Connect with us

Politics

Trump sues Hillary Clinton, DNC, officials involved in Russia probe

Published

on

Trump sues Hillary Clinton, DNC, officials involved in Russia probe

NEWNow you can hearken to Fox Information articles!

Former President Trump on Thursday filed a lawsuit towards Hillary Clinton, the Democratic Nationwide Committee, and quite a few different high-profile figures concerned within the “nefarious” “conspiracy” to create a story that he and his 2016 presidential marketing campaign had been colluding with Russia. Trump’s authorized staff informed Fox Information that they’re suing for tens of tens of millions of {dollars} in attorneys charges, damages exceeding $100 million, and “for our democracy.”

In a 108-page lawsuit filed within the Southern District of Florida on Thursday, Trump and his authorized staff say “within the run as much as the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton and her cohorts orchestrated an unthinkable plot—one which shocks the conscience and is an affront to this nation’s democracy.”

Trump filed the go well with towards Clinton, her 2016 presidential marketing campaign, the DNC, regulation agency Perkins Coie, former Clinton marketing campaign legal professionals Michael Sussmann and Marc Elias, former DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, Biden Nationwide Safety Adviser Jake Sullivan, former Clinton marketing campaign chair John Podesta, opposition analysis agency Fusion GPS, former FBI Director James Comey, former FBI officers Peter Strzok and Lisa Web page, former deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, and extra.

TRUMP: RUSSIA INVASION OF UKRAINE A CONSEQUENCE OF WORLD LEADERS ‘NO LONGER’ RESPECTING AMERICA

Advertisement

President Donald Trump and first woman Melania Trump wave to supporters after giving a speech at Andrews Air Drive Base, Md., Wednesday, Jan. 20, 2021. (AP Photograph/Luis M. Alvarez)

The go well with alleges that “appearing in live performance, the defendants maliciously conspired to weave a false narrative that their Republican opponent Donald J. Trump was colluding with a hostile international sovereignty.” 

“The lawsuit filed as we speak outlines the defendants’ nefarious plot to vilify Donald J. Trump by spreading lies to weave a false narrative that he was colluding with Russia,” Alina Habba, lawyer to Donald J. Trump, informed Fox Information. “For years, Hillary Clinton and her cohorts tried to defend themselves from culpability by directing others to do their soiled work for them.”

Habba informed Fox Information that this lawsuit “seeks to carry all events accountable for his or her heinous acts and uphold the ideas of our sacred democracy.”

“This motion exposes the remarkably devious techniques employed by the Defendants, who had been so blinded by their political ambitions that they acted with callous disregard for the injury they’ve precipitated,” Habba continued. “Clinton and her staff weaponized the Federal Bureau of Investigation and different federal businesses by instigating an investigation they knew had no benefit.”

Advertisement

She added: “Amongst different issues, they fabricated proof, deceived federal authorities, and abused entry to highly-sensitive databases.”

Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks during a press conference ahead of the screening of a movie "Hillary."

Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks throughout a press convention forward of the screening of a film “Hillary.”
(Abdulhamid Hosbas/Anadolu Company through Getty Photos )

Habba pointed to the multi-year investigation led by former Particular Counsel Robert Mueller, which yielded no proof of legal conspiracy or coordination between the Trump marketing campaign and Russian officers throughout the 2016 presidential election.

Habba mentioned that investigation, and the unique FBI probe, “fueled a media frenzy that poisoned our nation’s discourse for years to return.”

“We are going to vigorously prosecute each named Defendant for his or her position on this conspiracy,” Habba mentioned.

The case has been introduced towards quite a few people and entities concerned within the origins of the Trump-Russia narrative. 

Advertisement

TRUMP SAYS BIDEN IS LETTING ‘RADICAL CLIMATE EXTREMISTS RUN OUR COUNTRY’ AS GAS PRICES SOAR

Perkins Coie is the agency the DNC and the Clinton marketing campaign funded the anti-Trump file by way of. The unverified anti-Trump file was authored by ex-British intelligence officer Christopher Steele, commissioned by opposition analysis agency Fusion GPS, and funded by the Democratic Nationwide Committee and Hillary Clinton’s presidential marketing campaign by way of regulation agency Perkins Coie.

The file served as the premise for Overseas Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants towards former Trump marketing campaign aide Carter Web page.

The go well with additionally was introduced towards former Clinton attorneys Marc Elias – who was a companion for Perkins Coie – and Michael Sussmann, who has been indicted as a part of Particular Counsel John Durham’s investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe with making a false assertion to the FBI. Sussmann has pleaded not responsible. 

The indictment towards Sussmann, says he informed then-FBI Normal Counsel James Baker in September 2016, lower than two months earlier than the 2016 presidential election, that he was not doing work “for any consumer” when he requested and held a gathering wherein he introduced “purported knowledge and ‘white papers’ that allegedly demonstrated a covert communications channel” between the Trump Group and Alfa Financial institution, which has ties to the Kremlin.

Advertisement
President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference in the Rose Garden of the White House. 

President Donald Trump speaks throughout a information convention within the Rose Backyard of the White Home. 

The go well with additionally was introduced towards former FBI officers – Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Web page – all of whom served on the FBI’s unique staff investigating whether or not Trump and his 2016 presidential marketing campaign had been colluding with the Russians. The FBI’s code identify for that investigative staff was “Crossfire Hurricane.” 

Former Lawyer Normal Invoice Barr appointed Durham, then the U.S. lawyer from Connecticut, in 2019 to research the origins of the FBI’s unique Russia probe, or Crossfire Hurricane, which started in July 2016, by way of the appointment of Particular Counsel Robert Mueller in Might 2017 shortly after Mueller accomplished his years-long investigation into whether or not Trump’s marketing campaign colluded or coordinated with the Russians to affect the 2016 presidential election.

Mueller’s investigation discovered no proof of unlawful or legal coordination between Trump or the Trump marketing campaign and Russia in 2016.  

Barr, in December 2020, earlier than leaving the Trump administration, tapped Durham as particular counsel to proceed his investigation by way of the Biden administration.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

With 30 days until voting starts, 'election season' kicks off sooner than you think

Published

on

With 30 days until voting starts, 'election season' kicks off sooner than you think

There are 90 days until Election Day on Tuesday, Nov. 5.

But if Americans vote like they did in the last two election cycles, most of them will have already cast a ballot before the big day.

Early voting starts as early as Sept. 6 for eligible voters, with seven battleground states sending out ballots to at least some voters the same month.

It makes the next few months less a countdown to Election Day, and more the beginning of “election season.”

VANCE PRAISED FOR ‘ABSOLUTE FIRE’ TAKEDOWN OF HARRIS-WALZ ‘TAG TEAM’ RIOT ENABLERS: ‘MAKE AMERICA BURN AGAIN’

Advertisement

Former President Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris (Getty Images)

States have long allowed at least some Americans to vote early, like members of the military or people with illnesses. 

In some states, almost every voter casts a ballot by mail.

Many states expanded eligibility in 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic made it riskier to vote in-person.

That year, the Fox News Voter Analysis found that 71% of voters cast their ballots before Election Day, with 30% voting early in-person and 41% voting by mail.

Advertisement

Early voting remained popular in the midterms, with 57% of voters casting a ballot before Election Day.

TIM WALZ’S SELECTION AS HARRIS RUNNING MATE DRAWS SKEPTICISM, EVEN AMONG ANTI-TRUMP FIGURES

Voters casting their ballots.

A voter fills out a ballot in Lake Orion, Michigan. (Nic Antaya/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Elections officials stress that voting early is safe and secure. Recounts, investigations and lawsuits filed after the 2020 election did not reveal evidence of widespread fraud or corruption. 

The difference between “early in-person” and “mail” or “absentee” voting.

There are a few ways to vote before Election Day.

The first is early in-person voting, where a voter casts a regular ballot in-person at a voting center before Election Day.

Advertisement

The second is voting by mail, where the process and eligibility varies by state.

Eight states vote mostly by mail, including California, Colorado, Nevada and Utah. Registered voters receive ballots and send them back.

Most states allow any registered voter to request a mail ballot and send it back. This is also called mail voting, or sometimes absentee voting. Depending on the state, voters can return their ballot by mail, at a drop box, and/or at an office or facility that accepts mail ballots.

In 14 states, voters must have an excuse to vote by mail, ranging from illness, age, work hours or if a voter is out of their home county on lection day.

States process and tabulate ballots at different times. Some states don’t begin counting ballots until election night, which delays the release of results.

Advertisement

Voting begins on Sept. 6 in North Carolina, with seven more battleground states starting that month

This list of early voting dates is for guidance only. For comprehensive and up-to-date information on voter eligibility, processes, and deadlines, go to Vote.gov and your state’s elections website.

The first voters to be sent absentee ballots will be in North Carolina, which begins mailing out ballots for eligible voters on Sept. 6.

Seven more battleground states open up early voting the same month, including Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan and Nevada.

KAMALA HARRIS HAS AVOIDED INTERVIEWS FOR MORE THAN TWO WEEKS SINCE BECOMING DEM NOMINEE

Michigan citizens voting early.

Early voters cast their ballots in Ferndale, Michigan. (Nic Antaya/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

September deadlines

In-person early voting in bold.

Advertisement

Sept. 6

  • North Carolina – Absentee ballots sent to voters

Sept. 16

  • Pennsylvania – Mail-in ballots sent to voters

Sept. 17

  • Georgia – Absentee ballots sent to military & overseas

Sept. 19

  • Wisconsin – Absentee ballots sent

Sept. 20

  • Arkansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Utah, Wyoming – Absentee ballots sent to military & overseas
  • Minnesota, South Dakota – In-person absentee voting begins
  • Virginia – In-person early voting begins
  • Indiana, Kentucky, West Virginia – Absentee ballots sent

Sept. 21

  • Alabama, Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Kansas, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, New Hampshire, New York, Oregon, South Carolina, Washington – Absentee ballots sent to military & overseas
  • Indiana, New Mexico – Absentee ballots sent
  • Maryland, New Jersey – Mail-in ballots sent

Sept. 23

  • Mississippi – In-person absentee voting begins & absentee ballots sent
  • Oregon, Vermont – Absentee ballots sent

Sept. 26

  • Illinois – In-person early voting begins 
  • Michigan – Absentee ballots sent
  • Florida, Nevada – Mail-in ballots sent
  • North Dakota – Absentee & mail-in ballots sent

Sept. 30

  • Nebraska – Mail-in ballots sent

October deadlines

Oct. 4

  • Connecticut – Absentee ballots sent

Oct. 6

  • Michigan – In-person early voting begins 
  • Maine – In-person absentee voting begins & mail ballots sent
  • California – In-person absentee voting begins & mail ballots sent
  • Montana – In-person absentee voting begins
  • Nebraska – In-person early voting begins 
  • Georgia – Absentee ballots sent
  • Massachusetts – Mail-in ballots sent

Oct. 8

  • California – Ballot drop-offs open
  • New Mexico, Ohio – In-person absentee voting begins
  • Indiana – In-person early voting begins
  • Wyoming – In-person absentee voting begins & absentee ballots sent

Oct. 9

  • Arizona – In-person early voting begins & mail ballots sent

Oct. 11

  • Colorado – Mail-in ballots sent
  • Arkansas, Alaska – Absentee ballots sent

Oct. 15

  • Georgia – In-person early voting begins
  • Utah – Mail-in ballots sent

Oct. 16

  • Rhode Island, Kansas, Tennessee – In-person early voting begins
  • Iowa – In-person absentee voting begins
  • Oregon, Nevada – Mail-in ballots sent

Oct. 17

  • North Carolina – In-person early voting begins 

Oct. 18

  • Washington, Louisiana – In-person early voting begins
  • Hawaii – Mail-in ballots sent

Oct. 19

  • Nevada, Massachusetts – In-person early voting begins 
  • Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, Idaho, North Dakota, South Carolina, Texas – In-person early voting begins 
  • Colorado – Ballot drop-offs open

Oct. 22

  • Hawaii, Utah – In-person early voting begins 
  • Missouri, Wisconsin – In-person absentee voting begins

Oct. 23

  • West Virginia – In-person early voting begins

Oct. 24

  • Maryland – In-person early voting begins

Oct. 25

  • Delaware – In-person early voting begins

Oct. 26

  • Michigan, Florida, New Jersey, New York – In-person early voting begins 

Oct. 30

  • Oklahoma – In-person early voting begins 

Oct. 31

  • Kentucky – In-person absentee voting begins

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Column: After past disappointments, Harris shows courage in VP choice

Published

on

Column: After past disappointments, Harris shows courage in VP choice

Kudos to Vice President Kamala Harris. She didn’t do the blatantly political thing and select a popular governor from a key battleground state to be her running mate.

Instead, the Californian picked a popular governor from a blue state she was very likely to carry anyway — one who should have broad appeal in many middle America purple states.

Her choice of moderate Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz doesn’t smack of a typical, predictable, ultra-safe political move. That alone seems refreshing in this overly polarized election year.

She took a risk. If Harris had selected Pennsylvania’s popular Gov. Josh Shapiro, she’d have probably locked up a vital battleground state she’ll need to win in November.

Advertisement

But Shapiro — like California Gov. Gavin Newsom — already is very active in his support of Biden administration policies and warning voters against the perils of a second Donald Trump presidency. And Shapiro has a very strong local following. So he may help Harris carry Pennsylvania anyway.

At a Pennsylvania campaign rally Tuesday where Harris and Walz appeared together publicly for the first time, Shapiro promised that “I’m gonna be working my tail off” for the Democratic ticket. We’ll see.

Another vice presidential possibility on Harris’ shortlist — Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona — could probably have also wrapped up his battleground state for the Democratic ticket. And Kelly has a great resume: fighter pilot, astronaut, gun control advocate and all-around solid guy.

But Walz is a better, more natural communicator — virtually unexcelled, as he demonstrated to a national TV audience Tuesday.

It was the plainspoken Walz, after all, who came up with arguably this election cycle’s most effective adjective — a potential game-changer — calling Trump and his running mate JD Vance simply “weird.”

Advertisement

“Weird” is easily understandable and, in Trump’s case, practically undeniable — as opposed to years of Democrats labeling the former president a “threat to democracy,” an abstract notion that needs too much explanation. “Weird” has much more immediate sting.

Such a wordsmith who doesn’t need pollsters and focus groups to tell him what to say is priceless.

Referring to Trump and Vance at the rally, Walz told the cheering arena audience: “These guys are creepy and, yes, just weird as hell.”

As for Trump’s running mate, Walz said — like he really meant it — ”I can’t wait to debate the guy.”

Harris reportedly was attracted to the 60-year-old, balding governor’s “authenticity” — presumably his down-home, folksy manner that constantly emits sincerity. A regular dude. And Americans — let’s hope — are ready for normality.

Advertisement

He helped coach a small high school’s football team to a state championship and taught social studies. He spent 24 years in the Army National Guard, rising to the unlisted rank of sergeant major. The Democrat was elected to Congress from a purple district that historically went Republican. And he spent 12 years in the House working both sides of the aisle.

“I learned the art of compromise without compromising my values,” he said at the rally.

We need more elected officials like that who can get things done.

He’s a crack rifle shot and a hunter — but strongly supports gun control. “In Minnesota, we believe in the 2nd Amendment,” he said. “But we also believe in commonsense gun laws.”

Harris also reportedly was impressed with Walz’ “happy go lucky” demeanor. He’s positive and upbeat — not habitually negative and spewing hate like Trump and now Vance. Voters may be ripe for humor and smiles.

Advertisement

He thanked Harris for “bringing back the joy” to presidential campaigning.

All this aside, Harris did seemingly follow her unfortunate California pattern as state attorney general in one regard: By not picking Shapiro, she dodged a confrontation with a major labor group — in this case, public school teachers.

Shapiro supports school vouchers — public money to help students attend private schools — which is anathema to teachers unions.

But Harris was right on this one: The nation’s leading Democrat can’t be suspected of favoring so-called school choice — spending tax money on private classrooms.

By passing over Shapiro, Harris also didn’t risk alienating pro-Palestinian voters — particularly in battleground Michigan — by teaming with a Jewish running mate who has strongly supported Israel’s military campaign in Gaza.

Advertisement

So Harris was a bit risk-averse in her selection of Walz. But that’s savvy politics.

In tapping Walz, Harris also seemed to be making a play for the white old guy vote — trying to put the species at ease. Inclusion. Smart.

The first Black and Asian American female vice president already has awakened young voters and people of color.

Trump must be nervously squirming.

The GOP nominee immediately called Walz “a dangerously liberal extremist.”

Advertisement

But Walz with his broad smile, rural roots and common-man demeanor doesn’t look or sound dangerous. He seems to be out of an old Norman Rockwell painting. The evidence points to his extreme competence — as an officeholder and a campaigner.

As one who has been critical of Harris on previous occasions, I say that this time she deserves congratulations for making an outstanding move.

Continue Reading

Politics

Video: Harris and Walz Hold First Campaign Rally Together

Published

on

Video: Harris and Walz Hold First Campaign Rally Together

new video loaded: Harris and Walz Hold First Campaign Rally Together

transcript

transcript

Harris and Walz Hold First Campaign Rally Together

Vice President Kamala Harris and her newly announced running mate, Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota, went on the attack against the Trump-Vance Republican ticket during a raucous rally in Philadelphia.

“To his former high school students, he was Mr. Walz. And to his former high school football players, he was Coach. And in 91 days, the nation will know Coach Walz by another name: Vice President of the United States.” “Thank you, Madam Vice President, for the trust you put in me, but maybe more so, thank you for bringing back the joy. Now, Donald Trump sees the world a little differently than us. First of all, he doesn’t know the first thing about service. He doesn’t have time for it because he’s too busy serving himself. Like all regular people I grew up with in the heartland, JD [Vance] studied at Yale, had his career funded by Silicon Valley billionaires, and then wrote a best seller trashing that community. Come on. That’s not what middle America is. And I got to tell you, I can’t wait to debate the guy.”

Advertisement

Recent episodes in 2024 Elections

Continue Reading

Trending