associate, British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell. 

MAGA WORLD ERUPTS OVER TRUMP’S DEFENSE OF BONDI AMID EPSTEIN FILES FALLOUT

Trump has defended Bondi over the latest fallout, telling reporters earlier this week: “She’s handled it very well, and it’s going to be up to her, whatever she thinks is credible she should release.” 

On Thursday, Trump said he had directed Bondi to release all “pertinent” transcripts on the case.   

Trump in the Oval Office with a serious face

President Donald Trump listens during a meeting with Bahrain’s Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa in the Oval Office of the White House, Wednesday, July 16, 2025, in Washington.  (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

“Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Testimony, subject to Court approval,” Trump wrote on Truth Social late Thursday. “This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!” 

Advertisement

Bondi said her team was “ready to move the court tomorrow to unseal the grand jury transcripts.” 

Epstein, a 66-year-old millionaire financier with a private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands, died in federal custody in August 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. 

Fox News Digital’s Rachel Wolf and Ashley Oliver contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending