Connect with us

News

Ukraine presses on with surprise military incursion into Russia

Published

on

Ukraine presses on with surprise military incursion into Russia

Ukraine launched rocket and drone attacks as its forces expanded their operation inside Russia’s Kursk region, on the second day of a bold incursion that has forced Moscow to redeploy troops from the Ukrainian front.

Vladimir Putin said the attack, one of the largest since the Russian president launched his full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, was a “major provocation”. On Wednesday he accused Kyiv’s forces of “firing indiscriminately” at civilian targets with missiles.

Russian authorities reported 28 residents had been wounded and at least five killed, according to the Tass news agency. Kyiv has not commented on the operation.

The attack comes at a critical moment for Ukraine, which is steadily losing territory to Russia’s larger army, still struggling to replenish and motivate its battered forces and faces a potential collapse in US support if Donald Trump secures a second term as president in November.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Advertisement

Ukrainian units launched the surprise operation on Tuesday morning. Heavy battles continued through the night and on Wednesday.

Kyiv’s forces have since taken control of a handful of villages, shot down aircraft and destroyed military vehicles, according to Russia’s defence ministry. Pro-Kremlin military bloggers, eyewitnesses and videos and photos reviewed by the Financial Times corroborated the reports.

Ukraine has launched cross-border raids into Russia before, using Russian citizens fighting for Kyiv in units operating under the command of Kyiv’s military intelligence directorate, the GUR. But this incursion appears to be more significant in terms of the forces deployed.

“Compared to previous cross-border operations, this one is notable in that it appears to involve Ukrainian conventional forces and not just from GUR,” said Rob Lee, a senior fellow in the Foreign Policy Research Institute’s Eurasia programme.

Alexei Smirnov, the region’s acting governor, claimed the situation was “under control” and authorities were evacuating residents from border areas coming under artillery fire.

Advertisement

Smirnov said an unspecified number of civilians had died during the fighting, as well as others who were injured.

Putin said he had ordered officials to organise further aid to local residents and promised to give further orders after meeting with his security cabinet on Wednesday.

Russia’s defence ministry said it had prevented Ukrainian forces from advancing deeper through a series of air strikes and troop deployments at the border.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, chairing a meeting
Russian President Vladimir Putin, chairing a meeting on Wednesday, says the attack is a ‘major provocation’ © Valery Sharifulin/Pool/AFP/Getty Images
A still from an eyewitness video shows a fighter jet
A still from an eyewitness video shows a fighter jet flying over the border region © Reuters

According to authorities in Ukraine’s Sumy region bordering Kursk, Russian forces had retaliated with aerial attacks on Wednesday. Air defences had downed “a ballistic missile, two UAVs, and one helicopter” over the Sumy region, they said.

Moscow claimed to have destroyed 50 armoured vehicles and killed 260 Ukrainian troops. Kyiv did not comment on its alleged casualties.

Ukrainian troops also took hold of a gas transit station at Sudzha on one of the few remaining pipelines supplying Russian gas to Europe, according to Rybar, a news outlet close to the Russian defence ministry.

Advertisement

Pro-Kremlin accounts on Telegram posted video and drone footage of Sudzha that showed the town had all but been destroyed in the fighting. Sudzha’s mayor told state newswire RIA Novosti that the situation there was “very tense” as locals tried to evacuate.

A Ukrainian official involved in the Kursk operation told the FT that special forces from the security service of Ukraine, the SBU, had “shot down a Russian helicopter using a [first-person view] drone” in what it called a “unique special operation in the history of war”.

A video provided to the FT shows the SBU drone striking the rear propeller of the Russian Mi-28 helicopter as the screen turns black. It is unclear whether the helicopter crashes after the strike.

Separately, Deep State, a Ukrainian analytical group with ties to the defence ministry, said a Russian Ka-52 helicopter involved in the fight had been shot down in Kursk region and shared a photo of it in flames.

One video published by Ukrainian Telegram channels close to the military claimed to show Russian prisoners taken during the operation being marched through a field. Another purported to show interrogations with the captured men.

Advertisement

Some analysts believe Kyiv’s main objective may be to try to force Russia to redeploy forces from eastern Ukraine, where it has made significant gains in recent weeks.

Mick Ryan, a retired Australian army major general who is now a senior fellow for Military Studies at the Lowy Institute in Sydney, said another potential motive is political.

“The government of Ukraine want to shift momentum and the strategic narrative, and have directed such an operation,” he said.

The Ukrainian territory captured by Russian troops since early May is nearly double that which Ukraine’s military liberated a year ago, according to research by Pasi Paroinen of the Black Bird Group, an open-source military research group based in Finland.

Mykhailo Zhirokhov, a Ukrainian military analyst, told Kyiv’s Radio NV on Wednesday that the operation in Kursk appears to have forced some Russian units positioned near the Donetsk region city of Siversk to reinforce units to the north.

Advertisement

But other analysts questioned the effectiveness of the Kursk operation at a time when Ukraine’s army is already struggling to defend a frontline that stretches more than 1,000km with limited human and materiel resources.

“Given defensive pressures elsewhere . . . the strategic rationale for this operation at this time is difficult to fathom,” said Ryan, the retired Australian army major general.

Lee of the Foreign Policy Research Institute said it was unlikely that Ukraine’s brazen incursion would have a significant impact on the course of the war.

“A limited operation might be able to achieve limited goals, but a more ambitious operation carries greater risks.”

Advertisement

News

Louisiana Sen. Bill Cassidy loses in Republican primary, does not advance to runoff

Published

on

Louisiana Sen. Bill Cassidy loses in Republican primary, does not advance to runoff

One observer of the current Senate race in Louisiana noted that Sen. Bill Cassidy could lose his reelection bid.

Annie Flanagan for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Annie Flanagan for NPR

Sen. Bill Cassidy lost Saturday’s Louisiana Republican primary according to a race call by the Associated Press.

Cassidy, who served two terms in the Senate, was one of seven Republican senators who voted to convict President Trump after the January 6th insurrection at the Capitol. That vote put him at odds with Trump and his MAGA coalition, ultimately leading Trump to push Rep. Julia Letlow to run against Cassidy.

Cassidy’s bid for a third term was viewed as a test of Trump’s grip on the party–and of what voters want from their representatives in Washington. The primary pitted Cassidy, a veteran lawmaker, former physician and chair of the powerful Senate health committee, against Letlow, a political newcomer and a millennial MAGA loyalist.

Advertisement
A detailed view of a hat that reads, Run Julia Run, is seen at a campaign event for Rep. Julia Letlow (R-LA) on May 6, 2026 in Franklinton, Louisiana.

A detailed view of a hat that reads, Run Julia Run, is seen at a campaign event for Rep. Julia Letlow (R-LA) on May 6, 2026 in Franklinton, Louisiana.

Tyler Kaufman/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Tyler Kaufman/Getty Images

Advertisement

A former college administrator, Letlow won a special election in 2021 for the House seat her late husband, Luke, was set to assume before he died from COVID in 2020.

In Congress, Letlow sponsored a bill to collect oral histories from the pandemic and has focused on education and children. She introduced the “Parents Bill of Rights Act,” which would allow parents to review classroom materials like library books and require schools to notify parents if their child requests different pronouns, locker rooms or sports teams.

She also serves on the powerful appropriations committee and has embraced Trump’s agenda.

Advertisement

Letlow, who came first in Saturday’s primary, will face Louisiana state Treasurer John Fleming in the runoff on June 27. Cassidy came in third.

The election result is a victory for President Trump who has put Republican loyalty to the test on the ballot so far this year in Indiana state senate primaries and in Cassidy’s race.

Another major test of Trump’s influence comes in Kentucky’s primary on Tuesday when Republican Rep. Thomas Massie, who has found himself at odds with the president, faces a challenger endorsed by Trump.

Continue Reading

News

Brass bands in Beijing make way for sticker shock at home as Trump returns to escalating inflation

Published

on

Brass bands in Beijing make way for sticker shock at home as Trump returns to escalating inflation

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump returned from the spectacle of a Chinese state visit to a less than welcoming U.S. economy — with the military band and garden tour in Beijing giving way to pressure over how to fix America’s escalating inflation rate.

Consumer inflation in the United States increased to 3.8% annually in April, higher than what he inherited as the Iran war and the Republican president’s own tariffs have pushed up prices. Inflation is now outpacing wage gains and effectively making workers poorer. The Cleveland Federal Reserve estimates that annual inflation could reach 4.2% in May as the war has kept oil and gasoline prices high.

Trump’s time with Chinese leader Xi Jinping appears unlikely to help the U.S. economy much, despite Trump’s claims of coming trade deals. The trip occurred as many people are voting in primaries leading into the November general election while having to absorb the rising costs of gasoline, groceries, utility bills, jewelry, women’s clothing, airplane tickets and delivery services. Democrats see the moment as a political opportunity.

“He’s returning to a dumpster fire,” said Lindsay Owens, executive director of Groundwork Collaborative, a liberal think tank focused on economic issues. “The president will not have the faith and confidence of the American people — the economy is their top issue and the president is saying, ‘You’re on your own.’”

The president’s trip to Beijing and his recent comments that indicated a tone-deafness to voters’ concerns about rising prices have suggested his focus is not on the American public and have undermined Republicans who had intended to campaign on last year’s tax cuts as helping families.

Advertisement

Trump described the trip as a victory, saying on social media that Xi “congratulated me on so many tremendous successes,” as the U.S. president has praised their relationship.

Trump told reporters that Boeing would be selling 200 aircraft — and maybe even 750 “if they do a good job” — to the Chinese. He said American farmers would be “very happy” because China would be “buying billions of dollars of soybeans.”

“We had an amazing time,” Trump said as he flew home on Air Force One, and told Fox News’ Bret Baier in an interview that gasoline prices were just some “short-term pain” and would “drop like a rock” once the war ends.

Inflationary pain is not a factor in how Trump handles Iran

Trump departed from the White House for China by saying the negotiations over the Iran war depended on stopping Tehran from developing nuclear weapons. “I don’t think about Americans’ financial situation. I don’t think about anybody. I think about one thing: We cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon,” Trump said.

That remark prompted blowback because it suggested to some that Trump cared more about challenging Iran than fighting inflation at home. Trump defended his words, telling Fox News: “That’s a perfect statement. I’d make it again.”

Advertisement

The White House has since stressed that Trump is focused on inflation.

Asked later about the president’s words, Vice President JD Vance said there had been a “misrepresentation” of the remarks. White House spokesman Kush Desai said the “administration remains laser-focused on delivering growth and affordability on the homefront” while indicating actions would be taken on grocery prices.

But as Trump appeared alongside Xi, new reports back home showed inflation rising for businesses and interest rates climbing on U.S. government debt.

His comments that Boeing would sell 200 jets to China caused the company’s stock price to fall because investors had expected a larger number. There was little concrete information offered about any trade agreements reached during the summit, including Chinese purchases of U.S. exports such as liquefied natural gas and beef.

“Foreign policy wins can matter politically, but only if voters feel stability and affordability in their daily lives,” said Brittany Martinez, a former Republican congressional aide who is the executive director of Principles First, a center-right advocacy group focused on democracy issues.

Advertisement

“Midterms are almost always a referendum on cost of living and public frustration, and Republicans are not immune from the same inflation and affordability pressures that hurt Democrats in recent cycles,” she added.

Democrats see Trump as vulnerable

Democratic lawmakers are seizing on Trump’s comments before his trip as proof of his indifference to lowering costs. There is potential staying power of his remarks as Americans head into Memorial Day weekend facing rising prices for the hamburgers and hot dogs to be grilled.

“What Americans do not see is any sympathy, any support, or any plan from Trump and congressional Republicans to lower costs – in fact, they see the opposite,” Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Thursday.

Vance faulted the Biden administration for the inflation problem even though the inflation rate is now higher than it was when Trump returned to the White House in January 2025 with a specific mandate to fix it.

“The inflation number last month was not great,” Vance said Wednesday, but he then stressed, “We’re not seeing anything like what we saw under the Biden administration.”

Advertisement

Inflation peaked at 9.1% in June 2022 under Biden, a Democrat. By the time Trump took the oath of office, it was a far more modest 3%.

Trump’s inflation challenge could get harder

The data tells a different story as higher inflation is spreading into the cost of servicing the national debt.

Over the past week, the interest rate charged on 10-year U.S. government debt jumped from 4.36% to 4.6%, an increase that implies higher costs for auto loans and mortgages.

“My fear is that the layers of supply shocks that are affecting the U.S. economy will only further feed into inflationary pressures,” said Gregory Daco, chief economist at EY-Parthenon.

Daco noted that last year’s tariff increases were now translating into higher clothing prices. With the Supreme Court ruling against Trump’s ability to impose tariffs by declaring an economic emergency, his administration is preparing a new set of import taxes for this summer.

Advertisement

Daco stressed that there have been a series of supply shocks. First, tariffs cut into the supply of imports. In addition, Trump’s immigration crackdown cut into the supply of foreign-born workers. Now, the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz has cut off the vital waterway used to ship 20% of global oil supplies.

“We’re seeing an erosion of growth,” Daco said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Top Drug Regulator Is Fired From the F.D.A.

Published

on

Top Drug Regulator Is Fired From the F.D.A.

Dr. Tracy Beth Hoeg, the Food and Drug Administration’s top drug regulator, said she was fired from the agency Friday after she declined to resign.

She said she did not know who had ordered her firing or why, nor whether Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. knew of her fate. The Department of Health and Human Services did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The departure reflected the upheaval at the F.D.A., days after the resignation of Dr. Marty Makary, the agency commissioner. Dr. Makary had become a lightning rod for critics of the agency’s decisions to reject applications for rare disease drugs and to delay a report meant to supply damaging evidence about the abortion drug mifepristone. He also spent months before his departure pushing back on the White House’s requests for him to approve more flavored vapes, the reason he ultimately cited for leaving.

Dr. Hoeg’s hiring had startled public health leaders who were familiar with her track record as a vaccine skeptic, and she played a leading role in some of the agency’s most divisive efforts during her tenure. She worked on a report that purportedly linked the deaths of children and young adults to Covid vaccines, a dossier the agency has not released publicly. She was also the co-author of a document describing Mr. Kennedy’s decision to pare the recommendations for 17 childhood vaccines down to 11.

But in an interview on Friday, Dr. Hoeg said she “stuck with the science.”

Advertisement

“I am incredibly proud of the work we were doing,” Dr. Hoeg said, adding, “I’m glad that we didn’t give in to any pressures to approve drugs when it wasn’t appropriate.”

As the director of the agency’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, she was a political appointee in a role that had been previously occupied by career officials. An epidemiologist who was trained in the United States and Denmark, she worked on efforts to analyze drug safety and on a panel to discuss the use of serotonin reuptake inhibitors, the most widely prescribed class of antidepressants, during pregnancy. She also worked on efforts to reduce animal testing and was the agency’s liaison to an influential vaccine committee.

She made sure that her teams approved drugs only when the risk-benefit balance was favorable, she said.

The firing worsens the leadership vacuum at the F.D.A. and other agencies, with temporary leaders filling the role of commissioner, food chief and the head of the biologics center, which oversees vaccines and gene therapies. The roles of surgeon general and director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are also unfilled.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending